IPv6 Deployment Survey Summary of the results from the global Regional Internet Registry (RIR) community during June 2013, and compared with those from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPv6 Deployment CANTO Nate Davis, Chief Operating Officer 13 August 2014.
Advertisements

Rob Smets A user centred approach IPv6 deployment monitoring.
Sofía Silva Berenguer lacnic.net Paramaribo - Surinam IPv4 Exhaustion And IPv6 Deployment.
10/6/116Watch Project 1 6Watch: Gauging the Global Rollout of IPv6 Dan Massey Dave Meyer Lixia Zhang Colorado State U. Oregon UCLA.
IPv4 Exhaustion & Implications IPv6 Workshop Manchester September 2013 Kateel Vijayananda Wim Verrydt
June 2013 Internet Number Resource Report. June 2013 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 30 June 2013 Prepared.
December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report. December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 December.
March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report. March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 March 2014 Prepared.
APNIC IPv6 survey results APNIC 27 Manila, Philippines Paul Wilson, Director General.
1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
Introduction to ARIN and the Internet Registry System.
What fuels a market? The interaction of demand and supply! IPv4 exhaustion has had its impacts on supply. But can we quantify demand?
IPv6 Addressing – Status and Policy Report Paul Wilson Director General, APNIC.
IPv4 Address Exhaustion: A Progress Report Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.
IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist,
A proposal to improve reachability of new IANA blocks Tomoya YOSHIDA NTT Communications
IPv6 Deployment Survey Based on responses from the global Regional Internet Registry (RIR) community during June Maarten Botterman
IPv6 deployment status: Where are we now and way forward 26 th April 2013, APEC TEL47, Bali, Indonesia Miwa Fujii APNIC.
Prepared by The Regional Internet Registries [APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC and RIPE NCC]
APNIC Secretariat Reports Paul Wilson Director General 1.
University of Murcia 8 June 2011 IPv6 in Europe Jacques Babot European Commission - DG INFSO Directorate, Emerging Technologies and Infrastructures.
NRO report Axel Pawlik Chairman (2010) NRO Executive Council.
Results of the 2011 Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey Based on responses to the 2011 Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey from the global RIR.
NRO update APNIC 39, March 4th 2015 Fukuoka, Japan To be the flagship and global leader for collaborative Internet number resource management as a central.
NRO update LACNIC23, May 2015 Lima Peru To be the flagship and global leader for collaborative Internet number resource management as a central element.
1 IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Kamal Ahmed 7 July 2010.
APNIC Depletion of the IPv4 free address pool – IPv6 deployment The day after!! 8 August 2008 Queenstown, New Zealand In conjunction with APAN Cecil Goldstein,
Copyright © 2007 Japan Network Information Center Global Policy for the Allocation of the remaining IPv4 Address Space  Japan Network Information Center.
From IPv4 to IPv6… How far have we come? How far to go? Paul Wilson NRO/APNIC.
NRO update John Curran Member, NRO Executive Council ARIN 33, April 2014.
Prop-080: Removal of IPv4 Prefix Exchange Policy Guangliang Pan Resource Services Manager, APNIC.
NRO update German Valdez LACNIC 22, October 2014 To be the flagship and global leader for collaborative Internet number resource management as a central.
NRO update Paul Wilson Secretary NRO Executive Council.
1 Shared Transition Space Victor Kuarsingh & Stan Barber July 27, 2011.
NRO report Axel Pawlik Chairman (2010) NRO Executive Council.
IPv6. Why IPv6? Running out of IPv4 addresses Internet Assigned Numbers Authority allocated the last 5 /8 blocks on 3 Feb 2011 Internet Assigned Numbers.
NRO update RIPE 71, November 2015 Bucharest, Romania To be the flagship and global leader for collaborative Internet number resource management.
Internet Protocol Addresses What are they like and how are the managed? Paul Wilson APNIC.
NRO update ARIN 36, 8-9 October 2015 Montreal, Canada To be the flagship and global leader for collaborative Internet number resource management as a central.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.
NRO report Adiel Akplogan Chairman (2009) NRO Executive Council.
A proposal for ….. Proposer name APNIC 39 Open Policy Meeting Fukuoka, Japan Thursday, 5 March 2015.
Whois & Data Accuracy Across the RIRs. Terms ISP – An Internet Service Provider is allocated address space by an RIR for the purpose of providing connectivity.
1 APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Special Interest Group Session March 2nd, Korea, Seoul.
IPv4 shortage and CERN 15 January 2013
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
Internet Governance Hui
A Coordinated Proposal Regional Internet Registries
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Trailer
1.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
Permitted Uses of space reserved under NRPM 4.10
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT
IPv6 distribution and policy update
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
July 2016 Internet Number Resource Report.
Internet Number Resource Status Report Regional Internet Registries
INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries
Presentation transcript:

IPv6 Deployment Survey Summary of the results from the global Regional Internet Registry (RIR) community during June 2013, and compared with those from earlier years prepared for the RIPE 67 meeting in Athens Maarten Botterman An initiative funded by the European Commission ( ), and supported by the NRO,

Aim to establish comprehensive view of present IPv6 penetration and future IPv6 deployment plans by surveying Internet providers and users in the RIR communities around the world Process – Prepared and carried out by GNKS in close collaboration with AFRINIC, APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC and RIPE NCC – Survey was kept short and focused on essentials. Changes to the survey were kept to a minimum and are taken into account in the analysis – Privacy guaranteed History – ARIN carried out such a survey with its members in March 2008, a starting point for the current survey – RIPE NCC and APNIC carried out this same survey in 2009 – In 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, all RIRs participated to the survey making it truly global Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey

What percentage of your customer base uses IPv6 connectivity? source: GNKS 2013 N=639 ISPs only

Do you consider promoting IPv6 uptake to your customers? ISPs only source: GNKS 2013 N=646

Does your organization have an IPv6 presence ? source: GNKS 2013 n=1084

What are the biggest problems with IPv6 in production? source: GNKS 2013 n=1056

Do you use Large Scale NAT (LSN) aka CGN (Carrier Grade NAT)? source: GNKS 2013 n=994

source: GNKS 2013 n=182 – those that indicated they plan to use, or use LSN Do you use/plan to use Large Scale NAT (LSN) aka CGN (Carrier Grade NAT) along with or instead of IPv6?

Which best describes your organization’s IPv6 implementation (plans)?

IPv6 implementation plans for ISPs offering services to consumers source: GNKS 2013 n=630

IPv6 implementation plans for ISPs offering services to business customers source: GNKS 2013 n=644

High level conclusion Preparedness for IPv6 deployment continues to increase – Generally at high levels Almost half of ISP respondents offer IPv6 to their customers More than 80% will do so within 2 years More ISPs are now experiencing more significant usage by their clients – 31% experience more than 0.5% usage Carrier Grade NAT is generally not used as a solution to replace IPv6 – 18% of respondents use, or plan to use CGN but more than 70% of those use it along with IPv6 (not instead of)

High level conclusion  While a small minority is still banking on their stock of IPv4 addresses for the years to come, most recognize the importance of transitioning to IPv6.  As many are ready with initial preparations and are now waiting for a large scale IPv6 deployment and implementation, large scale deployment pilots would be a prudent way forward.

We thank all respondents for their contributions ! When asked if they’d be interested in participating in this survey again in a years’ time 93% of respondents said “Yes” For more information: An initiative funded by the European Commission ( ), and supported by the NRO,