Air Quality and Seney National Wildlife Refuge Jill Webster June 14, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Regional Haze November 15, 2012 Michele Notarianni EPA Region 4 1.
Advertisements

1 NC-DAQ Educational Opportunities Series 18 March 2015 Regional Haze Discussions and Issues in North Carolina.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
FLAG Deposition Subgroup Report Ellen Porter Air Quality Branch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Web-Based Decision Support Systems: Supporting Air Quality Monitoring Networks, Science, and Regulations Bret A. Schichtel, National Park Service Rudolf.
Economic Strategies to Reduce Acid Deposition Ecological Economic Theory Fall 2003.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Map of the Guadalupe Mountains Region NEW MEXICO TEXAS Guadalupe Mtns. Park Map To Carlsbad To El Paso To I-10 Visibility Degradation in Guadalupe Mountains.
National Park Service U. S. Forest Service Bureau of Land Management U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
The Cost and Benefits of Reducing Acid Rain By Sarah Abdulkarim.
IMPLEMENTATION OF EU AQ LEGISLATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC J. FIALA Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Eladio M. Knipping, Ph.D. January 16, 2014 Air Quality Applied Science Team (AQAST) Meeting Rice University, Houston, TX Air Quality Research from the.
Protecting Natural Resources in the West Ellen Porter Air Resources Division – National Park Service WRAP IOC Meeting, Denver, CO.
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
Eighteen Years of Acid Wet Deposition at Mt. Mansfield Goals & Objectives One goal of the VMC is to understand the sources, mechanisms, and effects of.
Environmental Protection Division 1 AWMA Georgia Air Update August 10, 2007 Heather Abrams, Branch Chief.
AIR QUALITY for the Interagency Wilderness Fire Resource Advisor 2011 SOUTHERN AREA ADVANCED FIRE AND AVIATION ACADEMY Discussion Topics: Very Brief Overview.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
Air Quality Surveillance Branch Air Monitoring Operations l Manual and Non-criteria Samplers » Reggie Smith » Special Purpose Monitoring & Data Support.
CLEAN AIR ACT  This act was passed as an attempt to regulate the amount of harmful pollutants into our air.  The Clean Air act’s goal.
BIOENGINEER ANALYSIS WATER. GOALS Students learn how to collect water samples. Then, they will aseptically collect a water sample and use a microscope.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A Management of Air Quality Monitoring Data Debbie Miller National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
Mercury Sources to Water and Associated Impacts Chris Piehler.
Ozone and Nitrogen Concerns in NM WRAP Ozone and NOx in the West November 11, 2009.
Inter-Tribal Environmental Council (ITEC) Clean Air Projects
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Why do we Measure Precipitation Chemistry? Christopher Lehmann CAL Director 2007 Field Operations Training Course.
Copyright © 2011 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Energy and the Environment James A. Fay / Dan S. Golomb FIGURE 10.6 Modeled versus observed O 3 concentrations.
FLAG, Policy Overview 15 December 1999 Presenter - Bruce Bayle USDA/Forest Service.
BART SIP Development: Example from Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park WRAP IWG Meeting, Denver, CO August 29, 2007 Presented by: Ray Mohr and Curt Taipale.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Air Quality Relative Values Data Summaries Graphical summaries of the current air quality status and trends in National Parks and other federal lands.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
By: Devon Yousif. What year did the park become an official National Park and why? Big Bend became an official National Park in It was done so that.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Informed NPS Air Quality Management Decisions in Response to a Changing Climate.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Monitoring Activities
EPA Air Policy Priorities
Monitoring/Data Analysis Discussion Group June 10, 2005
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Section Update: Monitoring & Planning
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Ozone.
Mercury in Fish.
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Four Corners Air Quality Task Force
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Clean Air Interstate Rule Office of Air and Radiation
Status of Regional Haze Rule
Western Regional Haze Planning and
MONTANA REGIONAL HAZE VISIBILITY PROTECTION PLAN
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
Air Update, Georgia EPD Karen Hays Chief, Air Protection Branch
Scorecards.
Alaska Regional Haze Overview
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Workshop on Monitoring & Data for Regional Analysis
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
RA BART Overview Deb Wolfe 8/9/2019.
Presentation transcript:

Air Quality and Seney National Wildlife Refuge Jill Webster June 14, 2007

Topics to be covered…  Why are we concerned about air quality at Seney NWR?  What air pollutants are being monitored and why? What are the sources?  What does the data reveal?  What is being done to protect air quality and visibility?  Conclusions!

Air Pollution Effects  Visibility impairment by particles  Eutrophication of coastal areas  Bioaccumulation of mercury  Ozone injury to plants  Acidification of lakes and streams

Congress set forth as the Nation’s visibility goal “the prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in Class I areas which impairment results from man made air pollution.”

Class I Areas  Special protection from air pollution  National parks > 6,000 acres  Wilderness areas > 5,000 acres  In existence on August 7, 1977

Visibility, viewing the scenery through “clean, fresh air” is one of the most important attributes of national parks and wilderness.

Sources of Air Pollution Power plantsSOx, NOx, metals IndustryNOx, SOx, organics, IncineratorsNOx, organics, metals Mobile sourcesNOx, organics

Air Quality Monitoring Why? establish current conditions determine trends over time assess the impacts of air pollution on natural resources identify sources/source areas of air pollution that affect natural resources in your refuge

What is Monitored at Seney? Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) Network -Scene -Particles National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) -Atmospheric Deposition -Mercury Deposition National Ambient Air Quality Standards (health- based standards) -Ozone -PM 2.5

IMPROVE Network Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments Identify the types and amounts of particles responsible for visibility impairment IMPROVE began in 1988 and grew to approximately 30 sites. Cooperative effort between EPA, FLMs, and state air agencies. In 1999, the Regional Haze Rule called for an expansion of visibility monitoring to all Class I areas.

IMPROVE Particle Sampler

Light Extinction on 20% Haziest Days in 2002

NADP Sample Collection and Analysis Site Operators collect the precipitation sample every Tuesday, measure pH and conductivity and send the sample to the Central Analytical Laboratory (CAL). The CAL analyzes the samples for hydrogen ion (pH), sulfate, nitrate, chloride, ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium. Data are posted to the NADP web site: and in annual publications.

NADP Equipment

Sulfate Deposition

Mercury Deposition Network (NADP/MDN) The Mercury Deposition Network, was formed in 1995 to monitor mercury in precipitation on a regional basis. The Network grew from an original 13 sites to almost 70 sites in Samples of precipitation are collected every Tuesday and sent to Frontier Geosciences to be analyzed to for total mercury and sometimes methylmercury.

NADP/MDN Equipment

Geographic Distribution of Emissions

What are we doing to clean the air???  Single Source Programs, ie permitting (1980)  Regional Haze multi source planning (1999)

Regional Haze Regulations requires States to: submit plans (SIPs) to improve visibility in Class I areas, including a 60 year glide path to natural conditions use IMPROVE monitoring network data to measure reasonable progress