ENVI 412 Hydrologic Losses and Radar Measurement Dr. Philip B. Bedient Rice University
Q e = energy used for evaporation Q h = sensible heat Q = stored energy Q v = advected energy Q N = net radiation absorbed by water body Lake Energy Budget
Function of wind speed, T, and humidity gradient Energy source - solar energy Mass transfer, energy budget, and pan evaporation Penman’s combined (1948) Lake Evaporation
E = e s - e a (a + bu) Where E = evaporation (cm/day) e s = Sat vapor pressure (T) e a = Vapor pres at fixed z u = wind speed in m/sec a,b = constants Mass Transfer
Shallow Lake Evap (Kohler, 1955)
Evaporation Pans Anemometer - wind Rain Gage - precip. Pan for water - evap Level measured daily Refilled as necessary
Soil Moisture Cycle Very Complex Soil Physics Autumn - rainfall recharge Winter - max soil storage Spring - some evap loss Summer - most depleted conditi on
Surface Flow Distribution
Horton’s Infiltration Concept f(t) = Rate of water loss into soil f = f c + (f o - f c ) exp (-kt) f c = final rate value f o = initial rate value K = decay rate Can integrate to get F(t) = Vol of infiltration
Horton’s Eqn
index Method Assumes constant rate over time of rainfall Volume above line is DRO Volume below line is F(t) Trial and error computed
Example of Index DRO VOL Infiltration F(t) DRO
Example of Index Assume 4.9 in of DRO from a 560 acre Basin index Set up a general Eqn for index 2(1.4 - +3(0.7- Find by trial and error by assuming a value and solving - try = 1.5 in/hr And it only accounts for 0.8 x 3 = 2.4 in of DRO 0.5 in/hr yields 9.0 in of DRO - too much DRO Try 1.0 in/hr or 2(.4) +3(1.3)+2(.1) = 4.9 inches
Harris Gully drains Rice/TMC Area Brays Bayou and Harris Gully Harris Gully: 4.5 sq. mi. Study Area: 8 sq. mi. Brays Bayou: 129 sq. mi. TMC
Existing Minor Drainage Network 2-15’x15’ ’x15’ 7.5’x11’ 90” 60” 72” 6.5’x10’ 66” 60” 72” 60” 6.5’x10’ 66” 72” 96” 114” 54” 84” Hermann Park TMC Rice
High Water Inundation in Rice/TMC Basin Area
Brays Bayou at Main St Bridge
Measure v at 0.2 and 0.8 of depth Average v and multiply by W*D Sum up across stream to get total Q Stream Cross-Section for Q
Plot of z vs. Q Determined from stream measurements of V Unique for each stream Changes with development Available for all USGS gages Typical Rating Curve for Stream