Age > 50 Abstract Background Limited data exists regarding outcomes and AT benefit/toxicity in Y pts with stage II and III CC. We examined overall survival.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.
Advertisements

David Kerr University of Oxford Oxford, UK
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
D. Haller, 1 J. Cassidy, 2 J. Tabernero, 3 J. Maroun, 4 F. de Braud, 5 T. Price, 6 E. Van Cutsem, 7 M. Hill, 8 F. Gilberg, 9 H-J. Schmoll 10 1 University.
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
Prevention of Early Menopause Study (POEMS)-S0230 Phase III trial of LHRH analog during chemotherapy to reduce ovarian failure in early stage, hormone.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
The Effect of Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole:
1 Stage III Colon Cancer What Works? Thierry André, MD Medical Oncology Departement, Hôpital Saint Antoine, APHP, Paris, France and University Pierre et.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
ESMO/ECCO Presidential Session III
Discussion abstracts Alberto Sobrero MD Ospedale San Martino Genoa, Italy.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
A Report from ASCO-GI 2008 and ASCO 2007 Up-to-Date Review of the Treatment of Adjuvant Colorectal Cancer Axel Grothey, MD Professor of Oncology Mayo Clinic.
Abstract 8504: E4697: Phase III Cooperative Group Study of Yeast Derived GM-CSF vs Placebo as Adjuvant Treatment of Patients with Completely Resected Stage.
A Quantitative Multi-Gene RT-PCR Assay for Prediction of Recurrence in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC): Selection of the Genes in 4 Large Studies and Results.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
Greg Yothers, Stephanie R. Land, Clifford Y. Ko, D. Lawrence Wickerham, Louis Fehrenbacher, Jeffrey K. Giguere, Norman Wolmark, and Patricia A. Ganz.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent,
Adjuvant Matters Richard M Goldberg MD UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Chapel Hill, NC.
Efficacy findings from a randomized phase III trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin versus bolus 5-FU/LV for stage III colon cancer (NO16968): No impact.
Impact of age and comorbidities on treatment effect, tolerance and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated on CALGB
Outcomes Following Adjuvant 5-FU based Treatment (AT) for Colon Cancer vs Impact on Recurrence Rate, Time from Recurrence to Death.
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
CJ Allegra, G Yothers, MJ O’Connell, MS Roh, RW Beart, NJ Petrelli, S Lopa, S Sharif, and N Wolmark Neoadjuvant Therapy For Rectal Cancer: Mature Results.
Xeloda for the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer Chris Twelves University of Leeds and Bradford NHS Trust UK.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL (PFS) AS A SURROGATE FOR OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER Buyse M 1, Burzykowski T 2, Carroll.
Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology.
How should efficacy of new adjuvant therapies be evaluated in colorectal cancer? Marc Buyse, ScD IDDI, Brussels, Belgium Based on Daniel Sargent’s talks.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
Individualizing Adjuvant Therapy on the Basis of Molecular Markers Charles S. Fuchs, MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston, MA.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
NSABP Overall Survival and Updated Disease-Free Survival Results of the NSABP C-08 Trial Assessing Bevacizumab in Stage II & III Colon Cancer CJ Allegra,
Lymph Node (LN) Ratio (LNR) Based Risk Classification (RC) in Stage III Colon Cancer (CC) with Internal and External Validation: Finding from the ACCENT.
The impact of smoking on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB Nadine A. Jackson, Charles S.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Tolerability of fluoropyrimidines differs by region Daniel G. Haller on behalf of: Cassidy J, Clarke S, Cunningham D, Van Cutsem E Hoff P, Rothenberg M,
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer: Where are we now ? Leonard Saltz, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY.
Should database studies effect patient management and clinical trial design? Discussion of abstracts #4010 and #4011 Howard S. Hochster, MD Professor of.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Results Abstract Analysis of Prognostic Web-based Models for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: A Population-based Validation of Numeracy and Adjuvant! Online.
Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial of Decitabine versus Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed.
INTERGROUP STUDY 0148 BMS CA Effect of TAXOL® (paclitaxel) and Doxorubicin Dose on Disease Free and Overall Survival of Patients with Node Positive.
Endpoints in adjuvant trials: a systematic review of the literature in colon cancer and proposed definitions for future trials Marc E. Buyse.
Response, PFS or OS – what is the best endpoint in advanced colorectal cancer? Marc Buyse IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve & Hasselt University
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
Phase III Clinical Trial of FOLFOX with or without Cetuximab in Resected Stage 3 Colon Cancer: Cooperative Group Trial N0147 (NCCTG*,
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
Phase III Trial of Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin vs
Presented By Marco Colleoni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
Presented By Luca Malorni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
Lindsay A. Renfro1, Axel Grothey2, Leonard B
Short or long adjuvant treatment: can we use new trials to decide it?
Time-dependent patterns of treatment effect and failure as an explanation for the predictive role of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in stage II and III.
MJ O’Connell for the ACCENT Collaborative Group
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Impact of older age on the efficacy of newer adjuvant therapies in >12,500 patients with stage II / III colon cancer: Findings from the ACCENT Database.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
and the NSABP Investigators
Aimery de Gramont Association between 3 year Disease Free Survival and Overall Survival delayed with improved survival after recurrence in patients receiving.
2 or 3 Year DFS is an Appropriate Primary Endpoint in Stage III Adjuvant Colon Cancer Trials with Fluoropyrimidines with or without Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan.
Presentation transcript:

Age > 50 Abstract Background Limited data exists regarding outcomes and AT benefit/toxicity in Y pts with stage II and III CC. We examined overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), recurrence free interval (RFI) and AEs in the 33,574 pt ACCENT dataset. Methods Individual pt data from 24 randomized Phase III clinical trials (CT) was obtained for survival outcomes, and 10 CT for AE outcomes. Two age-based cut-offs were used to define Y pts, age < 40 and < 50. Cox models stratified by study and adjusted for gender and stage. AT benefit analyses were limited to 9 CT testing 5-FU/LV or Lev vs control (7 CT) or oxaliplatin+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV (2 CT). Results 1758 (5.2%) pts were age 0.35). Y pts had improved OS and DFS (Table), even when restricting to age 50, interaction p=0.19). No clinically meaningful differences in AEs were observed between ages. Conclusions Among pts on CT, Y (age 30-50) stage II and III CC pts had similar RFI and AT benefit as older pts, with no clinically meaningful differences in AEs. Y pts have improved OS and DFS, likely primarily due to to fewer competing causes of death. Adjuvant therapy is beneficial for CC pts aged meeting typical CT eligibility criteria. ACCENT Initially established in 2003, to validate disease-free survival (DFS) as an endpoint in adjuvant colon cancer Individual patient data from 24 large adjuvant randomized clinical trails, 33,574 patients Jointly owned by all contributors ACCENT collaborators S Wieand, G Yothers, M O’Connell, N Wolmark – NSABP J Benedetti, C Blanke – SWOG R Labianca – Ospedali Riuniti (Italy) D Haller, P Catalano, A Benson – ECOG C O’Callaghan – NCIC JF Seitz – University of the Mediterranean (France) G Francini – University of Siena (Italy) A de Gramont, T Andre – GERCOR R Goldberg, L Saltz, J Meyerhardt, N Jackson – CALGB M Buyse – IDDI (Belgium) R Gray, D Kerr – QUASAR A Grothey, S Alberts, B Bot, E Green, Q Shi –Mayo Clinic C Twelves -University of Bradford (UK) J Cassidy – University of Glasgow (UK) F Sirzen – Roche ; L Cisar - Pfizer E Van Cutsem –University Hospital Gasthuisberg (Belgium); A Sobrero - Ospedale San Martino (Italy) Discussion Even restricting comparison to patients < 50 vs 50-60, p = (HR=1.08) for improved DFS for < 50 Detailed data on dosing not available Conclusions Among patients on clinical trials, younger (age 30-50) stage II and III colon cancer pts had similar adjuvant therapy benefit as older patients No clinically meaningful differences in AEs were present between age groups Younger pts have improved OS and DFS, likely primarily due to fewer competing causes of death Adjuvant rx is beneficial for colon cancer patients aged meeting typical clinical trials eligibility criteria Benefits and adverse events in younger (age <50) vs older patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: Findings from the 33,574 patient ACCENT dataset Daniel Sargent, Greg Yothers, Erin Green, Charles Blanke, Michael O’Connell, R Labianca, Archie Bleyer, A DeGramont, and David Thomas as a joint project of the LIVESTRONG Young Adult Alliance and the ACCENT collaborative group Methods Analyses of individual patient data Endpoints: Primary: Disease Free Survival (PFS) Secondary: Overall Survival (OS) Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AE) Cox regression models adjusted by age and gender, stratified by study: Effect of age with cut points of < 40 and < 50 Age-by-treatment interaction to assess relative benefit in 9 trials that demonstrated adjuvant therapy benefit Baseline Characteristics by Age ACCENT: Trials included DFS: Experimental vs Control - 9 Studies w/ Treatment Benefit Age Cutoff – 50 Age Cutoff – 40 Adverse Events by Age Disease Free Survival – All Studies Age Cutoff – 40 Time to Recurrence & Overall Survival – All Studies Age Cutoff – 50 OS: Experimental vs Control - 9 Studies w/ Treatment Benefit Age > 40 Age < 50 Age < 40 Age > 40 Age < 50Age > 50 Age < 40