1. 2 David Hume’s Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

Michael Lacewing Religious belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Frontiers of Western Philosophy Empiricism
PHIL 101 DAY 3 Epistemology Day 2 Maymester 2007.
The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
© Michael Lacewing A priori knowledge Michael Lacewing
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
The ontological argument
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
HUME AND EMPIRICISM  David Hume – Scottish philosopher – Epistemological approach set out in two key works:  A Treatise of Human Nature.
1 From metaphysics to logical positivism The metaphysician tells us that empirical truth-conditions [for metaphysical terms] cannot be specified; if he.
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
Newton and psychology Thanks to Newton, scientists and philosophers know that the world is controlled by absolute natural laws, so the inconsistencies.
Defeater of Dogmatic Slumbers
RATIONALISM AND EMPIRICISM: KNOWLEDGE EMPIRICISM Epistemology.
Rationalism and empiricism: Key terms.  You will learn the meaning of various key terms related to rationalism and empiricism.
David Hume ( )  Fame as a philosopher (for Treatise and Enquiry) followed fame as an historian (for A History of Britain)
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
The Problem of the Criterion Chisholm: Particularists and Methodists.
Science and induction  Science and we assume causation (cause and effect relationships)  For empiricists, all the evidence there is for empirical knowledge,
Empiricism: David Hume ( ) Our knowledge of the world is based on sense impressions. Such “matters of fact” are based on experience (i.e., a posteriori.
Rationalism: Knowledge Is Acquired through Reason, not the Senses We know only that of which we are certain. Sense experience cannot guarantee certainty,
HUME 1 BEHOLD THE RADICAL EMPIRICIST. David Hume Historian Economist Psychologist Philosopher.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Concept empiricism Michael Lacewing
More categories for our mental maps  How we understand knowledge has repercussions for how we understand our place in the world.  How we understand.
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
Seeing the “story” of ideas….
Chapter 8 HUME. How does the mind/body problem reveal a partial incoherence within Cartesian metaphysics? In what ways does David Hume turn away from.
Rationalism and Empiricism
David Hume’s Skepticism The nature of ideas and reasoning concerning ‘matters of fact’
Epistemology, Part I Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Hume’s Epistemology Melchert, Norman. “Unmasking the Pretensions of Reason” The Great Conversation: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy. Second edition.
 If I were to ask you to define the words “white and cold” what would you say?  If I were to ask you to describe the word “pain” how would you do it?
1 The Empiricists: Hume Theory of Ideas Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
David Hume By Richard Jones and Dan Tedham. Biographical Details Born in 1711 in Scotland. Major work: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) Contains.
A Priori vs. A Posteriori If I know something, I must have justification. If justification essentially relies on sensory experience, then it is a posteriori.
© Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing co.uk.
David Hume ( ) An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding Revised, 11/21/03.
L ECTURE 14: H UME ’ S R ADICAL E MPIRICISM. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Recap our investigation into empiricist theories of knowledge.
David Hume Often called a ”radical empiricist.”  Impressions give rise to ideas.  Ideas are “less lively” copies of impressions.  There are no ideas.
An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding
© Michael Lacewing Kant on conceptual schemes Michael Lacewing osophy.co.uk.
Critical Social Theory “[O]ur age is … the age of enlightenment, and to criticism everything must submit” Kant, Critique of Pure Reason.
L ECTURE 15: C ERTAINTY. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Review Hume’s radical empiricism and its consequences 2.Outline and investigate.
Eliminative materialism
Certainty and Truths.
1 John Locke’s Theory of Knowledge ( ). 2 Empiricist All knowledge is derived from experience.
The Cosmological Argument Today’s lesson will be successful if: You have revised the ideas surrounding the cosmological argument and the arguments from.
The Origin of Knowledge
The Search for Knowledge
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
NOTE: CORRECTION TO SYLLABUS FOR ‘HUME ON CAUSATION’
Skepticism David Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and John Pollock’s “Brain in a vat” Monday, September 19th.
David Hume and Causation
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Descartes’ Ontological Argument
Skepticism David Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Empiricism.
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
John Locke and modern empiricism
Remember these terms? Analytic/ synthetic A priori/ a posteriori
On your whiteboard (1): 1. What is innate knowledge? 2. What were Plato’s arguments for innate knowledge? 3. Was he right? Explain your answer.
Thinking about knowledge
Verification and meaning
Presentation transcript:

1

2 David Hume’s Theory of Knowledge ( ) Scottish Empiricist

3 An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Foundation of all knowledge is in sensory experience

4 Can we have certain knowledge? YES!

5 Relation of Ideas How our ideas relate to one another Analytic Truths Tautologies Mathematical Truths

6 Always can involve a contradiction “An unmarried man is not a bachelor” Why is this a contradiction? Because of how we define the terms

7 All other knowledge?

8 Matters of Fact Synthetic Truths Never can involve a contradiction We can only have a high degree of probability

9 Example “The sun will rise tomorrow”

10 2 Types of Perceptions

11 Impressions From sense data of of mind independent reality

12 Thoughts / Ideas From Our memory of ImpressionsorImagination

13 Difference between the two? Impressions are more lively than thoughts or ideas

14 Example Which is more lively: Actually burning your finger or The memory of burning your finger?

15 Empirical Criteria of Meaning 1. All meaningful ideas must be traced back to sense impression (Experience)

16 2. Ideas and beliefs that cannot be traced back to sense impression (experience) are meaningless

17 Example A golden mountain A unicorn God

18 How would you explain color to a blind person? You can’t They have no impression reference

19 Cause and Effect

20

21 Cause and Effect Cannot be traced back to impressions It involves no contradiction

22 For Example Let’s take the sentence: “X causes Y” Where X and Y are both events

23 X is the event of billiard ball A striking billiard ball B Y is the event of billiard ball B moving after being struck

24 Question: Is the sentence “X causes Y” analytic? That is to say, is the sentence “X does not cause Y” a self-contradiction? Like: “A unmarried male is not a bachelor”

25 Answer: NO! This sentence is not analytic!

26 Is this sentence synthetic? It seems that the answer will be yes because this is the only alternative But Hume had a problem with this answer too!

27 When he analyzed the concept of causality, he broke it down into three components: 1. Priority 2. Contiguity 3. Necessary Connection

28 Priority Means that X precedes Y This can be traced back to sense data

29 Contiguity Means that X touches Y This can also be traced back to sense data

30 Necessary Connection? Means that if X happens, Y MUST happen No matter how many times Hume looked he could find no necessary connection Therefore, causality cannot be traced back to sense data

31 Implications? Causality means that whenever we say that one thing (X) causes another thing (Y) We are really only reporting our own EXPECTATIONS that X will be followed by Y

32 This is a psychological fact about us and not a fact about the world Even if X was followed by Y innumerable times in the past, that does not justify our claim to know that it will do so again in the future

33 And we assume that (A) caused (B) But all we have seen is two distinct events that happen in succession

34 Example The rooster always crows just before the sun rises Does that cause the sun to rise? NO!

35 Causality is a matter of CUSTOMandHABIT