May 2015. Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Advertisements

... and what it means for teachers of non-tested subjects Johanna J. Siebert, Ph.D. NAfME Symposium on Assessment June 24-25, 2012.
BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
OCM BOCES Day 6 Principal Evaluator Training. 2 Nine Components.
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness Toward an Improvement-Focused System of Educator Evaluation Jennifer Hammond OCTE Meeting November 7, 2013.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
Student Learning Objectives It’s Been a SLO Summer.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.
SSL/NYLA Educational Leadership Retreat New York State Teacher Evaluation …and the School Librarian John P. Brock Associate in School Library Services.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs TST BOCES January 6, 2012.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
August 24, 2015 Albany, New York Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
August 27, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
Staff Evaluation Data Reporting September 30, 2014.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers August 2015.
NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS LEGAL PROVISIONS NEGOTIATION ISSUES “TO DO” LIST.
Factoring Growth Models Into Administrator and Teacher Performance Evaluations -- a presentation for -- Henderson, Mercer, and Warren Counties Regional.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
General Unit Meeting June 1 st NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 1.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
January 2016 Slides updated Emergency Action At their December 2015 meeting, the Board of Regents [again] took emergency action Introduced APPR.
TEACHER EVALUATION TEACHER TENURE TEACHER MENTORING New Educational Laws and What They Mean for Us.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
APPR Annual Professional Performance Review Legislation: 3012-d Board of Education Work Session November 9, 2015.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
Evaluation of Teachers & Principals (APPR)
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
2007 Article VII # ELFA 8 Education, Labor, and Family Assistance
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
APPR Update School Year.
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
Five Required Elements
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
APPR Update School Year.
Valley Central School District
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Updates for Middle Level Liaisons Alexander Trikalinos, Office of Educator Quality and Professional Development.
Annual Professional Performance Review APPR
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

May 2015

Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in struggling schools.

APPR Changes The new evaluation system is comprised of two components that determine each educator’s rating: Student performance: Requires the use of a state-provided growth score if course has a state test, if available; otherwise requires the use of a student learning objective (SLO). SLOs must use State assessments, as available. –If added by local collective bargaining, an optional second subcomponent could be used, comprised of an additional state-provided growth score on a state test or a growth score from a state-designed supplemental assessment calculated using a state-provided or approved growth model. These state-designed supplemental assessments include those developed, designed, purchased, or acquired by SED. Observations: Requires observations by a supervisor and an independent evaluator from outside the school building. Districts also have the option of having observations conducted by a trained peer who has been rated Effective or Highly Effective.

The Matrix A “matrix” will be used:

What’s Out The statute prohibits certain elements from being used as part of an evaluation, including: Lesson plans, artifacts of teacher practice, and student portfolios; Instruments of parent or student feedback Use of professional goal-setting Locally developed assessments not approved by the Department as a state-designated supplemental assessment; and Growth or achievement targets that do not meet minimum standards established by the regulations of the commissioner.

Negotiations There is less to be bargained: Whether there will be a second measure Note: the old APPR would stay in place until a new one is approved (by November 15th) Note: This will likely be the subject of litigation.

Student Placement Districts will be prohibited from assigning a student to two Ineffective teachers for two consecutive school years. There might be waivers for this for small schools.

To Be Determined There are many things “TBD:” Scoring ranges for and weights among category subcomponents Parameters for growth for the Student Performance category Parameters for supplemental student performance measures Observation rubrics Applicability to principals

Dates The Board must adopt regulations by June 30, 2015, to fully implement the new evaluation system created by the Governor and the legislature. In order for school districts to receive their scheduled increase in state aid, their new evaluation plans must be approved by the Department by November 15, 2015.

Tenure Extends tenure appointments for all educators from 3 years to 4 years, beginning with appointments after July 1. In order for educators to be eligible for tenure after the 4-year probationary period, an educator must receive a rating of either Effective or Highly Effective in at least 3 of the 4 probationary years, including the final year. An educator who receives an Ineffective rating in the final year cannot receive tenure (needs clarification). If an educator does not meet this criterion, tenure may be extended by an additional year at the discretion of the school district.

§3020-b Disciplinary Process Districts are authorized to bring charges of incompetence for educators with 2 consecutive Ineffective ratings and are required to bring charges of incompetence for educators with 3 consecutive Ineffective ratings. Hearings for educators charged for incompetence would be heard by a single hearing officer (as opposed to a panel) and must be completed between 30 (for cases of 3 Ineffective ratings) and 90 days (for cases of 2 Ineffective ratings). The statute provides that 2 or more consecutive ratings of Ineffective would constitute prima facie evidence of incompetence that can only be overcome by clear and convincing evidence that the educator is not incompetent and are just cause for removal.

Other Included Items Teacher training and certification Re-registration in TEACH Failing schools receivership Testing Reduction Report Teacher Centers