Graduation Rate: A Process; A Product New Hanover County Schools September 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Advertisements

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
May 14,  IDEA Funds  Summer Reports  ESY  COSF  Discipline  Indicator 11  Table 4  2013 – 2014  Reminders  Training  Next Meeting.
NHCS READY Report December Presentation Format Curriculum Change Rationale and Timeline Proficiency for Grades 3-8 School Growth Proficiency for.
Oct 1 Accountability Webinar Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
CALPADS and the Smarter Balanced Spring 2014 Field Test CALPADS/CBEDS/CDS Operations Office
Feeder Student Data File Instructions for Filtering & Usage Guidelines.
An Introduction to the Individual Student Enrollment System ISES Segment 2 Department of Public Instruction Spring 2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens, Assessment and Accountability Greg Houser, Student Learning and Partnerships Oregon Department.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Graduation – 2013 Cohort New Jersey Department of Education.
How Does Oregon Report Graduation Rates? Cohort Graduation Rate This year’s release reports on graduation rates for students who first entered high school.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
Angie Cave ADMS 618 – Leadership for Educational Change Summer 2015.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Data on Foster Children Attending Texas Public Schools Updates May 8,
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Mobile County Public Schools is the Largest System in Alabama.
Harvie Elementary School Improvement Plan By: Kristine Lara, Christopher Martinez, Amy Peterman, and Melinda Hammond.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Accountability & Quality Update. – ACCESS ELLs/Alternate ACCESS March 20 th end of testing window. Materials should be returned within two instructional.
Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
July 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations Annual Report on the Modified Mattie T. Consent.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
Student Equity Plan Tables Submitted 12/18/2015 in the SCC Student Equity Plan Katherine Zoloty SSSP & Student Equity Research Analyst.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Subgroup Performance Evaluation Using NYSED Accountability Data Elem/Middle Level Version Timothy Johnson Erie 1 BOCES.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.
Data for the 2000 and 2001 Cohorts February 2006.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
(Insert Fictional School Name Here) ADMS 618 Leadership for Educational Change and Improvement Jamilah Anderson Christian Nolde Chris Sumner.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
EVAAS Roster Verification Process Spring 2013 New Hanover County Schools.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
2016 Annual Dropout and Cohort Graduation Rates
2017 FSA Grade 3 English Language Arts
Administrative Conference, September 2013
English Language Arts Office Planning and Evaluation
On-Time Graduation Rate
Hickory Public Schools Accountability Update - Math
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Essential Skills Update Oregon State Board of Education March 8, 2012
Wednesday, Jan :30 a.m. Thursday, Feb. 1 4:30 p.m.
Every Student Succeeds Act


School Profile Andy Dekaney High School
Director of ESEA Programs
ESSA State Plan Amendment
GWU EDUC 6240 By: Melissa Raineri
Presentation transcript:

Graduation Rate: A Process; A Product New Hanover County Schools September 2012

Outcomes Participants will become familiar with  graduation rate data;  the graduation cohort audit process; and  the proposed new graduation cohort audit process.

Graduation Data Student Group NHCS 2011 NHCS 2012 NHCS NHCS v State All Students Male Female Asian Black Hispanic Two or More Races White Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficient Students With Disabilities

School Graduation Data GroupAshleyHoggardLaneyNHHSMosleyBearWEC All Students (80.4) > Male > Female > Asian~92.3>95 ~ ~~ Black > Hispanic ~ ~~ Two or More Races ~ ~~ White > ED > LEP~~ ~ ~~ SWD ~ ~~ Percent Percent

Graduation Gaps Remain The graduation rate for the Black student group remains 5.8 points below the state’s rate. The Students with Disabilities (SWD) group has the lowest graduation percentage at 48.4% compared to the state rate at 59.8%. The Students with Disabilities (SWD) group has the highest gap, trailing the state by 11.4 points.

Graduation Audit Process May 2012 Schools receive file of students “missing” from cohort. Early June 2012 Schools review records, “code” students, and return file to Testing. Early June 2012 Testing uploads revised files for verification. June 2012 Testing monitors verification process and processes graduation rate calculations. June 2012 Testing resends new file of students “missing” from cohort. Late June 2012 Testing uploads revised files for verification, monitors, and processes calculations. District Rate 77.3%District Rate 80.4%

Graduation Audit Process Schools verify “missing” students and submit files to Testing. Testing uploads, monitors, and rechecks files. Testing sends cohort files to schools.

Proposed Timeline Early April Testing trains school administrators. Early April Testing sends cohort files to schools. April Schools verify “missing” students and submit files to Testing. May Testing uploads, monitors, and rechecks files.

Next Steps