Team Rewards The Peer Evaluation Process. Your rewards Assessed by instructor Assessed by your team peers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using Self and Peer Assessment in TBL Stacey A. Jackson, M.S. William C. Hamlett, Ph.D. Rudolph M. Navari, M.D., Ph.D. Indiana University School of Medicine.
Advertisements

A method for addressing any large problem. Carefully consider the problem. Define the problem. Ask yourself the following questions: What is it that I.
Classroom Instruction That Works Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock August 19, 2008.
Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
Introduction to Grading Grading is one of the most important activities a faculty member does. Many problems in teaching arise because of grading issues.
Assessment- Middle/Senior Years.  Not everything that needs or should be assessed can be assessed, and  Not everything that can be assessed should be.
Descriptive Feedback Success Criteria Learning Goals
Foundations of Team Leadership 1 Bushfire Feedback.
5th International CDIO Conference Singapore, June , The Role of Peers in the Assessment of Students’ CDIO Skills Ivan D’haese Johan D’heer.
PBL Post-Project Review. 1. Student Engagement2. Project Idea3. Student Learning4. Authenticity of Project Tasks and Products5. Quality and Use of Driving.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
APPRAISAL An evaluation into the progress and work of an employee over a period of time. Appraisal is part of the job for any person who is responsible.
Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople
Summative Evaluation Independent Evaluations {brief look} Teamwork Evaluations {major look} Project Format for a Course A Team Project Evaluation A Member’s.
Working in Teams: Ideas for Managing Student Teams Panel: Jennifer Kreie New Mexico State University Sherry Mills New Mexico State University Jane Carey.
Peer Evaluations. Attendance- Does the team member attend group meetings? Is advance warning of non-attendance given? Is the member late to meetings?
Evaluation Arguments X Is (Is Not) a Good Y. Overview n Criteria-Match Structure n Problem of Standards.
Agenda: 11/29/04 zWednesday office hours: 9-10:00 zAll extra credit due Thursday zFinal exam: Thursday next, 1600, Peavy130 yStudy guide ed last.
Teamwork: Help Students Make the Most of the Experience Panel: Jennifer Kreie New Mexico State University Jane Carey Arizona State University West Sherry.
Team Peer Evaluation Process In-class and take-home Due Thursday.
Assessing Peer Performance in PBL Groups: how technology can help Carolyn K. Manning Associate Professor Dept of Health, Nutrition & Exercise Sciences.
THE IMPACT OF AN ALTERNATIVE LEARNING PROGRAM ON AT-RISK STUDENTS AT FISHER MIDDLE SCHOOL Janet S. Gleim Educational Leadership Program Dr. Ruth J. Palmer,
Research Day 2009 Assessment of Student Work on Geographically Distributed Information Technology Project Teams Charles Tappert and Allen Stix Pace University,
Performance Management
Grading Group Projects Taryn Vian. Why do group projects? Increases student engagement through applied learning Allows us to give more complex assignments.
1 Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. (1) 11 Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople Module 11 Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople.
HR Session 5 Performance Management and Appraisal Dr. Debra Munsterman
Submitted by: Maimoona Ali Roll # BS(IT) #3rd sem
DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF A PEER-TUTORING PROGRAM FOR BASIC SKILLS DEVELOPMENT February 19, 2010.
Assessing and Grading Pamela Dexter, EPICS High Tammy Watson, Agawam High School.
Geography (CB) Endorsement Program Reviewer Technical Assistance Office of Professional Preparation Services Michigan Department of Education.
Getting runs on the board with student group work The affordances of Online Peer Evaluation tools.
Managing staff development Chris Schiller Thursday 31 July 2014.
THE SCIENCE OF SUPERHEROES!. So - what IS the purpose of the Group 4 Project? This project allows students in different group 4 sciences to work together.
F The Open University of Israel Collaborative Learning in a Wiki Environment Edna Tal Hagit Tal The Open University of Israel The Center for Technology.
GET CONNECTED Core Motivation. Purpose To clarify the relationship between the team members’ personal and organizational motivations. 1 Source: Barrett.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama CHAPTER 11 Performance Management and Appraisal Section 3 Developing Human Resources.
Best Practices for Online Discussions Distance Learning Workshop March 24, 2004.
Peer Evaluation and the College of Business Effective 3/15/93.
Mission Maker Games Unit Name: My Learning Journal.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Research Problem The role of the instructor in online courses depends on course design. Traditional instructor responsibilities include class management,
Assessment. Summative assessment Summative assessment is the process of evaluating (and grading) the learning of students at a point in time. The University.
Scoring Rubrics: Validity and Reliability Barbara M. Moskal Colorado School of Mines.
S1 Health and Wellbeing Evaluation. A sample of S1 pupils were asked to complete a baseline assessment before completing HWB activities in Pastoral Care.
Session 4 Workshop Sand Art Performance ALLOTED TIME: 30 MINUTES ONLY Designing Scoring Rubrics As a team (4 members), create your own class project rubric.
Evaluating your Coaching
GET CONNECTED Personal 4 Whys. Purpose To create mission and vision statements for the individual team members. To clarify the relationship between the.
L5 Computing Team Project Final Presentation Guidelines.
As A Team Identify Current Conditions What does the instructor require? Is there a reward for early completion? Check the class outline for specific dates.
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
with Dr. Tracey Richardson Course Developer
Student Feedback of Instruction
PSYCH 706 Enthusiasstic Studysnaptutorial.com
HCS 370 Become Exceptional/ newtonhelp.com. HCS 370 All Assignments For more course tutorials visit HCS 370 Week 1 Introduction to.
Educator Beliefs The collective efficacy of school staff has one of the highest effect scores: 1.57.
Eliciting & Gathering Information About Student’s Understanding
Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople
Peer Assessment Is peer assessment a valid form of assessment?
2018 Staff Survey Results.
Unit 4 - A06 – Review Grade Criteria To get a c
MODULE 7 Definitions Module 7 page 1.
Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople
A Moodle-based Peer Assessment Tool
Personal 4 Whys.
Writing about Teaching for Tenure and Promotion
Core Motivation.
Teacher Report Card Grade 5/6 2011/12
Presentation transcript:

Team Rewards The Peer Evaluation Process

Your rewards Assessed by instructor Assessed by your team peers

On your team, different grades Replication of an actual organizational process Purpose to highlight – Peer eval and impact on team Team pressure – positive and negative Impact of different rewards on team performance and team relationships Value and impact of different contributions to team performance Individual learning through your own and others’ perceptions, feelings and needs

The Method for BA 352 Team identifies and defines your operating criteria Define requirements for team and ea member Review criteria and adjust

Criteria –measures for your team’s operation and effectiveness Look at sample criteria on handout Work quality Work quantity Etc. Develop weighting for each criterion – add up to 100%

Midway Feedback Halfway through term – meet to address criteria Give feedback to team members

Final Team and Peer Evaluation May 31 Each student completes Peer Evaluation Form Team and Peer Evaluation Memo