 Presented By: NameTitleOffice PresentationTitle SRA International Webinar, February 23, 2012 Presented By: Marcia Hahn, Director, Division of Grants.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time and Effort Reporting Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) 3/1/2014.
Advertisements

NIH S ALARY C AP OSP ROUNDTABLE. The final passage of H.R on December 23, 2011 – Reduced the NIH salary cap from Executive Level I ($199,700) to.
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)
Effort Reporting: Total Professional Activity vs. Institutional Activity.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
Dr. Chellu S. Chetty Associate VP for Research and Sponsored Programs February 23, 2010 Time and Effort Reporting.
Salary Cap.  Salary cap is the difference between what is charged and the cap which is allowed by NIH Example (FY): PI Salary: $250,000NIH Cap (2011):
Effort Certification Date Presenter. 2 New fiscal policy coming soon Existing fiscal policy FI0205 –About 2 paragraphs about effort just isn’t enough.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Guidelines for Preparing an NIH Budget
 August 14, 2012 Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health, HHS Scarlett Gibb, Customer Relationship Manager, eRA Commons Kathy Hancock,
Preparing and Submitting Reports Della Brown White, Ph.D. Program Officer, Office of Health Equity Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health.
Successful Navigation of NIH Salary and Graduate Student compensation caps Kamala Upadhyaya, Donald Hammer and Elizabeth Richardson
Grant Management Webinar Presenters – Karla Freeman – Beth Romero – Chris Epoca.
Effort Reporting and PARs What You Need to Know Before You Sign Your PAR January 24, 2013 Maja Marjanovic Director, Sponsored Programs.
Managing Your Grant: A Roadmap to the Finish Line Carol Gelormine Manager of Grant Accounting Division of Finance & Treasury Catherine Bruno Post-Award.
BUDGET BASICS FOR ADMINISTRATORS TIJUANNA DECOSTER, PH.D., MPA CHIEF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE.
Effort Certification Don’t Ignore It… Take credit for your efforts! Revised 7/11.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Uniform Guidance Update RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS TEAM MEETING FEBRUARY 2015.
1 All About Costs A Post-Award Primer NIH Regional Seminar Portland, OR June 2010.
DIVISION OF GRANTS OPERATIONS POST AWARD REQUIREMENTS Lois Hodge, Director.
LBNL Sponsored Projects Office
Grants Management Overview 2013 Minority Fellowship Program Grantee Meeting April 23-24, 2013 Salvador Ortiz; Maria Martinez;
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrator’s Forum February 2002.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
APRIL 16, 2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SESSION 4 OF SERIES III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
After the Award is Made…THEN WHAT? Bryan Clark Chief, Grants Management Officer Grants Management Branch Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child.
Hartford Hospital Research Institute Time and Effort Reporting Prepared By: HHC Office of Compliance, Audit and Privacy Angelo Quaresima, Research Compliance.
After the Award is Made…THEN WHAT?
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Got the Grant What’s next??????????? Joy R. Knipple Team Leader, National Institute of Mental Health July 26, 2006.
POST-AWARD GRANT MANAGEMENT June 23, 2014 Presented by Arina V. Kramer Grants Management Specialist Office of Grants Administration, NCI.
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SESSION 2 OF SERIES III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON.
Washington University Washington University Hilltop Campus Research Administrator’s Forum March 2002 Presented by The Research Office and Sponsored Projects.
Task Force on Federal Grant and Contract Compliance: Implementation Activities Dr. Jack Finney and Dr. Bill Knocke.
1 WUSM RA Forum September 2006 Grants & Contracts.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Sharing for Sponsored Programs College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources March 19, 2010.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Policies and Procedures for Summer Supplements on Federal Awards April
NIH S ALARY C AP G UIDELINES Presented to Campus-Wide Business Managers March 15, 2012.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
EFECS Application of New Salary Cap MRAM - March 13, 2014 Michael Anthony Management Accounting & Analysis University of Washington.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
FY 2011 Budget Period Progress Report Cheri Daly
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry Partnerships David Garcia 1.
1 WUSM RA Forum September 2007 Grants & Contracts.
BUDGET BASICS FOR ADMINISTRATORS TIJUANNA DECOSTER, PH.D., MPA CHIEF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
Roundtable – November 21, 2013 Haldeman, Room 125.
Cost Sharing on Sponsored Awards Division of Financial Affairs OSP Roundtable October, 2015.
Quality Research Administration Meeting May 2013.
RAFT Forum Welcome!. Online Attendees To ask a question at today’s meeting, Steve Slater at
COBRE Post Award Management Christy Leake Grants Administration Branch National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH.
Prior Approval? Is That A Fact? Attention! Uniformed Guidance Audit Anyone? $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
Office of Sponsored Projects Federal Updates/Reminders ROUNDTABLE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 CAMPUS.
NSP II Project Directors Meeting JUNE 3, 2016 PRISCILLA MOORE & OSCAR IBARRA.
SUBMITTING PROPOSALS AFTER LEGAL CLOSE If you plan to collaborate with VUMC investigators, you will need to include a VUMC proposal for an outgoing billing.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 3, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants.
Post-Award Grant Administration
Unobligated Balance Review April 2018
Post-Award Grant Administration
Presentation transcript:

 Presented By: NameTitleOffice PresentationTitle SRA International Webinar, February 23, 2012 Presented By: Marcia Hahn, Director, Division of Grants Policy, OPERA, OER, NIH And Lynne Chronister, Asst. Vice Provost for Research & Director of Sponsored Programs, University of Washington

1.Salary Cap – What is it? 2.What the recent changes are all about and how they will affect NIH grantee institutions. 3. How should NIH awardees handle the salary cap in submissions and awards?

A legislatively mandated provision limiting the direct salary that an individual may receive from an NIH grant (commonly called salary cap) Provided annually in the Appropriations Language Limits the amount NIH can award and institutions can charge a grant; not the actual institutional base salary of the individual Caps salary, not fringe benefits and F&A costs Institutional base salary = annual compensation an organization pays for an individual’s appointment regardless if the individual’s time is spent on research, teaching, patient care or other activities Does apply to subrecipients Does not apply to consultants

In effect since FY1990 Initially tied to a dollar level ($120,000 then $125,000) In FY1999 began to be associated with an Executive Level of the Federal Executive Pay Scale Allowed for periodic increases as Fed salaries increased FY1999 = Executive Level III $125,900) FY2000 = Executive Level II $136,700) FY2001 – FY2011 = Executive Level I ($157,000 - $199,700) For summary information see:

Salary Limitation dropped to Executive Level II ($179,700) effective with awards with an initial award Issue Date on/after12/23/2011, the date the President signed the Appropriation into law See NIH Guide Notice NOT-OD :

Since effective date is 12/23/2011, FY2012 awards (competing and non-competing) with an initial award Issue Date on/before 12/22/2011 are subject to Executive level I ($199,700) for the FY2012 award only Future years (FY2013 and beyond) will be subject to Executive Level II ($179,700); unless legislation provides otherwise A list of grants in this cohort is found on the RePORT website at:

FY2012 Award = Executive Level I ($199,700) Future Year Commitments* = Executive Level II ($179,700) Competing Grants o Those based on detailed budgets will be revised to adjust future year commitments only o Modular Budgets Awards will not be adjusted Grantees apply EL I for FY2012 Grantees apply EL II for FY2013 unless legislation provides otherwise; rebudgeting of excess is allowed *Assumes legislation supports this provision and does not otherwise provide

Non-competing Awards (SNAP and Non- SNAP) o Awards will not be adjusted o Grantees apply EL I for FY2012 o Grantees apply EL II for FY2013 unless legislation provides otherwise; rebudgeting of excess is allowed

FY2012 Award & Future Year Commitments = Executive Level II ($179,700) Competing Grants o Those based on detailed budgets will be issued using EL II for FY2012 and all future years o Any previously issued on/after 12/23/2011 will be revised and adjusted using EL II when applicable o Modular Budgets Awards will not be adjusted Grantees apply EL II Rebudgeting of excess is allowed

Non-competing Awards (SNAP & non-SNAP) o Awards will not be adjusted o Grantees apply EL II for FY2012 o Rebudgeting of excess is allowed

Questions and Answers

Q: In previous years when the cap would increase January 1 st, grantees could begin charging at the higher cap effective with the date of the increase. Why is this change being handled differently? A: In previous years the salary level remained constant at Executive Level I, although the amount of Executive Level I routinely increased on/about January 1st. Grantees adjusted the rate charged based on the date of the expenditure and the Level I salary in effect on the date of the charge. This year the actual Executive Level changed effective the date the Appropriation was signed into law, 12/23/2011. Therefore, the applicable level is based on when the FY2012 award was initially issued, not when the actual salary cost is charged.

Q: The Guide Notice uses the term “initial Issue Date”. Where do we find that date and how do we know it is the “initial” date? A: The Issue Date is in the Header information of every Notice of Award (NoA). When an award is revised; the NoA shows “REVISED” next to the Grant Number field and the Issue Date reflects the date of that revision; therefore the “initial Issue Date” is the date on the FY2012 NoA that has no reference to “REVISED”. See next slide for example.

Q: Does reference to “initial Issue Date” refer to the date of the award for this budget period; or does it refer back to the initial issue date for the start of the project period? A: The change in salary cap is tied to the FY2012 Appropriation; therefore, any reference to Issue Date refers to the Issue Date of the FY2012 award.

Q: How can grantees tell if an award is issued with FY2012 funds? A: The Fiscal Year is a data field on the award located in SECTION I – AWARD DATA, in the Fiscal Information section as well as in the chart immediately below. See the following example.

Q: A grant was issued on/after December 23, The award was based on Executive Level I. Can the grantee rebudget funds awarded in excess of the new Executive Level II salary limit, or will NIH adjust the award? A: It depends. If non-competing, NIH will not adjust the award. Grantees must apply EL II and may rebudget any excess. If competing award based on a detailed budget, the NIH IC will revise the award when an adjustment for the lower salary limit is needed. Competing modular awards will not be adjusted for salary cap; however, grantees must apply Executive Level II. Rebudgeting of any excess funds is allowed.

Q: For awards issued on/before 12/22/2011, will future year commitments be adjusted to reflect Executive Level II? A: For competing awards (non-modular) issued on/before 12/22/2011, future year commitments will be adjusted when applicable to reflect EL II. (No adjustment will be made to the FY2012 award level for salary cap). Non-competing awards will not be adjusted to reflect Executive Level II for either the FY2012 award or any future year commitments; however grantees must still apply the appropriate rate.

Q: An award has a November 1 start date; for FY2012 the applicable salary cap is Executive Level I. If FY2013 begins under a Continuing Resolution, which salary cap level will apply to the FY2013 award? A: Generally, a Continuing Resolution extends the provisions of the previous fiscal year Appropriation. Therefore, unless there is language in the Continuing Resolution to state otherwise, Executive Level II ($179,700) would be the applicable cap for the FY2013 award since Executive Level II is the level provided in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, This would be regardless of what the applicable level is for the FY2012 award.

Q: In follow-up to the previous question, is there any difference if Fiscal Year 2013 begins with a Full Appropriation (rather than a Continuing Resolution)? A: Possibly. It will depend on the language provided in that law.

Q: Can a researcher impacted by the lower salary cap reduce their level of effort in accordance with the lower salary? A: The salary limit is a yearly rate applied to an individual’s institutional base salary rate. Since the institutional base salary rate for the individual remains constant, reducing effort would only help to minimize the impact to a particular grant. Further, some programs have minimum effort required; some grants may specifically restrict percent effort of an individual; and significant changes in effort could trigger a change in scope requiring NIH prior approval. All of these issues must be considered before reducing effort based solely on the lower salary cap.

Q: A grant with an initial Issue Date on/before 12/22/2011 was awarded and included funding for a “to be named” position; the “to be named” person will not begin employment until after January 1, Which salary limit is applicable? A: Apply Executive Level I for FY2012. The salary limit is tied to the limit in effect when the grant was initially funded, regardless when the individual’s employment became effective.

Q: An award initially funded with FY2011 funds is now going into a no-cost extension period that will span FY2012 and a few months of FY2013. What salary limit applies during the extension phase? A: Executive Level I ($199,700) would be the applicable limit for the entire length of the no-cost extension period.

Q: My institution will carry over funds from the FY2011 award into the FY2012 budget period. Which salary cap applies to the carryover? A: Assuming the carryover will be used for salaries, Executive Level I ($199,700) would be the appropriate level to charge for the carryover amount only. Accordingly, institutions will need to ensure adequate separation of accounts as necessary to demonstrate compliance.

Q: A new grant funded 12/1/2011 has a consortium to a subrecipient, but the consortium agreement isn’t finalized until 1/1/2012. Which salary limitation applies to this subrecipient? A: Executive level I ($199,700). The key date is the initial Issue Date on the Notice of Award to the Prime grantee; it is not the date of the consortium agreement. Prime grantees hold the responsibility for ensuring the appropriate salary limit flows to subrecipients.

Q: My organization is preparing an administrative supplement request that includes salary for a researcher affected by the cap. Which salary limit applies? A: Assuming that the administrative supplement (T-3) will be issued for the first time after 12/23/2011, then the applicable salary limit is Executive Level II ($179,700). This would apply to competitive revision applications funded on/after 12/23/2011 as well. Q: Does is matter when the parent grant was awarded in FY2012? A: No. Timing of the applicable cap is tied to the date the FY2012 Appropriation was signed into law. So T-3s issued on/after 12/23/2011 will be subject to EL II regardless of what level the parent grant is subject to for FY2012. (Note same principles apply for Competitive Revisions.)

Q: An institution submits a request for additional funds in Feb 2012 with salary that is impacted by the cap. The parent grant was awarded 12/1/2011 so is subject to EL1. The additional funds will be awarded as an administrative increase (not a separate supplement award) in March What will be the applicable salary cap for the increase? A: Since the increase is in response to a discrete request for additional funds, and the decision to support the request is made on/after 12/23/2012, Executive level II would apply. When a salary cap is involved, NIH ICs are strongly encouraged to award such an increase as a separate supplement (T-3) award to help manage this requirement. If an IC awards such an increase through a revised FY2012 award instead of a T-3, an award term will be included that specifically references that the additional funds are subject to Executive Level II. Note this does not apply to revised awards to restore funds to awards initially issued under a Continuing Resolution. This only applies when the revision is to provide additional funds in response to a discrete prior approval request.

Q: What salary limitation level should be used in applications and progress reports being prepared now for submission to NIH? A: NIH application instructions remain unchanged. Applications with a detailed budget should continue to reflect actual institutional base salary of individuals for whom reimbursement is requested. NIH will make any adjustment necessary using the applicable salary limit in effect at the time of award. In lieu of actual base salary, institutions may elect to provide an explanation in the budget justification narrative indicating that the actual institutional exceeds the current salary limitation. When this information is provided, NIH staff will make necessary adjustments to requested salaries prior to award. When preparing an application using the modular budget format, applicants should use the current salary limit when estimating the number of modules requested. For progress reports (non-SNAP), requested salary may not proportionally exceed any imposed salary limit.

Q:An application using a detailed budget was submitted using Executive Level I as the salary cap. Can the institution submit a revised budget that reflects the new, lower cap and rebudget the extra funds elsewhere? A: No.

Q: A progress report (non-SNAP) was submitted 12/1/2011 and in accordance with instructions showed salaries capped at Executive Level I. Will NIH adjust the requested budget to reflect Executive Level II? A: No, NIH will not adjust any non-competing awards for salary cap. In this situation, the grantee must apply Executive level II once the award is issued.

Q: A grant is multi-year funded in FY2011. It is now in its 2 nd year of the project period. What salary cap level applies? A: Since the entire project period was issued with funds from FY2011, Executive Level I will be the applicable salary cap for the entire project period.

Q: An FY2012 grant awarded 12/1/2012, transfers June 1, The initial FY2012 award is subject to Executive Level I. What would be the applicable level for the transfer award to the new institution? A: Since the transfer award is the initial award to the new institution, Executive Level II would be the applicable level for the new institution. NIH will not make any adjustment for salary cap in the transfer award; however, the new grantee must apply Executive Level II.

Salary Cap Summary Webpage: FY2012 NIH Guide Notice NOT-OD : List of FY2012 Grants subject to Executive Level I on RePORT: Salary Cap – FY2012 Frequently Asked Questions:

Institution Considerations

The policy references “issue date” not award date, project date or budget period. Check eRA Commons. Have you set up a pre-award budget? o Need to track any pre-award spending when allowed 90 days prior to award. o Are alternative budgets being charged or do dreaded cost transfers need to be done to reconcile?

Can you track carry forwards to accommodate dual salary cap rates? Can your system keep track of supplements that may have dual salary cap rates? How will you track no-cost extensions that may be at the ELI and the next year award is at the EL II?

Will your effort reporting system accommodate two salary cap levels? If not, can a manual override be done? Faculty will need additional guidance on filling out effort reporting. A good time to remind them of the general requirements for effort reporting.

Do you have sub-awards that have been issued with the EL I that need to be revised? Have you let your sub-awardees know when budgets should be revised or that they can re-budget? Do you have flow through awards from a prime recipient of NIH funds? If so, have you been contacted regarding any flow through awards affected by the reduction in the cap?

Presenters: Future questions for NIH should be directed to: Lynne Chronister: Mike Anthony: SRA International: Rebecca Vandall x 212