Minnesota BMP CHALLENGE SM Workshop WELCOME!. THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED All or portions of 38 MN counties 13 major watershed management units ~90%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Advertisements

Agricultural Engineer Water Quality Specialist
1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Nutrient Loading in the Klamath Basin K.A. Rykbost B.A. Charlton Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station.
KEEPING WATER ON THE LAND Brandon Workshop March 20, 2013.
Cost-Share Funding Opportunities – How the Lower Souris Watershed Committee Can Help You? Karmen Kyle Group Plan Advisor, Lower Souris Watershed Committee.
Union County Conservation District Rain Barrel Workshop.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
NSF EPSCoR Water Dynamics Workshop November 9-12, 2008 Burlington, VT Midwest.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Elm Creek Watershed Green Lands, Blue Waters Annual Conference November 20-21, 2013 Linda Meschke, Rural Advantage.
The Gulf of Mexico’s Hypoxic Zone
Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy IFB Commodities Conference July 30, 2014 Lauren.
Eric G. Hurley, Nutrient Management Specialist USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Potential of Using Precision Agricultural Practices for P Fertilizer Management.
Economic and Biophysical Models to Support Conservation Policy: Hypoxia and Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CARD Resources and Environmental.
Nutrient Loading from Point and Non-Point Sources on Surface Waters by Adam Lanning.
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Anthropogenic Nutrient Sources Fertilizers Human & Animal Wastes Fossil Fuel Combustion Leguminous Crops Potential Ecosystem Effects Algae Blooms Hypoxia.
Environment and Natural Resources Stewardship: Opportunities and Issues Jim Pease and Matt Helmers.
Kathleen A. Garland EIH Envirothon Teacher Workshop February 18, 2012.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
PARTNERSHIP EFFORT WITH AGRICULTURE AND MINNESOTA PRODUCERS 2014 Drainage Water Management Initiative.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
The Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Zone:. Mississippi River Basin.
Gulf of Mexico and Environmental Protection By: Amanda Hassid and Tiffany Pouldar AP Government, Period 2 December 3, 2007.
BMP CHALLENGE Experience: Cannon River Watershed Partnership Information provided by: Dave Legvold Executive Director Cannon River Watershed Partnership.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Great Bay Municipal Coalition New Hampshire Water Pollution Control Association June 13, 2013 Dean Peschel Peschel Consulting
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Sections 2 and 3 Nutrient Management Regulations.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
SOIL AND WATER QUALITY MONITORING TECHINIQUES Ramesh Kanwar Professor and Chair, Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering Department Iowa State University,
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
Jonathan Burnett Jackie Comisso Travis Borrillo-Hutter Terra Michaels.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Minnesota BMP CHALLENGE SM & Water Quality Credit Trading (WQT) Workshop WELCOME!
New Resources for Managing Poo
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Private Lands Voluntary Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin Vicki Anderson Great Lakes Coordinator.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Dead Zones & Drinking Water: Farming’s Nutrient Loss Challenge Jonathan Coppess University of Illinois.
BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING EXAMPLES Unit 6.2. BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING EXAMPLES 1) Nutrient Pollution 2) Agricultural Importance 3) CZ Function and Dynamics.
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Introduction to Nutrient Management, Nutrient Cycling and Regional Nutrient Balance Issues Tom Basden Ag. and Natural Resources WVU Extension Service,
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico James Gillespie.
Taking on the Challenge Addressing Sustainability and Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Goals Caroline Wade, Nutrient Watershed Manager Illinois Corn Growers.
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
 Decreasing Nutrient Runoff from Iowa Farms to Improve Water Quality Everywhere from Local Sources in Iowa to the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico.
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Manure 101 University of Wisconsin - Extension
Nitrogen and Agriculture Let’s Talk About It!
Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy - NLRS
Texas Water Resources Institute
What is the MAEAP Model? Voluntary Partners Driven program that provides local Confidential boots on the ground 1 on 1 assistance to farmers to help them.
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
Iowa Agriculture Water Alliance
Environmentally sensitive areas
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Presentation transcript:

Minnesota BMP CHALLENGE SM Workshop WELCOME!

THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED All or portions of 38 MN counties 13 major watershed management units ~90% in agriculture >15,000 miles 2 in MN, IA, ND, & SD 335 miles of flow Increases MS River flow by 100% Nutrient Issues? Impairments!

THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED Nutrient Impairments – Phosphorous Flow-weighted Mean Concentrations (mg/L) EPA Desired Goal = 0.1 mg/L Algal Reduction = 0.26 mg/l

THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED Nutrient Impairments – Nitrates Flow-weighted Mean Concentrations (mg/L) Drinking Water Standard = 10 mg/L

THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED Who do we impact? Impacts – Phosphorous Drinking water quality – health/economics Freshwater Eutrophication Toxic algae blooms Loss of recreational value Impairments – e.g., lower MN River DO Tied to sediment issues (e.g., Lake Pepin) Impacts – Nitrogen Drinking water quality – health/economics Blue Baby Syndrome Potential link to some cancers/birth defects Weight gain suppression in livestock Saltwater Eutrophication Impairments – e.g., Gulf of Mexico hypoxia

THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED Who do we impact? ~1% of the Mississippi River Watershed USGS estimated MN ~6-9% NO 3 IATP estimated Upper MN ~50% NO 3 Up to 8000 miles 2

THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED What Needs to be Done? EPA – 40% reduction in nitrate-nitrogen Voluntary measures FIRST Program Support (nutrient trading, BMPs) Mandated measures IF NECESSARY Farm Bill requirements Clean Water Act enforcement TMDL

THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED Progress is being made…..  State Funded BMPs include  Residue Management - 52,768 Acres  Nutrient Management - 26,977 Acres  Conservation Crop Rotation - 15,527 Acres  Critical or Sensitive Area Protection - 2,717 Acres  Wetland Restoration - 1,134 Acres  >227 miles of drainage, buffer, and windbreak improvements

THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED Opportunities for improvement…..  Alternative Crops – cellulosic ethanol production  Certified Crop Consultants – expertise  Field-specific applications  Soil Testing  Prudent manure mgmt  Crop rotations  Application timing  Nutrient Trading  Credit Trading (Point-Point trading)  Future for Non-Point – Point Trades?  Nutrient application reduction demonstrations  BMP Challenge  Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative

Minnesota BMP CHALLENGE SM Workshop You can make a difference!