Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Testing the Match between Vibroseis and Dynamite Data Reflection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tutorial 3 Refractor assignment, Analysis, Modeling and Statics
Advertisements

How to import and interpret seismic refraction data using IXRefraX
Geophysical Data Systems Ltd. S E I S W I N O N B A S I S O F WINDOWS ® SOFTWARE PACKAGE Geophysical Data Systems Ltd. Address:117198, RUSSIA, Moscow,
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Reflection Seismic Processing
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Multiple Removal with Local Plane Waves
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Amplitude correction Important methods:
Processing: zero-offset gathers
GeoCenter LP SeisUP ® Marine Processing.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Predictive Deconvolution in Practice
Seismic Reflection: Processing and Interpretation Katie Wooddell UW Madison.
Parallel Geoscience Corporation
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Reflection Field Methods
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
A Short Course in Seismic Reflection Profiling
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics This Week: No new lab assignment… But we’ll go over the previous labs 06 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 07 Feb:
Deconvolution Bryce Hutchinson Sumit Verma Objectives: -Understand the difference between exponential and surface consistent gain -Identify power line.
GEOCENTER LP LAND PROCESSING. Step 2 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 3 Step 1 SeisUP ® “AGLEN” Dataset Land Processing.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Last week’s problems a) Mass excess = 1/2πG × Area under curve 1/2πG = × in kgs 2 m -3 Area under curve = -1.8 ×10-6 x 100 m 2 s -2 So Mass.
Seismic reflections. Seismic waves will be reflected at “discontinuities” in elastic properties A new ray emerges, heading back to the surface Energy.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Squelch Tests for Streamer Noise Attenuation Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
Refraction Statics Bryce Hutchinson Sumit Verma. 3D Statics display 1. Click this button on the right side of the statics window to open a 3D statics.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey
Introduction to Seismology
Lab 8 NMO and Residual Velocity Analysis Objectives: Apply NMO CMP Stack the NMO (for later comparison) Compute Residual Statics Apply Residual statics.
Bryce Hutchinson & Sumit Verma
Radon Transforms in Tau-P space and Multiple Removal
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2015 Matching Filter to match Transition Zone Airgun Source Wavelet.
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
Reflection seismograms
Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging References: J.M. Reynolds, An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics, John Wiley & Sons,
FIELD GEOMETRY FOR MULTICHANNEL SEISMIC (MCS) PROFILES Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging: Pt 2.
Info Read SEGY Wavelet estimation New Project Correlate near offset far offset Display Well Tie Elog Strata Geoview Hampson-Russell References Create New.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 23 Feb 2016 Lab 3 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Seismic Reflections Next assignment due one week from now Due noon Mar 1.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Source Designature Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67 Jan. 25, 2014.
GDF Suez Holland E 16-4 VSP Part 1:
Reflection Seismic Method
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
CLARITAS SWELL NOISE ATTENUATION PROCESS
Seismic Processing Data Processing Stream Field Record (marine)
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
From Raw Data to an Image
Typical Vertical Resolution
Shot Gather For Shot 1 Source Receivers R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 S1
Jacques JENNY Geo2X Genève
Seismic Reflections Lecture Shot Receiver Seismic Record
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Presentation transcript:

Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Testing the Match between Vibroseis and Dynamite Data Reflection event timing and First-arrival timing Feb. 17, 2014

Vibroseis and Dynamite shot records were found on 2 stations using the same set of receiver stations on line BST14A-04 First, the relationship between reflections in the subsurface was analysed. As per theory, Vibroseis is recorded zero-phase positive and impulsive source (Dynamite) data is recorded minimum-phase negative. Therefore the Vibroseis data requires minimum-phasing and polarity reversal to match Dynamite data. Shot records are displayed for the station 1339 and 1473 as follows: Slides 5 and 8: Vibroseis as recorded from surface Slides 6 and 9: Dynamite shifted 6 msec to surface Slides 7 and 10: Vibroseis with minimum-phasing and reverse polarity applied After applying the minimum-phasing and reverse polarity to the Vibroseis data the reflection data timing is a perfect match with the Dynamite reflection data. Second, the relationship between the first-arrivals was verified since this is very important for data-ties using Refraction Statics. As shown on slides 11 and 12 the timing of first arrivals at various offset also matches very well after the above processes are applied to the Vibroseis data and both sets of first-arrivals are minimum-phase onsets to troughs.

Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Location of Lines

Shot Record Displays Sequence Input field data/Reformat Add Geometry: (from SPS files) Spherical Divergence Correction: (V**2)(T**1.2) Ensemble Balance: entire record scaled Low-cut: 4 Hz Squelch: noise reduction band, Vibroseis Hz Dynamite: Hz NMO correction: single brute function Trace Balance:.7 sec. windows Display: -ve = blue, +ve = red Note: impulsive source reflection data positive reflection co-eff. = -ve number or blue color

Vibroseis Shot Record, Station 1339, Line 04 from Surface

Dynamite Shot Record, Station 1339, Line 04 Shifted 6 msec to Surface

Vibroseis Shot Record, Station 1339, Line 04 from Surface, Minimum-phased, Reverse Polarity Vibroseis Reflection Data matches timing of Dynamite Reflection Data

Vibroseis Shot Record, Station 1473, Line 02 from Surface Vibroseis Shot Record, Station 1473, Line 04 from Surface

Dynamite Shot Record, Station 1473, Line 04 Shifted 6 msec to Surface

Vibroseis Shot Record, Station 1473, Line 04 from Surface, Minimum-phased, Reverse Polarity Vibroseis Reflection Data matches timing of Dynamite Reflection Data

Stack, Deep Zone - Line B67 (deep water) Tau-P Decon - 12 msec gap Applied 308 msec 391 msec After Minimum-phasing and Reversal of the Vibroseis Data First Arrival Timing Matches Between the Vibroseis and Dynamite Data Station 1339 VibroseisDynamite

Stack, Deep Zone - Line B67 (deep water) Tau-P Decon - 16 msec gap Applied 246 msec 427 msec After Minimum-phasing and Reversal of the Vibroseis Data First Arrival Timing Matches Between the Vibroseis and Dynamite Data Station 1473 VibroseisDynamite