Academic Integrity, Student Misconduct, Deferred Exams and Special Consideration, Student Appeals Procedures, Equity and Access Plans and ANU Student Support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changes to the Assessment Procedures Manual for Quality and Standards Office.
Advertisements

WBS PLAGIARISM PROCEDURE
Quality &Validation Department (Q &V) BUE 1. Whats the Quality & Validation? 2.
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager.
2b. Serious Residential Offences Panel (SROP) RHUL Disciplinary Procedures 2a. Hall Disciplinary This will be held by the Residential Support Coordinator.
Cheating on College Campuses 83% of students cheat in some form 60% cheat on homework and see nothing wrong with it 19% cheat on exams Most likely to cheat:
Extenuating Circumstances Briefing for Chairs of Extenuating Circumstances Groups and Professional Support Staff.
Procedures for Dealing with Student Discipline and Misconduct Presented by: Linda Bird – Academic Registrar Adriana Jumelet – Secretary, Disciplinary Board.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY University of Arkansas at Little Rock Presented by: Darryl K. McGee, M.S. Office of the Dean of Students.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Student Integrity and Misconduct Training for Administrative Staff supporting the Misconduct Process.
Excellence - Education; Research; Knowledge Exchange Academic Appeals and ways to avoid them David Robinson Academic Services.
Mitigation and Extenuating Circumstances
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
Supporting & promoting Equality & Diversity through REF Dianne Berry, Chair REF E&D Advisory Panel Ellen Pugh, Senior Policy Officer ECU.
Academic Integrity at Griffith. 2 Definitions of Academic Integrity and Misconduct Perceptions and definitions vary between cultures and academic disciplines.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
School Deans appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for University Teaching The staff member whose teaching is being evaluated is informed.
School of Nursing Student Grade Appeal Procedure Prepared by cgalang Revised fkhoiny 4/2011.
Quality &Validation Department (Q &V) BUE 1 By: Nehal Osman.
Ohlone College Policy on Academic Dishonesty
Student Fitness to Practise
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
Cheating, Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
Entry to the Counselling Specialisation Student Presentation Bachelor of Applied Social Science (Counselling)
How not to cheat! (even by accident)
Enrolment in State Primary, Secondary and Special Schools EGPA (2006) Implementation and New Policies and Procedures Workshop – November 2006.
OMDOSHEAA 5th Conference “Conflict Resolution in Universities” Services We Present at UNE.
Curriculum & Assessment Information Dr. Emma C. Rainforth Acting Vice Provost for Curriculum and Assessment January 14, 2010.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
1 Academic Appeals STUDENT TUTORIAL Academic Advising Program in the College of Arts & Sciences and the General College.
Handling Complaints in Small and Specialist Institutions: Case Examples Siobhan Hohls Adjudication Manager 29 June 2010.
How to conduct an Academic Misconduct investigation in the FOA New policies and procedures effective September 2007 (Adapted for use in the FOA by Michael.
Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation Web Site Our core activities are the resolution and determination.
Grade Change & Incompletes Policy/ Procedure Auburn University Office of the Provost.
1 Academic Ethics An analysis of what constitutes CHEATING AND PLAGIARISM and the related consequences.
 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”
Review of University Policies and Procedures Academic Regulations.
Academic Washington State University Adam Jussel Director Office of Student Standards & Accountability.
Mitigating Circumstances 2015/2016 Leicester Medical School.
Academic Discipline: A Primer Donald McGillivray, 3 Nov 2010.
Cheating, Plagiarism Unfair Practiceaterials Quality Assurance Services Collaborations and Partnerships Group.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
N A T I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N O F I N T E R C O L L E G I A T E A T H L E T I C S Exception to a Standing Rule.
Academic Advising Syllabus Division of Undergraduate Studies Penn State Altoona Adviser Information Adviser: Office: Phone: Office Hours:
Mitigating Circumstances 2014 Leicester Medical School.
Excellence - Education; Research; Knowledge Exchange Academic Appeals and ways to avoid them David Robinson Academic Services.
Department name (edit in View > Header and Footer...) Academic Integrity and Academic Misconduct Presenter’s name Presenter’s title.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
Course Substitutions & Course Waivers Proposed New Policy AGC 1 st Presentation September 08, 2015 Patti Trepkowski and Diane Patrick.
MISSING THE SAFETY NET: (RE)DEFINING ‘EQUITY’ IN AUSTRALIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Dawn Darlaston-Jones, University of Notre Dame, Australia.
Academic Misonduct 1. Definition: Any act that compromises the academic integrity of the University or the educational process. 2.
Academic Integrity, Student Misconduct, Deferred Exams and Special Consideration, Student Appeals Procedures, Education Access Plans and ANU Student Support.
CASS Academic Integrity Briefing
Academic Misconduct Regulations
Mitigating Circumstances 2016/2017
THE ABA SITE VISIT: THE STUDENT SECTION
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
ASSESSMENT STRATEGY – INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS
Education Access Plans
University of Newcastle
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Assigning evaluators Deans (Education) appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching Dean (Education)
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
What is Academic Integrity?
Academic Integrity & Dealing with Academic Misconduct at UEL
The Financial Aid Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Appeal Process
Student Regulations Committee
Academic Misconduct Policy
Presentation transcript:

Academic Integrity, Student Misconduct, Deferred Exams and Special Consideration, Student Appeals Procedures, Equity and Access Plans and ANU Student Support Services Keturah Whitford, Director of Students and Learning

2 Academic Integrity Flow chart available here /cbe-flowchart-course-convenor.pdf /cbe-flowchart-course-convenor.pdf Academic Misconduct Rules available here

Academic integrity Marker identifies potential breach of rules Academic misconduct includes cheating, plagiarism, collusion, recycling, exam misconduct and engaging in conduct with a view to obtaining unfair advantage. Refer rules 5 – 8. Breach referred to course convenor 3

Academic integrity At that point the course convenor may decide Not to take the process further because (refer rule 17) –No grounds for deciding there student has engaged in alleged misconduct or –Breach is very minor - can only determine minor breach if Introductory course taken in student’s first year or first semester for graduate courses and The course outline provides that there may be a 10% reduction of total marks for minor breaches and the breach is a very minor mistake in referencing and An opportunity is provided in the course to learn appropriate academic integrity techniques 4

Academic integrity Or the course convenor needs to conduct an initial review (most usual course) –Write to the student with substance of allegation – refer rule 18 –Invite them to a meeting –Template letters available for this. –Purpose of the meeting is to determine if there is substance to the allegation and if there is to determine if it is poor academic practice or academic misconduct 5

Academic integrity Decision (see rule20) –No substance to allegation – advise student and Registrar –Academic misconduct – refer to Registrar (who will then generally refer to CBE Director of Students and Learning) –Poor academic practice – advise Registrar Defn see rule 9 Excusable due to mitigating circumstances (personal, emotional, health) Excusable due to unintended, inadvertent, careless or uninformed behaviour Not poor academic practice if severe or repeated. 6

Academic integrity Penalties for poor academic practice See rule 21 Resubmission of assessment Counsel the student Request student undertaking Reprimand student Change student’s marks for that assessment 7

Student Misconduct (other than academic misconduct) See Discipline Rules What is misconduct? See rule 3 for full definition Includes: –Disrupting a University activity –Damaging property –Falsifying documents for admission to university –Harassment, victimisation, discrimination –Behaving in intimidating manner –Falsifying medical certificate of academic transcript –Causing danger to health or safety of someone else 8

Student Misconduct What do you do about misconduct? –A report of misconduct should be made to the VC or a prescribed authority (CBE Dean or delegate, currently Director of Students and Learning) –The Dean may take no action or determine that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the student has engaged in misconduct and would then generally hold an inquiry – see rule 5. Range of potential penalties in rule 10 –Student may appeal to the appeals Committee see rule 20. 9

Deferred Exams and Special consideration Applications for deferred (previously called special exams are assessed centrally for final examinations and by the College for non-final examinations. See from clause 36 Course convenors receive notification about whether a student has been approved to sit a deferred exam Refer to Procedure: student assessment https://policies.anu.edu.au/ppl/document/ANUP_

Deferred Exams and Special consideration Applications for special consideration are received and noted centrally but forwarded to course convenors for consideration. Course convenors determine whether special consideration is to be applied taking into account: –A student’s overall performance and attendance –The severity of the event or condition and its impact on performance –Academic standing status –History of previous applications for special consideration 11

Deferred Exams and Special consideration  The outcome of the course convenor’s consideration may be that:  No consideration granted  Adjustment to individual assessment item result  Adjustment to course result  Additional supplementary assessment  Referral to support services  The course convenor needs to notify the applicant by advising whether their special consideration application is accepted. – see clause 58 12

Student appeals Refer to Assessment Rules After the final result is published the student can appeal the result by –Consultation with course convenor –Firstly consulting with the course convenor who must review the result and decide whether or not to amend the result and must notify the student of the decision made on the review (see Rule 10) – student has 20 days after publication of result to consult course convenor – important that course convenor or delegate is available in this time frame. 13

Student appeals Appeal to Director of Students and Learning –If, after discussing the final result with the Course Convenor and being notified of the Course Convenor’s decision on the review, the student considers that the result (as amended, if at all, by the Course Convenor) is inappropriate or incorrect because the established criteria of assessment or some aspect of the Assessment Rules or relevant policy or procedure has not been followed, the student may appeal to the Associate Dean (delegated in CBE to Director of Students and Learning) against that result. 14

Student appeals Director of Students and Learning considers the appeal and may conduct inquiries Director of Students and learning may –confirm the result appealed against; or –approve marks and the grade of a final result for the student (which may be different from the marks and the grade of result recommended by the Chair of Examiners). Decision to be notified to student within 20 working days of appeal. 15

Student appeals Appeal to College Dean (delegated to Associate Dean Education in CBE) –This further appeal is allowed on procedural grounds only –Must be made within 20 working days of notification of decision of Director of Students and Learning 16

Equity and Access Plans The University’s Access and Inclusion office assist student’s with a disability Based on medical evidence an Equity and Access plan is produced for eligible students. If you have a student who has an EAP approved you will be advised by and the plan sent to you. Any adjustments which might be required for that student are noted on that plan. Any adjustments which might be required for final examinations will be handled by Access and Inclusion and Examinations. 17

ANU Student Support Services It may be appropriate to refer to students to support services these include: –Dean of Students –Access and Inclusion –Counselling Centre –Academic Skills and Learning Centre 18