AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

North Santiam School District State Report Cards
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens, Assessment and Accountability Greg Houser, Student Learning and Partnerships Oregon Department.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Cohort Graduation Rate. Understand the changes to the graduation rate Understand how the cohort graduation rate will affect schools and districts Objectives.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Growth. 10/17/2015Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Growth. Growth Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student achievement and equity. Objectives.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
1 Student Longitudinal Growth Project Jonathan Wiens Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Cohort Graduation Rate. 1/8/2016Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the changes to the graduation rate Understand how the cohort.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Update on Accountability March “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
AYP and Report Card.
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Cohort Graduation Rate
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Growth Last updated: 08/20/09.
AYP and Report Card.
Presentation transcript:

AYP and Report Card

Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon Assessments. – Understand your responsibilities in relation to AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC

AYP AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) is a federal accountability reporting requirement under the No Child Left Behind Act. (Started ) Under AYP, ODE reports on whether schools and districts have made adequate progress toward the goal of having all students meet rigorous academic standards. Each year, the performance of all students in the school and district, as well as subgroups of students, are measured against annual performance targets. States must identify for improvement any school or district receiving Title I funds that does not meet adequate yearly progress for two consecutive years in the same content area. Overview

AYP/RC AYP (cont.) In order to meet AYP – All subgroups in a school must meet the participation and academic performance targets in English/Language Arts and Mathematics* – The school must meet the target for attendance or graduation – 2 years of data are used or 4 years used for small schools The targets this year are: – Participation – 95% – Math – 80% – English/Language Arts – 80% – Attendance 92% or Graduation – 67% for 4-Year Cohort – 72% for 5-Year Cohort * - Subgroups must meet a minimum size requirement to be rated. School YearEnglish/ Language Arts Mathematics %59% % % % % Criteria and Targets

AYP/RC AYP (cont.) If any subgroup of students or the student body as a whole in a school does not meet the targets, or does not make sufficient progress toward the targets, the school is designated as not meeting AYP. District AYP Designation is based on results for three grade spans: Elementary Grades (K-5) Middle Grades (6-8) High School Grades (9-12) At the district level, if any subgroup in any grade span for any content area is NOT MET, then the district is designated as NOT MET. District vs. School Performance

AYP/RC Title I schools are subject to sanctions if they are designated as not meeting AYP for the second consecutive year in the same area (i.e. English/language arts, mathematics, or other indicator). Title I districts are subject to sanctions if the same area is not met across all three grade spans for the second consecutive year. Even though mandatory consequences contained in the No Child Left Behind Act do not apply to schools not receiving Title I funds, all schools are expected to help all students reach state standards. A school or district that does not meet AYP should not be labeled as failing, since the designation may be based on a single factor or a single subgroup. AYP (cont.) Consequences of AYP Not Met

AYP/RC Report Card In state law, they are actually named “school and district performance reports.” These reports provide educators with an opportunity to communicate directly with parents and community members about how local schools are performing. The form of the Report Cards is used to meet state and federal reporting requirements. Overview

AYP/RC Report Card (cont.) Three overall rating categories – Outstanding – Satisfactory – In Need of Improvement Achievement based on math and reading scores. The growth model is incorporated into achievement. Graduation/Attendance and Participation are included in the rating system. Rating

AYP/RC Report Card (cont.) Achievement points awarded according to: – 133 points for Exceeds – 100 points for Meets – 100 points for Did Not Meet, but Met Growth Achievement Index is a weighted average of the performance of subgroups. High schools use growth in school performance as the growth measure. Low Attendance, Graduation or Participation can lower the school rating. Rating (cont.)

The growth target is not the ultimate goal for the student. The goal for the students is to meet the grade level achievement standard. The growth model sets intermediate goals for students, allowing them to move up to standard over a period of several years. Look at each student’s testing history (as displayed on the Growth Individual Student Report) to gain a more comprehensive view of each student’s achievement. AYP/RC Growth

AYP/RC Growth (cont.) Reading Growth Target Example 3 rd Grade Gap = 16 A student scores a 195 in 3 rd grade, which is 16 RIT points below the reading standard. To meet the growth target the student must decrease this gap by at least 33%, or 5.33 points, which is rounded up to 6. This means the target gap is 16- 6=10 points, or a score of 206 on the 4 th grade assessment. Student score = 195 Target 4 th Grade Gap = 10 Growth Target = 206 4thGrade Cut Score = 216

AYP/RC Cohort Graduation Rate Each school’s cohort begins with the set of first time 9 th graders in a particular year. Cohorts are “adjusted” by adding students to the cohort as they transfer into the school, and are removing them from the cohort if they transfer to another high school, emigrate or are deceased. The Four-year cohort graduation rate is the percent of students in the adjusted cohort that earn a regular high school diploma within four years. Only regular high school diplomas count as graduates for purposes of the cohort rate. Modified diplomas, GEDs, extended diplomas, and certificates of attendance are counted as non- graduates.

AYP/RC Changes New achievement standards for Reading -Academic Status for Reading based on tests on standards -Academic Growth for Reading based on tests on standards Cohort Graduation Targets - Four-Year target increased from 65% to 67% - Five-Year target increased from 70% to 72% New Race/Ethnicity Subgroups -Asian and Pacific Islander reported as separate subgroups for Assessment and Attendance AYP

AYP/RC Changes (cont) Basically the same as Report Card

AYP/RC Do’s and Don’ts Include students for participation if they were enrolled on the first school day in May. Include students for performance if they were enrolled on the first school day of May for a full academic year. Include Extended Assessments within 1% cap as Meets or Exceeds. Monitor data throughout the year. Do’s

Do’s and Don’ts (cont.) Don’ts Don’t include Extended Assessments over 1% cap as Meets. Anything over 1% must be recorded as Does not meet. Don’t leave a school as “pending”. ODE will default schools to rating of “Not Met”. Don’t code students at the district level unless a school is not accountable for their education. Don’t over use the District Special Education Flag. AYP/RC

AYP: – Targets go up – New Reading Achievement Standards – Asian and Pacific Islander split Report Card stays basically the same. In a Nutshell AYP/RC

2/25/2016Free Template from