ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Enforcement Lessons Learned Unexpected Airborne Release Presented to EFCOG Regulatory &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emergency Preparedness and Response
Advertisements

Building Your SUSP Team Part II
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Contractor Business System Rule Revision #, Date (of revision) Presented By: Kendrick Dickerson, PA, DCMA Property Group May 3, 2013.
USF Research Integrity & Compliance eIRB Comprehensive Training 10/07/2014.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Safety and Health Programs
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Slide 1 FAA’s Special Technical Audit of Boeing and the Audit Resolution Plan.
EM - TRANSPORTATION. EM Office of Transportation - Organization & Responsibilities Basis of Organization & Responsibilities Basis of Organization & Responsibilities.
Software Quality Assurance Implementation Plan June 15, 2004 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Chip Lagdon Director Office of Quality Assurance Programs.
Implementing a Calibration Management System Cory Otto Principal Metrology Engineer, Boston Scientific 10 October 2012.
Safety & Project Management by NABEEH JUM’AH. Eye on Safety  Proactive  Reactive.
Safety & Health Programs.
Stephen M. Sohinki Director Office of Price-Anderson Enforcement ASQ 2005 National Energy and Environmental Conference September 18-22, 2005.
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Inspections.
Unit #4 Establishing Committee Expectations – Safety & Health Programs 1.
ACTIVITY NAME Former Naval Station Treasure Island, CA TIDA Board of Directors Meeting 9 July 2014.
International Atomic Energy Agency Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources Training Course on Technical Requirements to Fulfill.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Safety and Health Programs 1. Benefits of Effective Safety and Health Programs Reduce work related injuries and illnesses Improve morale and productivity.
OSHAX.org - The Unofficial Guide To the OSHA1. Benefits of Effective Safety and Health Programs Reduce work related injuries and illnesses Improve morale.
Procedures and Forms 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop April 8-9, 2008.
Environmental Restoration Projects Methods for Safety Culture Realization November 30, 2007.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration USDOT – PHMSA HMEP Grants Major Audit Findings NASTTPO April 25,
OAS Meeting August 2012 Jennifer Opila (CO) and David Allard (PA)
Work-Specific Hazard Checklist (WSHC) May 20, 2013 Mark Berkheimer, CHMM ORAU EH&S Specialist 3/Chemical Hygiene Officer 1.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part II.
1 Hosting an FDA Inspection: A Field Investigator ’ s Perspective Presented by Mihaly S. Ligmond Consumer Safety Officer US Food and Drug Administration,
Safety Auditors Conference 2005 A Practical Approach…….
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Operational Experience Metrics Task Team August 7, 2009.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Presentation to PAC R. Casey NSLS-II ESH Program Status May 25, 2007.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
Procedure Writing ALARA Radiological Safety and Response RPT-243-PE-2.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Sustaining Excellence in Radiological Operations Through Peer Surveillance C. Schaefer, CHP D.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
SDC Update June 5, SDC Update – June 2012 Investment Plans submitted to OCIO for approval – Core Network – Firewall – Storage OB2 Heat Reduction.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
PPPL is Committed to the Success of NCSX Rob Goldston, Director Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory August 15, 2007.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Enforcement Lessons Learned Ergonomic Manual Lifting and Material Handling Investigation.
V Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG) Safety Working Group Regulatory & Reporting Technical Subgroup Enforcement Letter: Suspect Documentation October.
Qualification & Training of Work Planners Steven K. Little Work Control Department Manager.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA UNCLASSIFIED Classified Information Security Event EFCOG Fall Workshop.
Matthew Moury Associate Under Secretary for Environment, Health, Safety and Security Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security EFCOG Executive.
Copyright – Disaster Resistant Communities Group – Initial Planning Conference.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Pipeline Safety Management Systems
NRC’s 10 CFR Part 37 Program Review of Radioactive Source Security
Release of Airborne Contamination From AFCI Glovebox
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
10 CFR Part 61 Low Level Waste Disposal Rulemaking Update
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
Contractor Business System Rule
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Discrete Radioactive Particle Issues Associated with a
Presentation transcript:

ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Enforcement Lessons Learned Unexpected Airborne Release Presented to EFCOG Regulatory & Enforcement Technical Subgroup Debbie Jenkins ORNL Enforcement Coordinator October 21, 2015

2 NNFD – 3525 Uptake Event Summary of Event In August 2014, Personnel were resizing and repackaging highly enriched uranium (HEU) material into an approved shipping container Work was performed on the 2 nd floor mezzanine in a Lexan enclosure Activity was not expected to generate airborne radioactivity and no ventilation was provided June – August 2014 received and repackaged 4 batches

3 NNFD – 3525 Uptake Event Unexpected operational conditions during shearing of 5 th package CAM alarm occurred during shearing operations – CAM was in general vicinity, but not intended to monitor this activity Alarm response was less than adequate –RCT investigated and reset alarm personnel believed there was no airborne risk anomalous operation or radon suspected –Second CAM went into alarm –Material was placed in safe configuration –Two employees remained in the general area conflicting priorities between alarm response and security –First CAM went into alarm again Dose assessment determined that seven personnel received inhalation uptake of HEU –Total committed effective dose below 5 % of the regulatory limit for all personnel

4 NNFD – 3525 Uptake Event Comprehensive investigation initiated to identify causes Direct cause – Unexpected airborne contamination exited shear enclosure and went unrecognized until monitors alarmed Root Cause – Incorrect assumption regarding airborne contamination potential resulted in inadequate planning of work and inadequate contamination control Contributing Causes –Legacy items with little know about specifications –No destructive size reduction previously conducted –SMEs not involved in work planned – missed opportunity –Staff did not immediately exit are upon first alarm –Surface contamination encountered during previous work evolutions did not trigger questions –Personnel authorized to re-enter work area without fully understanding hazards

5 NNFD – 3525 Uptake Event Broad corrective actions focusing on safety culture improvements included the following Radiological Protection –Intensive four-day proficiency training completed for all Rad staff –Procedures were revised to add more clarity on alarm response actions and expectations –Radiological Engineer staffing levels and involvement in work planning increased –RWP development process strengthened –Qualification process for RCTs and supervisors revised to focus on facility-specific competencies –RCT continuing training redesigned to emphasize the need for more realistic and challenging hands-on practice drills Line Organization –Procedures updated and clarified Work control Pre-job briefing Alarm and abnormal response Work Acceptance Prioritization of safety vs. security issues –Staff re-trained to new expectations –Drill program enhanced to include facility specific drills

6 NNFD – 3525 Uptake Event In January 2015, Notice of Intent (NOI) to Investigate was received from OE Call from OE to provide CA clarification Would be recommending CO to OE NOI received Management and Site Office approval of CO request already in place CO request drafted and ready for final review Unallowable cost letter issued Signed CO agreement - $ 112, 500 Notified unofficially that CO would be granted Called OE to notify that a CO would be submitted within a week OE agreed to hold off on document request and scheduling of investigation CO request transmitted to OE Call from OE requesting CA clarification OE Enforcement Specialist communicated that he would be recommending the CO to his management May 20 Jan 16 Jan 29 Feb 12 Jan 20 Jan 23 Friday Tuesday Friday Thursday Draft CO agreement received for review Apr 13

7 NNFD – 3525 Uptake Event Developed 5-page Consent Order Request Acknowledgment of significance of event Mitigating Responses –Compensatory measures –Investigation/corrective action summary Laboratory-Wide Safety Culture Improvement Initiatives –Safe Conduct of Research –Front line supervisor training –Safety mentoring Radiation Protection Program Improvements –Organizational changes –Trending and analysis –Radiation Monitoring –Training and drills –Lessons learned

8 NNFD – 3525 Uptake Event Rationale for why a CO was warranted Demonstrated and consistent history of noncompliance reporting (NS, WSH, Security) Demonstrated history of strong radiological program performance and commitment to continuous improvement Prompt and thorough reporting of circumstances surrounding the release Comprehensive and aggressive investigation of event Timely development of corrective actions addressing not only issues specific to the event, but also underlying cultural issues Transparent communication and interaction with ORNL Site Office regarding the event and path forward