If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
Advertisements

(See also arXiv v2 [physics.med-ph] 29 Apr 2012.)
Lateral penumbra is a measure of the sharpness of the shadow cast by a patient aperture. It depends on depth in patient, air gap and beam line design,
Energy deposition and neutron background studies for a low energy proton therapy facility Roxana Rata*, Roger Barlow* * International Institute for Accelerator.
Experience, Expertise and a Commitment to Excellence™
Dose Calculations A qualitative overview of Empirical Models and Algorithms Hanne Kooy.
KT McDonald Target Studies Weekly Meeting July 10, Power Deposition in Graphite Targets of Various Radii K.T. McDonald, J. Back, N. Souchlas July.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
Carbon ion fragmentation study for medical applications Protons (hadrons in general) especially suitable for deep-sited tumors (brain, neck base, prostate)
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
Vertex2002 pCT: Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, SCIPP Initial Studies in Proton Computed Tomography L. R. Johnson, B. Keeney, G. Ross, H. F.-W. Sadrozinski,
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
Study of the fragmentation of Carbon ions for medical applications Protons (hadrons in general) especially suitable for deep-sited tumors (brain, neck.
Particle Interactions
Vertex2002 pCT: Hartmut F.-W. Sadrozinski, SCIPP Initial Studies in Proton Computed Tomography L. R. Johnson, B. Keeney, G. Ross, H. F.-W. Sadrozinski,
Tissue inhomogeneities in Monte Carlo treatment planning for proton therapy L. Beaulieu 1, M. Bazalova 2,3, C. Furstoss 4, F. Verhaegen 2,5 (1) Centre.
Radiation Dosimetry Dose Calculations D, LET & H can frequently be obtained reliably by calculations: Alpha & low – Energy Beta Emitters Distributed in.
At the position d max of maximum energy loss of radiation, the number of secondary ionizations products peaks which in turn maximizes the dose at that.
Electron Beams: Physical Principles and Dosimetry
Impact of synchrotron radiation in LEPTON COLLIDER arcs
BIOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY OF A THERAPEUTIC PROTON BEAM: A STUDY OF HUMAN MELANOMA CELL LINE I. Petrović 1, A. Ristić-Fira 1, D. Todorović 1, L. Korićanac 1,
Binary Degraders Often we want to control both scattering and energy loss in a beam line element. For instance, we might want a contoured scatterer with.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Dose Distribution and Scatter Analysis
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
PAMELA Contact Author: CONFORM is an RCUK-funded Basic Technology Programme Charged Particle Therapy Treating cancer with protons and light ions Ken Peach,
Научно-практический центр протонной лучевой терапии и радиохирургии (Москва-Дубна) A SYSTEM FOR MEASUREMENT OF A THERAPEUTIC PROTON BEAM DOSE DISTRIBUTION.
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
We thank N. Kanematsu, U. Schneider and M. Hollmark for discussions of their work and L. Urban (CERN) for providing test data on the step size dependence.
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
FFAG-ERIT Accelerator (NEDO project) 17/04/07 Kota Okabe (Fukui Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Radiation Processing Irradiation consists in exposing a product to ionizing radiation in order to preserve, modify or improve its characteristics. The.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Transverse emittance Two different techniques were used to measure the transverse emittance. The multislit mask in the injector 9 MeV Quadrupole scan for.
Target material and thickness considerations Alain Blondel, with thanks to Dean Adams and Dan Kaplan Priority for rebuild is to have a target mechanism.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
Aerosol Limits for Target Tracking Ronald Petzoldt ARIES IFE Meeting, Madison, WI April 22-23, 2002.
Fast Electron Temperature Scaling and Conversion Efficiency Measurements using a Bremsstrahlung Spectrometer Brad Westover US-Japan Workshop San Diego,
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, May, 2005 GLAST 1 A Parametric Energy Recon for GLAST A 3 rd attempt at Energy Reconstruction Keep in mind: 1)The large phase-space.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
P HI T S Melt a snowman by proton beam Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Aug revised.
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Single scattering is the simplest way to spread out a proton beam. It is relatively immune to beam alignment. On the other hand, it is inefficient and.
UCLA Positron Production Experiments at SABER Presented by Devon Johnson 3/15/06.
1 Design of active-target TPC. Contents I.Physics requirements II.Basic structure III.Gas property IV.Electric field Distortion by ground Distortion of.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
Interactions with Rest Gas – Typical Case Interactions with Rest Gas – ELENA Quantitative analysis for ELENA Evaluations at 100 keV Ejection Energy Evaluations.
Interaction of x-ray photons (and gamma ray photons) with matter.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
Development of elements of 3D planning program for radiotherapy Graphical editor options  automated enclose of contour  correction of intersections 
Nuclear emulsions One of the eldest particle detectors, still used in particle physics experiment (CHORUS, DONUT, OPERA) for its unique peculiarities:
INTERACTION OF PARTICLES WITH MATTER
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Electron Beam Therapy.
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov
AQUA-ADVANCED QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR CNAO
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX
Innovations in the Radiotherapy of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Wednesday,March 7, 2012 Dr. Brandt
Presentation transcript:

If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is the density of the target material? 2.A 100 MeV proton goes through 1 inch of Lexan (density 1.2 g/cm 3, S/ρ = 6.9 MeV/(g/cm 2 ) at 100 MeV). How much energy does it lose? 3.A cylindrical air-filled ionization chamber has a gap (thickness) of 1 cm and a radius of 1 cm. It is exposed to 0.1 nA of 200 MeV protons (S/ρ = 4.0 MeV/(g/cm 2 )) spread uniformly over the area. What is the dose rate to air? How much energy is deposited in the air in 1 sec? 4.An average person radiates heat at a rate of about 100 Watts. A whole-body radiation dose of 4 Gy is lethal in about 50% of cases in a few weeks, even with good medical care. How much time does it take the body to radiate an equivalent amount of energy? 5.How many 200 MeV protons does it take to deliver 1 Gy to 1 liter (1000 cm 3 ) of water? 6.Your are asked to treat a cylindrical volume, 10 cm in radius and 20 cm deep (treat to surface) with passive beam spreading at a dose rate of 2 Gy/min. If your double scattering system is 45% efficient, how many protons/sec do you need at the first scatterer?

7.A cylindrical Gaussian is 5% down at a radius of 2 cm. At what radius is it 10% down? What fraction of the protons lie inside the 10% radius? 8.Design a 160 MeV single scattered beam to treat (to maximum depth) a 5 cm radius field with a transverse dose uniformity of ±5%, using a pristine Bragg peak (no range modulation). You have 200 cm from the scatterer to the target. What is the treatment depth (d 80 ) ? If the input proton current is 1 nA, what is the dose rate at the peak? 9.If you wanted to use the same beam energy to treat to a depth of 10 cm (still no modulation), what changes would you make? What would be the new dose rate at the peak? 10.Compute and verify the mass stopping power, and its error, of 110 MeV protons in aluminum. The mean excitation energy according to ICRU49 Table 2.8 is 166 ±2 eV. 11.How much energy do 150 MeV protons lose in 1 inch of aluminum? Mev protons enter a stack consisting of 0.5 cm Pb and 10 cm Lexan. What is their residual range in water? 13.How much Lexan will reduce the residual range of 160 MeV protons to 3 cm in water? 14.What is the water equivalent of 0.5cm Pb at 200 MeV? at 100 MeV? 15.A 200 MeV proton beam with an energy spread of 3 MeV is degraded to 90 MeV in Lexan. What is its approximate energy spread at 90 MeV?

16.A cylindrical Gaussian probability density is 5% down at a radius of 2 cm. At what radius is it 10% down? What fraction of the protons lie inside the 10% radius? 17.Compute the rms projected multiple scattering angle of 100 MeV protons incident on 1 mm of water, or 1 m of air, or 1 mm of Pb using a) Rossi’s formula and b) Highlands’ formula. Present your results as a table, and include the ratio Rossi/Highland. 18.In a multiple scattering experiment, 160 MeV protons are incident on 1 g/cm 2 of a mystery target. The dose distribution on a screen 200 cm from the downstream target face is Gaussian with an rms width of cm. What is the mystery material? What is the energy loss in it? What is the energy loss in air, and the contribution of air to the rms width? What assumptions and approximations did you make? MeV protons hit a Pb/Lexan binary degrader. a) For 50 mrad and 80 MeV out, what thicknesses of Pb and Lexan do I need? b) Same, for 15 mrad and 80 Mev out. 20.The next page shows the phase space y′(y) trajectory of a proton. Sketch its actual space trajectory in a side view, y(z). 21.The next page shows the actual space trajectory x(z) of a proton. Sketch its phase space trajectory x′(x). 22.For the simple beam line shown on the next page compute, at the end of the beam line, the proton energy, beam size, emittance, angular spread, angular confusion, and virtual point source. Use Highland’s formula.

23.At z = 0 a beam has rms projected horizontal size 2 mm, rms projected angular divergence θ RMS = 5 mrad and emittance 10π mm mrad. a) Is it converging or diverging? b) What is its x RMS at z = 1 m?

y′ y problem 20: problem 21: end problem 22: end 1 g/cm 2 Pb 150 MeV 0 cm 300 cm 100 cm