Evidenced Based Protocols for Adult Drug Courts Jacqueline van Wormer, PhD Washington State University NADCP/NDCI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reducing Recidivism Reducing the Rate and Use of Incarceration Reducing Recidivism Reducing the Rate and Use of Incarceration What Works and Best Practices.
Advertisements

Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
Systems Approach Workbook A Systems Approach to Substance Use Services and Supports in Canada Communication Tools: Sample PowerPoint presentation The original.
WHAT WORKS What does WHAT WORKS have to do with my work? Ross Feenan Manager, Offender Assessments CSNSW.
Implementing Evidence Based Practices in Probation Departments Presented By: Natalie Pearl, Ph.D.
Practical Application of the ORAS The Corrections Institute Center for Criminal Justice Research University of Cincinnati.
1 Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Judge.
Requires DSHS and HCA to expend state funds on: (1) Juvenile justice programs or programs related to the prevention, treatment, or care of juvenile offenders.
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION Report on Study of Youthful Offenders Pursuant to Session Law , Sections 34.1 and 34.2.
Bernard Warner, Secretary.  Over 7 million people in the US are under community supervision.  More than 50% of parolees and 37% of probationers fail.
Research and Evaluation Center Jeffrey A. Butts John Jay College of Criminal Justice City University of New York August 7, 2012 Evidence-Based Models for.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
TAKING IT TO THE NEXT LEVEL: Core Correctional Practices
Developing a Logic Model
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies American Society of Criminology November 16, 2011.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
Assessing the Risk of Offending Conference 24/02/2010 Siobhan Young IYJS.
Overview of Adult Community Corrections. Outline Organizational Structure Organizational Structure Probation population breakdown Probation population.
Evidence-based Practices (EBP) in Corrections
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
NASC 2012 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 6, 2012 NASC 2012 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 6, 2012 Ray Wahl Deputy State Court Administrator.
What Works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism: The Principles of Effective Intervention: Presented by: Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. Center for Criminal.
Planning for Re-alignment in San Diego
Offender Rehabilitation
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
The Iowa Delinquency Assessment Tool
Prison Population Management John Baldwin Director Iowa Department of Corrections.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
Mental Health Crises & Police Contact in Midtown Detroit Bart W. Miles, PhD MSW Assistant Professor Wayne State University School of Social Work Center.
The Standardized Program Evaluation Protocol ~SPEP~
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
A Framework to Guide Full Service Partnerships for Adults Maria Funk, Ph.D. Mental Health Clinical District Chief ASOC Countywide Programs Los Angeles.
STICS: Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) Applying the RNR Principles.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
TREATMENT OF THE JUVENILE OFFENDER CONCLUSIONS FROM THEORY AND RESEARCH DR. ROBERT D. HOGE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY CARLETON UNIVERSITY OTTAWA, ONTARIO.
CEBP Research Institute: Past and current studies: Overview and findings CEBP Learning Institute May 27, 2010 Corinne Datchi-Phillips, Ph.D. Jeremy Kinser,
 Performance assessments can:  help identify potential problems in the program  help identify areas where streamlining the process could be useful.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Preliminary Report Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee Cynthia L. Forland September 14, 2005 At-Risk Youth Study.
January 2012 Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey Employment Forum.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Created by Jonathan Lee and Allen Lim
CONTINUITY OF CARE IN A RE-ENTRY CONTEXT
Evidenced Based Protocols for Adult Drug Courts Jacqueline van Wormer, PhD Washington State University NADCP/NDCI.
1 Please note before delivering this presentation Your management board may ask you questions relating to the implications of the changes for YOT resources.
What works: Principles of effective approaches to delinquency prevention and intervention Wisconsin Juvenile Court Intake Association Conference September.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs The Substance Abuse Research Consortium Semi Annual Meeting Improving the Quality, and Effectiveness.
Reducing Recidivism and Promoting Recovery: Implications of National and State Trends for Improving Treatment Programs Alexa Eggleston, J.D. Program Director,
Offender Assessment Utilizing the Risk-Need- Responsivity Model A web presentation for RSAT - T&TA by Roberta C. Churchill -ACJS.
Liam Ennis, Ph.D., R.Psych INTEGRATED THREAT AND RISK ASSESSMENT CENTRE/ ALBERTA LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE TEAMS Using the Principles of Risk, Need, and.
Accountability Court Programs: Targeting the Right Participants as Part of a Community Continuum of Responses Georgia School of Addiction Studies Conference.
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
Intercept 5 Community Supervision
ICT, Research and Teaching for Criminal Justice Practitioners
Exploring the Past Improving the Future
ICT, Research and Teaching for Criminal Justice Practitioners
Sarah L. Desmarais, Ph.D. North Carolina State University
Transforming Hidalgo County CSCD into an Evidence Based Agency
Key Legislative Outcomes 2017
Presentation transcript:

Evidenced Based Protocols for Adult Drug Courts Jacqueline van Wormer, PhD Washington State University NADCP/NDCI

 “The first test of reform is in it’s record of implementation. A program must ultimately be judged by results, what actual benefits it brings, and what degrees of mischief it has created…..”  David J. Rothman, Conscience and Convenience (1980)

Defining and Measuring Recidivism and Desistance  Recidivism is a central concept when assessing the effectiveness of a program because policy makers and practitioners want to know what impact a program or sanction has on criminality.  When a person reaches a permanent state of non-offending, it is called desistance. Desistance is the ultimate goal of all prevention and correctional intervention efforts.

What is evidence-based vs. best practice?

Definition: Evidence-Based  Multiple site random controlled trials across heterogeneous populations demonstrating that the program or practice is effective for the population.

Definition: Best Practice  An approach, framework, collection of ideas or concepts, adopted principles and strategies supported by research.

Program versus Practice

Definitions  Oh, and so many others….  Research-based  Consensus-based  Promising practices

Why do we need “evidence- based” and “best” practices?

The Hydraulic Justice System

Evidence-Based Practices  NADCP/NDCI Adult Drug Court Best Practice Standards Volume I & II  Louisiana Best Practice Standards for Drug Courts

What does the research tell us?  Use risk assessment tools to identify risk to reoffend and criminogenic needs.  Direct programming and interventions to medium and higher risk offenders  Focus interventions for medium and higher risk offenders on their individual criminogenic needs.  Respond to misconduct with swiftness, certainty, and proportionality.  Use more carrots than sticks  Deliver services in natural environments where possible  Pair sanctions with interventions that address criminogenic needs O Source: NIC (2012)

Individualized  Risk/Needs/Responsivity

R-N-R  RISK: who to treat  NEED: what to treat  RESPONSIVITY: how to treat

The RISK Principle  Because criminal behavior can be predicted, services should be matched to each person’s risk of reoffending  To reduce recidivism:  Higher risk youth need additional services  Lower risk youth need little to no intervention

The (Criminogenic) NEED Principle  The Central Eight  The Big Four (Tier I)  antisocial personality traits, thinking, and attitudes  criminal associations  Tier II  Substance abuse  Family/marital relationships  Education and employment  Positive leisure activities O Source: Andrews & Bonta (2010)

The RESPONSIVITY Principle  Service delivery should be responsive to the learning style and capabilities of each individual client  What protective factors does the client possess that will assist with participation in and completion of services?

Evidence-Based Programs

Data  Cannot reach a level of best practices without the use of data.  Data should drive decision making, programming planning, caseloads, target populations.  Monitor for racial/ethnic disparities in filings, referrals, jail stays, access to and completion of services.

Quality Assurance  Why QA? To use multiple levels of data and information to measure impact, and to implement changes if necessary  Multi-level Quality Assurance: State, County, Provider level.  Source: Crime and Justice Institute at Community Resources for Justice, Kristy Pierce ‐ Danford, & Meghan Guevara (2010). Commonwealth of Virginia: Roadmap for Evidence ‐ Based Practices in Community Corrections.

The QA Process  How does each stakeholder define quality  Draft definition of highest quality service for your ADC  (e.g. Utilize RNR tool for program placement, individualized TX & Incentives and Sanctions)  Logic Model – what do you intend to happen, and what are your short and long term outcomes?  How will you measure the goals?  Data Review  Peer Review: Audits, file reviews, interviews, checklists, client & staff surveys  Always communicate!

Questions?