Review Group -140 Thoughts on additional information requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Advertisements

Review Group 0166 Review of Necessary Reform of NTS Offtake Arrangements 20 th September 2007 Beverley Grubb SGN.
Long Term Entry Capacity & User Commitment Transmission Workstream 7 th August 2008.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
National Grid: Gas Transmission System Operator
Linepack ‘Park and Loan’ Quantity - Influencing Factors Review Group 291 – July 2010.
Exit Reform Review Transmission Workstream 07 January 2010.
Operating Margins. 2 Competitive Provision of Operating Margins Change to National Grid Gas’s Transporter Licence which:  Introduced Special Condition.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
Domestic Natural Gas Installations Marc Billington.
Network Analysis - Introduction Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream, 4 th May 2006.
Capacity trade and transfer mechanism and the next AMSEC auction Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 9 May 2007.
SO Incentives from April 2010 John Perkins. 2 Gas System Operator (SO) Incentives National Grid operates the high pressure Gas Transmission System in.
“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
Further consultation on NTS entry baselines Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Compliance and Enforcement 14 August 2007.
Capacity Release Processes and Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Review Group 291 – Balancing Arrangements Default Cashout Workshop 3 – 21 st June 2010.
Mod 116B Steve Rose - on behalf of RWE Trading. 2 Background Mod 116 B was raised after discussion with a number of shippers about aspects Mod 116 which.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Flow Variations at Entry Transmission Workstream Martin Watson 1 st November 2007.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Flow Margin Assumptions for NTS Planning and Development Transmission Planning Code Workshop 3 5 th June 2008.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Offtake Arrangements Document – An Overview Paul Roberts 12 th May 2005.
OPNs & LDZ Demand Forecasts Chris Shanley & Nick Reeves.
Delivering Connections and Capacity RIIO-T1 and associated commercial changes - Summary June 7th 2012.
UNC modification proposal 0407 : Standardisation of notice periods for offtake rate changes for all National Grid NTS Exit Users Transmission Workstream.
Gas Emergency Arrangements Proposal Transmission Workstream 5 th April 2007.
Transmission Planning Code – Design Margin Update Transmission Workstream, 4 th February 2010.
1 Allocation of Baseline Reduction in the Substitution Methodology Draft Presentation aimed for 11 th June Substitution Workstream John Baldwin Gas Strategies.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 2 7 th May 2008 Substitution Example.
Force Majeure - Capacity Transmission Workstream 2 July 2009.
Modification proposal 0073 ‘Revision to the Notice Period regarding the implementation of changes to Transportation charges’ Transmission Workstream, 2.
Mod 166 Review Group Incremental Exit Capacity at New and Existing Exit Points.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Flow Flexibility Capacity Joint Office 7 th December 2006.
Review of Entry Capacity and the Appropriate Allocation of Financial Risk Review Group th Sept 2008.
Initial Thoughts on the Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 3 rd April 2008.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Modification Proposal 0395 & 0398 – Limitation on Retrospective Invoicing and Invoice Correction 1 st December 2011.
15 February 2006 TPCR second consultation: gas offtake Offtake Arrangements Workstream 15 February 2006.
Enduring Exit Regime & NTS Risk Management Processes Offtake Arrangement Workstream – OAD Section I Review Group 316.
Fundamental review of entry charging principles UNC Transmission Workstream - 6 th August 2009.
The calculation of the NTS Optional Commodity tariff (NTS Shorthaul) in the Enduring Exit Period Richard Hounslea/Debra Hawkin National Grid NTS, Gas Charging.
Metering Standards and Impact on Shrinkage Issue for Consideration 1 October 2009 for Gas Transmission Workstream.
MIPI European Transparency Project (ETP) Transmission Workstream 7 th October 2010.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Supply Assumptions for Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 1 3rd April 2008.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
RIIO Gas Transmission Workshop - 5 th Sept Supplementary information 1 Hypothetical examples to illustrate the impact of combining the constraint management.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
Assignment of NTS Entry Capacity Review Group 221, 10th December 2008.
Connected System Exit Points Options for strategic regime change Chris Warner.
Mod 376: Increased Choice when Applying for Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Jeff Chandler - 5 th May 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon 1.
The Role of TSO. Madrid, 7-8 Feb The Role of TSO2 The roles of industry players First vision of role of TSO in GTE position paper Industry players.
DN Interruption Reform Transmission Workstream Mark Freeman 5 th April 2007.
System Operator information transparency. As Transmission System Transporter National Grid Gas undertakes responsibility for safe, effective and efficient.
UNC Modification Proposal 0097: Modification to release aggregated ex-post information for pipeline interconnector offtake flows Christiane Sykes E.ON.
Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.
Transmission Planning Code – Draft Document
Transmission Planning Code
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
Modification Proposal 0101 – “Amendment to demand forecasting timings in relation to the Gas Balancing Alert”
Review Group /09/2007.
Information Provision for Transitional Exit Capacity
Stefan Leedham Transmission Workstream 2nd November 2006
195AV “Future work” – system flexibility
Presentation transcript:

Review Group -140 Thoughts on additional information requirements

As Transmission System Transporter National Grid Gas undertakes responsibility for safe, effective and efficient operation of the system Licence obligations and SO Incentives which relate to this activity Actions taken by the SO have a direct bearing upon Users of the Transmission System both commercially and physically The manner in which the system is configured has significant impact upon the capability to transport gas Longer term, impossible for Users to form objective view of true System capabilities  This is necessary to inform specific development and investment plans, as well as the ability to make a reasoned contribution to processes such as Price Control Reviews Regulator party to more detailed information on System Operation: wider publication of information will greatly add to the evaluation of the effective and efficient operation of the network by Users Background

Two key areas of focus: SO operations System Capability Background

Forecast maximum physical terminal capability on the day (e.g. to how close to TFA) Input pressures at every input point and storage connection point with no minimum threshold Exit point pressures initially to include DN offtakes only All compressor stations - information on suction pressure, discharge pressure, flow rates, power and flow direction  actual compressor running hours, by machine  amount of compressor fuel consumed by day  compressor stops and starts Exit flow rates at  LDZ s  Interconnectors  Storage sites  NTS connected DM sites Pipeline pressure limits Feeder flows and known constraint points: publication of gas flows (actual if metered, estimated if not) at specified points. Include max physical flow possible based on specified pressure assumptions at inlet and exit to the pipeline, and actual flow System Operator Information required

Increasing requirement for information on Capacity e.g. to understand system capability Especially relevant with introduction of Capacity Trades, Transfers, and Substitution Information starting to become available as part of the above processes need to formalise within this review group Requirement for a matrix/model setting out system capability by ASEP on different demand days Also, on the day system capability by ASEP based upon NG forecast demand System capability information required

Provide level playing field across entry points  Currently only terminal operators have sight of their input pressures Enable parties other than transporters to begin to model NTS and provide constructive feedback Enables more informed input to discussions  Price Controls  True system capability (e.g. entry baselines etc) Discovery of appropriateness of SO incentives  Is system managed to best effect for Users?  Is system managed to best effect for SO incentive payments?  Are these currently aligned? Taking part in Trades, transfers process and understanding impacts of substitution Why

Tension between SO Incentives and transparency? Current information provision  What’s available?  How much is it used?  Cost of new information provision vs benefit to industry  All information on common platform? Gives rise to potential discrimination between players (e.g. shippers or end users) Timing of publication  Forecast (e.g. day ahead)  Near real time  After the day (e.g. D+1) Issues