FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
Advertisements

Chapter 30. Induction and Inductance
Current and Resistance
Magnetic Circuits and Transformers
12: Electromagnetic Induction 12.1 Induced Electromotive Force.
Lecture 20 Discussion. [1] A rectangular coil of 150 loops forms a closed circuit with a resistance of 5 and measures 0.2 m wide by 0.1 m deep, as shown.
Lecture #26 Gate delays, MOS logic
1 Faraday’s Law of Induction If C is a stationary closed curve and S is a surface spanning C then The changing magnetic flux through S induces a non-electrostatic.
Martin Wilson Lecture 5 slide1 'Pulsed Superconducting Magnets' CERN Academic Training May 2006 Plan the quench process decay times and temperature rise.
1 DC ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS INDUCTANCE. 2 DC ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS When current travels down a conductor it creates a magnetic field around the conductor,
1 QXF heater proposal M. Marchevsky, H. Felice, T. Salmi, D. Cheng, G. Sabbi, LBNL.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
Rumus yang dipakai.
1 Faraday’s Law Chapter Ampere’s law Magnetic field is produced by time variation of electric field.
3 Nov 2006S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection of the 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. 3 November 2006.
HQ02b Meeting 4/24/14High Miits Study – G. Sabbi 1 High MIITs Study GianLuca Sabbi Video meeting on HQ02b test results – April 24, 2014.
Chapter 20 Induced Voltages and Inductance. Faraday’s Experiment – Set Up A current can be produced by a changing magnetic field First shown in an experiment.
Helene Felice With great help from many: Giorgio Ambrosio, Berhnard Auchmann, Philippe Fazilleau, Massimo Sorbi, Heng Pan, Lidia Rossi, Tiina Salmi… WAMSDO.
Anharmonic Effects. Any real crystal resists compression to a smaller volume than its equilibrium value more strongly than expansion to a larger volume.
Current Electric Current (I)
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IR Quad Heaters.
A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 3 Feb 2009, LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix 2009 Arjan Verweij TE-MPE - joint stability - what was wrong with the ‘old’ bus-bar.
1 Numerical study of the thermal behavior of an Nb 3 Sn high field magnet in He II Slawomir PIETROWICZ, Bertrand BAUDOUY CEA Saclay Irfu, SACM Gif-sur-Yvette.
HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 review, 20/1/2011, Philippe Fazilleau, 1/16 EuCARD-WP7-HFM Dipole Conceptual Review Nb 3 Sn dipole protection Philippe.
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
TUesday, April 12, PHYS Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 02 Review #2 Tuesday April 12, 2011 Dr. Andrew Brandt TEST IS THURSDAY 4/14.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
LQ Quench Protection – G. Ambrosio 1 LQ DS video Mtg – May. 23, 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Quench Protection Giorgio Ambrosio LQ DS.
USPAS January 2012, Austin, Texas: Superconducting accelerator magnets Unit 7 AC losses in Superconductors Soren Prestemon and Helene Felice Lawrence Berkeley.
1 Feb 2007S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection for Very High Field Magnets using HTS Conductors Stephen Kahn Muons Inc. NFMCC UCLA Meeting 1.
E. Todesco PROTECTION IN MAGNET DESIGN E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With help from B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, H. Felice, J. Fleiter, T. Salmi, M.
Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.
WAMSDO-2013, New Techniques, GdR WAMSDO, January 2013 Gijs de Rijk CERN 1 NEW TECHNIQUES.
QXF quench heater delay simulations Tiina Salmi, T. Salmi.
Martin Wilson Lecture 4 slide1 JUAS February 2015 Lecture 4: Quenching and Protection Plan the quench process decay times and temperature rise propagation.
Upper limits for QPS thresholds for selected 600 A circuits B. Auchmann, D. Rasmussen, A. Verweij with kind help from J. Feuvrier, E. Garde, C. Gilloux,
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Quench modelling for accelerator magnets L. Bottura and S. Izquierdo Bermudez CERN TE-MSC Boston October 9 th -11 th, 2013 A Case Study and Various Other.
Advanced simulations of events in the RB circuit Short circuit to ground Quench of a dipole provoked by the quench heaters Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to.
1 QXF / SQXF heater design update M. Marchevsky (12/03/13)
DC Generators (ii) Lecture No 4. Armature Resistance (Ra) The resistance offered by the armature circuit is known as armature resistance (Ra) and includes:
Quench Protection Maximum Voltages G. Ambrosio, V. Marinozzi, M. Sorbi WG Video-Mtg January 14, 2015.
Pier Paolo Granieri, TE-CRG Collimation Upgrade Specification Meeting #35 21 st March, 2014.
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
FEASIBILITY ANALYS OF AN MHD INDUCTIVE GENERATOR COUPLED WITH A THERMO - ACOUSTIC ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM S. Carcangiu 1, R. Forcinetti 1, A. Montisci.
CURRENT, RESISTANCE, AND ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE Chapter 4.
SC Undulators protection and commissioning W. Venturini Delsolaro Acknowledgements: R. Denz, R. Maccaferri.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
The most likely cause of death for a superconducting magnet Input data for thermal modeling of Nb 3 Sn Superconducting Magnets by Andrew Davies Find the.
CHATS-AS 2011clam1 Integrated analysis of quench propagation in a system of magnetically coupled solenoids CHATS-AS 2011 Claudio Marinucci, Luca Bottura,
Cold powering test results of the 11 T cosθ model magnets at CERN Gerard Willering With thanks to Jerome Feuvrier, Vincent Desbiolles, Hugo Bajas, Marta.
12: Electromagnetic Induction
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
Status of QLASA Tool Adapter
MQY-30 Test Result Report
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
MQXF Quench Protection and Meeting Goals
MMI^2T limits for magnets, what are they and how where they developed
Quench protection of the MAGIX high-order correctors
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
I2 is decreasing in magnitude I2 is constant
Using the code QP3 to calculate quench thresholds for the MB
FRESCA Facility for the REception of Superconducting CAbles
Chapter 31 Faraday’s Law 31.1 Faraday’s Law of Induction
PANDA solenoid quench calculations
Chapter 29 D.C. Motor. Chapter 29 D.C. Motor D.C. Motor C-29 Motor Principle Comparison of Generator and Motor Action Significance of the Back e.m.f.
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
DC CIRCUITS: CHAPTER 4.
Presentation transcript:

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 1/19 FRESCA II Dipole review March 28 th, CERN Magnet protection Protection studies by Philippe Fazilleau – presented by Maria Durante CEA Saclay / IRFU / SACM / LEAS

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 2/19 Outline Dipole Conceptual Review January 2011 Magnet protection principles New computations 2D FEM model: - quench heaters - dump resistor 2D FEM results: - quenched volume - coil temperature - dump resistor - current decrease - hot spot temperature versus detection time Conclusions and future actions

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 3/19 DCR January 2011 Results from computations made with the QTRANSIT fortran code had been presented : 3D simulation of the quench thermal transient in the magnet was based on quench propagation velocities and the resistance growth with time. transverse propagation longitudinal propagation quench ignition or    Computation hypothesis transverse propagation

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 4/19 DCR January 2011 To the question, « Is the quench protection for the dipole sufficient? », the recommendations had been : 1.The quench protection in case of a quench starting in the high field region is fine; although the transverse propagation (layer-layer, turn-turn) should be decreased in the simulations in order to make sure that computations are conservative. Specifically, as one of the worst scenario, the transverse normal zone propagation speed (in the presentation it was 25 cm/s) should be zero. 2.The quench protection should be studied also in case of a quench starting in the low field region when the magnet is carrying its nominal operating current. 3.You may consider another protection technique in which the magnet is subdivided by shunt resistors, e.g., each of the four coils will be shunted by a resistor. This subdivision, however, must consider the unbalanced forces that might result from the non-uniform current flows in the four coils induced upon quenching.

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 5/19 Magnet protection principles The protection technique is based on the extraction of the magnetic stored energy into a dump resistor, as well as on the development of coil internal resistance thanks to quench heaters Grounding circuit ± V max /2 to ground, Inductances computed with ROXIE DP1 DP2 DP3 DP4

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 6/19 New computations To get rid of the propagation velocities, we have decided to made new computations with the FEM code CAST3M, where only thermal and electrical properties of coil components are used.  2D FEM computations have been led in order to evaluate temperature and current evolution with time following quench heater activation  3D FEM computations will be led in order to ascertain the behavior of the quench propagation before the activation of the heaters.

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 7/19 2D FEM model Quench heaters are activated and the code computes the quench propagation, the current decrease and the temperature distribution within the dipole. 0,2 mm 0,05 mm Conductor Kapton Fiberglass Insulation Quench Heaters 0,1 mm 1,5 mm 0,5 mm

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 8/19 Quench heaters o Quench heater detailed design is not yet defined. o We expect a heater power of 50 W/cm2 with a spatial distribution as uniform as possible. o In 2D model, heater power is uniform on the coil surface. o In order to take into account real spatial distribution, we decided to decrease heater power for computations: it was then set at 25 W/cm², which correspond to a power distribution on half of the coil surface. o The pulse of power has been set to 50 ms.

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 9/19 Dump resistor I : nominal current, t : time, L : magnet inductance,  : overall resistivity, C P = specific heat.

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 10/19 2D results: quenched volume FEM code computes the evolution of the quenched volume with time It takes 457 ms to totally quench the dipole. The time delay between the activation of the heaters and the quench ignition in the dipole is 20 ms.

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 11/19 2D results: coil temperature Temperature evolution in the coils between heater activation and 1 s

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 12/19 2D results: coil temperature Due to the heaters, the temperature is well distributed and the thermal gradients are kept low. Temperature distribution at t = 0.98 s

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 13/19 2D results: coil temperature The use of 4 heaters helps to distribute more uniformly the temperature (lower temperatures gradients). Temperature distribution in the case of 2 external heaters Temperature distribution in the case of 4 heaters

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 14/19 2D results: dump resistor The temperature of the dump resistor at the end of the discharge is 622 K, which is an acceptable value. Dump resistance increases by 30 % during magnet discharge The voltage at the terminals of the dump resistor remains maximum at the beginning of the discharge (nul slope).

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 15/19 FEM code computes the evolution of the current decrease with time The time constant (I/e) is 520 ms. 2D results: current decrease

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 16/19 2D results: hot spot temperature From the current evolution, the adiabatic hot spot temperature is calculated and compared to the maximum temperature computed by the FEM code. The good accordance between the two curves allows us to use current evolution to evaluate the maximal temperature J(t) : overall current density, t : time,  (  ) : overall resistivity,  : density,  : temperature, C(  ) = specific heat.

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 17/19 2D results: hot spot temperature Curve (t > t det ) determined by 2D FEM computations The hot spot temperature can then be calculated in function of the detection time by assuming the magnet current equal to nominal current during t det and using the current decrease given by FEM calculations for t > t det.

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 18/19 2D results: hot spot temperature The following figure gives the hot spot temperature in the dipole, in function of the detection time t det. If we want a maximal temperature in the coils below 150 K, the detection time should be lower than 30 ms. We expect a t det of 100 ms : this lead to a maximal temperature of 203 K for 4 heaters and 230 K for 2 heaters. The use of 4 heaters decreases the maximal temperature in the dipole The maximal temperature difference between the cases with 2 and 4 heaters is of about 30 K.

FRESCA II dipole review, 28/ 03/2012, Ph. Fazilleau, M. Durante, 19/19 Conclusions and future actions The 4 heaters 2D FEM study shows a good protection of the magnet in the case the quench detection occurs within 100 ms. 3D FEM computations must be led in order to evaluate the behavior of the quench propagation before the activation of the heaters. 2.The quench protection should be studied also in case of a quench starting in the low field region when the magnet is carrying its nominal operating current. 3D computations of detection time will be led in the low field region where propagation velocities are lower; the MQE will also be computed. 3.You may consider another protection technique in which the magnet is subdivided by shunt resistors, e.g., each of the four coils will be shunted by a resistor. If 3D study shows detection time consistent with 100 ms, the protection system based on dump resistor and heaters is adequate for the dipole. If the 3D study shows a detection time too large, a complementary protection technique must be considered.