Bus 411 DAY 18

Agenda A Philosophy of education Grading in this Class Quick way to an A Dell Computer Case study Team work  Send me your presentation at least 30 min prior to class  All presentation will be uploaded to class slides directory for further use and evaluation.

teams Team 1  J. Harbison  N. Lozier  M. Martin Team 2  C. Brusig  C. Pennine  T. Nhundu  J. Jalbert Team 3  K. Beaulieu  M. Doucette  D. Lemon

Timeline March 23  Team 1 Case Study Two Dell Computer  Case study team work March Spring Break April 3  Team 2 Case Study Three PepsiCo  Case study team work April 6  Team 3 Case Study Four Molson Coors Brewing Company  Case study team work April 10  First round scores received  Team 1 Case Study Five Hershey Foods Corporation  Case study team work April 13 (Friday the 13 th)  Team 2 Case Study Six Kellogg Company  Case study team work April 17  Team 3 Case Study Seven Freddo (Ice Cream Co.)  Case study team work April 20  Second round Scores received  Team 1 Case Study 19 JetBlue Airlines  Case study team work April 24  Team 2 Case Study 20 AirTran Airways  Case study team work April 27  Team 3 Case Study 21 USA Truck  Case study team work Last 3 cases are student choice  May1 and 4 May 8 in Class Final exam

Grading in this class All assessment guides/rubrics for all assignments and exams were determined prior to the class starting. Most of the assessment metrics are documented in the syllabus. All grades are posted in WebCT Grade calculation (from Syllabus)  Mid Term Exam (Chapter 1-9) 15%  Final Exam (Chaps 1-9 and Cases)25%  Assignments 5%)25%  Case Presentations25%  Pre-professional Conduct 10% If you want to know what you current grade is GO to WebCT and DO the math Midterm Grades were reported Feb 21 (you got them a month later)  (Assignment 1+2+3)/3 = Midterm grade  Any of you that were missing anything received a midterm warning Grading in ALL of my class is objective and dispassionate  Assessment ALLWAYS supports the grade assigned A % B % C % D % F %

A Philosophy of Education Secondary Education  Bloom level 1 (mostly) with some level 2 exposure 100 level course  Bloom level 1 & level course  Bloom level 2 & 3 & level course  Bloom level 3 & 4 & level course (and graduate school)  Bloom 4 & 5 & 6 The practice of Strategic Management is at Bloom level 4, 5 & 6  Chapter 1-9 was Bloom 2, 3, 4 & 5; so was the midterm  My job is to get you to those higher level of cognitive ability  Case Study analysis exposes you to level 4, 5 & 6 cognitive abilities  Final will be be level 2-6 The business management program is beginning to use Bloom taxonomy which is one of the most widely accepted models for student outcome assessment in higher education. The eCommerce program is based on Blooms taxonomy from the very beginning

Bribe List (2007) 2007 BMW M HD FLH “knucklehead” 2007 Ford Shelby Cobra GT Audi R8 Redneck Engineering Chopper  “curves frame” Waltz HardCore Chopper 1950 Buick RoadMaster Convertible

Case Presentation Analysis Company: Date: Presenting Team Members: Place comments after each rating.Ratings (circle the appropriate numbers). CONTENTPoorBelow Average Above Average Superior 1. Mission and Vision Statement Thoroughness, accuracy, and depth of external analysis Thoroughness, accuracy, and depth of internal analysis Identification and evaluation of alternative strategies using matrices Quality, quantity, feasibility, and relevance of recommendations Justification and support for recommendations12345 DELIVERY 1. Organization of presentation Professionalism of presentation Use of visuals and color Communication skills of team Use of time (40 min presentation) Handling of questions (up to 10 minutes)12345 OVERALL EVALUATION:12345 Numeric Score = 40 + (Avg * 12)

Peer Review for Case studies Put your name and your team members’ names in the spaces provided, one name at the top of each column. Names: Ratings: On time for all group meetings: Helped keep the group cohesive: Number of useful ideas contributed: Quantity of work done: Quality of work done: ++++ Add Total Scores Here: In rating yourself and your team members, use a one- to five-point scale, where 5 = superior, 4 = above average, 3 = average, 2 = below average, and 1 = really weak. Add the scores to obtain a total score for yourself and the other group members. Put any comments you like on the bottom or back of this page. Fold this sheet when you complete the ratings below. If you receive a poor rating on this evaluation, your final case average will be lowered one letter grade. A superior rating may add points to the final case average.