ANRS C05 HIV-2 Cohort Clinical case management S Matheron Hopital Bichat – Claude Bernard Université Denis Diderot Paris 7.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Severe morbidity among HIV- infected patients : a comparison between a Brazilian and a French clinic based observational cohort FIOCRUZ: Prof B Grinsztejn.
Advertisements

Tuberculosis incidence and risk factors among adult patients receiving HAART in Senegal: a 7-year cohort study Assane DIOUF et al. IRD/UMR 145 CRCF, CHNU.
Monica Gandhi MD, MPH Associate Professor and Women’s HIV Clinic provider, HIV/AIDS Division San Francisco General Hospital/ UCSF Safe Poz Love, U.S. Positive.
Should we treat HIV Controllers ? IAS 2013 Pr Olivier Lambotte Department of internal medicine and clinical immunology Bicêtre Hospital, University Paris.
Natural and induced control of HIV infection: differences and similarities VISCONTI Study Asier Sáez-Cirión, PhD Unité de Régulation des Infections Rétrovirales.
Morbidity During the 5 Years Following Initiation of Protease Inhibitor Therapy in HIV-infected Patients. Vincent Le Moing 1, Geneviève Chêne 2, Lise Cuzin.
Virologic and immunologic response following antiretroviral therapy initiation among pregnant and postpartum women with acute HIV-1 infection: MOPDB0101.
Cost-effectiveness of different starting criteria of antiretroviral therapy in Mexico. Caro Y., Colchero A., Valencia A., Bautista-Arredondo S., Sierra.
DNA methylation as an epigenetic marker in HIV-2 disease in West Africa? Alberta Davis MRC Laboratories, Gambia 18th January 2013.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Factors associated with a low HIV reservoir in patients with prolonged suppressive antiretroviral therapy S. Fourati 1, R. Calin 2, G. Carcelain 3, P.
Rémi Cheynier Victor Appay Anne Hosmalin Gianfranco Pancino Vincent Vieillard Brigitte Autran Françoise Brun-Vezinet Charlotte Charpentier Diane Descamps.
1 Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
ACHI E V2 E, COHERE & EuroCoord Added value of collaborative studies Geneviève Chêne Inserm U897, Bordeaux Segalen University.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
HIV i-Base: SMART Study & CROI Feedback UK-CAB - Feb 2006 UK-CAB 24 February 2006 CROI Feedback: SMART Study Simon Collins.
Antiretroviral Treatment Monitoring: A Canadian Case Example Antiretroviral Treatment Monitoring: A Canadian Case Example Robert Hogg, PhD BC Centre for.
HIV acquisition after arrival in France among sub-Saharan African migrants living with HIV in Paris area. Estimations from the ANRS PARCOURS.
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES AT THE BOTSWANA- BAYLOR CHILDREN’S CLINICAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE: A REPORT TO THE WHO TECHNICAL REFERENCE GROUP ON PEDIATRIC CARE.
HIV-1 infected subjects treated with an autologous dendritic cell therapy (AGS-004), exhibited a significant reduction in viral load (when compared to.
TO EVALUATE EARLY ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE AND SAFETY OF A DUAL BOOSTED PROTEASE INHIBITORS REGIMEN INCLUDING LOPINAVIR/r (LPV) PLUS AMPRENAVIR (AMP) OR FORTOVASE.
Effect of 24 Week Intensification with a CCR5-Antagonist on the Decay of the HIV-1 Latent Reservoir IAS HIV RESERVOIRS WORKSHOP, 16 & 17 JULY 2010, VIENNA.
Challenges to replacing CD4 testing with viroloigical monitoring Andrew Hill, Pharmacology Research Laboratories, University of Liverpool, UK World AIDS.
The Use of Pooled Viral Load Testing to Identify Antiretroviral Treatment Failure Davey Smith 1, Susanne May 2, Josué Perez-Santiago 1, Matthew Strain.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 30 June - 3 July 2013 In chronically HIV-1-infected patients long-term antiretroviral therapy initiated above 500.
MRC Unit, The Gambia Leading scientific research to save lives and improve health across the developing world Development of quantitative HIV-2 viral load.
Data from the Collaborative HIV Paediatric Study (CHIPS) Reports up to March 2010* * Numbers are based on reports received rather than children seen to.
Simplification from Protease Inhibitors to Once or Twice Daily Raltegravir: the ODIS trial Eugenia Vispo, Pablo Barreiro, Francisco Blanco, Sonia Rodríguez-Novoa*,
ZIMBABWE AIDS CARE FOUNDATION NEWLANDS CLINIC Virological Outcomes in Adult Patients on Second Line ART, at Newlands Clinic Dr S. Bote.
Supported by: NIAID/NHLBI R24 AI067039, NIAID R21 AI Viremia copy-years: A measure of cumulative HIV burden among patients initiating antiretroviral.
12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching.
Progressive histological liver improvement after sustained virological response to therapy in HCV / HIV coinfected patients. Jose L. Casado,
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Viral tropism by geno2pheno as a tool for predicting CD4 decrease in HIV-1 infected naïve patients with high CD4 counts Viral tropism by geno2pheno as.
Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study Wafaa El-Sadr and James Neaton for the SMART Study Team.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Human Immune Deficiency Virus Infection Dr Huda Taha Sep 2015.
Design of the RESIST Study Program Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
Figure 2: Trends in currently prescribed antiretroviral therapy % prescribed HAART increased from 74% to 83% Trends in ART use, HIV viral load, and CD4.
Time to HAART Resume after Structured Treatment Interruption is Strongly Associated with HIV DNA Level in PBMC at Interruption: Results of the ANRS 116.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Hadziyannis SJ et al. EASL Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) (PEGASYS ® ) in combination with ribavirin (RBV): efficacy and safety results from a phase.
Short-Term Efficacy and Tolerance of ddI, 3TC, EFV regimen Once-Daily in HIV-1–Infected African Children: ANRS (Burkiname). Operational lessons from.
Long-term clinical and viro-immunologic outcomes of post-treatment controllers (PTCs) in the ANRS-VISCONTI study Laurent HOCQUELOUX, MD Orléans’ Regional.
Improving Patients Retention in Antiretroviral Treatment Programs: The experience of ARV Programs in Côte d’Ivoire Eugène MESSOU, MD, PhD CePReF- Aconda.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
Boston University Slideshow Title Goes Here Eliminating CD4 thresholds in South Africa will not lead to large increases in persons receiving ART without.
Novel Antiretroviral Studies and Strategies
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
PRESENTED AT THE 9TH IAS CONFERENCE ON HIV SCIENCE - PARIS, FRANCE
RALTEGRAVIR vs LPV/R FOR LATE-PRESENTERS PREGNANT WOMEN.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Acceptability of early HIV treatment among South Africa women N Garrett, E Norman, V Asari, N Naicker, N Majola, K Leask, Q Abdool Karim and SS Abdool.
Higher rate of antiretroviral therapy reinitiation among HIV-HBV coinfected patients in the episodic arm of the SMART study Dore G.1, Soriano V.2, Neuhaus.
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Validating Definitions of Antiretroviral Treatment Failure in Malawi
A. Stepanov, A. Kruk, N. Polovinkina, A. Vinogradova
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Dorina Onoya1, Tembeka Sineke1, Alana Brennan1,2, Matt Fox1,2
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Impact of Baseline NNRTI Mutations on the Virologic Response to TMC125 in the Phase III Clinical Trials DUET-1 and DUET-2 J Vingerhoets, A Buelens, M.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Presentation transcript:

ANRS C05 HIV-2 Cohort Clinical case management S Matheron Hopital Bichat – Claude Bernard Université Denis Diderot Paris 7

Open, multi-centric national cohort - since investigating centers patients included (June, 2011) since 2007 ANRS HIV-2 cohort Clinical, epidemiological, biological and therapeutic follow-up –/ 6 months* Virological follow-up – untreated patients –/ 6 months * –/ 3 months if plasma VL>100copies/ml –treated patients –M1, / 3 months * + in case of intermediate event Inclusion criteria HIV-2 Infection only ≥ 18 years old, > 1 year in France IAS 2011, ANRS satellite, HIV-2, 19 th July 60% women 50% > 40 years 75% from subsaharan Africa (WA) 24% previously given cART Year of HIV-2 diagnosis

ANRS CO5: Patients’ characteristics CD4 counts (median) At inclusion CDC stage (n=719) A B C N (%) 83.3% 4.4% 12.3% 37% 47% 18% 35% 18% 30% 51% % 26% 95% 70% IAS 2011, ANRS satellite, HIV-2, 19 th July A B C (Tuberculosis 44 %)

ANRS CO5: Patients’ characteristics Detectable plasma RNA CD4 counts (median) Median : 2.8 log At inclusion CDC stage (n=719) A B C Plasma RNA >100 copies/ml (n=235) CD4+ T lymphocytes >500/mm 3 [ ]/mm 3 <300/mm 3 Follow-up (n=702) Lost of follow-up cART initiation (n=488) Survival at 5 years Non progression to AIDS at 5 years N (%) 83.3% 4.4% 12.3% 37% 47% 18% 35% 18% 30% 51% % 26% 95% 70% IAS 2011, ANRS satellite, HIV-2, 19 th July

ANRS CO5: Patients’ characteristics Detectable plasma RNA CD4 counts (median) Median : 2.8 log At inclusion CDC stage (n=719) A B C Plasma RNA >100 copies/ml (n=235) CD4+ T lymphocytes >500/mm 3 [ ]/mm 3 <300/mm 3 Follow-up (n=702) Lost of follow-up cART initiation (n=488) Survival at 5 years Non progression to AIDS at 5 years N (%) 84% 4% 12% 38% 47% 18% 35% 18% 30% 51% % 26% 95% 90%

ANRS CO5: Patients’ characteristics Detectable plasma RNA CD4 counts (median) Median : 2.8 log At inclusion CDC stage (n=719) A B C Plasma RNA >100 copies/ml (n=235) CD4+ T lymphocytes >500/mm 3 [ ]/mm 3 <300/mm 3 Follow-up (n=702) Lost of follow-up cART initiation (n=488) Survival at 5 years Non progression to AIDS at 5 years N (%) 84% 4% 12% 38% 47% 18% 35% 18% 30% 51% % 26% 95% 90%  Natural history  Response to cART

Drylewicz J et al, AIDS, HIV-1 HIV-2 _49 cells/ml PY _1.01%/year _9 cells/ml PY _0.04%/year Comparison of viro-immunological marker changes between HIV-1 and HIV-2-infected patients (n= 6707/ 592) IAS 2011, ANRS satellite, HIV-2, 19 th July

Comparison of viro-immunological marker changes between HIV-1 and HIV-2-infected patients 8 HIV-2 HIV-1 _49 cells/ml PY _11 cells/ml PY Drylewicz J et al, AIDS, 2008 IAS 2011, ANRS satellite, HIV-2, 19 th July

Non progressor and HIV controllers patients ANRS CO5 HIV-2 HIV-2 patients with at least one follow-up available since 2009 with known date of HIV diagnosis n=357 HIV-2 infection ≥ 8 years n=221 At least 3 plasma viral loads and CD4 in the last five years n=176 Asymptomatic patients n=119 Antiretroviral naïve patients n=60 CD4 nadir ≥ 500 cells/µl n=36 « LTNP* » CD4 nadir ≥ 600 cells/µl n=26 « LTNP** » CD4 slope ≥ 0 over the last 5 years n=8 « Elite-LTNP » 1,5% Among which 5 HIV controlers and 5 Elite controlers HIV infection ≥ 10 years n=44 90% of pVL ≤ 500 copies/ml n=40 « HIV controlers » 9% Last pVL ≤ 100 copies/ml n=37 « Elite-controlers » 8;8% Among which 23 LTNP and 5 Elite LTNP 6%

Treatment Clinical case management in the setting of cohort study  features and specificities of HIV-2 infection – Fewer patients – Slower infection » Fewer clinical events » Slower CD4 decrease – Lower viral replication – Viral load quantification » Threshold 100 cp/ml – Fewer potent drugs – Resistance pathway  data through retrospective studies currently higher evidence-based level of knowledge on treatment  Viral load can’t be used as primary endpoint  Limited options for second and further lines

lopinavir/r - containing cART (29 naïve patients, ) – Response at W24 : + ≥ 50 CD4 at M6, and VL < 100 cp/ml = 59% – Median CD4 gain W24+71 (28) W (19) W (13) A Benard, AIDS, 2008 ANRS CO5: Response to cART Estimated CD4 slope W0-W12 : +23 CD4/mm3/mth W13-W96: +8 CD4/mm3/mth IAS 2011, ANRS satellite, HIV-2, 19 th July

Drylewicz, AIDS, /mth +24/mth log/m- 0,62 log/m + 46/y - 2,88/y Comparison of viro-immunological marker changes between HIV-1 and HIV-2-infected patients IAS 2011, ANRS satellite, HIV-2, 19 th July match according to VL at D0 (>3.5 versus 3.5 log10 cp/ml)

M0-M3 +12/mm 3 /month + 6/mm 3 /month p=0.24 M4-M12 +76/mm 3 /year - 60/mm 3 /year p=0.002 Estimated CD4 cell count changes (n=158) IAS 2011, ANRS satellite, HIV-2, 19 th July ACHIeV2e : 3 INTI vs 2 INTI+PI/r as 1 st line N=44N=126 Bénard, CID, 2011

M0-M log 10 cp/month -0.4 log 10 cp/month p=0.02 M4-M log 10 cp/ml/year log 10 cp/ml/year p=0.19 Estimated HIV-2 RNA changes in patients with detectable values at treatment initiation (n=67) IAS 2011, ANRS satellite, HIV-2, 19 th July ACHIeV2e : 3 INTI vs 2 INTI+PI/r as 1 st line Bénard, CID, 2011

Case reports –Experienced patients (several cART failures) ANRS CO5 raltegravir including cART

Recommendations – First line 2 INTI + PI/r : LPV, or DRV/r or SQV/r – 2 nd line ? Same strategy as for HIV-1 –Tolerance, observance, PK, and genotype Integrase inhibitors Anti CCR5 Clinical case management

Questions : Start earlier ? Start stronger ?  impact on tolerance, observance ?  which options for 2 nd line ? Clinical research –Evaluation of new treatment strategies International network –Randomized trial Clinical case management

Investigateur coordonnateur Sophie Matheron SMIT, Bichat-Claude Bernard Coordination virologique Francoise Brun-Vézinet, Laboratoire de Virologie, Bichat-Claude Bernard Florence Damond Coordination immunologique Brigitte Autran, Laboratoire d’immunologie cellulaire, Pitié-Salpétrière Coordination méthodologique Genevieve Chêne, NSERM U593, Bordeaux Antoine Bénard Monitorage Dien Le, SMIT, Bichatt Statistique et informatique Audrey Taïeb, INSERM U593 HIV-2 cohort Clinical centres Germany: Jürgen ROCKSTROH, Carolynne SCHWARZE-ZANDER Netherlands: Frank DE WOLF *, Ard van SIGHEM *, Peter REISS Maarten SCHIM VAN DER LOEFF Portugal: Francisco ANTUNES* Emilia VALADAS * Kamal MANSINHO * Spain: Vicente SORIANO* Ana TREVINO * Carlos TORO * Berta RODES * Switzerland: Jürg BÖNI * Martin RICKENBACH * Alexandra CALMY * UK: Jane ANDERSON Jennifer TOSSWILL Laboratories Belgium: Patrick GOUBAU *, Jean RUELLE Canada: Marc WAINBERG France: Brigitte AUTRAN Françoise BRUN-VEZINET * Florence DAMOND*, Diane DESCAMPS * François SIMON * Gambia: Akum AVEIKA, Matthew COTTEN Sarah ROWLAND-JONES Germany: Bernd KUPFER Italy: Claudia BALOTTA * Carlo TORTI Netherlands: Martin SCHUTTEN Portugal: Vitor DUQUE, Joao VAZ Ricardo CAMACHO *, Perpetua GOMES * Sweden: Jan ALBERT USA: Geoffrey GOTTLIEB UK: Deenan PILLAY, Bridget FERNS, Jeremy GARSON

19 ANRS CO5 HIV-2 cohort Acknowledgments Patients Investigators