A Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Study of Drug-72 and Drug-12 Department of Mathematic & Statistics York University Yufeng Lin Xiaofeng Zhou.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Asthma Trial – a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study Team Moser: Jing Dong Yan Yan Wu Haipeng Yao.
Advertisements

Research Study Designs
Lab exam when: Nov 27 - Dec 1 length = 1 hour –each lab section divided in two register for the exam in your section so there is a computer reserved for.
WARM – UP 1. What is the Critical Value t* for a distribution of 26 observation with probability 0.10 to the Right? 2. What is the Critical Value t* for.
BS704 Class 7 Hypothesis Testing Procedures
Statistical Analysis. Purpose of Statistical Analysis Determines whether the results found in an experiment are meaningful. Answers the question: –Does.
Hypothesis Testing – Examples and Case Studies
 Be familiar with the types of research study designs  Be aware of the advantages, disadvantages, and uses of the various research design types  Recognize.
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
T tests comparing two means t tests comparing two means.
Study design P.Olliaro Nov04. Study designs: observational vs. experimental studies What happened?  Case-control study What’s happening?  Cross-sectional.
Clinical Trials - PHASE 1. WHAT ARE PHASE I TRIALS ?  Phase I trials refer to the first introduction of an experimental drug into the human population.
Section Inference for Experiments Objectives: 1.To understand how randomization differs in surveys and experiments when comparing two populations.
© Oxford University Press 2011 IB Testing new drugs Testing new drugs.
Pediatric Endocrinology Use of Biologic and Chemotherapeutic Agents Pediatric Endocrinology Use of Biologic and Chemotherapeutic Agents.
Research Study Design. Objective- To devise a study method that will clearly answer the study question with the least amount of time, energy, cost, and.
Interaction between acetaminophen and warfarin in adults receiving long-term oral anticoagulants: a randomized controlled trial นศภ. ณัฐวุฒิ ดวงแดง มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่
1 I4E-MC-JXBA and JXBB Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the PK and Drug-Drug Interaction of Cetuximab and Cisplatin (JXBA) Cetuximab and Cisplatin (JXBB)
The Practice of Statistics Third Edition Chapter 13: Comparing Two Population Parameters Copyright © 2008 by W. H. Freeman & Company Daniel S. Yates.
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Types of Research and Designs This week and next week… Covering –Research classifications –Variables –Steps in Experimental Research –Validity –Research.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 Gathering Data Section 4.3 Good and Poor Ways to Experiment.
Two-Sample Inference Procedures with Means. Remember: We will be interested in the difference of means, so we will use this to find standard error.
The COMBINE Study: Design and Methodology Stephanie S. O’Malley, Ph.D. for The COMBINE Study Research Group JAMA Vol. 295, , 2006 (May 3 rd.
Essential Question:  How do scientists use statistical analyses to draw meaningful conclusions from experimental results?
Inference for Two Population Means Goal: Hypothesis Test or Confidence interval for the “average difference” between two populations There are two designs.
A health magazine recently reported a study in which researchers claimed that iron supplements increased memory and problem-solving abilities in a random.
Significance Tests Martin Bland Professor of Health Statistics University of York
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.1 Categorical Response: Comparing Two Proportions.
Systemic Exposure of Topical Tacrolimus Veneeta Tandon, Ph.D. Pharmacokinetics Reviewer Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation III Office of Clinical Pharmacology.
T-TestsSlide #1 2-Sample t-test -- Examples Do mean test scores differ between two sections of a class? Does the average number of yew per m 2 differ between.
Suppose we have a population of adult men with a mean height of 71 inches and standard deviation of 2.6 inches. We also have a population of adult women.
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing.
1.1.3 Experimentation. 2 What is an experiment? 1. An experiment is a controlled test. 2. Only one variable should be changed at a time. a. Independent.
RAD Immunosuppression in Heart Transplant Recipients Duke Heart Failure Research Pager:
1. Objectives Novartis is developing a new triple fixed-dose combination product. As part of the clinical pharmacology program, pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug.
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School, Fall, 2005 © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Sample Size and Power Considerations.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Blinding in clinical trials.
Clinical Trial : Analysis & Interpretation of Results Fixed dose combination therapy of antioxidants in treatment of idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia:
Robert A. Terkeltaub, Daniel E. Furst, Katherine Bennett, Karin A. Kook, R. S. Crockett, and Matthew W. Davis ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM Vol. 62, No. 4, April.
Chapter 11 Lesson 11.3b Comparing Two Populations or Treatments 11.3: Inferences Concerning the Difference Between 2 Population or Treatment Proportions.
The process of drug development. Drug development 0,8 – 1 mld. USD.
Analytical Interventional Studies
Warm-up An experiment on the side effects of pain relievers assigned arthritis patients to one of several over-the-counter pain medications. Of the 440.
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
EXPERIMENT DESIGN.
Warm Up Check your understanding P. 586 (You have 5 minutes to complete) I WILL be collecting these.
Comparing Two Populations or Treatments
Aliskiren and Valsartan for Antihypertensive Therapy Trial
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Design of Experiments.
Unit 6 - Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Comparing Two Means: Paired Data
Comparing Populations
Two-Sample Hypothesis Test with Means
Comparing Two Means: Paired Data
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Presentation transcript:

A Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Study of Drug-72 and Drug-12 Department of Mathematic & Statistics York University Yufeng Lin Xiaofeng Zhou

Problem Two drugs: –drug-72 with half-life time of 72 hours, taken once daily –drug-12 with half-life time of 12 hours with potential interaction, taken twice daily Maximum concentration: –drug-72 alone is expected to be at 6 hours –drug-72 and drug-12 together (interaction) is expected to be at 4 hours Question: Is there an interaction between these two drugs?

Assumption High tolerability Moderate effect sizes Different pharmacological profiles Potentially different effects on outcomes. Using α= 0.05 & β=80%

METHODS Subjects –twenty-four normal, healthy adult male and female paid volunteers Method –multiple dose within subjects, 2-way crossover design with double blind of drug- 72 and drug-12 –all subjects will receive two treatment conditions during 180 days period. – washout period = 5 * 72 =360 hours Study Procedures –randomized assign 24 health adults into two groups A and B by a computer- generated code –Medication combination: Drug-72 + placebo Drug-72 + drug-12 –all subjects will be dosed with each medication combination start from Feb 1st midnight –period1: Feb.1 st ---May.1 st (90 days) washout period: May.2 nd ---May.16 th (15 days=360 hours) period2: May.17th---Aug.14 th (90 days)

Continue…. Study Procedures –randomized assigned each group to one of the drug combinations –every 24 hours are a small time interval for a 180 days treatment condition –in every 24 hours period, Treatment conditions were: Group A, take drug-72 and placebo (1 capsulate for each) and group B, take drug-72 and drug-12 (1 capsulate) on midnight Every 12 hours, group 1, take placebo (1 capsulate) and group 2, take drug-12 (1 capsulate). Repeated until 180 days period reached.

| Period 1 | Washout | Period 2 | placebo > > 72 +placebo

In period 1, group A take drug-72+ placebo at time 0 and placebo only at time 12 hours in every 24 hours period, group B take drug-72+drug-12 at time 0 and drug-12 at time 12 hours in every 24 hours period. 12h 24h 0h Group A: drug-72+placebo Group A: drug-72+placebo Group B: drug-72+drug-12 Group B: drug-12 Group B: drug-72+drug-12 Group A: placebo only In the period 2, reverse the treatment conditions

In every 24 hours period, for each group we do blood draw two times, and record c(4) and c(6). c(4): blood concentration at 4 hours c(6): blood concentration at 6 hours 0h 4h6h 24h Blood draw 1 Blood draw 2 Total blood draws needed is 360 for each group

Statistical Analyses primary endpoint in the study is Cmax (maximum blood concentration). during first period, for each group, do hypotheses test: H0: C(6) – C(4) >= 0 vs H1: C(6) – C(4) < 0 then for the group, if H0 is true, we can tell that the group patients have taken the drug-72 and placebo, while if H0 is reject, then that group patients have taken the drug-72 and drug-12 because the maximum concentration is at 4 hours when interaction occurs. If in period 1 we get H0 is true and in period 2 H1 is true for the same group, then it approximately shows the evidence that the interaction effect has occur.

Some explanation The washout period Using minimum duration of 5 times the half-life of the treatment i.e. 72 * 5 = 360 hours =15 days. We need 360 blood draws during the 180 days trial. (Since during every 24 hours, we need do two blood draws on 4 hours and 6 hours, and total we have 180 days, so we need 2 * 180 = 360) We use double-blind to keep both subjects and investigators are unware of treatment assignment  If patients drop out during the study, we still keep their records and do analysis, but additional analysis will be perform only using the data collected from the patients who complete the trial.