1 Diodes (APDs) for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter in the ALICE experiment Paola La Rocca University and INFN Catania Characterization of Avalanche Photo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Charm and beauty with ALICE at LHC
Advertisements

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
2008, July Nantes 1 APD Tests : Status and Protocol Giuseppe S. Pappalardo INFN Catania.
Centauro and STrange Object Research (CASTOR) - A specialized detector system dedicated to the search for Centauros and Strangelets in the baryon dense,
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Levente Molnar, INFN-Bari, KFKI-RMKIMarch, 2007, Jyväskylä1 Prospects on identified particle correlation in ALICE Levente Molnar INFN-Bari, KFKI-RMKI.
Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC David Hardtke LBNL.
1 Working Group 5: Particle Identified Studies in Jets - Status / Plans (July 23 rd, 2008) - Group Coordinator: Rene Bellwied (WSU) Group Contributors:
Identification of Upsilon Particles Using the Preshower Detector in STAR Jay Dunkelberger, University of Florida.
Mini Bang at Big Accelerators Prashant Shukla Institute of Physics University of Heidelberg Presentation at ISA, 30 January 2005, Heidelberg, Germany.
Timing Properties of T0 Detectors At PHOBOS Saba Zuberi, Erik Johnson, Nazim Khan, Frank Wolfs, Wojtek Skulski University of Rochester.
ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.
Cynthia HadjidakisTerzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE Detection of photons and electrons in EMCAL Photons, Electrons and  0 at large p T Identification.
October-November 2003China - ALICE meeting1 PHOS in ALICE A PHOton Spectrometer with unique capabilities for the detection/identification of photons and.
Ken Read Oak Ridge National Laboratory/ University of Tennessee on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration SESAPS 2008, Raleigh, NC October 30, 2008 Research.
03/27/'07T. ISGC20071 Computing GRID for ALICE in Japan Hiroshima University Takuma Horaguchi for the ALICE Collaboration
JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII
Photon physics in ALICE Y.Kharlov D.Peressounko IHEP RRC “Kurchatov Institute” for the ALICE collaboration and.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
12/12/2010 LHC First Data 2010 – Ann Arbor, USA J.L. Klay 1 A first glimpse down the rabbit hole: status of ALICE after one year Jennifer Klay California.
Update on Silicon Photomultipliers Yi Qiang (Hall-D) Jefferson Lab S&T Review May 10, 2011.
Physics in Initial Years at ALICE Kenta Shigaki, Hiroshima University (ALICE Collaboration) 30, October 2007 Workshop on Phenomenology of QGP in Heavy.
28 April 0 Yaxian Mao, Daicui Zhou, Yves Schutz In ALICE Physics Workgroup: High p T and photons ( for ALICE collaboration -- Wuhan)
Heavy Ions at the LHC Peter G. Jones University of Birmingham, UK NP UK Community Meeting, Cosener’s House, September 2008.
SiPM: Development and Applications
Matching between charged tracks and electromagnetic calorimeter (EMCAL) clusters in ALICE Alberto Pulvirenti University & INFN Catania ACAT 2007 Conference.
1 ALICE T0 detector W.H.Trzaska (on behalf of T0 Group) LHCC Comprehensive Review, March 2003.
ALICE-USA Collaboration T.M. Cormier Wayne State University for the ALICE – USA Collaboration Jet Physics in ALICE and a Proposed Electromagnetic Calorimeter.
E.Kistenev Large area Electromagnetic Calorimeter for ALICE What EMC can bring to ALICE Physics and engineering constrains One particular implementation.
15-16 Oct 2005 Alice-USA meetingAleksei Pavlinov GEANT EMCAL geometry for ALICE current status Aleksei Pavlinov WSU.
Heavy flavour capabilities with the ALICE TRD Benjamin Dönigus ISNP 2008 Erice/Sicily.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
EMCal in ALICE Norbert Novitzky 1. Outline How Electro-Magnetic Calorimeters works ? Physics motivation – What can we measure with Emcal ? – Advantages.
Jet Physics in ALICE Mercedes López Noriega - CERN for the ALICE Collaboration Hot Quarks 2006 Villasimius, Sardinia - Italy.
The 21st International Conference on Ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, March 30 – April 4, Knoxville, TN Results from cosmics and First LHC.
The ALICE Experiment at the CERN LHC P. Kuijer for the Alice collaboration ICHEP 2002.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Prospects in ALICE for  mesons Daniel Tapia Takaki (Birmingham, UK) for the ALICE Collaboration International Conference on STRANGENESS IN QUARK MATTER.
FIT (Fast Interaction Trigger) detector development for ALICE experiment at LHC (CREN) Institute for Nuclear Research (INR RAS) National Research Nuclear.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
first results from EMCal test beam
Photon Detector with PbWO 4 Crystals and APD Readout APS “April” Meeting in Denver, CO on May 4, 2004 presented by Kenta Shigaki (Hiroshima University,
Nantes — 2008, July Analysis of results from EmCal beam test at CERN PS (and SPS) energies P. La Rocca & F. Riggi University & INFN Catania University.
The ALICE Experiment Event by Event fluctuations ALICE TOF Calibration 30th November 2007Chiara Zampolli1.
Aerogel Cherenkov Counters for the ALICE Detector G. Paić Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM For the ALICE VHMPID group.
A Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) Based Readout for the sPHENIX Upgrade S. Boose, J. Haggerty, E. Mannel, A. Sukhanov For the PHENIX Collaboration Introduction:
March 3, 2008E. Scapparone INSTR081 Particle identification in ALICE E. Scapparone(INFN/CERN) on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration INSTR08, March 3, 2008.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
Results from ALICE Christine Nattrass for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville.
The Double Ridge Phenomenon in p-Pb Collisions Measured with ALICE Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus, CERN for the ALICE Collaboration Moriond QCD 2013.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
January 2011, Cracow Epiphany Conference Adam Matyja Inclusive production of neutral mesons in ALICE Outline Motivation Experimental apparatus.
Jet-Hadron Azimuthal Correlation Measurements in pp Collisions at √s = 2.76 TeV and 7 TeV with ALICE 2012/08/11-18 Quark Matter 2012 Motivation PhysRevC (CMS)PhysRevC (PHENIX)
SPHENIX Mid-rapidity extensions: Additional Tracking system and pre-shower Y. Akiba (RIKEN/RBRC) sPHENIX workfest July 29,
CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER Jean-Pierre Ernenwein OVERVIEW 6th international conference on advanced technology and particle physics Villa Olmo, Como,
May 10-14, 2010CALOR2010, Beijing, China 1 Readout electronics of the ALICE photon spectrometer Zhongbao Yin *, Lijiao Liu, Hans Muller, Dieter Rohrich,
Performance Evaluation for Open Charm and Beauty Measurement at LHC ALICE PID capability from λ and K s 0 measurement at LHC ALICE 筑波大学数理物質科学研究科 Kengo.
The ALICE Electromagnetic Calorimeter
Prospect of SiPM application to TOF in PANDA
The PSD at Pb-Pb run PSD drawbacks at Ar beam
Review of ALICE Experiments
The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR
Jet reconstruction in ALICE using the EMCal
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Jet Physics in Heavy Ion Collisions with the ALICE Detector at the LHC
Jet Measurements with the EMCal of ALICE
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
Presentation transcript:

1 Diodes (APDs) for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter in the ALICE experiment Paola La Rocca University and INFN Catania Characterization of Avalanche Photo Florence, 29 th June 07

2 The ALICE experiment at LHC ALICE ElectroMagnetic CALorimeter APD testing station in Catania Test results Conclusions and Perspectives Outline

3 The Large Hadron Collider CERN Z Point 2: ALICE Florence, 29 th June 07

4 Layout of the ALICE detector ITS low p t tracking Vertexing ITS low p t tracking Vertexing TPC Tracking, dE/dx TPC Tracking, dE/dx TRD Electron ID TRD Electron ID TOF PID TOF PID HMPID PID at high p t HMPID PID at high p t PHOS ,  0 PHOS ,  0 MUON-Arm  -pairs MUON-Arm  -pairs PMD  multiplicity PMD  multiplicity EMCAL Photons, jets EMCAL Photons, jets Florence, 29 th June 07

5 ALICE will track and identify products from pp and nucleus-nucleus collisions in a large multiplicity environment (dN ch /dy up to 8000). Main tasks: studying QCD matter under extreme conditions studying the phase transition between confined matter and Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) Alice Physics Florence, 29 th June 07

6 The ElectroMagnetic CALorimeter Total Coverage  = 110° -0.7 < η < 0.7 Florence, 29 th June 07 EMCal design is heavily influenced by its integration within the magnet It provides a partial back-to-back coverage with the PHOS Spectrometer ALICE Calorimeters: PHOS & EMCal

7 EMCal Physics Motivation: jet study Jet : A fast quark or gluon plus its radiation (theory). Collimated bundle of particles with high p T (experiment). Jet quenching : Change of the jet properties when traversing a colored medium with respect to those in vacuum. Florence, 29 th June 07 The combination of the EMCal with the unique tracking and particle ID capabilities of ALICE enable the most extensive measurements of jet quenching at the LHC

8 EMCal Physics Performance /1 Florence, 29 th June 07 EMCal provides : High p T trigger Improved jet reconstruction up to 200 GeV Most probable measured fraction of jet energy: below 20% about 50% about 90%

9 EMCal Physics Performance /2 Florence, 29 th June 07  /  0 discrimination (direct photon measurements) Shape analysis + invariant mass e - /  - discrimination (Heavy Quark Jets)

10 10 super modules with 12 x 24 modules  = 20°  = super modules with 6 x 24 modules  = 20°  = 0.7 Modules with 2 x 2 towers Total Number of Towers: The EMCal Project Florence, 29 th June 07

11 Elementary Module : Towers 77 alternating layers of Pb and polystyrene based scintillator Radiation Length ~ 20 X 0 Front dimensions 6×6 cm 2 Design resolution:  E /E~1% + 8%/√E Scintillation photons produced in each tower are collected by an array of 36 optical fibres (Shashlik fiber geometry) Florence, 29 th June 07 Transmitted Light is recorded with Avalanche Photo Diode (APD)

12 EMCal Planning and Organization Florence, 29 th June 07 Catania Task : testing activity on ~3000 APDs Current expectations : Sept - Oct 2007 beam tests at PS and SPS Several US and EU institutes involved in the EMCal project (Italy : Frascati, Catania) Actually tested a batch of 80 APDs

13 Hamamatsu APDs Si APS S8664 series R&D Activity by the CMS Coll. & Hamamatsu Photonics To be used in EMCal calorimeter in a similar way that is already used by PHOS ( different temperature and gain ) S APD Florence, 29 th June 07

14 Hamamatsu APDs Si APS S8664 series Florence, 29 th June 07

15 EMCal Readout Electronics EmCal electronic requirements are quite similar to those of PHOS  PHOS readout electronics has been adopted for the EmCal readout (with minor modifications) DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS: Large dynamic range ~14bits: dual gain range shapers, flash ADC Fast trigger input based on overlapping tower energy sums Individual APD bias control for gain matching Appropriate timing for low energy neutron / antineutron rejection Florence, 29 th June 07

16 EMCal Readout Electronics Florence, 29 th June 07

17 APDs Testing Activity  APD Calibration is important to: Improve the EMCal energy resolution Provide a good L0 and L1 trigger  Tasks: Selecting APDs according to their performances Measuring the APD gain dependence on the bias voltage (Voltage Coefficient dM/dV × 1/M) Evaluating the nominal voltage setting for the APD to obtain gain M=30 (instead of 50 as for PHOS) Measuring the APD gain dependence on the operating temperature (Temperature Coefficient dM/dT × 1/M) Florence, 29 th June 07

18 Testing set-up / 1 HV APD OUT PA Voltages Light Out LED box Copper Plate Pulse Generator (Amplitude 3.1 V Frequency 100 Hz Width 50 ns) Oscilloscope max Optical fibers T-card HV LED CHILLERCHILLER Florence, 29 th June 07

19 Testing set-up / 2 Florence, 29 th June 07

20 Oscilloscope Measurements Use of oscilloscope histogramming capabilities to perform measurements Florence, 29 th June 07

21 APD Gain dependence on bias voltage M(V) = H(V) / H(plateau) Parameterization with an exponential plus a constant: M(V) = p 0 + p 1 exp(p 2 V) Florence, 29 th June 07

22 Voltage coefficient of the gain versus gain (1/M)*dM/dV from parameterization at room temperature ( T = + 25 °C) At M = 30 and T = +22 °C (1/M) * dM/dV ≈ 2. 3 % / V M = 30 At M = 50 and T = +25 °C (1/M) * dM/dV ≈ 3 % / V CMS value (M = 50): 3. 3 % /V at room temperature M = 50 With a bias voltage control step of 0.2 V/bit, a voltage coefficient of 2.3% / V M=30) would limit the Gain calibration to 0.46 % Florence, 29 th June 07

23 APD Gain dependence on temperature /1 Florence, 29 th June 07

24 APD Gain dependence on temperature/2 The gain decreases when the temperature increases. - Small fluctuations from APD to APD - Realistic measurement of the temperature (thermal equilibrium and thermocouple position) Florence, 29 th June 07

25 Temperature coefficient 1/M dM/dT = -1.7 % M = 30) Example:  T =  1° C M = 30  0.5 Florence, 29 th June 07

26 Gain of 80 APDs for a fixed HV Considerable differences in individual APD gain exist for production batches when the same reverse-bias voltage is applied at an operating temperature of +25° C Florence, 29 th June 07

27 Distribution V 30 V 30 : Voltage at which gain M = 30 At room temperature (+25° C) V 30 value should be lower than 400 V Florence, 29 th June 07 The safety limit changes depending on the operating temperature

28 V 30 –V Breakdown Correlation Florence, 29 th June 07 V30 voltage is highly correlated with V50 and with V Breakdown It should be safe to operate the APDs up to 400V without too much care about possible breakdown.

29 EMCal Calibration Florence, 29 th June 07 1.APD pre-Calibration An example: the PHOS Calibration Before calibration After calibration (H. Müller, J. Hamblen, L. Benhabib) Resolution ~ 5%

30 EMCal Calibration Florence, 29 th June In-beam MIP, Electron and  0 Calibrations 2. Cosmic Ray Calibration (relative calibration of individual module better than 5%) (H. Müller, J. Hamblen, L. Benhabib)

31 Florence, 29 th June 07 Conclusions and Perspectives Present Status: A working testing station has been set up First results of the APD characteristics fits the experimental requirements of the EMCal A first batch of 80 APDs analyzed In the future: Sept - Oct beam tests Writing a common protocol for the preparation and testing of APDs Starting the testing activity for APD mass production

32

33 Radiation Hardness /1 CMS collaboration studied extensively the radiation damage in S8664 APDs Florence, 29 th June 07  Irradiation for about 2 h with a 2 nA beam of 64 MeV protons (equivalent to a neutron flux of about 2×10 13 neutrons/cm 2 – the expected total neutron fluence after 10 years of LHC operation in the central section of the calorimeter)  annealing for a week at a temperature of 90°C and  all parameters re-measured K. Deiters et al. / NIMA 453 (2000) 223 No changes in the gain curve Slight changes Increase of the dark current No changes in the quantum efficiency

34 Radiation Hardness /2 Radiation in ALICE detectors in 10 years running scenario Florence, 29 th June 07

35 Energy Resolution Florence, 29 th June 07 8% intrinsic 1% calibration Digitization (full scale=250 GeV) PA/shaper eNC=2000 (48MeV)

36 Statistics provided by Hamamatsu /1 1 st batch of 100 APDs Florence, 29 th June 07

37 Statistics provided by Hamamatsu /2 The breakdown voltage is highly correlated with V50 It should be safe to operate the APDs up to 400V without too much care about possible breakdown. Florence, 29 th June 07