Implementation Year 2: Student Academic Progress (Rating Tables) Dr. Carrie L. Giovannone & Dr. Yating Tang Arizona Department of Education September 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI) The NEW Report Card in Georgia.
Advertisements

Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
10/27/14 LaGrange School District 105 First Quarter Goals Update
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Dallas ISD’s Value-Added Model School Effectiveness Index (SEI) Classroom Effectiveness Index (CEI) Data Analysis, Reporting, and Research Services.
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
Using the WV Growth Model to Measure Student Achievement Nate Hixson Assistant Director, Office of Research.
Student Learning Objectives Part 2: A Deeper Dive Leading Change 2014 Virginia Stodola Susan Poole Effective Teachers and Leaders Unit.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES PART 1: AN OVERVIEW LEADING CHANGE 2014 VIRGINIA STODOLA & SUSAN POOLE EFFECTIVE TEACHERS AND LEADERS UNIT.
AZ Learns and A-F Letter Grades Arizona Department of Education Presentation to the NCAASE Committee ASU Washington Center, Washington D.C. March 7, 2012.
Arizona Group B Teachers SLO Informational Webinar Dr. Carrie L. Giovannone Deputy Associate Superintendent of Research & Evaluation.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Student Growth Percentiles 1.
Getting the Most from your ACT Explore Reporting Package
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 4 Monitoring Progress and Refining.
Arizona LEARNS: Overview of the Achievement Profiles.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data The SLO Process – Part 1 Determining Students’ Level.
Academic Progress Plan Results. Two Topics to be Covered ASD DCAS results relative to other Delaware school districts SY Performance.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 5 Reviewing and Establishing a Summative.
Overall Training Objectives for TODAY Explain how appropriate STAR Reports assist with the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) process Explain how to use.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
2014 A - F Letter Grades - AIMS The State of Arizona utilizes AIMS to measure student growth. In measuring student growth, the State of Arizona then identifies.
By Brian Patrick Federal Programs Director Whiteriver Unified School District #20 WHITERIVER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 I.ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW.
NH Commissioner’s Task Force Meeting September 21, 2010 NH DOE 1 Commissioner's Task Force Meeting: September 21, 2010.
Benchmark Data Meetings Presented to Coaches September 6, 2013 Adapted from MiBLSi materials.
July 2 nd, 2008 Austin, Texas Chrys Dougherty Senior Research Scientist National Center for Educational Achievement Adequate Growth Models.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
Brad McMillen and Sonya Stephens Data and Accountability September 19, 2013.
Welcome to MMS MAP DATA INFO NIGHT 2015.
Part 2: Interim Measures and Learning Trajectory Approaches to Progress Monitoring Christina Schneider
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
Diagnostic Reviews for Cohort 2 Priority Schools and Districts  Kentucky Department of Education and AdvancED Kentucky  A diagnostic review/leadership.
SAT-10/ARMT Results (Stanford 10),was administered to Alabama students in Grades 3-8 for the first time in April Norm-referenced scores Enable us.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
Arizona LEARNS: Overview of the Achievement Profiles.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
Understanding ERB Scores
Curriculum Night Elementary. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Policy Recommendation Best Practices in Reading Achievement to Address Reading Failure Roxanne Boyd Walden University.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
Communication Webinar:
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
System for Effectiveness and Achievement in Learning
Create a Strong Start ACT® Aspire ®.
Fostering Tomorrow's STEM Innovators and Leaders
Understanding Results
CORE Academic Growth Model: Results Interpretation
High Stakes Assessments
World’s Best Workforce
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
Vancouver Public Schools - Milestone Benchmarks
HOGSETT Elementary School
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
Presentation transcript:

Implementation Year 2: Student Academic Progress (Rating Tables) Dr. Carrie L. Giovannone & Dr. Yating Tang Arizona Department of Education September

 Overview of Student Academic Progress component  Rating Tables  SGP and SGT

50% Teaching Performance 33% Student Academic Progress 17% Student Academic Progress

 40 points(33%)  Three categories ◦ Achievement ◦ Growth (24 points=20%) ◦ Career and College Ready

Every Teacher is responsible for the following data:  Classroom SLO(S)  Targeted SLO(s)  Prior year classroom level data ◦ (e.g., AIMS, AZELLA)

Current Year Classroom Roster:  Classroom SLO (s)  DIBELS composite: percent of students at benchmark by the end of year Prior Year Classroom Roster:  Percent at or above the 4 th Stanine on Stanford 10- reading, language and mathematics  Percent passing AIMS- reading, mathematics and science  Percent proficient on AZELLA

Current Year Classroom Roster:  Targeted SLO(s)  DIBELs (Initial Sound Fluency-ISF)  DIBELs (Phoneme Segmentation Fluency-PSF)  DIBELs (Nonsense Word-Word Fluency-NWF-CLS)  DIBELs (Oral Reading Fluency-ORF) Prior Year Classroom Roster:  Student growth percentile (SGP)  Student growth target (SGT)  Percentile rank on Stanford 10 language and mathematics  Student growth from one performance level to the next performance level on AZELLA

Prior Year Data:  Attendance rate (school-level)  Graduation rate (school-level)  Grade 8 students who earn Exceeds on AIMS reading and/or mathematics  CCR equivalent scores- reading and mathematics  Reduction in Falls Far Below AIMS Reading

Think, Pair, Share

 Group A  Group B  SEI  SPED

 Grade 2 Reading Specialists  Grade 2 Mathematics Specialists  Grade 2 General Education Teachers  Grade 3 Reading Specialists  Grade 3 Mathematics specialists  Grade 3 General education teachers  Grades 4-6 General education teachers  Grades 7-8 Language teachers and 4-8 reading specialists  Grades 7-8 Mathematics teachers and 4-8 mathematics specialists

 Kindergarten teachers  First grade teachers  Grades 2-8 new teachers  Grades 3-8 group B teachers

 Grades K-2 SEI teachers  Grade 3 SEI teachers  Grades 4-8 SEI teachers

 Grades K-2 SPED teachers  Grades 3-8 SPED AIMS A teachers  Grades 3-8 SPED AIMS teachers

-evaluation/teacherprincipal- evaluation-pilot-project-resources/

1. Find one teacher who teaches the same grade level and/or content area as you 2. Discuss the questions you have for the data used for your evaluation 3. Write down your questions on a post-it note

26 Q&A

Arizona Growth Model Growth Percentile Growth Target 28 Growth Ratio

Rock-n-Roll Arizona Marathon 29 PF Chang’s

30 When you are preparing for a marathon there are three extrinsic rewards you are aiming for: 1)1 st place 2)Best time 3)Finish the race

Rock-n-Roll Arizona Marathon Christie Foster from Sierra Vista, AZ placed: 1 st for the women, and 6 th place overall. Her time was 2:44:41

32 Christie placed 1 st for the women and 6 th place overall. Students’ growth compared to their academic peers across the state. A criterion to measure against to gauge whether the growth achieved in one year is enough to reach a goal. Growth Percentile Growth Targets What amount of sustained growth is necessary to reach a target? How are you improving compared to peers? Her goal time for this year’s race was 2:40. Her completion time was 2:44:41.

33 Christie’s goal* is to clock a time of 2:38 in the 2015 Marathon so she set benchmarks each year prior to prepare and train appropriately to reach her goal. How close did she come to reaching the 2013 benchmark goal of 2:40 (160 mins)? 160 min (2:40) 164 min (2:44) =.98 Growth Target 2:40 2: :44 *Hypothetical example

The ADE calculates percentiles and growth targets for each student in reading and mathematics What do they mean to schools, teachers, and parents?

Meets 43 rd PR

67 th PR 43 rd PR Meets Within the student’s peer group across the state, which SGP did this student have to acquire to be on track?

Growth Ratio Expected Percentile Actual Percentile 37 Was the student’s actual growth enough to reach the target? Growth Achieved = Growth Ratio ≥1, on track (the growth is enough to reach the target) Growth Ratio < 1, not on track (the growth is not enough to reach the target)

67 th PR 43 rd PR Meets 43 rd PR 67 th PR =

Very High High Typical Low Very Low 43 rd PR Meets Student Growth Target for 2014 Which SGP does the student need to achieve in order to be on-track to meet the goal of proficient by grade 7?

40 Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade

Green- Good To Go