Feb 24, 20081 Abnormal Events in HF: TB04, Simulation, and Feb.08 Fermi Testbeam Anthony Moeller (U. Iowa) Shuichi Kunori (U. Maryland) Taylan Yetkin (U.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of CTB04 electron data vs MC analysis Stathes Paganis (Sheffield) Martin Aleksa (CERN) Isabelle Wingerter (LAPP) LAr Week, Cargnano, Italy 13-Sep-05.
Advertisements

Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
DREAM Collaboration: Recent Results on Dual Readout Calorimetry. F.Lacava for the DREAM Collaboration Cagliari – Cosenza – Iowa State – Pavia – Pisa –
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
SUNJI KIM, H. BHANG, M. KIM, K. TSHOO, K. TANIDA, H. FUJIOKA1, Y. SADA1, and H. ASANO1 Seoul National University, 1 Kyoto University Abstract Introduction.
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
1 Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting June 20, 2007.
Directional Detectors and Digital Calorimeters Ed Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For the 25 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky,
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. Program Flow CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) HcalElectronicsSim HBHEDataFrame (or HF, or HO) SimHits DetId= ,
PID, trigger and DAQ for the GLAST beam test (preliminary study) Nicola Mazziotta INFN Bari Dec. 6, 2005.
Far forward angle physics at the LHC E. Norbeck and Y. Onel University of Iowa For the 24th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics South Padre Island
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson 1. CMSSW HCAL Simulation Three gains are used as input –Calibration (GeV/fC) From DB gain, by channel –Electronics (fC/photoelectron)
Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,
Data Acquisition Software for CMS HCAL Testbeams Jeremiah Mans Princeton University CHEP2003 San Diego, CA.
We observe two classes of anomalous signals in HCAL 2) Cherenkov light produced by interactions in the window of the Forward Calorimeter PMTs ¼ photoelectrons.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
Study of HF pmt high tail signal FNAL: Jim F, Rick Vidal Iowa: Ugur Akgun, Asli Albayrak, Warren Clarida, Antony Moeller, Yasar Onel, Justin Parsons, Taylan.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Adam Para, Fermilab, April 26, Total Absorption Dual Readout Calorimetry R&D Fermilab, Caltech, University of Iowa, Argonne National Laboratory,
LCG Meeting, May 14th 2003 V. Daniel Elvira1 G4 (OSCAR_1_4_0) Validation of CMS HCal V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Experimental set-up Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE Multi-Channel MCP PMTs S.Korpar a,b, R.Dolenec.
Preshower/Crack Upgrade Update Detector overview 2.W electron data 3.Simulation overview 4.Early tests of new simulation.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
Status of Møller Polarimeter Peter-Bernd Otte September 23, th Collaboration Meeting, Mainz.
Tests of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting March 10 – 12, 2010 University of Texas at Arlington.
CMS Calorimeter HB- HB+ HE- HE+ HF- HF+ HO-2 HO-1 HO0 HO+1 HO+2
Scintillation Detectors
BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration.
January 21, 2007Suvadeep Bose / IndiaCMS - Santiniketan 1 Response of CMS Hadron Calorimeter to Electron Beams Suvadeep Bose EHEP, TIFR, Mumbai Outline:
May 1-3, LHC 2003V. Daniel Elvira1 CMS: Hadronic Calorimetry & Jet/ Performance V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
CMS H4 ECAL testbeam data comparison with simulation F.Cossutti a), B. Heltsey b), P. Meridiani c), C. Rovelli c) a) INFN Trieste b) Cornell University.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
CALICE Tungsten HCAL Prototype status Erika Garutti Wolfgang Klempt Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, October.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
Calibration of uniformity between LYSO crystals Zhigang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS The Third International Workshop on the High.
10-Dec-2008 / S.KunoriHCAL Noise Identification and Monitoring1 HCAL Noise Identification and Filtering (HPD behavior and noise identification) Shuichi.
Geant4 Tutorial, Oct28 th 2003V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Simulation of the CMS 2002 Hcal Test Beam V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Tutorial.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
HF Calorimeter PMT Upgrade R&D Yasar Onel for University of Iowa, Fairfield University, INFN, Trieste.
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Hardware & Preliminary Test Beam Data Anthony Moeller The University of Iowa.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
MC study of TREND Ground array Feng Zhaoyang Institute of High Energy Physics,CAS
Matteo Volpi, Luca Fiorini Timing study with Muons at 90º from first beam PRELIMINARY STUDY (Barcelona) 1 Tile Timing Group meeting 17 September 2008.
1 Status of Zero Degree Calorimeter for CMS Experiment O.Grachov, M.Murray University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS A.S.Ayan, P.Debbins, E.Norbeck, Y.Onel University.
Preliminary results from the attenuation scans in BGO crystal. 1 F.Lacava CERN
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
“Performance test of a lead glass
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
HCAL Commissioning and Related Activities
HE Calorimeter Upgrade Studies
Testbeam comparisons arXiv:
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
High Granularity Calorimeter Upgrade Studies
Dual readout calorimeter for CepC
Presentation transcript:

Feb 24, Abnormal Events in HF: TB04, Simulation, and Feb.08 Fermi Testbeam Anthony Moeller (U. Iowa) Shuichi Kunori (U. Maryland) Taylan Yetkin (U. Iowa) Jim Freeman (Fermi)

Feb 24, Outline TB04 –Events observed, analysis of TB04 data Geant4 Simulations –PMTs added –Muons, pions, jets FNAL Feb. 08 testbeam –Preliminary results

Feb 24, TB04 analysis from GeV pions from TB04 While analyzing TB04 data during the summer of 2005, abnormally high energy events were seen in several pion runs.

Feb 24, Abnormal Events These events are most likely to be from Cerenkov radiation from particles directly hitting the PMT window. –peak of muon signal ~ 200 GeV The glass window is plano-convex. –1mm thick in center –6.1mm thick at the edges These events were also seen in TB07 by Freeman et. al.

Feb 24, GeV Pions Out of events for 300 Gev pions aimed at tower 2: –4056(2.2%) have at least 1 channel with more than 600 GeV. –3625(1.9%) have at least 1 channel with more than 600 GeV when excluding channels 1 and 14. –42679(22.8%) have more than 600 GeV per event when summing over all channels. –7513(4.0%) have more than 600 Gev per event when summing over all channels except 1 and 14.

Feb 24, Assorted comments on TB04 Analysis Event filters using S/(L+S) and timing have been studied. –Using a value of 0.2 for Δcut from the mean value of S/(L+S) for normal pions: ~5% of “normal” events would be rejected. ~85% of “abnormal” events would be rejected. We looked at several electron runs, abnormal events were not observed. A CMS internal note has been submitted on this analysis –See talk from last CMS week. Event filters need to be test for jets at the LHC –New HF simulation is under development Preliminary results – today.

Feb 24, Geant4 HF Simulation The original HF simulation only had two depths, one for long fibers, and another for short fibers. In order to correctly identify abnormal events that were hitting the PMT windows, it was necessary to add the PMT windows to the simulation, these were added as discs located behind HF. The hits recorded in these discs are represented by two additional depths, one for PMTs corresponding to long fibers, and another corresponding to short fibers. –There are now four total depths for HF. Working in CMSSW_1_7_0. Rough schematic of PMTs behind HF. The two different colors represent long and short PMTs. Actually 48 PMTs per wedge, only 8 shown. (see Sunanda’s talk today)

Feb 24, GeV Muons Depth 3 & 4 (PMT window sim_hits)

Feb 24, Use of Pythia for u-quark Jets Pt: 20GeV eta: phi: deg

Feb 24, Hits in Depths 3 &4 Pt 20 GeV jets (up quarks) Pt 100 GeV jets (up quarks) (100,000 events)(90,000 events)

Feb 24, Pt of Abnormal Events 20 GeV jets 100 GeV jets Pt (GeV) Depth 3 & 4

Feb 24, Abnormal Event Rates Pt 20 GeV jets (100k events) Pt 100 GeV jets (90k events) Pt (GeV)

Feb 24, η of Abnormal Events (20 GeV jets) genrated Pt > 80GeV Pt >40GeV Pt>160GeV

Feb 24, Feb. 08 Testbeam at Fermi The goal of this testbeam was to test the possibility of placing a crystal in front of the PMT window to help identify abnormal events. –LYSO, BGO –As particles go through the crystals, scintillation should occur. –A large delay in the signal should also be observed. Involvement from Fermi (Jim Freeman, Rick Vidal), University of Iowa, and Princeton.

Feb 24, Beam Setup Beam Lucite * 167cm Absorber * (full HF length)‏ PMT Stage 0.5mm Wire Chamber PMT Crystal Mount * Scint Counter for rates Scint Counter 2 Scint Counter 3 Iron and Lead Absorber * These items were not present in all beam configurations. Trigger Scints

Feb 24, Nb. of Events vs. Charge (pC)‏ NoXtal Delay: 0 ns Delay: 32 ns Delay: 64 ns Delay: 96 ns Delay: 160 ns Beam: 120 GeV proton without HF Absorber (~30k)‏ Delay: 128 ns NoXtal Delay: 0 ns Delay: 32 ns Delay: 64 ns Delay: 96 ns Delay: 160 ns Delay: 128 ns NoXtal Beam: 120 GeV proton with HF Absorber (~85k)‏ Single hit requirement. No muon id tag. w/ block: 0.3% (293/85288)‏ w/o block: 31.6% (9327/2953)‏

Beam: 120 GeV proton with HF Absorber, No crystal (~85k)‏ LYSO Delay: 0 ns Delay: 32 ns Delay: 64 ns Delay: 96 ns Delay: 160 ns Delay: 128 ns LYSO Beam: 120 GeV proton with HF Absorber, LYSO crystal (50k)‏ BGO Delay: 0 ns Delay: 32 ns Delay: 64 ns Delay: 96 ns Delay: 160 ns Delay: 128 ns BGO Beam: 120 GeV proton with HF Absorber, BGO crystal (50k)‏ NoXtal Delay: 0 ns Delay: 32 ns Delay: 64 ns Delay: 96 ns Delay: 160 ns Delay: 128 ns NoXtal Nb. of Events vs. Charge (pC)‏

Feb 24, Angle Study PMT LYSO Histograms have 10k events Beam: 16 GeV proton without HF Absorber Beam 30 degrees Pedestal ADC Saturation Pedestal PMT LYSO

Feb 24, Nb. of Events vs. Charge (pC) for Three Cases LYSO shifts the signal more than BGO. The pedestal location (red ovals) shifts with changes in amplification. The testbeam just finished on Wednesday; more detailed analysis continues. Beam: 120 GeV proton with HF Absorber NoXtal LYSOBGO