Carolin Vierneisel This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Every Child Matters: Change for Children Emerging Practice.

Advertisements

Strategic Management & Planning

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.

Paul Vaughan National Project Manager HCA Initiative, WiPP OVER TO YOU! BUILDING ON THE WORK OF WIPP.

This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Amman – 23 April 2012 RCBI ‘handover’ meeting Jordan.

CREATING CHILD SAFE ENVIRONMENTS IN SPORT A national approach to defining, developing and implementing child safe environments throughout an organisation.

Greater Involvement of People Living with HIV (GIPA)

MADRID April European Commission Information Society and Media GaLA Game and Learning Alliance The European Network of Excellence on Serious Games.

The perception of psychosocial risks at work: the PRIMA-EF survey among EU stakeholders Rome, 5 November 2008 Sergio Iavicoli International Conference.

Matthias Wentzlaff-Eggebert, BZgA, Cologne, Germany This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which.

Step 1 - Community Engagement and Analysis

NETLIPSE Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool Professor Hans-Rudolf Schalcher, ETH Zürich Amsterdam, 21 April 2009.

Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment

There is no reason to pay close attention to this unless you are going to conduct a proposal for a needs assessment.

The Challenge … children die each day due to poverty.

European Union | European Regional Development Fund Zooming in Interreg Europe National Info Day 12 May 2015, Paris Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer.

Practitioners versus Academics Software Engineering Problems Academics Practitioners.

More than Knowing At Mercy College Karin Gilbert & Michelle Cotter.

Name Speaker This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European.

A Comparative Analysis of the Social Dimension surrounding the project partners Hannah Leichsenring Ghent | 12. November 2013.

UNECE Working Party on Rail Transport Workshop on Passenger Accessibility of Heavy Rail Systems Geneva 19 November 2009 Policy and Legislative Context.

1 Evaluation is a Partnership Dr. Darla M. Cooper Associate Director Center for Student Success Basic Skills Coordinators Workshop September 17, 2009.

EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.

State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources The Global Strategy for the Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources.

Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.

Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,

Elements of a Model KM Framework for Country Offices United Nations Development Programme Knowledge Management Workshop UNDP Bhutan August 2004.

WHO European Ministerial Conference on Couteracting Obesity European Commission Workshop About Shape Up.

Christiana Noestlinger & Bea Vuylsteke, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention.

Cluster Management Scorecard FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)

Grundtvig Learning Partnership Project TeachingFlex.

Strategies for improving civil registration and vital statistics systems Discussant: Dr AJ Lanyon Australian Bureau of Statistics 29 June 2011.

ASEF Risk Communication for Public Health Emergencies, 2015 Overview.

Summary of Local Seminars & Focus Groups 20/06/ Athens WP8 – TESTING II coordinated by IFI.

GROUP N. 1 Three documents / presentations reflecting Labour education policy of a national trade union centre Basic structure and design of a national.

Name Speaker This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European.

Maximising the Use of Evaluation Reports 1 Thomas Alveteg HIV Joint Evaluation Workshop, Limbé, March 15 –

Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back.

This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European Union within.

How the course works – content, CUEGIS concepts and cases!

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

Name Speaker This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European.

Human Resource Management, 4th Edition © Pearson Education Limited 2004 OHT 9.1 A Model of Human Resource Development I = Individual O= Organisation E=

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under.

Role of Policy in Behavior Change. Contents of the Lecture.

Role of Policy in Behavior Change. Contents of the Lecture.

Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.

Participation in the Process of Brownfield Regeneration Dagmar Petríková, Matej Jaššo „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.

1 CREATING AND MANAGING CERT. 2 Internet Wonderful and Terrible “The wonderful thing about the Internet is that you’re connected to everyone else. The.

John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.

Christine Winkelmann This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the.

This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European Union within.

1 Older Citizens’ use of Scrutiny A workshop presentation by Sharon Brearley, Director Age Concern Salford Natalie Davies, Project manager LinkAge Plus,

Matthias Wentzlaff-Eggebert, BZgA This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding.

Successes and Challenges of Integrating Quality Improvement in HIV Prevention: Results of the Quality Action's mixed method evaluation Christiana Nöstlinger.

Deirdre Seery The Sexual Health Centre Cork, Ireland This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which.

Viveca Urwitz, WP4 This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European.

Developing National Capability for Integrated Border Management (IBM) in Lebanon Project Funded by the European Union Implemented by the International.

Statistical process model Workshop in Ukraine October 2015 Karin Blix Quality coordinator

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon2020 research and Innovation programme under grant agreement No

Cochrane Agenda and Priority Setting Methods Group (CAPSMG)

Findings from the Child Protection Skills Mapping exercise Review of the Implementation of the IASC Guidelines on MHPSS.

European Women Interactive Learning GRUNDTVIG Learning Partnership PROJECT ACTIVITIES REVISION With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the.

The role of mutual learning in Migration Integration policies

Strategic Management & Planning

Partnerships and networks

Results of the previous workshop 2016 and outlook on the workshop 2018

Customer Empowerment Working Group

CHRODIS PLUS WP8 Task 8.2 – Toolkit and pilot

Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities

Presentation transcript:

Carolin Vierneisel This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European Union within the framework of the Health Programme.

84 applications – Addressed key populations

Type of project/programme

Participation of Stakeholders

What are enablers for and barriers to a successful practical tool application?

Sources of analysis  Case Studies (main data) … filled in by projects/programmes  Documentation Tables … filled in by WP 6 members  Qualitative Content Analysis (Mayring, 2010)  Focus Groups (WP 3) … with WP 6 members and country contacts, members of projects/programmes  Online questionnaire on incompleted applications (WP 3)

6 Key Factors 1.Tool Fit 2.Planning and Preparation 3.Participation and Involvement 4.Facilitation 5.Available Resources 6.Additional Support Enablers and barriers

1.Tool Fit captures tool-related factors that can be either supportive or challenging and that influence the application itself as well as people’s strategies for responding flexibly, including making a range of adaptations. ‘The PQD tool was definitely the right tool to choose for a project targeted to migrants.’ ‘[…] and when doing the evaluation of the project I simply skipped some questions. There were a little too many very similar questions and some questions did not really "fit" in what I was doing.’ Key factors

2.Planning and Preparation applies both to the whole application process as well as to the actual meeting or workshop during which the tool is applied. ‘It was essential to have a fixed organizational team and one main person in charge of the process. The team met up before and after each meeting to exchange on and adapt the planning.’ Key factors

3.Participation and Involvement puts the focus on the importance of involving the right people and the strategies to achieve this. ‘The problem was at the recruitment level. Without external motivation (vouchers) it would be nearly impossible to recruit group of experts (main reason: lack of time).’ Key factors

4.Facilitation of the application process can pose challenges, e.g. keeping a discussion both focused and creative, and is seen as a main success factor. ‘Using two facilitators and taking turns being the lead facilitator enables more on the spot reflections on the process. The role of the facilitator/moderator cannot be understated.’ Key factors

5.Available Resources are those already existing (or lacking) within an organisational structure that people can draw on to implement a quality improvement process. ‘Applying the tool next to regular work has proven to be a challenge.’ Key factors

6.Additional Support as a factor includes strategies to organise the support needed for the practical application process. ‘Build support within your organization, especially with your management. You'll need them for feedback and investing resources.’ Key factors → Read more: Practical Application Report

Case Study Research Database