S3 and S4 pulsars injections Graham Woan, University of Glasgow, For Matt Pitkin Réjean Dupuis PULG … LIGO-G050453-00-Z.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

RECOVERING HARDWARE INJECTIONS IN LIGO S5 DATA Ashley Disbrow Carnegie Mellon University Roy Williams, Michele Vallisneri, Jonah Kanner LIGO SURF 2013.

Advertisements

S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.

Upper-limit on Sco X-1 S2 preliminary results C Messenger, V Re and A Vecchio on behalf of PULG LSC General Meeting LHO, 10 th – 13 th November 2003.

LIGO-G Z 1 S2/E10 pulsar injection analysis Réjean Dupuis University of Glasgow 13 November 2003 LSC Meeting, LHO.

Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.

Pulsar Detection and Parameter Estimation with MCMC - Six Parameters Nelson Christensen Physics and Astronomy Carleton College GWDAW December 2003.

1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #22.

1 LIGO-G Z Penn State / LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2003 March 18 Calibration Testing Patrick Sutton, with Michael Landry, Gabriela Gonzalez,

LIGO-G Z LSC March 2004 KYF1 Veto efficiency study of triple coincidence playground WaveBurst events using WaveMon and glitchMon S2 veto triggers.

LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),

The search for continuous gravitational waves: analyses from LIGO’s second science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO.

Phase Difference = Phase Difference = 0.05.

1 Known Isolated Pulsars Preliminary S2 Results Réjean Dupuis, Matt Pitkin, Graham Woan LIGO-G Z.

ALLEGRO G Z LSC, Livingston 23 March, Calibration for the ALLEGRO resonant detector -- S2 and S4 Martin McHugh, Loyola University New Orleans.

LSC Meeting, 17 March 2004 Shawhan, Marka, et al.LIGO-G E Summary of E10 / S3 Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Szabolcs Márka, Bruce.

CW signals: plans for S2 June the group held a f2f meeting to discuss plans for analyses of S2 data (and beyond). Slides from the various presentations.

S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.

LIGO- G Z LSC ASIS Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 S2 Hardware Pulsar Injections Bruce.

3/19/08G D S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2008 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.

1 Environmental Coupling During S5 Robert Schofield (University of Oregon) I. PEM injection overview II.Acoustic/seismic coupling III.Seismic upconversion.

Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.

Concurrency Control. Objectives Management of Databases Concurrency Control Database Recovery Database Security Database Administration.

Expected compact-object merger rates LSC Mar R. O’Shaughnessy, C. Kim, T. Fragkos, V. Kalogera, Northwestern University LIGO-G Z.

10/06/2003LSC WIDE COLLOQUIUM1 LSC Pulsar Group and P Shawhan, S Marka, and S Koranda presented by B Allen, R Dupuis, N Christensen, and X Siemens S2 Hardware.

GWDAW - Annecy December 17 th 2004 LIGO-G Z1 Searching for gravitational waves from known pulsars Matthew Pitkin for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)

LSC Meeting, 19 March 2003 Shawhan, Leonor, MarkaLIGO-G D Introduction to Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Isabel Leonor, Szabi Márka.

A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data LSC Inspiral Analysis Working Group LIGO-G Z LSC Meeting Andres C. Rodriguez.

LSC ASIS Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee LIGO-G Z E10/S3 Hardware Pulsar Injections Bruce.

Raw datafile Demodulated spectra Averaging into 1 period Energy calibration Part 1: initial data processing Demodulation formula Input: lines to skip /

Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.

3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.

LIGO-G Z S2 and S3 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the Calibration team Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins.

LIGO-G E1 Reviewer Report for the S2 Time-Domain Pulsar Search Teviet Creighton, Andri Gretarsson, Fred Raab, B. Sathyaprakash, Peter Shawhan.

S3: Calibration factors update Two weeks ago: L1 - Comparison with official factors found a problem: Investigating the discrepancy Gaby found an error.

Graphing Trig Functions Review Whiteboard Activity.

LIGO-G Z 1 Setting upper limits on the strength of periodic GWs using the first science data from the LIGO and GEO detectors Bruce Allen, University.

Searching for continuous gravitational wave signals A.M. Sintes, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain Sources of Gravitational Waves Trieste, September.

LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.

1 Controlled concurrency Now we start looking at what kind of concurrency we should allow We first look at uncontrolled concurrency and see what happens.

LIGO-G Z SenseMonitor Updates for S3 Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.

APS meeting, Dallas 22/04/06 1 A search for gravitational wave signals from known pulsars using early data from the LIGO S5 run Matthew Pitkin on behalf.

First Year S5 Low Mass Compact Binary Coalescences Drew Keppel 1 representing the LIGO/VIRGO Compact Binary Coalescence Group 1 California Institute of.

LIGO-G Z r statistics for time-domain cross correlation on burst candidate events Laura Cadonati LIGO-MIT LSC collaboration meeting, LLO march.

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Generating time domain strain data (h(t)) for the ALLEGRO resonant detector or calibration of ALLEGRO data.

DAQ Errors John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC Analysis Meeting Tufts June 6, 2004.

S5 First Epoch BNS Inspiral Results Drew Keppel 1 representing the Inspiral Group 1 California Institute of Technology Nov LSC Meeting MIT, 4 November.

1 Work of the LSC Pulsar Upper Limits Group (PULG) Graham Woan, University of Glasgow on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW 2003.

LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan (University of Maryland) for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Special thanks to Michael Landry and Bruce Allen Eastern.

CW Search Group Status Summary: August 2005 M.Alessandra Papa for the CW group G05yyxx-00-Z.

LIGO-G Z S5 calibration: time dependent coefficients  Myungkee Sung, Gabriela González, Mike Landry, Brian O’Reilly, Xavier Siemens,…

LSC Meeting, June 3, 2006 LIGO-G Z 1 Status of inspiral search reviews Alan Weinstein (LIGO Laboratory / Caltech) For the LSC Internal review.

Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.

GWDAW11, Potsdam 19/12/06 LIGO-G Z 1 New gravitational wave upper limits for selected millisecond pulsars using LIGO S5 data Matthew Pitkin for.

Xavier Siemens for the LSC University of Wisconsin -- Milwaukee

Overview of the CW Search Group Efforts – S2 data analyses Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the CW Search Group LSC Meeting March.

S3 Spinning Binary Black Hole Search: Status Report

Sco-X1search : S2 results

Analysis of Density Waves in UVIS Ring Stellar Occultations

Analysis of LIGO S2 data for GWs from isolated pulsars

Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections

S3 time domain known pulsar search

S3 time domain known pulsar search

Plans for stochastic hardware injection

Hardware Injections in S4

Chapter 9. Design of Control Systems

Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries

Calculation of the phases of injected pulsars from the servo loop

Hardware Injection Status Update

Presentation transcript:

S3 and S4 pulsars injections Graham Woan, University of Glasgow, For Matt Pitkin Réjean Dupuis PULG … LIGO-G Z

S3 injections Posterior pdfs for h 0 and  0, hardwiring the other parameters to their injection values Amplitudes corrected to take account of the difference between the calibration used to calculate the injection strength (E10), and the calibration used to recover the signal (S3 v3) Phases post-corrected for the fact that we added the actuation phase correction to the injections with the wrong sign

S3 injections recovered (public pulsars) calibration problem? /1.6 P0 injected into H2 with 1.6x the correct amplitude

S3 injections recovered (private pulsars) P7 injected into H2 with 1/60 th the correct amplitude x60

S4 injections Posterior pdfs for h 0 and  0, hardwiring the other parameters to their injection values. S4 v3 calibration. NO amplitude correction, but differences between injection and recovery calibration is small.

S4 injections recovered (public pulsars) No corrections for actuation calibration Sign inconsistency between LHO and LLO 

S4 injections recovered (private pulsars) 

S4 injections recovered (binary pulsars) P10 amplitude in L1 is ~4 times lower than in H1/H2, though the injection parameter files appear to be OK. same sign flip seen in the isolated injections. ?

Bottom line S3 injections are now understood and are consistent over the IFOs S4 injections are mostly understood, but: P10 is seen too weakly in L1 by ~ factor 4 There is a sign flip (or phase lag v. close to pi) between LHO and LLO, with L1 showing the expected sign/phase Is the sign problem with the calibration (bad news) or the injection (less bad news)?