EDU 5818 CLINICAL SUPERVISION Dr Ramli Basri Faculty of Educational Studies University Putra Malaysia 1EDU5818/20.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

Importance of Questioning and Feedback Technique in developing 3 Cs
Effective Strategies and Process Prepared for the Walmart Foundation, AIHEC, HACU, and NAFEO Student Success Collaborative Meeting at Sitting Bull College.
Developmentally Appropriate Practice
Through Instructional Rounds
Purpose of Instruction
Alternative Strategies for Evaluating Teaching How many have used end-of-semester student evaluations? How many have used an alternative approach? My comments.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
PEP 590 The Supervision of Physical Education. View of Clinical Supervision The teacher is viewed as a professional who is actively seeking greater expertise,
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
The Communication Process
MICHAEL DiPAOLA, EdD DLST PROJECT February 13, 2012.
The Purpose of Action Research
Peer Coaching Dr. Barbara Gottesman
Teacher Development and Supervision – The Role of Principals in Icelandic Compulsory Schools Börkur Hansen and Steinunn Helga Lárusdóttir School of Education,
Meeting the Needs of Gifted Students Through the Use of Differentiated Instruction Angela Nicole Flenniken University of Saint Thomas Research Professor:
Teaching Methods Chapters 7 and 8 Instructors and Their Jobs and additional resources.
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
Student Responsibility Classroom Management that Works.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Observations A Mirror of the Classroom. Objectives  Gain specific strategies for communicating with teachers to promote successful teaching and learning.
Communication. Levels of Communication 3 levels: Social,Therapeutic, Collegial – Social: interactions for the purpose of accomplishing tasks or building.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities. Component 4a: Reflecting on Teaching ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished AccuracyTeacher does not.
Reflective Coaching for Professional Growth. Reflective Coaching Adapted from Costa and Garmston (1985) Cognitive Coaching Framework.
© 2011 Brooks/Cole, A Division of Cengage Learning Chapter 16 Consultation and Collaboration You must be the change you wish to see in the world. Mahatma.
A Network Approach To Improving Teaching and Learning Center Point High School Instructional Rounds in Education.
Encompasses a broad, overall approach to instruction.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Go to my group zap and share your thoughts on interaction in the classroom. How often do you use student to student interaction in class?
Jim Fay and David Funk – Tracy and Gyseka
Management Development
/0903 © 2003 Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Human Resources Training Presentations Coaching Techniques.
 MOVING BEYOND UNDERSTANDING: Developing authentic learning tasks and assessments for problems based curricular approach in Family and Consumer Sciences.
Inquiry and the IB. Stuents do not learn by doing. on what they have done. Rather, they learn by and.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
ED 578 Sullivan & Glanz Chapters 4 & 5. Definition Clinical Supervision may be defined as a supervision focused upon the improvement of instruction by.
Presenter Shereen Khan August 17 th,  A school based activity that engages teachers in meaningful, non-judgmental and on-going instructional dialogue.
EDU 5818 THEORY AND METHODOLOGY OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION Dr Ramli Basri Faculty of Educational Studies University Putra Malays ia.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Small Group Learning. Why?  Learners gain a sense of ownership of the learning process.  Helps learners build their own knowledge.  Provides an environment.
(c) 2007 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Accountability and Teacher Evaluation Chapter 14.
Facilitate Group Learning
 When working with children, staff learns to communicate with a variety of people for different purposes:  Building relationships with colleagues 
Chapter 19: Action Research: The School as the Center of Inquiry
EDU 5818 CLINICAL SUPERVISION
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Instructional Rounds Tutorial Problem of Practice Theory of Action Task Predicts Performance.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Dr Ramli Basri Faculty of Educational Studies
SUPERVISORY OPTIONS FOR TEACHERS
teacher-centered supervision
Action Research Designs
ELT 329 ACTION RESEARCH Week 4
Instructional Coaching Samir Omara RELO-NileTESOL Trainer s. m
Western Teaching of Mathematics
The Role of Classroom Observation
SUPERVISORY OPTIONS FOR TEACHERS
C&S563--#6 Models of Staff Development and Differentiated Supervision: A Vehicle to Promote Teacher Growth.
EDU 5818 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Dr Ramli Basri Faculty of Educational Studies
SUPERVISORY OPTIONS FOR TEACHERS
The Intentional teacher
EDU 5818 L08 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
EDU 5818 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Presentation transcript:

EDU 5818 CLINICAL SUPERVISION Dr Ramli Basri Faculty of Educational Studies University Putra Malaysia 1EDU5818/20

CONTENT 1.Review teachers’ view on supervision 2.Clinical Supervision 3.Steps in Clinical Supervision 2EDU5818/20

1. TEACHERS’ VIEW ON SUPERVISION ( Stoller, 1996) In fact, most teachers react defensively and hostilely towards supervision even though it is a standard part to most programs. Teachers often view supervision as a threat and become anxious when interacting with their supervisors. These adversarial attitudes often stem from traditional supervisor-supervisee relationships and the unsystematic and subjective nature of traditional classroom visits that are usually unannounced, supervisor-centered, authoritarian, directive, and judgmental. 3EDU5818/20

Whether we supervise teachers for the purposes of retention, review, dismissal, promotion, reward, or reprimand, our efforts need not be viewed as negative or unproductive. One of the greatest challenges we face is how to turn negative attitudes towards supervision around so that teachers (and our programs) can reap the rewards and benefits-in the form of professional development and improved instruction. Clinical supervision techniques can radically change supervisor/supervisee relationships, resulting in less stress and anxiety-on the part of both the supervisor and teacher-and a more positive teacher response to supervision. (Acheson and Gall, 1992). 4EDU5818/20

PURPOSE Quality Control (Ensuring teachers meet minimum standard of performance) Professional improvement (increasing understanding of teaching and enhancing practice STANDARDS - Process is formal and documented - Criteria are explicit, standard, and uniform for all teachers. - Criteria are legally defensible as being central to basic teaching competence - Emphasis is on meeting minimum accepted requirements - Evaluation by administrators and other designated officials count the most - Process is informal - Criteria are tailored to needs and capabilities of individual teachers or teams -Criteria are considered appropriate and useful to teachers -Emphasis is on helping teachers reached agreed upon professional development goals - Self evaluation, collegial evaluation, and evaluation information from students count the most OUTCOME Protects students and the public from incompetent teaching Guarantees quality teaching and schooling for students and the public DIFFERENT PURPOSES, DIFFERENT STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION 5EDU5818/20

Whether we supervise teachers for the purposes of retention, review, dismissal, promotion, reward, or reprimand, our efforts need not be viewed as negative or unproductive. One of the greatest challenges we face is how to turn negative attitudes towards supervision around so that teachers (and our programs) can reap the rewards and benefits-in the form of professional development and improved instruction. Clinical supervision techniques can radically change supervisor/supervisee relationships, resulting in less stress and anxiety-on the part of both the supervisor and teacher-and a more positive teacher response to supervision. (Acheson and Gall, 1992). 6EDU5818/20

2. CLINICAL SUPERVISION Definition “The collection of data from first-hand observation of classroom teaching and face- to-face interaction between the supervisor and teacher to analyze the data and plan for instructional improvement” (Goldhammer et al., 1980) 7EDU5818/20

…CLINICAL SUPERVISION (Acheson and Gall, 1992) CS Goal: “the professional development of teachers, with an emphasis on improving teachers’ classroom performance” Design to engage supervisors & teachers in supportive and interactive process: 1. provide objective feedback on instruction 2. diagnose and solve problems 3. assist teachers in developing strategies 4. professional development for teachers. 8EDU5818/20

Basic Steps of clinical supervision approach (Acheson and Gall, 1992) 1.PLANNING CONFERENCE: meeting between the supervisor and supervisee, agree on the focus of classroom visit and a method for collecting data for later analysis. 2.CLASSROOM OBSERVATION: supervisor observes a lesson systematically and nonjudgmentally, collecting data related to the objectives agreed upon during the planning conference. 3.FEEDBACK CONFERENCE: supervisor meets with the teacher to analyze the data collected. The supervisor and supervisee interpret the data from the teacher's perspective with an eye towards diagnosing and solving instructional problems. [Segiovani and Starratt (2002) breaks it to 8, Tracy and McNaughton (1993), 5 steps] 9EDU5818/20

Planning Conference The goal of the planning conference is to identify and define an area of genuine concern that the teacher would like to understand better or improve. Joint decision eliminates teacher’s stress and anxiety and creates responsive atmosphere. classroom management classroom interaction affective factors use of resources, teaching techniques, methodology, and/or acquisition. 10EDU5818/20

Classroom Observation Data collection Specific focus Specific technique 11EDU5818/20

Example of Focus Questions For Supervision How clear are my directions? What kinds of questions do I direct to students? Do I give all students equal attention? What is the distribution of student talk/ teacher talk in class? How much student participation is there? What kinds of verbal and non-verbal feedback do I give students? To whom do I direct these different types of feedback? How often do students direct their comments to classmates, and how often do they direct them to the teacher? How well do I use the blackboard? How well do I answer students' questions? Are my answers more complex than the questions require? Is my pacing too fast or too slow for the majority of students in the class? How well am I implementing the curriculum? How well do I handle unanticipated classroom events? 12EDU5818/20

Development of Instrument for Supervision ConstructQuestionItemMeasurementAnalysis  Usage of English in Teaching Science  The extent of usage  Usage  Clarity  Understanding  Vocabulary (for teacher and students)  Quantitative (likert scale)  Qualitative (descriptive notes, transcript)  Quantitative (percentage, mean,..)  Qualitative (descriptive notes, transcript) 13EDU5818/20

Feedback Conference After class observation, data still fresh Concentrate on the agreed area/focus and data collection technique Accurate and informative data important for informative, instructive and useful feedback Goal: guide the teacher in the analysis, interpretation, and modification of instructional practices based on objective data. 14EDU5818/20

Together, the supervisor and teacher do the following: 1.Analyze the data cooperatively. 2.Reach agreement on what is actually happening. 3.Interpret the data, considering causes and consequences of actions. 4.Reach decisions about future actions by considering alternative approaches. 15EDU5818/20

CONFERENCES WITH TEACHERS: TIPS FOR SUPERVISORS 1.Listen more and talk less so that teachers can be active participants in the supervision process. 2.Give teachers enough time to reflect and comment on the data. We must resist the temptation to impose our own judgments at the very start of the feedback session. 3.Ask non-threatening questions that will guide teachers in the evaluation of their teaching and help them to clarify their thoughts. We can pose questions such as these: what practices would you repeat if you were to teach this class again? What would you change if you were to teach this class again? If you were a student, what would you want to change? 16EDU5818/20

CONFERENCES WITH TEACHERS: TIPS FOR SUPERVISORS 4.Praise effective teaching practices that teachers point out when analyzing the data. 5.Reinforce teachers' good ideas and/or building upon them. 6.Ignore some very obvious classroom problems if the teacher has come up with solutions for other problems that s/he has discovered. It is impossible to solve all classroom problems after one visit. 7.Recognize the inherent tension that exists between supervision and evaluation and the potential conflicts that can arise between teacher and supervisor. A high level of trust is needed so that teachers willingly entertain alternatives. 17EDU5818/20

CONFERENCES WITH TEACHERS: TIPS FOR SUPERVISORS 8.Give teachers credit for being able to help themselves. As guides, we can nurture true professional development and improved teaching. 9.Be open to alternative solutions. Teachers may come up with alternatives that we had never considered. We must acknowledge the fact that there is no one single answer for instructional dilemmas. 10.Help teachers contextualize findings and relate them to the larger teaching/learning context so that oversimplified conclusions are not drawn from the data. 18EDU5818/20

SUMMARY Benefits of CS: gives the supervisor the opportunity to be more interactive than directive, more democratic than authoritarian, more teacher-centered than supervisor- centered, more concrete than vague, more objective than subjective, and more focused than unsystematic. Features of CS: face-to-face interaction between the supervisor and supervisee; the active involvement of the teacher in the three-stage supervision process; and the use of real classroom data for analysis. CS provides: objective feedback on instruction, diagnose and solve instructional problems, assist teachers in developing strategies to promote more effective instruction, and help teachers develop a positive attitude towards continuous professional development. 19EDU5818/20

REFERENCE Reference Chapter 12: Clinical Supervision, Researching Practice, Teacher Learning. in Sergiovni, T. J., Starratt, R. J. (2002) Supervision a redefinition. (7th ed.) Boston: Mc Graw Hill. (UPM Library LB S484 20EDU5818/20