Announcements/Updates CSL Usage: (150%/133% thresholds) Development: 197%/117% for 30/90 day Production: 134%/104% for 30/90 day Marika will ask Dave Hart.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intro to Computer Org. Pipelining, Part 2 – Data hazards + Stalls.
Advertisements

Test Case Management and Results Tracking System October 2008 D E L I V E R I N G Q U A L I T Y (Short Version)
“What do you want me to do now?”
Finding an Apartment What is right for you? Click the arrow to continue.
CCSM Testing Status Tony Craig Lawrence Buja Wei Yu CCSM SEWG Meeting Feb 5, 2003.
Project Perfect Pty Ltd Project Administrator Overview of Software.
D. Düllmann - IT/DB LCG - POOL Project1 POOL Release Plan for 2003 Dirk Düllmann LCG Application Area Meeting, 5 th March 2003.
IS 214 Needs Assessment and Evaluation of Information Systems Managing Usability © Copyright 2001 Kevin McBride.
Hints and Tips for New Systems Administrators or What to panic about…… Catherine Jones Systems Librarian.
Software Parallel Intro 1M.Ellis - CM23 - Harbin - 15th January 2009  Focus this CM continues to be on needs for analysis of data and use of G4MICE online.
Configuration Management Process and Environment MACS Review 1 February 5th, 2010 Roland Moser PR a-RMO, February 5 th, 2010 R. Moser 1 R. Gutleber.
University of Palestine software engineering department Testing of Software Systems Fundamentals of testing instructor: Tasneem Darwish.
Possible Strategic Capability Projects High resolution coupled simulation: (ASD) – 1/8 o CAM, 1/10 o POP, 20 years (initially) – SCIDAC proposal: Small,
Testing. Definition From the dictionary- the means by which the presence, quality, or genuineness of anything is determined; a means of trial. For software.
Future of the Partnership Board. The Board asked for a working group to look at the future of the Board People were worried about – Too many meetings.
CCSM Software Engineering Coordination Plan Tony Craig SEWG Meeting Feb 14-15, 2002 NCAR.
Standard Grade Computing SYSTEM SOFTWARE CHAPTER 19.
Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology Software Engineering Project – I Clone of Rally GROUP NO : WD-SEP-002 | PROJECT NO :25 PROJECT : CLONE OF.
1 Copyright ©2004 TAC. 2 T-WorMS Adding Sanity to Your Process Jamie L. Mitchell CTO TAC.
CS 350 – Software Design The Object Paradigm – Chapter 1 If you were tasked to write code to access a description of shapes that were stored in a database.
Git – versioning and managing your software L. Grewe.
Step 5 Studying & Revising. So, we come to the most widely asked question of all: How do I study? The answer isn’t straightforward. Everyone has their.
The B uff. The Buffs Agenda 1. Recent iteration and Progress 2. Plan for next iteration 3. Prototype demonstration.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST Testing processes Leanne Guy Testing activity manager JRA1 All hands meeting,
Regression Testing. 2  So far  Unit testing  System testing  Test coverage  All of these are about the first round of testing  Testing is performed.
CESM WG co-chair meeting March Announcements/Updates CSL Usage: Development: 73%/113% for 30/90 day (150%/133% cut off) Production: 128%/179%
Lessons learned from building and managing the Community Climate System Model David Bailey PCWG liaison (NCAR) Marika Holland PCWG co-chair (NCAR) Elizabeth.
CESM/ESMF Progress Report Mariana Vertenstein NCAR Earth System Laboratory CESM Software Engineering Group (CSEG) NCAR is sponsored by the National Science.
O. Music Classrooms and Teaching Spaces: These are used for teachers and children. They can be used for music practical and music theory.
1 김 수 동 Dept. of Computer Science Soongsil University Tel Fax
QUALITY ASSURANCE PRACTICES. Quality Plan Prepared and approved at the beginning of project Soft filing system approach followed. Filing location – –
New perfSonar Dashboard Andy Lake, Tom Wlodek. What is the dashboard? I assume that everybody is familiar with the “old dashboard”:
Problems in school By: Rory W, Alexis J, Lisa J, and Thomas C.
Y2K/Focus April 1999 S. Jarp Year 2000 co-ordination AT CERN S.Jarp/IT months left 29 April 1999.
Advanced Quantitative Research ED 602. You know, Mary Stevens has really blossomed this year. She is doing much better. Actually, this whole fifth grade.
Process Refactoring Michael L. Collard, Ph.D.. Real World Often ad hoc with no process Different levels of developers knowledge, experience, and capabilities.
Software Configuration Management (SCM). Product Developer Disciplines One view of the world is that there are three types of activities are required.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Testing and Documentation Part II.
Grid Security Vulnerability Group Linda Cornwall, GDB, CERN 7 th September 2005
Article Summary of The Structural Complexity of Software: An Experimental Test By Darcy, Kemerer, Slaughter and Tomayko In IEEE Transactions of Software.
WATERFALL DEVELOPMENT MODEL. Waterfall model is LINEAR development lifecycle. This means each phase must be completed before moving onto the next!!! WHAT.
Matthew Glenn AP2 Techno for Tanzania This presentation will cover the different utilities on a computer.
UHCS 2005, slide 1 About Continuous Integration. UHCS 2005, slide 2 Why do you write Unit Test ? Improve quality/robustness of your code Quick feedback.
(1) Introduction to Continuous Integration Philip Johnson Collaborative Software Development Laboratory Information and Computer Sciences University of.
Copyright © , Dennis J. Frailey, All Rights Reserved Day 2, Part 1, Page 1 1/11/2004 Day 2, Part 1 Estimating Software Size Section 2 Calculating.
Version Control and SVN ECE 297. Why Do We Need Version Control?
Yeah but.. What do I do? Software Leadership Dan Fleck 2007.
CCSM Software Engineering Update Tony Craig CCSM SEWG Meeting Feb 4, 2003.
Thanks for giving me an opportunity to share with you our process for controlling media and other supplies. Disclaimer: We are not yet accredited to ISO.
Copyright © 2004, Keith D Swenson, All Rights Reserved. OASIS Asynchronous Service Access Protocol (ASAP) Tutorial Overview, OASIS ASAP TC May 4, 2004.
Targeting Audiences Plus: Reliability & Performance Updates.
CESM-CAM5 Large Ensemble Update May 13, list for all future updates -
CCSM PROGRAM PLAN an update to science plan and business plan based on the proposals put forward for CSL allocations a possible framework to allocate CCSM.
05 October 2010 HMA-FO Task 2: Feasibility Analysis Service HMA Follow On Activities Task 2: Feasibility Analysis Service (Sensor Planning Service) Monthly.
An operating system for a large-scale computer that is used by many people at once is a very complex system. It contains many millions of lines of instructions.
RAL, 2012, May 11 Research behaviour Martin Juckes, 11 May, 2012.
Open source development model and methodologies.
Effective Time Management
Regression Testing with its types
Managing the Project Lifecycle
Sample Wiki Comments?.
Experimental tag for cesm1.5
Community Earth System Model (CESM) for CMIP6
LCGAA nightlies infrastructure
Taking an Iteration Down to Code
Upgrading Condor Best Practices
Finding and Managing Bugs CSE 403 Lecture 23
Tonga Institute of Higher Education IT 141: Information Systems
Tonga Institute of Higher Education IT 141: Information Systems
System Reengineering Restructuring or rewriting part or all of a system without changing its functionality Applicable when some (but not all) subsystems.
Presentation transcript:

Announcements/Updates CSL Usage: (150%/133% thresholds) Development: 197%/117% for 30/90 day Production: 134%/104% for 30/90 day Marika will ask Dave Hart to increase the thresholds if the machine truly is underutilized (as long as this could be done for the rest of the allocation period). Co-chairs will notify their working groups to run in economy for the month of November. Integrations – LE Runs, Last Millennium, CLM4.5-CAM5 Coupled Run, Others? Last millenium 6 runs in progress: full forcing, volcanic only, solar only, GHG only, Land use/cover only, and one other. These runs are out a few hundred years. 850 control run mostly done CLM4.5 coupled run Amazon forest about 1/3 as healthy as it should be in the coupled run. Since this is the biggest carbon stock on the planet, this is a big deal. Same problem exists in 2 deg run. Dave L is going through a sequence of sensitivity experiments to understand it. It seems like there is a feedback: low RH -> low leaf area, and things die back. Does not seem to be due to precipitation... now looking at other possible factors Large ensemble To relieve glade space, plan to delete the original history files, only saving time slices. This means: if there's anything you want to do with the raw history files, do that now! They're doing finishing touches on BAMS proposal. Note that only AMWG and OMWG are doing diagnostics on these – due to lack of liaisons for the other groups. But they have confirmed that they're saving the files needed to run the other diagnostics in the future.

Announcements/Updates (continued) CSEG (Decaf?!?) Coffee Talk This would be a quick way to communicate to scientists Start in January Talks would compliment written instructions Record and archive Frequency – every 2 months (Brown Bag) Rich: Would be good to have a longer talk on coding standards, maybe bringing more uniformity and quality across component Cecile: important to have scientists involved in development of this. She volunteers to help with this. Gokhan: points out that some software engineering changes (e.g., in coupler) have made it harder to do some science changes. This points to the need for a 2-way dialogue. Trello We are moving a lot of the software engineering planning to trello. e.g., we have cpl, clm, cam boards showing upcoming tasks & projects

Announcements/Updates (continued) New release update procedure CSEG realized that, if we could have a portion of our development repo that was publicly readable, that would streamline the release process and make it less time-consuming. This makes the process of creating release tags more similar to what we do for CESM beta tags. Since it's easier to do release updates, we can do this more frequently (how frequently is TBD) Mariana: From CSEG's point of view, release updates will include machine updates & bug fixes – NOT new science changes, unless the co-chairs decide otherwise. Gokhan: Would this reduce human cost of creating releases, especially related to testing? Mariana: it might reduce test costs, because we won't have to rerun the whole test suite if the fixes are limited to a subset of the system. Keith: An example: BGC group wants to get CMIP compsets into the 1.0 series. Does this change this? Mariana: no & yes: we would first target the 1.2 series, but then we can consider doing the 1.0 series. Jim: if you were willing to do a large chunk of the work to put this in & test it, this might be doable. JF: thinks we're opening a can of worms if we let new science come in. Jen: need to prioritize, and sees machine updates for yellowstone as a higher priority than science updates that will only benefit a small set of people. Marika: part of this is seeing how much work reduction this really means, then we can revisit what it means in terms of frequency of release updates. Gokhan requests a record of how much time is spent on a release update. Mike Levy: There currently isn't clear documentation of when a minor release will happen, and what the process is for getting a bug fix into the next minor release Marika: Note that we previously said we weren't going to have minor releases (except for the annual release), so this is allowing for the possibility that we might have some now