9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tevatron Beam Diagnostics: Boosting Collider Performance Vladimir Shiltsev, Ron Moore, Andreas Jansson FNAL/Accelerator Division.
Advertisements

FNAL Emittance Devices Flying Wires (FW) Sync Lite Ion Profile Monitors (IPM) aah,6/20/2000.
Development of a Chromaticity measurement application using Head-Tail phase shift technique.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Digital Filter Mode Switch Closed Orbit Mode Fast Abort Buffer Slow Abort Buffer Profile Frame Buffer Display Frame Buffer - Switch activated every 2ms.
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
F Tevatron Software Digital Receiver Beam Line Tuner Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Instrumentation Meeting July 13, 2005.
Key Specifications for Tevatron BPM Hardware Architecture Choices Jim Steimel.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
Beam diagnostics control for J-PARC LINAC Guobao SHEN J-PARC Center Japan Atomic Energy Agency Mar
11 Overview of the Tevatron Collider V.S. Morozov Old Dominion University Muons, Inc. Collider Review Retreat, Jefferson Lab, February 24, 2010.
● 08:30 Loaded by mistake squeeze function to 2 m  Dumped beams ● 10:30-13:00 Test of new algorithm for long. Emittance blow-up to minimize oscillations.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation and Experimental Results of SSRF Top-up Operation Haohu Li, Manzhou Zhang SSRF Top-up Workshop, Melbourne
:00: Prepared new fill B1: Q X =0.293, Q Y =0.269; lifetime = 25h ✔ B2: Q X =0.297, Q Y =0.267; lifetime = 5h ✗ Strong 50Hz and 100hz lines.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.
Run II Operational Status and Plans Run II Meeting October 28, 2004 Dave McGinnis.
Check lists to mouse clicks Automation Session : WAO The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research laboratory,
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
All Experimenters' Mtg - Aug. 04, 2003 Week in Review: 07/28/03 –08/03/03 Doug Moehs – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
June 15, 2002David Finley to Aspen PAC Slide 1 Report on 132 nsec Operation Report to the Fermilab.
BPM Upgrade Projects Status & Technical Update Bob Webber DOE Review of Tevatron Operations March 2005.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
October 2002 Jean Slaughter SDA – Shot Data Analysis Outline Description of SDA Examples Plans for 2003 SDA is a system for acquiring and analyzing data.
S. Pordes - to part of CD 09/10/031 Introduction to some Beams Division jargon in some order…see how far we get:
Beam Line BPM Filter Module Nathan Eddy May 31, 2005.
AP2 Line & Debuncher Studies Status Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source January 9, 2006 Many people involved with providing the hardware and software that.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
A Possibility of Constant Energy Extraction at ATF2 A.Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Daresbury Laboratory Warrington UK FONT Meeting.
Fermilab February 17, 2003Recycler BPM Front-end1 Duane C. Voy
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Simultaneous Position Measurements of Protons and Anti-Protons in the Tevatron R. K. Kutschke †, J. Steimel, R.Webber, S. Wolbers, Fermilab*, Batavia,
Run II PMG 1/19/06 Pushpa Bhat 1 Run II Upgrades Status January 2006 Pushpa Bhat.
TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary Status, Motivation, and Directions.
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
TBPM Front-End Software Design Review L.Piccoli April
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
14/1/2011 LHC Lumi days - J. Wenninger 1 IP positions and angles, knowledge and correction Acknowledgments: W. White, E. Calvo J. Wenninger BE-OP-LHC.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Low-Emittance Tuning at CesrTA Jim Shanks Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2.
SDA- Shot Data Analysis Jean Slaughter DOE Review July 21, 2003.
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
TBPM Front-End Software Design Review
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Wednesday Morning 8: :30 end of fill study - octupole polarity inversion (Elias, Tatiana, Alexey, Georges, …): Goal: study the effect of the.
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Another Immortal Fill….
Presentation transcript:

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements2 Requirements First, Determine the uses of the BPM system. Then, Use + Type of Measurement (Closed Orbit, TBT, etc.) + Mode of Data Collection (Manual or Triggered) + Beam Structure and Intensity + Accuracy and Precision = Set of Requirements (for that particular use.)

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements3 Requirements (Example #1) Use: Measure the orbits during a shot setup. Then, Orbits during shot setup + Closed Orbit Measurement + Collected on TCLK event and saved in a buffer + 36 p bunches (300e9) + 36 pbar bunches (150e9) mm error = One of the requirements (out of several dozen)

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements4 Requirements (Example #2) Use: Measure the orbit on the first revolution for injection tune up. Then, 1 st turn injection orbit + Single Turn Measurement + Collected on TCLK event (Injection event) + 30 uncoalesced proton bunches (3e12 total) mm error = Another of the requirements

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements5 Uses of the BPM system  Measuring the closed orbit positions during collider operations.  TCLK triggered closed orbit data collection for orbit smoothing.  Maintaining the orbit positions at CDF and D0 during a collider store.  1st turn orbit and intensity data for commissioning and diagnostics.  Multi-turn orbit and intensity data for commissioning.  1st turn and TCLK triggered closed orbit data for injection closure.  Last turn data for tune up and diagnostics of the A0 beam dump.  Diagnosing aborts using a circular buffer of closed orbits.  Archiving orbits during shot setups with the (SDA.)  Fast time plotting (FTP) of orbits positions during aperture scans.  Lattice measurements using the 1-bump technique.  Lattice and coupling measurements using turn-by-turn (TBT).  Closed orbit measurements during accelerator studies.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements6 Types of Orbits The Closed Orbit Closed orbit: A particle with no betatron or synchrotron oscillation returns to the same position every turn. Not necessarily in the center of the BPM! BPM position settles on the closed orbit. Can use “averaging” to improve signal/noise. “fast” betatron oscillations. “slow” synchrotron oscillations.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements7 Types of Orbits The Single Turn Orbit Single turn measurement: Measure the position from a single pass of beam. Include the intensity measurement. BPMs synchronized to get orbit on the same turn. BPM position Intensity F0 -> A0 -> B0 -> C0 -> D0 -> E0 -> Restriction in the beamline!

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements8 Types of Orbits The Turn-By-Turn (TBT) Turn-by-turn measurement: Measure the position from a single pass of beam. Measure the position on consecutive turns. BPMs synchronized to get orbit on the same turn. Shows the coupling. Energy transferred from horizontal to the vertical plane and back.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements9 Methods of data collection. In closed orbit mode: (the default measurement type.) o Position of each BPM available as an ACNET parameter. (T:HPE11) o Position can be plotted with FTP. o Positions of all BPMs on manual request. (i.e. request orbit from T39.) o Positions of all BPMs saved in a buffer when triggered by a TCLK event. o Positions stored in a circular buffer that is halted by a Tev abort. Not all methods used in all cases.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements10 Methods of data collection. In closed orbit mode: (the default measurement type.) BPM electronics (t) BPM Pickup (t) can be: Protons OR Pbars Batch OR Bunch No requirement for separate channels.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements11 Methods of data collection. In closed orbit mode: (the default measurement type.) BPM electronics (t) BPM Pickup ACNET Parameter (T:HPE11) Fast Time Plot 50 Hz

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements12 Methods of data collection. In closed orbit mode: (the default measurement type.) BPM electronics (t) BPM Pickup Wait for TCLK = $ZZ + YY secs x

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements13 Methods of data collection. In closed orbit mode: (the default measurement type.) BPM electronics (t) BPM Pickup Manual Request from Application Page (T39)

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements14 Methods of data collection. In closed orbit mode: (the default measurement type.) BPM electronics (t) BPM Pickup X1X1 X2X2 X3X3 X4X4 X5X5 X6X6 X7X7 X8X8 X9X9 X 10, … Wait for 2 msec Halt on Tev Abort.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements15 Methods of data collection. In closed orbit mode: (the default measurement type.) BPM electronics (t) BPM Pickup X1X1 X2X2 X3X3 X4X4 X5X5 X6X6 X7X7 X8X8 X9X9 X 10, … Wait for TCLK = $75

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements16 Accelerate Tevatron accelerates beam from 150 GeV to 980 GeV. Orbits collected at 150 Gev, 200 Gev, 300 Gev, …, 980 Gev.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements17 Orbits up the ramp 150 Gev 200 Gev 980 Gev 900 Gev

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements18 Methods of data collection. In closed orbit mode: (the default measurement type.) BPM electronics (t) BPM Pickup ACNET Parameter (T:HPE11) Fast Time Plot 50 Hz X1X1 X2X2 X3X3 X4X4 X5X5 X6X6 X7X7 X8X8 X9X9 X 10, … Wait for TCLK = $75 X1X1 X2X2 X3X3 X4X4 X5X5 X6X6 X7X7 X8X8 X9X9 X 10, … Wait for 2 msec Halt on Tev Abort. Wait for TCLK = $ZZ + YY secs x Manual Request from Application Page (T39)

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements19 Methods of data collection. In single-turn mode: BPM electronics (t) BPM Pickup 1.Arm for single turn measurement. 2.BPM “electronics” ready in 1 msec. 3.Wait for TCLK trigger 4.Collect single-turn position and intensity 5.Store data in buffer 6.Return to Closed Orbit Mode in 1 msec. Arm can be on TCLK, State Device Transition, or Manual Request. All BPMs must collect position and intensity on the same revolution.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements20 First turn orbits during startup This plot shows the proton orbit on the 1 st turn after injection after a startup. +5 mm -5 mm Beam injected here.Source of error here.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements21 Methods of data collection. In TBT mode: BPM electronics (t) BPM Pickup 1.Arm for TBT measurement. 2.BPM “electronics” ready in 1 msec. 3.Wait for TCLK trigger 4.Collect position and intensity for 1024 turns 5.Store data in buffer 6.Return to Closed Orbit Mode in 1 msec. Arm can be on TCLK, State Device Transition, or Manual Request. All BPMs must collect position and intensity on the same revolution.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements22 Data in an Orbit Frame Information Contained in the Orbit Frame Data. o Status or Error Code o BPM Azimuthal Position o Trigger Settings o Closed Orbit/Flash Mode Setting o Proton/Pbar Setting o Batch/Bunch Setting o Size of Data Array o Trigger Event for Current Data Acquisition o Arm Event for Current Data Acquisition o Array of: Position readings Intensity readings Time stamps The precision of the time stamps are o Single turn or TBT mode:1 μs (3  rms) o Closed orbit mode:500 μs (3  rms)

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements23 Uncoalesced Beam Bunch structure with uncoalesced protons in the Tevatron. There is a group of 20 to 30 consecutive bunches spaced one RF bucket (18.8 nsec) apart followed by a gap of ~20  sec without beam before the group returns after one revolution. The lower figure shows the beam over a little more than one revolution and the upper figure zooms in on the consecutive bunches.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements24 Coalesced Beam 36 x 36 configuration 396 nsec bunch spacing 3 x 12 proton bunches 3 x 12 pbar bunches

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements25 Collision point cogging After accelerating, the relative timing of the protons and pbars is changed. This is done by a process called cogging. Proton and pbar bunches now cross at CDF and D0.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements26 Cogging, crossings, BPMS Cogging affects locations of proton and pbar bunch crossings. Has implications for separating proton and pbar signals at the locations of the BPMs

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements27 Inject final pbars 36 bunches of coalesced pbars injected for bunches at a time. Bunches are in three groups of 12. Bunches are spaced 21 RF buckets (396 nsec) apart. Injected on the helical orbit (with separators on.)

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements28 Tevatron Separators Protons C0 B0 A0 D0 F0 E0 Antiprotons H,V H H V V Electrostatic separators are used to separate the proton and pbar orbits transversely … except at the IPs where the protons and pbars collide head-on.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements29 Helical orbits Orbit changes for protons when the electrostatic separators are used. Pbar orbits change in other direction. EFACBD Horz Vert Scale is +/- 10 mm. ~100 BPMs in each plane Six sectors in the Tevatron

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements30 Intensities Range of intensities and bunch lengths expected in Collider Run II. Particles/bunch Number of bunches Bunch length (3  value in nsec) Uncoalesced Protons 3e9 to 30e to 10 Coalesced Protons 30e9 to 350e91 to to 10 Coalesced Antiprotons 3e9 to 150e91 to to 10

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements31 Accuracy Measurement range Range of positions, relative to the BPM center, over which the BPM measurement must be valid and meet the accuracy requirements. BPM system accurate over a range of  15 mm from the center. …. beyond this range -> get the sign right

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements32 Accuracy Absolute position accuracy Determine how accurately the BPM system measures the position of the beam for all beam conditions, for the entire range of positions, for long periods of time (years), and when parts of the BPM system or BPM electronics are replaced. It is sufficient for the BPM system to have a 3  absolute position accuracy of 1 mm. Hard to actually confirm this measurement.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements33 Accuracy Long term position stability Essentially this requirement limits the amount of drift allowed by a BPM over the period of a week, for consecutive stores, or after a shutdown. The requirement on the long term positions stability is a 3  drift of 0.02 mm per week. Maybe should be 0.05 mm per week?

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements34 Accuracy Change in BPM measurement ± 1.5% of the slope Change in BPM measurement Change in beam position Slope of response at center of BPM BPM response Envelope of BPM response at ± 1.5% of the slope Definition of the linearity requirement for the Tevatron BPM. Note that the requirement on the linearity of the BPM response does not constrain the slope of the BPM response.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements35 Accuracy Relative position accuracy should be 5%.  xa is then change in the actual position of the beam,  xm is the measured position change of the beam, then  xm =  xa  5%. There should be a requirement stating that all BPMs have the same gain to within 1?%, 2%?

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements36 Accuracy Orbit position resolution The smallest change in beam position that the BPM system can reliably measure. For the most precise measurements the orbit position resolution is 3  of 0.02 mm. What is meant by resolution?

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements37 Requirements Table 3 Summary of the modes of Tevatron BPM operation and the requirements of the system for each mode. Measurement Purpose Beam Structure Data Acquisition Type Position accuracy and resolution Proton closed orbit during a store. 36x36.Manual. Buffered on TCLK. ACNET variable. FTP variable. As in Table 2 Pbar closed orbit during a store. 36x36.Manual. Buffered on TCLK. ACNET variable. FTP variable. Position resolution of 0.05 mm. Proton closed orbit during ramp and LB squeeze 36x36. Prot coal. Prot uncoal. Buffered on TCLK. ACNET variable. FTP variable. Position resolution of 0.05 mm. Pbar closed orbit during ramp and LB squeeze 36x36. Pbar coal. Buffered on TCLK. ACNET variable. FTP variable. Position resolution of 0.05 mm.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements38 Requirements Table 3 Summary of the modes of Tevatron BPM operation and the requirements of the system for each mode. Measurement Purpose Beam Structure Data Acquisition Type Position accuracy and resolution Proton single turn for injection commissioning. Prot uncoal.Single turn, triggered on TCLK. Position resolution of 0.1 mm. Proton closed orbit for injection commissioning. Prot uncoal.Buffered on TCLKPosition resolution of 0.05 mm. Proton single turn for injection tune up. Prot uncoal.Single turn, triggered on TCLK. Position resolution of 0.05 mm. Proton closed orbit for injection tune up. Prot uncoal.Buffered on TCLK.Position resolution of 0.02 mm.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements39 Requirements Table 3 Summary of the modes of Tevatron BPM operation and the requirements of the system for each mode. Measurement Purpose Beam Structure Data Acquisition Type Position accuracy and resolution Closed orbit circular buffer. 36x36. Prot coal. Prot uncoal. Pbar coal. Circular buffer halted on Tevatron Abort. Aperture scansProt coal. Prot uncoal. Manual. Buffered on TCLK. ACNET variable. FTP variable. As in Table 2 Lattice measurements Prot uncoal. Prot coal. Manual. Buffered on TCLK. ACNET variable. FTP variable. As in Table 2 Lattice and coupling measurements Prot coal. Prot uncoal. TBT buffer.

9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements40 Conclusion Structure for defining requirements exists Number of issues (i.e. average out synchrotron oscillation?) Lots of questions to answer! Justification is weak.