DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Advertisements

NPRR 532 Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin David Kee CPS Energy Energy Supply & Market.
SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve
February 25, 2011 Demand Side Working Group EILS Update Mark Patterson ERCOT, Manager Demand Integration.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup Update to DSWG 3/9/
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
Report to TAC February In Brief Chair and Vice-Chair for 2009 Chair and Vice-Chair for 2009 Working Group Reports Working Group Reports QMWG QMWG.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
Demand Integration Update to DSWG ERCOT Emergency Responsive Service (ERS) Report to the Public Utility Commission of Texas for the 2013 ERS Program Year.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC November 4 th, 2010.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
EILS Cost Comparison WMS Jan. 28, Background ERCOT procures Emergency Interruptible Load Service three times annually by Contract Period –February-May.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
July 10, 2008 ROS Early Delivery Systems Status – R6.3 2 Hour Test John Dumas and Jeff Gilbertson.
Outstanding Issues & Action Items 1.Obligations to Honor Ancillary Services Commitments 2.Variable ERCOT Bias 3.Sign reversals of the Regulation Signal.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
ERCOT Public 1 Overview of ERCOT Concept Paper on Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services & Multi-Interval Real-Time Market.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April In Brief Two Working Group reports Two Working Group reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports BENA presentation.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (January 2015) ERCOT Public February 15, 2015.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
DSWG Update to WMS 8/10/2011. DSWG Goals #DSWG GoalDeliverable Target Date Primary Owner Team MembersStatus 1SCED Load Participation Complete analysis.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
Reliability Deployments Task Force Update WMS Meeting WMS Chair created task force with the directive that the task force will address real-time.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meeting of
RDTF June 1, Purpose “The effect of the Shadow Price cap for the Power Balance Constraint is to limit the cost calculated by the SCED optimization.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
July 15, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
1 Market Trials Update NATF January 5, 2010.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Interpreting DREAM NPRR 777.
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
Presentation transcript:

DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011

EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours MW Procured or Self Arranged467.7 Number of EILS Resources127 (includes 86 aggregations) Projected cost$1, Average cost per MW per hour$6.39 Business Hours 2 HE 1400 through 1600, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 255 hours MW Procured or Self Arranged470.7 Number of EILS Resources127 (includes 86 aggregations) Projected cost$792, Average cost per MW per hour$6.60 Business Hours 3 HE 1700 through 2000, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 340 hours MW Procured or Self Arranged472.6 Number of EILS Resources125 (includes 86 aggregations) Projected cost$1,089, Average cost per MW per hour$6.78 Non-Business Hours All other hours; 1,859 hours MW Procured or Self Arranged384.2 Number of EILS Resources111 (includes 79 aggregations) Projected cost$4,550, Average cost per MW per hour$6.37

LR - Feb 2 nd & Feb 3 rd Longest LR deployment in history – Approximately 8 hours – Previous record of just under 3 hours set on 4/17/2006 LR performance to be presented to ERCOT Board on 2/15/2011

EILS - Feb 2 nd & Feb 3 rd First EILS deployment – Approximately 28 hours – Second day of Contract Period EILS performance will not be available for at least another month Voluntary EILS deployments may be requested by ERCOT

GroupDateTime Load Participation in SCEDFebruary 24 th, 20119:30 am – 3:30 pm DSWGFebruary 25 th, 20119:30 am – 3:30 pm EILS Improvement SubgroupMarch 11 th, 20119:30 am – 12:00 pm DSWG Meeting Schedule

Loads in SCED Group Chaired by Alice Jackson – Identify issues / identify solutions Updated whitepaper posted – Comments welcomed First meeting on January 21 st, 2011

CategoryIssueNotes Settlement Compensation: Settle DR offers on full LMP, or LMP minus LMPZ? Or, LMP minus Retail Rate ( per FERC)? Or, other? See Appendix B: Settlement for DR Energy This issue mirrors the ongoing debate at FERC over DR compensation. At a high level, this has issues in common with the discussion on how to compensate Storage. If decision is to pay LMP minus LMPZ, how will the calculation/process flow occur in Settlements? TX SET transactions are potentially affected. Settlement Settlement price points for aggregations of small loads. Need to determine whether to create a new category of SPP. Will an aggregation need to be unique to an LSE? What geographical concentration will be required? This issue is dependent on how the modeling question is resolved. SettlementQSE affiliations. Can an LR contract to provide AS thru SCED with a QSE other than its LSE QSE? The difference between LR participation in current AS markets and LR participation in SCED is that energy transactions are affected in the latter. Settlement Participation incentive: LR setting LMP assured of being paid only for a single SCED run ($MWh/12). If LR is dispatched for only a single SCED run, its load will still be settled at the full 15-minute settlement interval LMPZ. Should any additional compensation be considered for these types of situations? Development of a Load reduction offset could avoid volatile dispatch instructions but would not assure sustained prices near the LR's strike price. Minimum run-time parameter will be viewed as unequal treatment with gen. Look at Quick Start solution (possible parallels). Loads in SCED – Identified Issues

Dispatch Block offer at the margin too large for SCED requirement Possible solutions: 1) If SCED requirement is 50%, accept offer and dispatch the LR. 2) Give the QSE the ability to not follow the dispatch instruction under certain parameters, and not incur a penalty, and solve the power balance issue with Regulation (assuming block is not too large). 3) Limit size of block offer. DispatchMultiple block offers tied at same price Possible solutions: 1) if congestion, dispatch LR with highest Shift Factor relative to the constraint. 2) Select LR with block offer that most closely matches the MW need. 3) Random selector. 4) Prior to SCED execution, randomly modify tied block offers by small amount ($.01 or less). Offer Submission Load Resource offers to SCED. Determine parameters needed as part of LR offers (i.e., counterparts to generator requirements). Examples: HSL, LSL. RegistrationModifications to RARFNeed to modify LRARF to accommodate new types of LRs. AS Deployment Should LRs providing RRS have the option of being dispatched by SCED? Would UFR requirement be affected? Could prematurely deplete amount of capacity with armed UFR, thus compromising instant frequency response in case of unit trip during emergency conditions. AS Deployment How to maintain current LR dispatch requirements for Reserve services (10 minutes for RRS; 30 minutes for Nonspin). See Appendix A: Ancillary Services SCED deployment. DispatchThree-hour return to service. How/whether to maintain the current 3-hour return to service window if LR is dispatched by SCED?

Pricing Transparency "Look-Ahead" SCED pricing Advanced notice of pricing would likely improve participation. Concerns shared by quick start generators. THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO QSTF. Participation by Distribution- Connected Loads Aggregated telemetry. See Appendix C: Participation by Small-Customer Aggregations Need to determine acceptable technology to allow aggregations of small, distribution-level loads to participate. Can an acceptable method of statistical sampling be devised? What are the parameters/values that need to be telemetered? Participation by Distribution Connected Loads Network modeling. Need to determine how aggregations of distribution-level loads will be modeled. Model at a Load Aggregation Point (LAP) level TBD? Or can they carry zero shift factors and be dispatched for power balance only (ie, not for congestion management)? Participation by Distribution Connected Loads Aggregations of small loads without shift factors' impact on LFC. Is there an acceptable alternative to assigning shift factors to distribution- connected load aggregations? Market Monitoring Gaming issues. For example: How to prevent gaming by LRs that submit low EOCs prior to a planned outage. Establish an EOC price floor for Loads? Measurement & Verification Performance metrics.Will need to be developed for all types of participants.