ATF Damping Ring in 2010 autumn Multibunch instability study 2011.1.13 Measurement (S. Kuroda, T. Naito and K. Kubo) and Calculation of ion trapping (Kubo)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CEPC BoosterDesign CEPC Booster Design FCC Week 2015, March, 2015 Marriot Georgetown Hotel Huiping Geng Presented for Chuang Zhang.
Advertisements

CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
CornellVideo Talk. Dec page 1 John Byrd Experimental studies of the fast- beam ion instability in the ALS- The Sequel John Byrd Lawrence Berkeley.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Recent observations of collective effects at KEKB H. Fukuma, J. W. Flanagan, S. Hiramatsu, T. Ieiri, H. Ikeda, T. Kawamoto, T. Mitsuhashi, M. Tobiyama,
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
10/18/2005 FII in damping ring L Wang1  Smaller (vertical) beta function  Long bunch spacing Both growth rate and tune-shift are small if there is a.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
Simulation of IP beam size with orbit jitter + wakefield in EXT-FF ATF2 Project Meeting K.Kubo.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Final results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS (26 and 55 GeV/c) G.
Preliminary RF and Beam Data Analysis Jeff Dooling June 26, 2007.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Status and Plan of Compton  -ray Generation at KEK-ATF Japanese Labs. : KEK, ATF group, Hiroshima University Tsunehiko OMORI (KEK) for 13 February 2014.
ATF2 beam commissioning status and beam time request Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 11 / 12 ATF2 Commissioning Meeting.
ATF DR Overview Introduction Low emittance history Present status S.Kuroda ( KEK ) GDE Review 3rd Apr.2013.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Analysis of 2008 Beam Instability Data S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, M. Plum HB2008.
J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Optics corrections in the ATF damping ring Jürgen Pfingstner, Yves Renier.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
Polarisation monitoring Sabine Riemann, Andreas Schälicke, Andriy Ushakov (DESY) Positron Source Group Meeting, October, 2009 University of Durham.
Results on recent technology developments at ATF - Beam extraction study by a Fast Kicker - N. Terunuma, KEK LER11, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2011/Oct/5.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Status of ATF Collaboration The unique test facility for ILC with a low emittance beam. Junji Urakawa, KEK LCPAC at KEK
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
1 H. Hayano ATF Status June/2004 H. Hayano ATF: emittance status beam study status plan nm-project collaboration & plan ATF review 6/17/2004.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Random ideas for discussion. Logging/storage We need to decide on the list of required variables to log and analyze for each fill For each variable, we.
ATF Fast Ion Study Plan N.Terunuma (KEK) Results in 2007, 2008 Vertical emittance studies at ATF Plan.
ATF2: Summary of Scheduling Strategy Session Grahame Blair Feedback and Feedforward systems Fast Kicker for ILC bunch train structure Laser-wire Shintake.
1 Fast kicker study Machine Time 2011/10/18~10/29(2 weeks) TB meeting 2011/01/14 T.Naito.
ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
2016/3/31 Fast kicker Experiment at ATF ATF2 - 40nm beam production, measurement Extraction kicker The difficulty of the beam extraction is that the kick.
Japan-US Collaboration /3/7 Japan-US Collaboration /3/7 Fast kicker development The beam extraction design from DR to the extraction line and.
1 Update on Ion Studies Guoxing Xia, Eckhard Elsen ILC2007 Workshop, May 30~Jun 2, 2007 DESY, Hamburg.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
CESR as Light Source David Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
1 1 H. Hayano and ATF group ATF Status August/2004 H. Hayano and ATF group Multibunch emittance Instrumentation developments Plans for run Multibunch.
Characterization of the Fast Ion Instability at CesrTA David Rubin Cornell University.
ISG – Damping Ring Physics and Design Group ATF – 2003// focus on the TRC challenge Marc Ross – 1.Instability about which little is known: Fast ion,
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
V.Shiltsev 1 Comments on What Kind of Test Facility(ies) the ILC Needs Vladimir Shiltsev/ Fermilab.
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
Intensity dependence of Beam size at IP and Wakefield in ATF2
Fast Ion Instability Study at DESY
Status of Fast Ion Instability Studies
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
ATF2 Recent Wakefield (Beam size Intensity dependence) Studies
Fast Ion Experiments at ATF
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Strip-line Kicker R&D at KEK-ATF
Fast ion instability WP 15
Fast Kicker R&D at ATF T.Naito(KEK) TILC09 18/April/ /11/27.
Junji Urakawa ( for collaborators ) March KEK at LNF
G. Arduini, R. Calaga, E. Metral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R
Monday 24 October hours of 25ns MD
Instability measurement plans at ATF
e- Cloud Studies-Tune Studies with 45 Bunch Trains
Monday 152 bunch operation summary
Presentation transcript:

ATF Damping Ring in 2010 autumn Multibunch instability study Measurement (S. Kuroda, T. Naito and K. Kubo) and Calculation of ion trapping (Kubo)

Damping Ring in 2010 autumn For single bunch, DR Emittance and Stability are good enough for the 1st goal (small spot size at IP). Emittance –As usual, emitt_y was pm. (X-SR mon.) Laser wire in DR did not work well. (Detector was changed for Laser-Compton study.) –Beta-function looks OK. –No important change since June BPM worked for COD and 1-turn. But turn-by-turn data could not be taken. Multi-bunch instability was studied. (2~3 shifts)

Multi-bunch instability Measurement in Nov Change number of trains, number of bunches/train and charge/bunch Measure beam size using X-SR profile monitor –Gate timing width 20 ms  Transverse oscillation is observed as beam size blow up. Turn-by-turn BPM did not work very well, but some oscillation could be observed. No time for preparation/tuning of Laser Wire Nonitor, which could have measured bunch-by-bunch projected beam size. Data taken on Nov. 10 (bad vacuum around kicker, large v-emittance) and 17 (better vacuum, small v-emittance)

Observation 1 No significant blow up (vertical oscillation) in one-train and two-train modes –up to 10-bunch/train and ~0.4E10 particle/bunch No significant blow up in three-train mode up to 3- bunch/train –up to ~0.4E10 particle/bunch Blow up (vertical oscillation) observed in three-train mode from 6-bunch to 10 bunch/train –Beam size (oscillation amplitude) depend on bunch intensity for each beam config.. But not monotonically.

3-train mode 10 bunch 7 bunch6 bunch yy xx yy

Observation in 3-train, 6~10-bunch/train Data was taken in “storage mode” (beam was stored. no injection/extraction) From beam size (projected) vs. intensity of each fill, –At very high intensity: Beam is some times stable (and sometimes unstable). –Lower intensity: Beam is always unstable. Beam size is monotonic function of intensity. Possibility of ion trapping?

Simple calc. of Ion trapping condition depends on beam condition and atomic number of ion.

Example of Trace(M) 3 train, 10 bunch, A=28, At the top of east arc Preliminary There is a small bug in this calculation

1/  y /(  x +  y ) Large variation in straight sections

Ratio of trapped region in DR (trapped length / circumference) Preliminary

Stability Depends on Amount of Trapped Ion ? Preliminary

Compare measurement and ion trap calculation 3 train, 7 bunch/train Preliminary

Compare measurement and ion trap calculation 3 train, 10 bunch/train Preliminary

Summary of Multi-bunch study Beam size measured by X-SR mon. changing number of trains, number of bunches/train and charge/bunch, in storage mode. –Gate timing width 20 ms  Transverse oscillation is observed as beam size blow up. No significant blow up (vertical oscillation) in one-train and two-train modes –up to 10-bunch/train and ~0.4E10 particle/bunch No significant blow up in three-train mode up to 3-bunch/train Blow up (vertical oscillation) observed in three-train mode from 6- bunch to 10 bunch/train –Beam size (oscillation amplitude) depend on bunch intensity for each beam configuration. But not always monotonically. At very high intensity: Beam is mostly unstable but sometimes not. Lower intensity: Beam is always unstable. Beam size is monotonic function of intensity. Simple calculation for ion trapping –Should be checked if it is correct. –May explain the observations qualitatively ?????