Performance of a New Steelhead Line Derived from Hatchery Parents Collected in Autumn in the Grande Ronde River Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UMATILLA HATCHERY MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROJECT Richard Carmichael, Wes Stonecypher, Gerold Grant, and Will Cameron Project # Oregon Department.
Advertisements

Project Principal Investigator: Stephen J. Rocklage Co-authors: Billy D. Arnsberg and Dale S. Kellar Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries.
Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#
Grande Ronde Supplementation Lostine River: Operation and Maintenance and Monitoring and Evaluation Sponsor: Nez Perce Tribe Project Number:
Comparative Survival Study Smolt Monitoring Program 2010 PIT Tag Mark Groups.
Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
UMATILLA RIVER FISH PASSAGE OPERATIONS
Imnaha River Smolt Survival and Smolt to Adult Return Rate Quantification (Imnaha River Smolt Monitoring Program) BPA Project Number Nez Perce.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Looking for Pieces of the Puzzle: LIFE HISTORY OF SPRING CHINOOK IN THE WILLAMETTE BASIN Kirk Schroeder Brian Cannon Luke Whitman Paul Olmsted Oregon Department.
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
C. A. Peery, M. L. Keefer, and S. R. Lee Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit U.S. Geological Survey and Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
Assessing the use of PIT Tags as a Tool to Monitor Adult Chinook Salmon Returns to Idaho John Cassinelli Regional Fisheries Biologist Idaho Department.
New genetic technology for the management of Columbia River salmon and steelhead Parentage Based Tagging Matthew Campbell Idaho Department of Fish and.
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
Kathryn Kostow Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife A Demonstration of Modified Selection Pressures in a Steelhead Hatchery Program on the Hood River,
The Use of Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) Tags as a Tool to Monitor and Manage Steelhead John Cassinelli Carl Stiefel Regional Fisheries Biologists.
Development of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan: A Brief History Scott Marshall LSRCP Program Administrator U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Tucannon Endemic Steelhead – An Integrated Program picture.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.
New genetic technology for the management of Columbia River salmon and steelhead Proposal : Parentage Based Tagging Matthew Campbell Idaho Department.
Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 2009 Technical Management TeamDecember 11, 2009 Lessons Learned 2009 Bill.
Hydrosystem Operations and Fish Recovery in the Columbia River Basin U
2014 Program Goal Statements for Salmon and Steelhead Overview Nancy Leonard, Laura Robinson and Patty O’Toole (NPCC)
In Search of the Lost Legions Attempting to account for Hatchery-origin steelhead returns to the Snake River Herb Pollard – NOAA –National Marine Fisheries.
May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection (SMP Traps) Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting Feb. 11,
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 1. BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 2 BiOp Performance Standards for Dam Passage Survival RPA RM&E Actions - Strategy.
RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.
Columbia River Basin Dams FCRPS--29 federal dams (USACE and BOR) Hydropower (50-65% of the region’s needs) Flood control Irrigation Recreation Navigation.
Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook: Relative Reproductive Success in Captive Chinook Salmon Melissa Baird 1, Ewann Berntson 1, Timothy Hoffnagle 2, Steve.
Imnaha River Summer Steelhead Hatchery Program Review R. W. Carmichael, L. R. Clarke, M. Flesher, D. Eddy, S. Warren, and H. Stanton Oregon Department.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
Contribution of Resident O. mykiss to Anadromous Populations and Vice Versa: Implications for Recovery Strategies and VSP Analysis Richard W. Carmichael.
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
Migration pathway, age at ocean entry, and SARs for Snake River Basin fall Chinook prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
Effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing and release practices at Winthrop NFH William Gale and Matt Cooper -USFWS, Mid-Columbia River Fishery.
Chinook Salmon Supplementation in the Imnaha River Basin- A Comparative Look at Changes in Abundance and Productivity Chinook Salmon Supplementation in.
Downstream Survival of Juvenile Stream Type Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Through the Snake/Columbia River Hydropower System and Adult Return Rates AFEP.
Recovery Patterns of Coded-Wire Tagged Spring Chinook Salmon in the Upper Willamette River Basin David S. Hewlett Cameron S. Sharpe Oregon Department of.
1 Independent Scientific Advisory Board June 12, 2003 A Review of Salmon and Steelhead Supplementation.
Joe Bumgarner Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Release Strategies to Improve Post-Release Performance of Hatchery Summer Steelhead in Northeast Oregon. Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
Alsea Steelhead Acoustic Tagging Project. ODFW -Salmonid Life Cycle Monitoring Project Alsea Steelhead Acoustic Tagging Project EPA – Estuarine Habitat.
LSRCP Hatchery Steelhead Salmon River Brian Leth and Carl Stiefel LSRCP Steelhead Program Review July 20-21, 2012 Clarkston,WA.
Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.
Implementing Hatchery Reform The Dawn of a New Beginning or more of the same old thing? Mike Delarm NOAA Fisheries.
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
Age at ocean entry of Snake River Basin fall Chinook and its significance to adult returns prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
The Data Wars Of the Columbia Basin.
Comparative Survival Study Project #
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Steelhead status in Idaho – 2012 Update
Direct Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers: Update with 2007 Results Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update
Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update
On Recruitment of Steelhead in Mid Columbia Subbasins
Hatchery Production Wells Hatchery Steelhead: 450,000 fish annually
Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman
Presentation transcript:

Performance of a New Steelhead Line Derived from Hatchery Parents Collected in Autumn in the Grande Ronde River Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren, and Richard Carmichael Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Wallowa Stock Steelhead Wallowa Hatchery Joseph La Grande Union Troy

Wallowa Hatchery Broodstock Stock founded from adults collected in spring at Ice Harbor (1976) and Little Goose (1977 & 1978) dams Current broodstock sourced from spring returns to hatchery Substantial fishery in Grande Ronde basin from Sept.−April Stock founded from adults collected in spring at Ice Harbor (1976) and Little Goose (1977 & 1978) dams Current broodstock sourced from spring returns to hatchery Substantial fishery in Grande Ronde basin from Sept.−April

Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks Lyons Ferry Dworshak B Sawtooth Pahsimeroi Hells Canyon Imnaha Wallowa Deschutes River basin

Dworshak B 0 Hells Canyon Imnaha Lyon’s Ferry Pahsimeroi Sawtooth Wallowa Average Annual Deschutes River Straying By % STRAY RATE Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks HATCHERY PROGRAM (Based on Years of Data) Error bars = 1 SE

Objectives Create a new hatchery line from Wallowa stock returning to Grande Ronde in autumn.  Autumn Line may stray less and improve the autumn fishery. Create a new hatchery line from Wallowa stock returning to Grande Ronde in autumn.  Autumn Line may stray less and improve the autumn fishery. Compare performance of Autumn Line with the standard Wallowa Stock.  Is smolt outmigration survival similar?  Does the Autumn Line return earlier?  Are smolt-to-adult survival rates similar?  Does the Autumn Line stray at a lower rate?  Are contributions to fisheries different?

Upon landing, anglers placed hatchery fish in a tube –Oriented fish into flow, held up to 24 h –Fish PIT-tagged, transferred to Wallowa Hatchery, held for spawning Upon landing, anglers placed hatchery fish in a tube –Oriented fish into flow, held up to 24 h –Fish PIT-tagged, transferred to Wallowa Hatchery, held for spawning Broodstock Collection and Handling (Brood Years 2004 − 2007)

Acclimation Ponds

Juvenile Steelhead Releases  Coded wire tags were implanted into 100K of Autumn Line and Standard Line juveniles for estimating stray rates. Brood Year Number PIT tagged Autumn St andard 20043,7773, ,5673, ,5673, ,5586,914 Gen- eration F1F F2F2 3,5995,203 Number Released Autumn Standard 170K 373K 277K 308K 221K 258K 140K 345K 129K 241K F1F1 F1F1 F1F1

Survival (± CI) AutumnStandard (2.1) 77 (3.0) (6.6) 74 (5.3) (22.3)78 (41.0) (19.3) 84 (13.5) 77%79% Averages 23.5 (7.0) 21.6 (11.5) 30.8 (6.7) 31.3 (11.3) AutumnStandard 23.8 (7.6) 22.4 (10.8) 30.1 (8.7) 33.1 (12.9) Brood Year % Outmigration Travel Time (d; ± SD) Juvenile Performance (4.8) 80 (3.9) 18.3 (9.7) 17.3 (11.2)

Average Adult Steelhead Return Timing McNary Lower Granite MONTH PERCENT RECOVERED Bonneville AUTUMN LINE STANDARD STOCK Average Adult Steelhead Return Timing F1 Generation, (BY ) June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Aug. 5 Aug. 14 Aug. 31 Sept. 24 Sept. 11 Oct. 6

Smolt-to-Adult Survival to Bonneville Dam BROOD YEAR PERCENT SURVIVAL Autumn line, F 1 generation Standard stock Autumn line, F 2 generation (significantly different, P = 0.004)

BROOD YEAR Smolt-to-Adult Survival to Lower Granite Dam (significantly different, P < 0.001) PERCENT SURVIVAL Autumn line, F1 generation Standard stock Autumn line, F2 generation

BROOD YEAR % 1-OCEAN ADULTS Age At Return Standard stock (P = ) Autumn line, F 1 generation

% STRAY RATE INDEX BROOD YEAR Percent of Steelhead that Strayed Autumn line, F 1 generation Standard stock %76.0%47.0%41.0% And the Percent of Barged Fish Incomplete Data

Kilometers Mouth (RK 0) Pelton Trap (RK 161) Sherars Falls (RK 69) Warm Springs National Fish Hatchery (RK 154) S p r i n g s W a r m R i v e r D e s c h u t e s R i v e r COLUMBIA RIVER Deschutes River Basin FB SP % RECOVERED ABOVE RK 69 % TRAP RECOVERIES Before Feb. 1 SP Total FB SP

Run Year Experimental Group Number Detected at Sherars Falls Number Later Detected at McNary or Above Percent Later Detected at McNary or Above Autumn Line 50 0 Standard Stock Autumn Line 6117 Standard Stock Autumn Line19421 Standard Stock Autumn Line 5240 Standard Stock 50 0 Total Autumn Line35720 Total Standard Stock30723 PIT Tag Detections in Deschutes and at McNary

Compensation Plan Fisheries

SeptOctNovDecJanFeb MarApr PERCENT OF TOTAL HARVEST Lower Grande Ronde Autumn line Standard stock Harvest Timing in the Grande Ronde Basin MONTH Wallowa (run years to )

SeptOctNovDecJanFebMarApril MONTH Autumn line Standard stock Harvest in the Compensation Area Error bars = 1 SE No. HARVESTED /1,000 SMOLTS

Average BROOD YEAR No. HARVESTED /1,000 SMOLTS Autumn Line In Oregon Autumn Line Outside Oregon Standard stock Outside Oregon Standard stock In Oregon Harvest Contribution in the Compensation Area

Conclusions Autumn Line F 1 adults pass Lower Granite Dam earlier, provide increased autumn fishing opportunities in Grande Ronde River.  Will F 2 and subsequent generations continue to return earlier? Greater Autumn Line survival to adulthood.  Is it just because they return at an earlier ocean age?  Will the trend continue? No apparent straying benefit to Autumn Line.  Will stray rates remain low for all release groups?  Are there other broodstock, rearing, or release strategies that can be used to reduce straying. Autumn Line F 1 adults pass Lower Granite Dam earlier, provide increased autumn fishing opportunities in Grande Ronde River.  Will F 2 and subsequent generations continue to return earlier? Greater Autumn Line survival to adulthood.  Is it just because they return at an earlier ocean age?  Will the trend continue? No apparent straying benefit to Autumn Line.  Will stray rates remain low for all release groups?  Are there other broodstock, rearing, or release strategies that can be used to reduce straying.

Future Plans for the Autumn Line 1.Brood Year 2012: Increase smolt production to 240,000 smolts (30% of entire Wallowa stock production). Maintain current marking and tagging to assess whether F 3 generation performs similarly to F 1 generation. 2.Brood Year 2013 and beyond: Increase Autumn Line production to 320,000 smolts in BY 2013, 400,000 smolts in BY  Releasing both lines would benefit autumn and spring fishing periods, provided future generations perform similarly to the F 1 generation.  Autumn Line may require occasional refreshing with new broodstock collected via angling in the Grande Ronde in autumn.  During this time, straying information from F 1 and F 2 generations will continue to be collected and assessed.  The ability of the hatchery to concurrently spawn, rear, and release Autumn Line and standard production groups (each consisting of 400,000 smolts) will impact future decisions.

Acknowledgements Many thanks to the 192 anglers and volunteers for: –7,000 hours –111,000 miles of travel –2500 meals served ODFW Wallowa Hatchery and NE Region fish liberation staff Rick Madigan – Wenaha Wildlife Area Volunteers from local state and tribal agencies Many thanks to the 192 anglers and volunteers for: –7,000 hours –111,000 miles of travel –2500 meals served ODFW Wallowa Hatchery and NE Region fish liberation staff Rick Madigan – Wenaha Wildlife Area Volunteers from local state and tribal agencies