Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.
Advertisements

Causes of Haze Assessment Mark Green Desert Research Institute Marc Pitchford, Chair Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
1 The Asian Aerosol Contribution to North American PM Pollution: Recognizing Asian Transport Composition and Concentration Modeling Regional Aerosol Burdens.
Technical Support System Review / / RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Workgroup Conference.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Worst 20% Hazes Across the Country Based on IMPROVE Speciation Data by Marc Pitchford August 2001.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Tribal Causes of Haze Representativeness Assessment Phase I Mark Green, Alissa Smiley, and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
Attribution of Haze Report Status Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting December 8, 2004 Tom Moore Marc Pitchford.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
WRAP 2004 Technical Work Elements Tom Moore March 24, 2004 Air Managers’ Committee §308/§309(g) Implementation Workgroup.
WRAP COHA Update Seattle, WA May 25, 2006 Jin Xu.
Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Case Study: Using the AoH Report for a Preliminary Look at Glacier National Park Trista Glazier March 2005 WRAP Implementation Workgroup Meeting San Francisco,
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
WRAP CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results Implementation Workgroup Meeting August 29, 2006.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute Presented at the RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting November 5, 2003.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center April 25-26, 2006 AoH Work Group Meeting Regional Modeling Center Status Report AoH Workgroup Meeting Seattle, WA April 25-26,
AoH Phase I Report Outline AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
RPO Monitoring Issues by Marc Pitchford, Ph.D. WRAP Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Co-chair.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Project Outline: Technical Support to EPA and RPOs Estimation of Natural Visibility Conditions over the US Project Period: June May 2008 Reports:
An Integrated Systems Solution to Air Quality Data and Decision Support on the Web GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot – Phase 2 (AIP-2) Kickoff Workshop.
Airmass History Analysis During High and Low Sulfate Days Bret A. Schichtel NPS/CIRA Fort Collins, CO BRAVO Study Data Analysis Meeting San Antonio, TX.
Causes of Haze Assessment Update for Fire Emissions Joint Forum -12/9/04 Meeting Marc Pitchford.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
Influence of the Asian Dust to the Air Quality in US During the spring season, the desert regions in Mongolia and China, especially Gobi desert in Northwest.
Draft, 2 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 1. Project Overview Ivar Tombach Regional Haze Data Analysis Workshop 8 June 2005.
Trajectory Calculations Trajectory or backtrajectory analyses use interpolated measured or modeled meteorological fields to estimate the most likely central.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study:  Understand the long-range, trans-boundary transport of visibility-reducing.
Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Attribution of Haze Project Inter-RPO Modeling Discussion Group May 25-26, 2004 Denver, CO.
Causes of Haze Assessment Update for the Haze Attribution Forum Meeting By Marc Pitchford 9/24/04.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update Jin Xu. Update Visibility trends analysis (under revision) Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002 (modeling.
Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update Combined Session – Emissions and Fire Emissions Joint Forums – Missoula, MT September.
Ambient Monitoring Data Summary: Dust WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Attribution of Haze Project Update Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting September 8-9, 2004 Worley, ID.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Weight of Evidence Approach: Soil and Coarse Mass Case Studies WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists,
Phase I Attribution of Haze Overview (Geographic Attribution for the Implementation of the Regional Haze Rule) or (an experiment in weight-of evidence)
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Asian Dust Episode (4/26/2001)
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Asian Dust Episode (4/16/2001)
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Causes of Haze Assessment Brief Overview and Status Report
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Attribution of Haze Workgroup Organizational Meeting
New CoHA Product Access Page & Representativeness Analysis
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Attribution of Haze Project Update
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)

Principal Tasks Monitor regional haze at locations representing all visibility-protected federal class I areas – IMPROVE provides these measurements ($0 from WRAP leveraging over $3.5M/yr.) Assemble, distribute and prepare summary report on all appropriate measurements – VIEWS, originally a WRAP only web data base with analysis tools provides this ($50k from WRAP leverages $200k from other RPOs) Assess the causes of haze by analyzing ambient data – a WRAP contract effort (the 3 rd year of a 4 year contract at $225/year)

Causes of Haze Assessment Overview of Past Years’ Accomplishments COHA web site summaries for every WRAP class I area –Maps showing NO x, SO 2 & reported fire emission within 20km of each site –Maps showing terrain, land-use, & other air quality/meteorological monitoring within 20km –Descriptions of the local climatologic & meteorologic factors that effect air quality –Descriptions of the aerosol species contributions to overall & worst/best visibility –Maps summarizing air flow patterns for all days, best & worst haze days, & extremes of particle components (more than 6000 maps based on over 26,000 back-trajectories/site) Support of Attribution of Haze Workgroup, Phase I Report –Trajectory Regression Analysis to identify source regions for light extinction and sulfate for all monitoring sites with a year or more of data Episode analyses for eastern sulfate, Asian & regional dust, smoke, etc. COHA training for the AoH workgroup and presentations at several WRAP meetings

Causes of Haze Assessment – 2005 Plan Task Overviews (completion date) –Complete trajectory regression analysis support of the Attribution of Haze Phase I report – (12/04) –Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002 (modeling base year) compared to 2000 through 2004 (RH baseline period) – (8/05) –Trends analysis of extinction & aerosol components – (6/05) –Continue case-study analysis of worst case days – (on-going) –Evaluate winds used in back-trajectory analysis – (9/05) –Communicate results via COHA web-site and WRAP (especially AoH) meeting participation – (on-going)

Causes of Haze Assessment – 2005 Plan Meteorological representativeness (complete by 8/05) –Generate 8-day back-trajectories of all WRAP IMPROVE aerosol monitoring sites (every 3 hrs, from 3 starting heights) for 2003 and 2004 to give 5 years of trajectories –Produce residence time maps for 2002 and the 5-year period (2000 – 2004), plus maps of ratios and of differences of 2002 and the 5-year period for each site for the warm and for the cold periods of the year (warm defined as April through September) –Interpret the maps for each monitoring site and document on the COHA web site

Causes of Haze Assessment – 2005 Plan Trends analysis (complete by 6/05) –Perform trends analysis of reconstructed extinction and major aerosol components for sites with 10 years of data, 1994 to 2003 (29 sites) –Identify the direction, magnitude, and level of statistical significance of all trends –Plot individual site trends and produce summary maps –Prepare descriptions of trends and explanations where possible and document in a new Trends section of the COHA web-site

Trend Analysis for 20% Worst Days in WRAP

Trend Analysis for 20% Worst Days in WRAP Sites with More Than 10 Years of Data ( ) Increase – statistically significant (P<0.05) Decrease - statistically significant (P<0.05) Increase - statistically insignificant Decrease - statistically insignificant * Size of the arrow is in proportion to the change rate (slope, unit/year) Bep Soil CM

Trend Analysis for 20% Worst Days in WRAP Sites with More Than 10 Years of Data ( ) - Continue OC EC SNitrate

Causes of Haze Assessment – 2005 Plan Continue case-study analysis of worst case days –Continue to do episode analysis (use of available data to understand extreme haze events) –Conduct PMF analysis on particle species data for groups of sites to statistically identify common factors (interpreted as effective source profiles) Assess the contributions, frequency, seasonality, etc of PMF factors to worst haze days for all WRAP sites Associate factors with transport pathways using trajectory analysis Document in a new PMF section of the COHA web-site – (complete by 11/05)

Site groupings from the TSSA attribution analysis in the Phase I AoH Report Will test use of these groups plus Alaska and Hawaii groups Plan is to run all data for group sites in a single PMF, then analyze the results separately for each site Comparisons of factors among sites in the groups and between different groups may help identify local, regional, and continental scale of factor influence Trajectory analysis may help identify source regions associated with various factors

Example of PMF Analysis for Crater Lake (CRLA1) – 6 Factors (ug/ug) Factor 1, secondary nitrate Factor 2, fine soil Factor 5, secondary sulfate Factor 4, Al artifact Factor 3, transportation Factor 6, fire

Crater Lake PMF Contributions From Source Factors (ug/m3) Secondary Nitrate Fine Soil Transportation Al Artifact Secondary Sulfate Fire

Time Series of PMF Contributions (ug/m3) in 20% Worst Days of 2002 For Crater Lake Outlier: Due to negative OC4 concentration Aerosol chemistry data

Example of PMF for Grand Canyon (GRCA2) – 5 Factors (ug/ug) Factor 1, Fire Factor 2, Secondary Sulfate Factor 3, Al Artifact + ? Factor 4, Secondary Nitrate Factor 5, Fine Soil

Grand Canyon PMF Contributions From Source Factors (ug/m3) Fire Secondary Sulfate Fine Soil Secondary Nitrate

Grand Canyon Monthly Average Contributions From Source Factors (ug/m3)

Time Series of Factor Contributions (ug/m3) in 20% Worst Days of in GRCA

Causes of Haze Assessment – 2005 Plan Evaluate winds used in back-trajectory analysis (complete by 9/05) –Obtain upper air wind measurements from about 12 sites (radiosonde, radar wind profiler & NEXRAD) throughout WRAP for 2000 to 2004 –Compare winds used in back-trajectory analyses to measurements –For 2002 also compare MM5 and trajectory winds to measurements and each other (presumes that the RMC will provide MM5 wind profiles for measurement sites) –Communicate results to the appropriate WRAP organizations and document on the COHA web site

Candidate Upper Air Monitoring Sites for Checking Trajectory & MM5 Wind Fields

Example Wind Field Analysis from the BRAVO Study

Figure 9 ‑ 1. Comparisons of MM5 and EDAS wind direction frequencies versus radar wind profiler measurements, by level above ground, for July-September 1999 at Big Bend National Park.