Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Beam Size Measurement m Survey of beam size measurement techniques and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators
Advertisements

1. Detector 2. Crystal diffraction conditions
Interference and Diffraction
5/3/2015J-PARC1 Transverse Matching Using Transverse Profiles and Longitudinal Beam arrival Times.
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers
Short bunches in SPEAR J. Safranek for the SPEAR3 accelerator group November 2, 20101J. Safranek CLS THz Workshop.
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers A Brief Guide to Understanding and Obtaining the Proper Resolution of the 785 Raman System.
COMPUTER MODELING OF LASER SYSTEMS
Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Linear optics from closed orbits (LOCO) Given linear optics (quad. gradients),
Light… and other Electromagnetic Radiation. Radiation A loaded term; That which makes radiation dangerous is primarily its energy; Energy is related to.
Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Beam dynamics in insertion devices m Closed orbit perturbation m Linear.
Exam II Review. Review of traveling wave interference Phase changes due to: Optical path length differences sources out of phase General solution.
James Welch October 30, FEL Commissioning Plans J. Welch, et. al. FEL Commissioning Plans J. Welch, et. al. Accelerator.
Images. Pinhole Lens Photons from a source can be focused by a small aperture. –Aperture radius a –Magnification m –Image is inverted Image is blurry.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
M1-01 LASER DIFFRACTION - FIXED SINGLE SLIT M1-21 LASER DIFFRACTION - MULTIPLE SLITS M1-22 LASER DIFFRACTION – GRATINGS M1-34 LASER DIFFRACTION - COMPACT.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Chapter 25 Waves and Particles Midterm 4 UTC
U. Iriso, A. Nosich, and L. Torino Accelerator Division, CELLS May 2014 Beam Size Measurements at ALBA.
Rayleigh Scattering & Mie Scattering
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Lesson 5 Conditioning the x-ray beam
Recent Progress in X-ray Emittance Diagnostics at SPring-8 S. Takano, M. Masaki, and H. Sumitomo * JASRI/SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan SES, Hyogo, Japan *
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
Chapter 36 Diffraction In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing.
Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry
Control room High resolution flat screen monitors CCD image intensifiers are easily identified by their shape A modern fluoroscopic suite.
PHYS 430/603 material Laszlo Takacs UMBC Department of Physics
XBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson Review of the optics elements: Pinhole (“GAP”), FZP, Coded Aperture Extracting information from the GAP what is the GAP width?
05/05/2004Cyrille Thomas DIAMOND Storage Ring Optical and X-ray Diagnostics.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Storage ring optics characterization – the basics
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
Synchrotron Radiation
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
New emittance monitor beamline
NON-INTERCEPTING DIAGNOSTIC FOR HIGH BRIGHTNESS ELECTRON BEAMS USING OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION INTERFERENCE (ODRI) A. Cianchi #1,2, M. Castellano 3,
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
Hale COLLAGE (CU ASTR-7500) “Topics in Solar Observation Techniques” Lecture 8: Coronal emission line formation Spring 2016, Part 1 of 3: Off-limb coronagraphy.
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
XBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson Review of the optics elements: Pinhole (“GAP”), FZP, Coded Aperture Extracting information from the GAP what is the GAP width?
Vertical Emittance Measurements using a Vertical Undulator K.P. Wootton, G.N. Taylor, R.P. Rassool Uni. Melbourne M.J. Boland, B.C.C. Cowie, R. Dowd, Y.-R.E.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
G. Trad on the behalf of the BSRT team Emittance meeting 04/11/2015.
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Emittance measurements for LI2FE electron beams
UNIT-3 ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Summary of SPARC first-phase operations
Wakefield issues due to a slotted foil for a THz source
T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler
Analysis of optical IPM data
Chapter 5 Telescopes.
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Light Through a Single Slit
Fourier Optics P47 – Optics: Unit 8.
LCLS bunch length monitor utilizing coherent radiation
Pulsed Sextupole Injection for Beijing Advanced Photon Source
Types of field distribution:
Transverse coherence and polarization measurement of 131 nm coherent femtosecond pulses from a seeded FEL J. Schwenke, E. Mansten, F. Lindau, N. Cutic,
Presentation transcript:

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Beam Size Measurement m Survey of beam size measurement techniques and applications. m Detailed analysis of an X-Ray pinhole camera  Description  What is actually measured?  Image processing and resolution

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Laser wire measurement, PRST-AB Shintake measurement, see Chao handbook

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Measures of beam size m Touschek lifetime m Luminosity scan (Y. Cai, EPAC’00, p 400) m Quadrupole moment detectors (A. Jansson et al., CERN-PS, PAC’99)

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek More measures BessyII pinhole array.

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Beam-beam scan, Wenninger et al., EPAC98.

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Minty and Spence

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Mitsuhashi

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek X-Ray pinhole camera Pinhole camera on X28 dipole beamline at NSLS X-Ray Ring: electrons x-rays 7.5 m9.3 m x-rays pinhole: molybdenum crossed slits H 2 O-cooled Cu pre-absorber takes heat load. Slit has angles to avoid internal x-ray reflections. X-rays exit vacuum chamber through 250  m Be window. 25  m Al foil to harden spectrum. visible mirror YAG phosphor video camera Slit gap set to 30  m and confirmed by measuring diffraction from HeNe laser.

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek What is measured? o iL1 L2 The standard formula for a pinhole camera, i=(L2/L1)o, assumes that the object is radiating light equally in all directions. Synchrotron radiation is highly collimated in the direction of the electrons, so this formula does not necessarily hold. I’ll show that for a dipole beamline, it does hold in the horizontal plane, but does not in general in the vertical plane. The problem in the vertical plane is that electrons at the top of “o” (in this case the top of the electron beam) do not necessarily radiate photons that go through the pinhole, so i<(L2/L1)o.

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Review of electron phase space The on-energy electrons in a storage ring make a Gaussian in phase space. Area of e -1/2 ellipse is . The full extent of the electron beam including energy spread is larger.

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Phase space distribution of photons at source on-energy e- Full e- ellipse with energy spread photon ellipse at source point

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Photon ellipse at source on energy electrons electrons including energy spread photons

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Measured vertical profile Coupling uncorrected Coupling corrected meas y’=-y/L1 The beam profile at the source point seen by the pinhole camera is the intersection of the pinhole camera acceptance, y’=-y/L1, and the photon ellipse. The electron emittance can be found with:

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Measured horizontal profile pinhole acceptance x’=-x/L1 pinhole electrons sagitta The ellipse sweeps across the pinhole acceptance in an arc in (x,x’). The sagitta (the change in x) is negligibly small. In the fixed coordinates at the beamline source point, the photon ellipse sweeps across the pinhole acceptance. Integrating the changing profile gives: The integrated profile seen by the pinhole camera is

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Resolution & image processing Two contributions to resolution: 1.Pinhole diffraction. 2.Resolution of detector (phosphor, mirror, lens, and CCD). The two resolution functions are deconvolved from each horizontal and vertical slice. A two dimensional, tilted Gaussian is fit to the resulting profile. Example for one vertical slice.

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Diffraction Even though we are dealing with X-Rays, diffraction is a significant resolution limitation. The diffraction pattern was calculated numerically as a function of pinhole dimension. For large pinholes, it looks like a geometric image of the square pinhole. For small pinholes, it looks like Fraunhofer diffraction, getting larger as the pinhole gets smaller. The pinhole size that gives the best resolution is somewhere between the Fraunhofer regime and geometric image. Calculating diffraction pattern, sum up over phases. The diffraction pattern must be integrated over the spectrum absorbed by the YAG phosphor.

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Resolution functions All secondary maxima in the diffraction pattern wash out when integrating over the wavelength spectrum. The resolution of the detector was measured by placing a very narrow slit just in front of the phosphor. The measured image is a convolution of the real profile with the resolution functions. The data and resolution functions are sets of discreet points, so the deconvolution could be turned into a big matrix inversion. A more traditional method uses FFTs. Convolution in frequency space is simply multiplication, so deconvolution becomes division.

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Deconvolution 1. FFT 3. division 4. FFT 2. Filter high frequency noise

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Modulation transfer function Pulnix video camera MTF Instead of dividing FFTs, use only amplitude part of FFT – called modulation transfer function (MTF). MTF is a common way to specify resolution. For example, this graph came with the video camera that was used for the X-Ray Ring pinhole camera.

Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Parting slide Numerical Recipes, Cambridge Press, is a good reference for FFTs and deconvolution.