1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: Acceleration and Deceleration Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr Martin Hendry University of Glasgow. Why are we here?…. The period of inflation in the very early Universe was invoked to explain some apparent fine.
Advertisements

1 1 Dissecting Dark Energy Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
CMB but also Dark Energy Carlo Baccigalupi, Francesca Perrotta.
Dark Energy and Extended Gravity theories Francesca Perrotta (SISSA, Trieste)
Primordial Neutrinos and Cosmological Perturbation in the Interacting Dark-Energy Model: CMB and LSS Yong-Yeon Keum National Taiwan University SDSS-KSG.
This has led to more general Dark Energy or Quintessence models: Evolving scalar field which ‘tracks’ the matter density Convenient parametrisation: ‘Equation.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course
Quintessence and the Accelerating Universe
Curvature Perturbations from a Non-minimally Coupled Vector Boson Field Mindaugas Karčiauskas work done with Konstantinos Dimopoulos Mindaugas Karčiauskas.
Álvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz Theoretical Physics Department Complutense University of Madrid in collaboration with Antonio L. Maroto & Antonio Dobado Different.
Quintessence from time evolution of fundamental mass scale.
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
The Statistically Anisotropic Curvature Perturbation from Vector Fields Mindaugas Karčiauskas Dimopoulos, MK, JHEP 07 (2008) Dimopoulos, MK, Lyth, Rodriguez,
CMB as a physics laboratory
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
IFIC, 6 February 2007 Julien Lesgourgues (LAPTH, Annecy)
Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?
COSMO 2006, Lake Tahoe 9/28/2006 Cuscuton Cosmology: Cuscuton Cosmology: Dark Energy meets Modified Gravity Niayesh Afshordi Institute for Theory and Computation.
The Galaxy Formation Paradigm Paradigm R. Giovanelli Astro620/Spring ‘07 Remember to mention.pdf file.
InflationInflation Andrei Linde Lecture 1. Plan of the lectures: Inflation: a general outlook Basic inflationary models (new inflation, chaotic inflation,
Universe: Space-time, Matter, Energy Very little matter-energy is observable Critical matter-energy density balances expansion and gravitational collapse.
1 1 Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Course on Dark Energy Cosmology at the Beach 2009 JDEM constraints.
Based on Phys.Rev.D84:043515,2011,arXiv: &JCAP01(2012)016 Phys.Rev.D84:043515,2011,arXiv: &JCAP01(2012)016.
THE GRACEFUL EXIT FROM INFLATION AND DARK ENERGY By Tomislav Prokopec Publications: Tomas Janssen and T. Prokopec, arXiv: ; Tomas Janssen, Shun-Pei.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
The Hunting of the Dark Energy and On Beyond Lambda Eric Linder Cosmology Teach-In 26 June 2003.
Antisymmetric metric fluctuations as dark matter By Tomislav Prokopec (Utrecht University) Cosmo 07, Brighton 22 Aug 2007 ˚1˚ Based on publications: T.
Structure formation in dark energy cosmology La Magia, April 2005.
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
Early times CMB.
1 1 Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Seeing Darkness: The New Cosmology.
Dark Energy & High-Energy Physics Jérôme Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris.
Dark Energy The first Surprise in the era of precision cosmology?
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Cosmic Microwave Background  Cosmological Overview/Definitions  Temperature  Polarization  Ramifications  Cosmological Overview/Definitions  Temperature.
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
Dilaton quantum gravity and cosmology. Dilaton quantum gravity Functional renormalization flow, with truncation :
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
1 1 Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Interpreting Dark Energy JDEM constraints.
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Heidelberg, May 31, 2005.
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 2 perturbations Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Inflation and String Cosmology Andrei Linde Andrei Linde.
University of Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Galaxy clusters.
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity collaborated with Elcio Abdalla.
Dark Energy Philippe Brax IPhT Saclay « ANR» afternoon, November 2012P.B, C. Burrage, A.C. Davis, B. Li, H. Winther, G. Zhao etc…
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
PHY th century cosmology 1920s – 1990s (from Friedmann to Freedman)  theoretical technology available, but no data  20 th century: birth of observational.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 10.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: The Heart of Darkness Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Madrid, November 15, 2005.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: Mapping Expansion and Growth Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Inflationary Theory of Primordial Cosmological Perturbation Project for General Relativity (Instructor: Prof.Whiting) Sohyun Park.
1 1 Eric Linder 22 November 2010 UC Berkeley & Berkeley Lab Institute for the Early Universe Ewha University, Korea CMB Probes of Dark Energy.
Hypothesis Scalar Field is the Dark Matter and the Dark Energy in the Cosmos, i.e. about 95% of the matter of the Universe. Scalar Field is the Dark Matter.
Dark Energy in the Early Universe Joel Weller arXiv:gr-qc/
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
Neutrino Cosmology and Astrophysics Jenni Adams University of Canterbury, New Zealand TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
ETSU Astrophysics 3415: “The Concordance Model in Cosmology: Should We Believe It?…” Martin Hendry Nov 2005 AIM:To review the current status of cosmological.
In Dynamic Dark Energy Models. 1. Accelerating expansion & interpretation 2. What is Dynamic dark energy model 3. recent observational results.
Smoke This! The CMB, the Big Bang, Inflation, and WMAP's latest results Spergel et al, 2006, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year results:
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Quantum Spacetime and Cosmic Inflation
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Probing the Dark Sector
Graduate Course: Cosmology
Presentation transcript:

1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: Acceleration and Deceleration Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

2 2 Discovery! Acceleration

3 3 accelerating decelerating accelerating decelerating cf. Tonry et al. (2003) Cosmic Concordance Supernovae alone  Accelerating expansion   > 0 CMB (plus LSS)  Flat universe   > 0 Any two of SN, CMB, LSS  Dark energy ~75%

4 4 Acceleration and Particle Physics Key element is whether (aH) -1 = å -1 is increasing or decreasing. I.e. is there acceleration: >0. Also, å~aH~H/T~T/M p for “classical” radiation, but during inflation this redshifts away and quantum particle creation enters. a.. Comoving scale å -1 Time horizon scale Inflation The conformal horizon scale (aH) -1 tells us when a comoving scale (e.g. perturbation mode) leaves or enters the horizon.

5 5 Acceleration = Curvature The Principle of Equivalence teaches that Acceleration = Gravity = Curvature Acceleration  over time will get v=gh, so z = v = gh (gravitational redshift). But, t  t 0  parallel lines not parallel (curvature)! t0t0 t´ Height Time

6 6 Equations of Motion Expansion rate of the universe a(t) ds 2 =  dt 2 +a 2 (t)[dr 2 /(1-kr 2 )+r 2 d  2 ] Friedmann equations (å/a) 2 = H 2 = (8  /3M p 2 ) [  m +   ] /a = -(4  /3M p 2 ) [  m +   +3p  ] Einstein-Hilbert action S =  d 4 x  -g [ R/2  + L  + L m ] a..

7 7 Spacetime Curvature Ricci scalar curvature R = R   = 6 [ a/a + (å/a) 2 ] = 6 ( a/a + H 2 ) Define reduced scalar curvature R = R/(12H 2 ) = (1/2) [1 + aa/ å 2 ] = (1/2)(1-q) Note that division between acceleration and deceleration occurs for R =1/2 (q=0). Superacceleration (phantom models) is not (a) > 0, but (a/a) > 0, i.e. R >

8 8 Today’s Inflation To learn about the physics behind dark energy we need to map the expansion history. Subscripts label acceleration: R = (1-q)/2 q = -a /å 2 R =1/4 EdS R =1/2 acc R =1 superacc a..

9 9 Equations of Motion Expansion rate of the universe a(t) ds 2 =  dt 2 +a 2 (t)[dr 2 /(1-kr 2 )+r 2 d  2 ] Friedmann equations (å/a) 2 = H 2 = (8  /3M p 2 ) [  m +   ] /a = -(4  /3M p 2 ) [  m +   +3p  ] Einstein-Hilbert action S =  d 4 x  -g [ R/2  + L  + L m ] a..

10 Scalar Field Theory Scalar field Lagrangian - canonical, minimally coupled L  = (1/2)(    ) 2 - V(  ) Noether prescription  Energy-momentum tensor T  =(2/  -g) [  (  -g L )/  g  ] Perfect fluid form (from RW metric) Energy density   = (1/2)  2 + V(  ) + (1/2)(  ) 2 Pressure p  = (1/2)  2 - V(  ) - (1/6)(  ) 2..

11 Scalar Field Equation of State Continuity equation follows KG equation [(1/2)  2 ] + 6H [(1/2)  2 ] = -V  - V + 3H (  +p) = -V d  /dln a = -3(  +p) = -3  (1+w)  + 3H  = -dV(  )/d  ¨˙ Equation of state ratio w = p/  Klein-Gordon equation (Lagrange equation of motion)

12 Equation of State Reconstruction from EOS:  (a) =    c exp{ 3  dln a [1+w(z)] }  (a) =  dln a H -1 sqrt{  (a) [1+w(z)] } V(a) = (1/2)  (a) [1-w(z)] K(a) = (1/2)  2 = (1/2)  (a) [1+w(z)].

13 Equation of State Limits of (canonical) Equations of State: w = (K-V) / (K+V) Potential energy dominates (slow roll) V >> K  w = -1 Kinetic energy dominates (fast roll) K >> V  w = +1 Oscillation about potential minimum (or coherent field, e.g. axion)  V  =  K   w = 0

14 Equation of State Examples of (canonical) Equations of State: d  /dln a = -3(  +p) = -3  (1+w)  = (Energy per particle)(Number of particles) / Volume = E N a -3 Constant w implies  ~ a -3(1+w) Matter: E~m~a 0, N~a 0  w=0 Radiation: E~1/ ~a -1, N~a 0  w=1/3 Curvature energy: E~1/R 2 ~a -2, N~a 0  w=-1/3 Cosmological constant: E~V, N ~a 0  w=-1 Anisotropic shear: w=+1 Cosmic String network: w=-1/3 ; Domain walls: w=-2/3

15 Expansion History Suppose we admit our ignorance: H 2 = (8  /3)  m +  H 2 (a) Effective equation of state: w(a) = -1 - (1/3) dln (  H 2 ) / dln a Modifications of the expansion history are equivalent to time variation w(a). Period. Observations that map out expansion history a(t), or w(a), tell us about the fundamental physics of dark energy. Alterations to Friedmann framework  w(a) gravitational extensions or high energy physics

16 Expansion History For modifications  H 2, define an effective scalar field with V = (3M P 2 /8  )  H 2 + (M P 2 H 0 2 /16  ) [ d  H 2 /d ln a] K = - (M P 2 H 0 2 /16  ) [ d  H 2 /d ln a] Example:  H 2 = A(  m ) n w = -1+n Example:  H 2 = (8  /3) [g(  m ) -  m ] w= -1 + (g-1)/[ g/  m - 1 ]

17 Weighing Dark Energy SN Target

18 Exploring Dark Energy

19 Dark Energy Models Scalar fields can roll: 1)fast -- “kination” [Tracking models] 2)slow -- acceleration [Quintessence] 3)steadily -- acceleration deceleration [Linear potential] 4)oscillate -- potential minimum, pseudoscalar, PNGB [V~  n ]

20 Power law potential “Normal” potentials don’t work: V(  ) ~  n have minima (n even), and field just oscillates, leading to EOS w = (n-2)/(n+2) n024∞ w-101/31

21 Oscillations Oscillating field w = (n-2)/(n+2) Take osc. time << H -1 and  constant over osc.  2  =  dt  2 /  dt =  d   /  d  /  = 2   d  [1-V/V max ] 1/2 / [1-V/V max ] -1/2 If V = V max (  /  max ) n then  w  =  0 1 dx (1-x n ) 1/2 /  0 1 dx (1-x n ) -1/2 = -1 +2n/(n+2)... K=0 V max = . Turner 1983

22 Linear Potential Linear potential [Linde 1986] V(  )=V 0 +  leads to collapsing universe, can constrain t c a t curves of 

23 Tracking fields Criterion  = VV  /(V) 2 > 1, d ln (  -1)/dt <<H. However, generally only achieves w 0 > Successful model requires fast-slow roll. Can start from wide variety of initial conditions, then join attractor trajectory of tracking behavior.

24 Quintessence Interesting models have dark energy: 1)dynamically important, 2)accelerating, 3)not  ~  [(1+w)  ] ~  (1+w) HM p Damped so H ~ V, and timescale is H -1. Therefore  ~ M p. Unless 1+w << 1, then  << M p and very hard to reconstruct potential. . . ..

25 Dark Energy Models Inverse power law V(  ) ~  -n “SUGRA” V(  ) ~  -n exp( 2 ) Running exponential V(  ) ~ exp[- (  )  ] PNGB or “axion” V(  ) ~ 1+cos(  /f) Albrecht-Skordis V(  ) ~ [1+c 1  +c 2  2 ] exp(- ) “Tachyon” V(  ) ~ [cosh( )-1] n Stochastic V(  ) ~ [1+sin(  /f)] exp(- )...

26 Tying HEP to Cosmology Accurate to 3% in EOS back to z=1.7 (vs. 27% for w 1 ). Accurate to 0.2% in distance back to z lss =1100! Klein-Gordon equation  + 3H  = -dV(  )/d  ¨ ˙ w(a) = w 0 +w a (1-a)

27 Scalar Field Dynamics The cosmological constant has w=-1=constant. Essentially no other model does. Dynamics in the form of w/H = w = dw/dln a can be detected by cosmological observations. Dynamics also implies spatial inhomogeneities. Scale is given by effective mass m eff =  V˝ This is of order H ~ eV, so clustering difficult on subhorizon scales. Vaguely detectable through full sky CMB-LSS crosscorrelation..

28 Growth History While dark energy itself does not cluster much, it affects the growth of matter structure. Fractional density contrast  =  m /  m evolves as  + 2H  = 4  G  m  Sourced by gravitational instability of density contrast, suppressed by Hubble drag. Matter domination case:  ~ a -3 ~ t -2, H ~ (2/3t). Try  ~ t n. Characteristic equation n(n-1)+(4/3)n-(3/2)(4/9)=0. Growing mode n=+2/3, i.e.  ~ a...

29 Growth History Growth rate of density fluctuations g(a) = (  m /  m )/a

30 Gravitational Potential Poisson equation  2  (a)=4  Ga 2  m = 4  G  m (0) g(a) In matter dominated (hence decelerating) universe,  m /  m ~ a so g=const and  =const. Photons don’t interact with structure growth: blueshift falling into well matched by redshift climbing out. Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect = 0.

31 Inflation, Structure, and Dark Energy Matter power spectrum P k =  (  m /  m ) 2  ~ k n Scale free (primordially, but then distorted since comoving wavelengths entering horizon in radiation epoch evolve differently - imprint z eq ). Potential power spectrum  2  L ~ L 4  (  m /  m ) 2  L ~ L 4 k 3 P k ~ L 1-n Scale invariant for n=1 (Harrison-Zel’dovich). CMB power spectrum On large scales (low l), Sachs-Wolfe dominates and power l(l+1)C l is flat.

32 Deceleration and Acceleration CMB power spectrum measures n-1 and inflation. Nonzero ISW measures breakdown of matter domination: at early times (radiation) and late times (dark energy). Large scales (low l) not precisely measurable due to cosmic variance. So look for better way to probe decay of gravitational potentials. Next: The Darkness of the Universe 3: Mapping Expansion and Growth