New CEC/DCDT Transition Standards! 1 Welcome to this session! Who’s Who? Dr. Jim Martin – U. of Oklahoma – VP, DCDT Dr. Robert Morgan –Utah State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
Advertisements

ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT: BUILDING VALID AND RELIABLE TESTS Habeeb Quadri, M.Ed Denis Jarvinen, Ph.D.
Developed by ESC Region 12 in partnership with TEA. 9/01/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
1 Student Success Program Ministry of Education November 2004.
The Program Review Process: NCATE and the State of Indiana Richard Frisbie and T. J. Oakes March 8, 2007 (source:NCATE, February 2007)
2005 CELT Conference1 Strategies from the Assessment Trenches: A Self-Help Clinic presented by AURA.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Partnering with States to Improve Transition Services: Online and In-Person Approaches Mary E. Morningstar Patricia M. Noonan Amy Gaumer Erickson Barbara.
Developing Systems of Professional Development in Transition: Resources & Strategies National Secondary Technical and Training Assistance Center October.
Using Online Training & Resources for Statewide Professional Development Mary E. Morningstar, Ph.D. NSTTAC National Summit May 2-4, 2007
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
School Counselor Evaluation Task Force February 23, 2011.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
The College Board: Expanding College Opportunity The College Board is a national nonprofit membership association dedicated to preparing, inspiring, and.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Are We making a Difference
New York State Education Department Understanding The Process: Science Assessments and the New York State Learning Standards.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Secondary Transition Education Scholars Jim Martin and Kendra Williams-Diehm University of Oklahoma Dept of Ed Psy & the Zarrow Center.
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Best Practices Gradual Release Model Presented by: Curriculum & Instruction Gradual.
Visual Art GPS Roll Out.  Student achieves standard  Project  Lesson plans  Fulton County Art Curriculum  GPS  National Standards.
Martha Thurlow and Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes CEC Preconvention Workshop #4 April 21, 2010.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Public School-Operated UPK Information Session. Goals Increase your understanding of QUALITYstarsNY Answer your questions and concerns about participating.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
Do Now What makes you a good teacher? (if you believe you are ) Please introduce yourself and tell us what makes you a good teacher. What DO YOU HAVE TO.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Preparing Leaders for Florida’s Most Challenging Schools Florida Department of Education.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Preparing High Qualified Professionals in Secondary Transition: Use of Technology to Support Professional Development Dr. Mary E. Morningstar
Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.
Implementation Planning: Module 10 Iowa Core Curriculum Leadership Development Series Year Two.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
1 Unpacking the Common Core Staff/Curriculum Development Network June 3, 2011 Gail Sobolewski Senior Mathematics Specialist Jack Costello Director of School.
A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-
Program Standards for Bilingual Authorization Jo A. Birdsell, Ed.D. Commission on Teacher Credentialing Technical Assistance Meetings November 21 & 25,
New York Institute of Technology
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
An Introduction to Virginia’s Standards of Learning, Assessments, and Related Resources Provided by the Virginia Department of Education Dr. Linda Wallinger.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Presentation on Praxis™ ESOL for the Nevada English Master Council Terry M. Owens, Ph.D. Client Relations Director, ETS March 4, 2016.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Illinois CEEDAR Partnership
“Grade-level” and “Competency” Portfolios
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
DEC, CEC, NAEYC Standards Alignment: A Tool for Higher Education Curriculum Development Council for Exceptional Children Annual Conference Boston, MA.
Curriculum Development Updates
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
EDCI Retreat; Aug TJ Oakes Phillip VanFossen
USBE: Tracy Gooley and Tanya Semerad
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Jane Razeghi, DCDT Executive Director
Jaeliza Morales CUR/516 Dr. Mary Poe
Recommended Practices for Engaging Families
Presentation transcript:

New CEC/DCDT Transition Standards! 1 Welcome to this session! Who’s Who? Dr. Jim Martin – U. of Oklahoma – VP, DCDT Dr. Robert Morgan –Utah State University Dr. Mary Morningstar- U. of Kansas; Past President, DCDT Dr. Jane Razeghi – Executive Director, DCDT Dr. Monica Simonsen – U. of Kansas Dr. Kendra Williams-Diehm – U. of Oklahoma

1. Summarize the process for developing the standards 2. Describe research-base for standards 3. Share how three universities are applying these standards to their educator preparation programs Today we will…

The Background: Transition Specialist Standards 3 Over a decade old! Previous attempts…. CEC’s Validation Study Resource Manual (2010) Formation of a DCDT Validation Team Mary Bob Kendra Jane

Identified Unique Partners 4 Council for Administrators of Special Education (CASE) The IDEA Partnership The National Secondary Transition & Technical Assistance Center (NSTTAC)

How Were the transition “standards” updated? 5 1. Created a DCDT Validation Team (Nov ‘12) 2. Developed a “Concept Paper” – (Jan ‘13) 3. Submitted “Concept Paper” to the CEC: Professional Standards & Practices Committee (PSPC) for approval – (April ‘13) 4. Developed/updated the existing transition standards within the new CEC Standards (Jan – June ‘13). Demonstrate research basis for standards. 5. Submitted these draft new standards to the CEC Knowledge & Skills Committee (July ‘13)

How Were the transition “standards” updated?? 6 6. Made revisions to the “set” 7. 2 nd presentation to CEC K&S (Aug/Sept ‘13) 8. Made revisions to present to the CEC PSPC – (Sept ‘13) 9. Made revisions to present to the CEC PSPC again (Oct ‘13) 10. CEC PSPC – presented final transition standards to CEC’s Board of Directors & they approved them! (Oct ‘13)

Why Are Research Based Transition Standards Important? 7 University Preparation Programs State & Local Job Descriptions Accreditation Reviews for Special Education Programs Formulation of Goals & Guidelines

Research Base for Transition Standards 8 Transition Coordinator Lit Review & Survey- Transition Coordinators (Morningstar et al.) Transition Teacher Competency Lit Review & Survey (Morgan et al.) Knowledge & Skills Committee: Development of CEC Special Education Transition Specialist Advanced Specialty Set

Research Base for Developing Standards Dr. Mary Morningstar University of Kansas Dr. Robert Morgan Utah State University

10 Designing the Transition Coordinator Survey Literature/research Scan Mapping competencies Expert Review Pilot with TC’s Revisions Final Survey & Validation Study

11 Transition Coordinator Survey

12 Embedding Competencies Secondary Teachers Transition Survey (2009) Instructional Planning Curriculum and Instruction Transition Planning Assessment Collaboration

Early ResearchEarly Research  In the process of creating a masters-level curriculum for transition specialists, USU faculty reviewed the literature on transition standards (e.g., Benitez, Morningstar, & Frey, 2009; Blalock et al., 2003; DCDT, 2000; Kohler, 1996; Test, Aspel, & Everson, 2006).  Based on 67 competencies found in the literature review, we surveyed national transition experts ( n =52) and practitioners from five states ( n =231). Respondents were asked to rate the importance of 67 competencies.  Results indicated substantial similarities in ratings across all respondents (Morgan, Callow-Heusser, Horrocks, Hoffmann, & Kupferman, 2013).

Early Research, continuedEarly Research, continued  Survey results served as one data source for development of transition competencies.  With data on rankings of transition competencies, conversations developed with co-presenters on importance of Updating existing standards Providing an empirical basis for standards

Application of Standards Dr. Robert Morgan Utah State University Dr. Mary Morningstar Dr. Monica Simonsen University of Kansas Dr. Jim Martin Dr. Kendra Williams-Diehm University of Oklahoma

Application of StandardsApplication of Standards  Relevant standards are cited in masters’ course syllabi and practicum handbooks.  Particular standards are “task analyzed” into operational statements allowing observation of teacher performance in practica. Statements on observation form are cross- referenced to standards. Example >>>

Excerpt from Observation FormExcerpt from Observation Form PSE=Postsecondary education

Mary E. Morningstar Monica Simonsen University of Kansas November 5, 2015 Using Transition Standards in Evaluating Practitioner Competencies

19 Embedding Standards within Program Coursework planned, revised and enhanced based on identified competencies Evaluate student competence pre-post program surveys – Level of preparation – Level of implementation E-Portfolio aligned with competencies

20 E-portfolio Competency Evaluation Multi-media artifacts demonstrating mastery within domains Peer Review Evaluate using competency- based tool

21

22

In What Other Ways Are Transition Standards Used Today? 23 How Are You Using Them? Dr. Jim Martin & Dr. Kendra Williams-Diehm

OU’s Transition Scholars 24 Converted each Standard into a Qualtrics survey Students complete 3 times during 2 yr masters program – Beginning of program – End of Yr 1 – End of Yr 2 Use results for program evaluation/research data

Sample Survey Items 25 Item Results From Two Cohorts

Sample Survey Items 26 Item Results From Two Cohorts

Assignments – Related to Individual Student Results 27 Transition Practicum – Final course in a 6 course transition sequence Two assignments related to survey result: Individual Transition Improvement Plan #1 and #1 On items with the lowest score (3 or below) students target individual improvement. Must develop and implement a plan specific to improving skill/knowledge in that area

In closing….. 28 Celebrate the beginning of a new era of transition standards! Enjoy the knowledge that they are solidly “research-based” Use them well…. Add your name to the sign-up sheet to receive them electronically

Contact Information 29 Dr. Jim Martin – ou.edu Dr. Robert Morgan – Dr. Mary Morningstar – Dr. Monica Simonsen- Dr. Kendra Williams-Diehm – Dr. Jane A. Razeghi –