Breakout sessions 13:15-14:45Five Breakout sessions 1.Atmosphere – Walsh/Elliot 2.Sea Ice/Ocean – Proshutinsky/Flato/Gerdes 3.Terrestrial/Permafrost –

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO Global Integrated Polar Prediction System (GIPPS) Peter Lemke (on.

Advertisements

WCRP polar climate predictability initiative Vladimir Ryabinin

Planning for NOAA’s Climate Interests

The Downscaled Climate Projection Has Arrived – NOW WHAT?

Breakout Group A: Tuesday a.m. Potential emphases of ASM applications: Reconstruction pf past states of Arctic system (reanalysis, data assimilation) Model.

Arctic Systems Modeling Workshop, Montreal July 2009 (notes by Elliott and Roberts) Afternoon Breakout Summaries: Day 2 Erika Key leads the International.

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.

THORPEX-Pacific Workshop Kauai, Hawaii Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich.

Departamento de Física

How can regional coupled arctic modeling efforts best interact with the global climate modeling community? Marika Holland, NCAR Cecilia Bitz, U. Washington.

WRF-VIC: The Flux Coupling Approach L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory BioEarth Project Kickoff Meeting April 11-12, 2011 Pullman, WA.

How does it all work? Synthesis of Arctic System Science Discover, clarify, and improve our understanding of linkages, interactions, and feedbacks among.

Numerical International Polar Year Andrey Proshutinsky and AOMIP group, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution NOAA Arctic Science Priorities Workshop, February.

Climate 2010 Gary Strand High Performance Network Planning Workshop.

Report on Ice Sheet Modelling Activities David Holland Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University, NY USA Jonathan Gregory Walker Institute,

Arctic Systems Modeling Workshop, Montreal July 2009 Atmospheric Breakout: Led by John Walsh, Notes by Scott Elliott First list atmospheric issues mentioned.

Objectives of the ACE TRIM Joe Casas, ACE Technical and Project Manager 1.

Challenges in Urban Meteorology: A Forum for Users and Providers OFCM Workshop Summaries Lt Col Rob Rizza Assistant Federal Coordinator for USAF/USA Affairs.

Dr. Frank Herr Ocean Battlespace Sensing S&T Department Head Dr. Scott L. Harper Program Officer Team Lead, 322AGP Dr. Martin O. Jeffries Program Officer.

Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,

Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.

1 Breakout Notes Session 3 Group 2 – (Global/Broad Scale/Regional) Integrated assessment models (socio-economic/biophysical) in relationship to land cover.

Report on March Crystal City Workshop to Identify Grand Challenges in Climate Change Science By its cochair- Robert Dickinson For the 5 Sept

Identifying Grand Challenges in Climate Change Research: Guiding DOE’s Strategic Planning: Report on the DOE/BERAC workshop March Crystal City For.

Modelling Theme White Paper G. Flato, G. Meehl and C. Jakob.

Arctic Systems Modeling Workshop, Montreal July 2009 (notes by Elliott) Afternoon Breakout Summaries: Day 1 Holland leads Ice Sheets Sea level change the.

기후모델 : 기후변화연구의 인프라 Climate Model: Infrastructure for Climate Change Research Wonsun Park Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences Kiel, Germany KOFST Ultra.

Ocean - Proshutinsky/Haidvogel (CG Left Bay) What science questions exist for the arctic that are best answered with coupled regional models? o process.

Workshop on Planning Coordinated Research on Ecosystems, Climate, and Policy in the Northeast.

● Institution Contacts ● Institution Contacts Prof. Minghua Zhang, ITPA Prof. Minghua Zhang, ITPA Stony Brook University Stony Brook University

Consultation meetings: Jan 2005, Brussels, consultation meeting on topics for FP7 2-3 Feb 06, Brussels, Symposium in memoriam Anver Ghazi 17 Feb 06, Text.

Status of the Sea Ice Model Testing of CICE4.0 in the coupled model context is underway Includes numerous SE improvements, improved ridging formulation,

1 The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Director Climate Change Science Program Office Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Director Climate Change.

Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.

Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.

CPPA Past/Ongoing Activities - Ocean-Atmosphere Interactions - Address systematic ocean-atmosphere model biases - Eastern Pacific Investigation of Climate.

16/07/ ASM Montreal Biogeochemical Outbreak 1 Modelling of Biogeochemical Cycles and Ecosystems in the Arctic Ocean Participants: Nadja Steiner (DFO/EC),

Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.

Arctic System Model Workshop Background and Objectives International Arctic Research Center Hosted by National Center for Atmospheric Research May 19-22,

A Portable Regional Weather and Climate Downscaling System Using GEOS-5, LIS-6, WRF, and the NASA Workflow Tool Eric M. Kemp 1,2 and W. M. Putman 1, J.

SEARCH Understanding Change: Priorities and Needs Matt Berman, John Walsh SEARCH Science Steering Committee Meeting, Arlington, VA 28 October 2008.

How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.

1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.

World Climate Research Programme Joint Scientific Committee – 31 Antalya, Turkey.

Experience with ROMS for Downscaling IPCC Climate Models 2008 ROMS/TOMS European Workshop, Grenoble, 6-8 October Bjørn Ådlandsvik, Paul Budgell, Vidar.

Jim Hurrell Director Climate and Global Dynamics Division Climate and Ecosystem Community Planning Meeting November 2-3, 2005 Boulder,

CFusion and NCEO. NCEO Components Ciais et al IGOS-P Integrated Global Carbon Observing Strategy Global Carbon Data Assimilation System.

Welcome to the PRECIS training workshop

Perspectives in Computational Earth System Science an oceanographer’s view Aike Beckmann Division of Geophysics, Department of Physical Sciences

The Polar Prediction Workshop, Oslo, Norway, 6-8 October 2010.

Collaborative Research: Towards Advanced Understanding and Predictive Capability of Climate Change in the Arctic using a High- Resolution Regional Arctic.

Page 1 Andrew Lorenc WOAP 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Andrew Lorenc Head of Data Assimilation & Ensembles Numerical Weather Prediction Met Office, UK Data.

Shuyi S. Chen Rosenstial School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami (DRAFT only!!! Improving Hurricane Structure and Intensity Forecast:

Arctic climate simulations by coupled models - an overview - Annette Rinke and Klaus Dethloff Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research.

Do we / why do we want to develop an ASM? Climate working group for WRF – workshop on model developments for climate studies with WRF (summary of.

Maps. 3 types of maps  Physical  Political  Special purpose.

BG 5+6 How do we get to the Ideal World? Tuesday afternoon What gaps, challenges, obstacles prevent us from attaining the vision now? What new research.

Climate Mission Outcome A predictive understanding of the global climate system on time scales of weeks to decades with quantified uncertainties sufficient.

Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Scoping Workshop on Terrestrial and Coastal Carbon Fluxes and Exchanges in the Gulf of Mexico May 6-8, 2008 St. Petersburg,

O BSERVATIONAL AND E XPERIMENTAL R ESEARCH BREAKOUT SESSION UCAR Members Meeting 2012 REPORT / SUMMARY Yvette Richardson Steve Cohn 1.

ESSL Holland, CCSM Workshop 0606 Predicting the Earth System Across Scales: Both Ways Summary:Rationale Approach and Current Focus Improved Simulation.

Physical and Human Geography

Craig Nicolson, UMass-Amherst

Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)

AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation

The Global Observing System for Climate Carolin Richter, Director

CEOS SIT Technical Workshop Perspective on Arctic Initiatives

Presentation transcript:

Breakout sessions 13:15-14:45Five Breakout sessions 1.Atmosphere – Walsh/Elliot 2.Sea Ice/Ocean – Proshutinsky/Flato/Gerdes 3.Terrestrial/Permafrost – Verseghy/Hinzman/Cherry 4.Ice sheet/Glacier – Holland 5.Biogeochemistry/Ecosystem – Wolf-Gladrow/Steiner/Elliot 14:45–15:15 Break 15:15-16:30 Presentations from breakout sessions 16:30-17:30 Floor discussion – David Carlson/Larry Hinzman Co-ordinating international efforts in Arctic System Modeling

Questions for breakout sessions Purpose –Communicate progress in the individual fields –Gain better understanding of the different field’s needs and potential in a coupled set-up What can your field gain and provide by being part of a coupled system model? –Better process/feedback descriptions? –Important on what time scales? Online/offline coupling –Integration of “emerging components” and human dimension modelling. –Integration with observational effort s –Integration with global system modelling –Organizational structures

Understanding of coupled processes –Albedo (influenced by … permafrost, vegetation, marine biology, …) Future climate projections … 1. What Science questions can best be answered with coupled Arctic regional climate models? Science questions missing from existing plans? 2. What modelling and model validation efforts to address the above are planned/exist?

Experiments under controlled (large scale) conditions Higher resolutions than possible in a global model in your model component? 3. Boundaries for the 'Arctic System' for respective research areas: What are the opportunities and limitations due to a limited Arctic model domain?

4. How are observations incorporated into model development and how can the link be improved? 5. Would regional modelling efforts benefit from an international, centralized method for sharing model output for intercomparison and for sharing validation data and validation code/methods? Problems with point observations Need for integrated data sets Satellite obs partly difficult to apply Need for better reanalysis? Need for assimilation methods easy to apply? Model-assisted observations? …

Transfer of parameterizations? –Towards universal parameterizations? Nesting? Data exchange? … 6. What interactions are there between regional modelling and global modelling in your field of research? Would projects benefit from a community- coordinated program for obtaining data from and sharing model output with a global modelling community?

”emerging” = new to the classical core system (atmosphere, ocean, sea ice, soil) Ice sheet, vegetation, atmospheric chemistry, bio- geo-chemistry, marine biology, ecology, human dimension, …? … 7. What plans are in action for including emerging modules into existing regional arctic models?

What parts of the human dimension is currently modelled? Which approaches exist to assess economic or HD consequences of Arctic climate change? In what way can projections of future climate used for economic models/human dimension models? Different ways for downscaling … 8. What human dimension modelling is being done in conjunction with physical modelling? 9. What are possible interface strategies for collaboration between natural-science modelling and research on adaptation and human living conditions?

Define the type of coupling –Fully interactive? –One-way? On what time scale? For what kind of study? 10. What level of interaction between components is desirable? What is the benefit of interactive coupling on the complete system? Which other components should your component be coupled to? On what time scale is interactive coupling/one-way coupling useful? - for your component - for other component

Breakout sessions 1. Atmosphere – Walsh/Elliot 2. Sea Ice/Ocean – Proshutinsky/Flato/Gerdes 3. Terrestrial/Permafrost – Verseghy/Hinzman/Cherry 4. Ice sheet/Glacier – Holland 5. Bio-geo-chemistry/Ecosystem – Wolf-Gladrow/Steiner/Elliot Rooms?

Breakout sessions 13:15-14:45Five Breakout sessions 1.Atmosphere – Walsh/Elliot 2.Sea Ice/Ocean – Proshutinsky/Flato/Gerdes 3.Terrestrial/Permafrost – Verseghy/Hinzman/Cherry 4.Ice sheet/Glacier – Holland 5.Biogeochemistry/Ecosystem – Wolf-Gladrow/Steiner/Elliot 14:45–15:15 Break 15:15-16:30 Presentations from breakout sessions 16:30-17:30 Floor discussion – David Carlson/Larry Hinzman Co-ordinating international efforts in Arctic System Modeling Session leaders, please provide report

Let’s work