28/01/101 Zvv bkg, how to get an estimate with first data ? R. Brunelière Time schedule is tight. Goal : get an estimate by may/june if we get data from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Measurements at 8 TeV of TTbar events with additional particles in the final state Boris Mangano (ETH Zürich) on behalf of the CMS collaboration Boris.
Advertisements

1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
1 A limit on Br(t→Zc) Henry Frisch, Carla Pilcher, Collin Wolfe, Alexander Paramonov VEP Meeting June 19, 2007.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
W/Z + jets in ATLAS Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford
1 4 th June 2007 C.P. Ward Update on ZZ->llnunu Analysis and Sensitivity to Anomalous Couplings Tom Barber, Richard Batley, Pat Ward University of Cambridge.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
University of Science & Technology of China (USTC) University of Science & Technology of China (USTC) W/Z+  ATLAS On behalf of ATLAS Collaboration.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.
4/10/12 Contribution in ATLAS Collaboration 1 Talk “Multi-jet balance for high pT jet calibration” presented on ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop 2011(SLAC.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Data results for inclusive all-hadronic (RA  with 318 nb -1 SUSY Hadronic/GMSB Meeting [C. Rogan et al.] Data Plots Towards.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
Analysis Plans for Jets + EtMiss Signatures Pierre Savard ATLAS Toronto Group Meeting January
US ATLAS T2/T3 Workshop at UTANovember 11, Profiling Analysis at Startup Jim Cochran Iowa State Outline: - Computing model status - Expected Early.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
W + /W - and l + /l - A Means to investigate PDFs T. Schörner-Sadenius, G. Steinbrück Hamburg University HERA-LHC Workshop, CERN, October 2004.
A few slides to summarise what Alessandro and I were up to for March 24th video meeting Taking for granted that W+/- are good measurements to make- are.
R jets measurement. Outline Motivation for a R jets measurement –What is this measurement? –Why is it interesting? –Other R jets measurement within ATLAS.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Monica D’Onofrio University of Liverpool Boson+jets measurements at the CDF experiment "Vector boson plus jets as a signal and background“ Durham, September.
1 W/Z Planning Monte Carlo samples 7 TeV – W, Z, top, QCD, EW (tau+DY).. [ Ping and Wayne State ] Trigger – L1 and HLT. Good runs. Lumi segments.
QCD and Top backgrounds in W+jets and Rjets Alessandro Tricoli (CERN) on behalf of W+jets and Rjets groups 3 rd May 2013 W+jets and Rjets EB Meeting.
Organisation of the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs WG Meeting - 22 Jan.09.
Diphoton+MET 2015: Tasks and Timelines A living document… Bruce Schumm SCIPP.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
Plenary Physics Meeting, 17 June 05 Per Jonsson Imperial College London 1 Higgs Searches with 1 fb -1 Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
H->bb Weekly Meeting Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) HSG5 H->bb Weekly Meeting, 8 February 2011.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
W/Z+Jets production studies in ATLAS
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
C.Clement Eta RegionTraining regionVariable set |  |
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
W→e and W→e +jets: a data-driven selection method By Alessandro Tricoli ATLAS UK SM Meeting 4 th June 2008 In Collaboration with M. Wielers (RAL) D. Prieur.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Photon Physics activities Higgs activities ATLAS LPNHE group meeting, 2011, Nov. 8th.
WZ and top physics at ATLAS and CMS Ellie Dobson With main focus on W/Z inclusive cross sections.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Introduction 08/11/2007 Higgs WG – Trigger meeting Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
Methodology and examples to determine fake rate separate signal from background Using fit on sideband. Using independent control sample.
1 Top activities in Milano. 2 Overview Study of W+jets background to semileptonic tt –I. Besana (1 st year PhD student, continuing work of diploma thesis)
Report from SUSY working group
Diphoton+MET: Update on Plans and Progress
Proposals for near-future BG determinations from control regions
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Early EWK/top measurements at the LHC
SUSY Particle Mass Measurement with the Contransverse Mass Dan Tovey, University of Sheffield 1.
Alan Barr Claire Gwenlan
tt+jets simulation comparisons
Observation and measurement of HW+W-
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
Presentation transcript:

28/01/101 Zvv bkg, how to get an estimate with first data ? R. Brunelière Time schedule is tight. Goal : get an estimate by may/june if we get data from end february Need to organize ourselves to make sure all topics are covered

28/01/102 Zvv signal MC samples: alpgen full simulation samples at 10 TeV are existing : alpgen samples at 7 TeV being generated at freiburg => then official mc request alpgen matching uncertainties samples have been generated at freiburg at 10 TeV NLO MCFM production can be done for 1,2jets with new MCFM version 5.7 Objet and event selection cuts are defined by etmiss group Our data-driven methods should work for any set of cut, but need starting point for studies. Propose to concentrate : 1.On 2-jets channel checking it works on the different discriminating variables ( , ,MT2,MCT,HTmiss). Also because 2jets channel is only one where theory uncertainties can be fully studied and Wlv bkg is less sensitive to ttbar contribution. 2.Same exercise on 4jets channel

28/01/103 The different control samples List of possible control samples : Zmumu Zee Wlv (l=mu,e) Gamma (both prompt unconverted and converted photons) Any other ? Difficulty CS Statistics

28/01/104 Zll control sample Basic idea : 2 methods : So-called “replace” method means N(Zll;data) applies same cuts as N(Zvv;data) including M eff cut So-called “MC” method means N(Zll;data) applies only preselection cuts. N(Zvv;data) predicted assuming MC is predicting correct M eff shape If M eff cut is too high, only “MC” method is possible with first data but requires good understanding of theory uncertainties (in particular NLO/LO M eff shape)

28/01/105 Z  control sample (1/2) MC samples: alpgen full simulation samples at 10 TeV are existing : alpgen samples at 7 TeV already generated and requested by SM and top wg alpgen matching uncertainties samples have been generated at 10 TeV. Request for Atlfast1 being done now. NLO MCFM production done by James Buchanan at 10 TeV. Will probably redo later at 7 TeV. Objet and event selection cuts are defined by etmiss group, but can also start with Z/W+jets strawman selection for leptons : Trigger : mu10 + susy trigger to check trigger efficiency

28/01/106 Z  control sample (2/2) Theory uncertainties on acceptance corrections: NLO/LO using MCFM for 1,2 jets Matching uncertainties using the different alpgen samples Pdf using pdf reweighting tool from Yusuke Turn on/off jimmy UE Are FSR introducing any bias ? Detector uncertainties : JES, soft MET, muon id efficiency uncertainties Is it enough to take lepton id corrections from Z/W+jets wg ? How much is QCD background ? How to estimate it ? How do we compute “MET” ? Pt(  1+  2) or neutronification ? How much statistics+systematics uncertainties do we get after all preselection cuts ? After different Meff cut ? Suffers from statistics but benchmark channel for other control samples which can be cross-checked wrt Zmumu

28/01/107 Zee control sample Same as Z , but electrons are also reconstructed as jets : => Bias “other” jets reconstructed like when  R(jet,elec) < 0.6. How big is this effect ? Can we remove the two electron clusters and redo jets (and MET) ? Can we use existing tools : embedding, jet/met, redecay, simpler method ? On AODs ? Cannot directly check susy trigger. Need looking at trigger objects, remove objects associated to offline electrons, check trigger chain again  Not so easy to do.  Can benefit again of work done in Z/W+jets wg (e.g. by Hugo and Caterina)

28/01/108 Wlv control sample (1/2) Method : Good points: Wlv has ~ same statistics as Zvv W/Z ratio very stable and hopefully well known (up to 2 jets) W/Z ratio is among first SM W/Z+jets paper => lot of work being done there Reversing method + using Zll can be used to predict Wlv background Bad points: For 3,4 jets, ttbar background very difficult to estimate (except via using b-tagging) For 3,4 jets, W/Z ratio no more predicted at NLO. Can we still trust it ?

28/01/109 Wlv control sample (2/2) MC samples: alpgen full simulation samples at 10 TeV are existing : alpgen samples at 7 TeV already generated and requested by SM and top wg alpgen matching uncertainties samples have been generated at 10 TeV. Request for Atlfast1 being done now. NLO MCFM production done by myself at 10 TeV. Soon available on grid. Redo later at 7 TeV. Wev sample has same trouble as Zee. Easier to start with W  Background rejection for 2jets ? How ? Who is already working on this topic ? Yusuke ?

28/01/1010 Prompt photon control sample Used by CMS for Zvv estimation. Statistics ~ Zvv. But tricky. MC samples: alpgen full simulation samples at 10 TeV are existing : but too small ! I have started generating alpgen samples at 7 TeV up to 5 jets. Already nearly done. In order to study theory uncertainty properly, photon fragmentation correction has to be included => use recent Sherpa : Amir proposal concerning background rejection + obj selection efficiency : make use of converted/unconverted rate not affecting final distributions.  +jets/Zll+jets measurement and comparison with MC should be used as proof of feasibility

28/01/1011 Summary Proposal : start with 2jets analysis as proof of feasibility for the various methods Should quickly setup who is working on what to avoid duplicated effort Examples few topic uncovered till now : Theory systematics Background rejection (specially for Wlv) Prompt photon whole method Trigger emulation Concentrate myself to work on few topics : MC samples production/study Theory uncertainties (with MCFM/Alpgen/Sherpa)