Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AP Physics B Units.
Advertisements

FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4.
Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. Figure 1 Thermoelastic Analysis in Design William Bell & Paul-W. Young Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. John Stewart,
Chapter 2 Basic Electricity. Objectives Upon completion of this course, you will be able to: –Briefly explain the atomic theory and is relationship to.
WS11-1 VND101, Workshop 11 MSC.visualNastran 4D Exercise Workbook Bracket.
NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses
Thermal Analysis of Two Braze Alloys to Improve the Performance of a Contactor During the Temperature Rise Test G. Contreras 1, E. Gutierrez-Miravete 2.
Chapter 9 Magnetic Forces, Materials and Inductance The magnetic field B is defined from the Lorentz Force Law, and specifically from the magnetic force.
An Artificial Gecko Foot Model
1 Design of Gridded-Tube Structures for the 805 MHz RF Cavity Department of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering M. Alsharoa (PhD candidate)
EEE340Lecture : Magnetic Circuits Analysis of magnetic circuits is based on Or where V m =NI is called a magnetomotive force (mmf) Also Or (6.83)
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
Electromagnetic Force
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
Electro Mechanical System
Chapter 1 Introduction. Training Manual Electromagnetic Analysis in Workbench March 4, 2005 Inventory # A. Feature Overview Workbench EMAG features.
Thermal Analysis of Two Braze Alloys to Improve the Performance of a Contactor During the Temperature Rise Test G. Contreras 1, E. Gutierrez-Miravete 2.
K L University 1. 2 MAGNETOSTATICS 3 Introduction to Magneto statics – Magnetic field, Magnetic force, Magnetic flux Biot-Savat’s law -- Applications.
PIPE FEA USING ANSYS.
MODELING OF INDUCTION HARDENING PROCESS PART 1: INDUCTION HEATING
Axisymmetric Analysis of a Pipe Assembly
Physics of Fusion power Lecture4 : Quasi-neutrality Force on the plasma.
Electric and Magnetic Constants
1 Strong and Weak Formulations of Electromagnetic Problems Patrick Dular, University of Liège - FNRS, Belgium.
ANSYS 7.1 TUTORIAL Magnetostatic problems Ruben Specogna A.A. 2005/06
ELECTROMAGNETIC, THERMAL, AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF RF CAVITIES USING ANSYS 2.1 GHz 3-Cell Cavity Cliff Brutus 6/15/15 Job Name: 2.1ghz_Symmetry_
University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy Department of Material Science and Engineering FINITEELEMENT METHOD By eng. Veselin Paunov Prof. Veselin.
Non stationary heat transfer at ceramic pots firing Janna Mateeva, MP 0053 Department Of Material Science And Engineering Finite Element Method.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
1 Magnetostatics. 2 If charges are moving with constant velocity, a static magnetic (or magnetostatic) field is produced. Thus, magnetostatic fields originate.
1 Magnetostatics The Basics. 2 Stationary charge: Stationary charge: v q = 0 E  0B = 0 Moving charge:Moving charge: v q  0 and v q = constant E  0B.
NSTXU-CALC Vessel Port Rework for NB and Thomson Scattering
Micro-Resistor Beam.
NSTXU-CALC TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
Magnetic Flux and Faraday’s Law of Induction
APPLIED MECHANICS Lecture 13 Slovak University of Technology
ANSYS for MEMS by Manjula1 FEM of MEMS on ANSYS MEMS Summer 2007 Why FEM for MEMS? Features in ANSYS Basic Procedures Examples.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
October 5, 2011  Monday ◦ Finish Capacitor Activity ◦ Dielectric in Capacitors ◦ Magnetism, Intro.  Wednesday ◦ Magnetism  Friday ◦ Quiz ◦ Magnetism.
Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Fall 2014 Notes 15 ECE 2317 Applied Electricity and Magnetism 1.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
Shape Finder Appendix Thirteen. Training Manual Shape Finder August 26, 2005 Inventory # A13-2 Chapter Overview In this chapter, using the Shape.
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
1 MAGNETOSTATIC FIELD (MAGNETIC FORCE, MAGNETIC MATERIAL AND INDUCTANCE) CHAPTER FORCE ON A MOVING POINT CHARGE 8.2 FORCE ON A FILAMENTARY CURRENT.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
General Analysis Procedure Chapter 4. Training Manual October 30, 2001 Inventory # Chapter 4 - General Analysis Procedure Overview The objective.
Vectors scalar quantities magnitude mass temperature electric potential.
DR. A. O. ADEWALE Course Outline: Electrostatics, potential and capacitance, dielectrics, production and measurement of static electricity. Current, Ohm’s.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
Andrew Biehl.  The objective of this project is to develop a method for determining the nut factor of a bolted joint using the finite element method.
AWB NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review April 10, 2003 Art Brooks.
Workshop 3 Various Workshops for SOLSH190 Solid-Shell Element
Twisted Racetrack Revisited Model Changes: Side A has 10 turns Clamps have been modified to as built geometry. Property Changes (linear results.
COUPLED ANALYSES Chapter 7. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Fluid-Structure Analysis “One Way” Analysis –Structural deformation effect.
ELEN 340 Electromagnetics II Lecture 2: Introduction to Electromagnetic Fields; Maxwell’s Equations; Electromagnetic Fields in Materials; Phasor Concepts;
The Hall Effect AP Physics Montwood High School R.Casao.
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
Measurements SI base unit.
ELEC 3105 Basic EM and Power Engineering
Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics
MODELING OF INDUCTION HARDENING PROCESS PART 1: INDUCTION HEATING
Peter Uzunov Associate professor , PhD Bulgaria, Gabrovo , 5300 , Stramnina str. 2 s:
Maxwell 3D Transient.
5. Conductors and dielectrics
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
Maxwell and Ansys simulations for the CAPP detector
7ο εξάμηνο Σχολή Μηχανολόγων Μηχανικών ΕΜΠ Διδάσκων: Michael Neidlin
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4

Figure 2 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Solid Model: Version 4

Figure 3 – ANSYS Multiphysics Analysis Block Diagram

Figure 4 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly FEA Model: Mesh

Figure 5 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Electric Model Results: Voltage

Fig. 6 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Electric Model Results: Current Density

Figure 7 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Electric Model Results: Joule Heat

Fig. 8 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Thermal Model Results: Temperature

Study: Determine Current Best-Practice to Perform Magnetostatic Analysis in ANSYS 12.0 WorkBench New SOLID236/237 magnetic analysis elements Have both Magnetic Vector Potential (MVP) and Line Edge method capability. Replaces SOLID97 and SOLID117. Compatible with WB generated Electric, Thermal, and Static Structural analyses meshes. No 3D MVP or Line Edge contact elements Requires conformal mesh with shared nodes across the joints, which makes modeling assemblies including frictional and pressure-dependent electric and thermal contact impossible, or Non-conformal/ dissimilar mesh, with duplicate nodes across the joint. Magnetic coupling using CPINTF command requires nearly-matched meshing, which is difficult to achieve in a large assembly. Above problems are greatly reduced if modeling the air enclosure, and modeling the magnetic coupling across the joints, are not necessary May be valid for materials with a relative magnetic permeablity = 1. Goal: Prove with a comparison study.

Outer-most Lamination Arch Segment with Air Enclosure: Solid Model B = 1 T I = 4074 A Merged Volumes Outer-most Lamination Arch Segment with Air Enclosure: Solid Model

Outer-most Lamination Arch Segment with Air Enclosure: Mesh Conformal Mesh: Nodes shared at Interface (perfect magnetic coupling) Outer-most Lamination Arch Segment with Air Enclosure: Mesh

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Current Density (A/m^2)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Joule Heat

SOLID236: LINE EDGE METHOD Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Metal +Air)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Metal Only)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Current Density

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz Forces (N)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Metal Only)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz Forces (N)

SOLID186 Stress and reaction force results closely agree with hand-calculated values. Arch Segment w/ Air Static Structural Model Results: von Mises Stress (Pa)

SOLID236 LINE EDGE METHOD Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Tesla)

Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Current Density (A/m^2)

Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz forces (N)

Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Tesla)

Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz Forces (N)

SOLID186 Stress and reaction force results closely agree with hand-calculated values. Arch Segment _ No Air - Static Structural Model Results: von Mises Stress (Pa)

Total Reaction Force: ANSYS = 262.5 lbf MathCAD = 262.6 lbf Hoop Stress: ANSYS = 729.9 psi MathCAD = 729.3 psi Arch _ No Air - Static Structural WB Model Results: von Mises Stress (psi)

Arch _ No Air_Neg Az - Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Tesla)

Arch _ No Air_Neg Az - Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz Forces (N)

Arch _ NoAir_NegAz - Static Structural WB Model Results: von Mises Stress (psi)

Arch _NoAir_.3Ty+(-1)Tz - Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Tesla) IsoView

Arch _NoAir_.3Ty+(-1)Tz - Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Tesla) Side View

Arch _NoAir_.3Ty+(-1)Tz - Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz Forces (N)

Arch _NoAir_.3Ty+(-1)Tz – Static Structural Model Results: von Mises Stress (psi) Iso View

Arch _NoAir_.3Ty+(-1)Tz – Static Structural Model Results: von Mises Stress (psi) Side View

Conclusions SOLID236 results using line edge method closely agree with hand-calculated classic solution values. SOLID117 results are not valid No difference between results with air enclosure modeled and without. Modeling without air enclosure is valid only for cases where all materials have a relative magnetic permeability = 1, and where magnetic coupling across the joint is not required (static analysis, no eddy current calculation). Unlike MVP method, negative values of Az are allowed Combined Fields: Az input as a vector with magnitude and direction Use WPRO to rotate WP so that Z-direction is aligned with Az direction, then use CSWP to define coordinate system aligned with WP Apply Az = resultant, magnitude of vector Must change to metric units in WB prior to SOLVE so that the Lorentz forces in newtons from Magnetostatic analysis scale correctly. Can switch back to english units after solution.

Single Lamination Bolted Assembly - Magnetostatic Model: Mesh

Single Lamination_.3Ty+(-1)Tz - Magnetostatic Results: Magnetic Flux (Tesla)

Single Lamination_.3Ty+(-1)Tz - Magnetostatic Results: Current Density (A/m^2)

Single Lamination_.3Ty+(-1)Tz - Magnetostatic Results: Lorentz Forces (N)

Single Lamination_.3Ty+(-1)Tz - Magnetostatic Results: Magnetic Flux (Tesla)

Single Lamination_.3Ty+(-1)Tz - Magnetostatic Results: Current Density (A/m^2)

Single Lamination_.3Ty+(-1)Tz - Magnetostatic Results: Lorentz Forces (N)