Atcllc.com Using CEMS Data to Estimate Coal-Fired Plant FORs and Scheduled Maintenance Chris Hagman 12-15-15.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WORKSHOP ON UTILITY WIND INTEGRATION STUDIES: MODELS AND METHODS Panel 6 – Base Load Unit Cycling Costs Gene Danneman P.E. June 24 & 25, 2010.
Advertisements

Modeling Tres-Amigas Update Modeling Work Group Meeting February 10, 2011 WECC Staff.
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
Capacity Planning ABI301.
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
Outage Cost Study Market Analysis and Design Outage Coordination Improvement Task Force 3/23/2015.
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
Dealing With Uncertainty
IMO 18-Month Outlook Presentation to the F&ASC June 25, 2003.
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
David Ing CSE 3, Average Temperature over 10 years First interpretation: This tread line goes from December of 2001 to May While it may seem.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
GE Energy Asia Development Bank Wind Energy Grid Integration Workshop: Issues and Challenges for systems with high penetration of Wind Power Nicholas W.
NW Transmission System Bottlenecks and Impacts of 2005 Summer Operation BPA Transmission Business Line Mike Viles January 2006.
Study Results Drought Scenario Study This slide deck contains results from the 2011 TEPPC Study Program. This study shows the impact in the interconection.
Optimization for Operation of Power Systems with Performance Guarantee
NW Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Conference Call November 4, 2010.
Base Case Draft – For Comment Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003.
Load Data for Vermont Docket 7081 workshop 9/30/05.
Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants: Economic and Environmental Impacts 15 June 2011 Professor Paul Fischbeck Carnegie Mellon University
Climate Change and The NW Power Supply Climate Impacts on the Pacific Northwest University of Washington April 21, 2009.
1 18-Month Outlook October March 2005 Presented by Greg Hine IMO Long-Term Forecasts and Assessments.
Discussion of Resource Plans Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Wednesday, June 10, 2009.
California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20071 Estimating the Generation Resource Mix of Electricity Imports to California – Energy Commission.
UFE 2003 Analysis June 1, UFE 2003 ANALYSIS Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation June 1, 2005.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
April 15, 2003 UFE 2002 ANALYSIS. April 15, 2003 LOAD AND UFE – ERCOT PEAK 2002 This is a graphic depiction of load and UFE on the ERCOT Peak Day for.
The Future of Electricity Analyzing the Next Decade of Ontario’s Power Generation.
PowerGEM Power Grid Engineering & Markets 1 LMP’s and Congestion Relief Lens, Crystal Ball, or Alice’s Looking Glass ? January 30, 2003 Jim Mitsche
Plug-in Vehicles and the Electric Grid Mark Kapner, PE Senior Strategy Planner Austin Energy
Optimizing Deployment of CCGT Duct Firing Capacity in the Nodal Market Josh Clevenger Brazos Electric Cooperative.
“DRAFT” RMATS 2008 Base Case (To be presented at the RMATS Stakeholders Meeting) March 17, 2004.
1 Public Power Looking to Participate in New Coal Generation Public power communities are very concerned about affordable electricity and –Coal is the.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
Power System Marginal CO2 Production Factors Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council Presented to the RTF April 18, 2006.
1 Proposed Input Assumptions to RTF Cost-Effectiveness Determinations February 2, 2010.
Analysis of Demand Response Modeling in GridView Andy Satchwell and Sarah Smith Modeling Work Group December 21, 2015 The work described in this presentation.
DWG – Dependable Capacity Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Task Force - Chair.
The number which appears most often in a set of numbers. Example: in {6, 3, 9, 6, 6, 5, 9, 3} the Mode is 6 (it occurs most often). Mode : The middle number.
Developing Load Reduction Estimates Caused by Interrupting and/or Curtailing Large Customers By Carl L. Raish 2000 AEIC Load Research Conference.
Variable Load on Power Stations
January 14, 2016 PacifiCorp-CAISO-NVE EIM Initiative Overview.
INTEGRATING WIND ENERGY WITH ELECTRIC SYSTEMS ERIC HIRST Consultant in Electric-Industry Restructuring Bellingham, WA December.
Capacity Forecast Report Fall Update Sean Chang Market Analysis and Design Suresh Pabbisetty CQF, ERP, CSQA Credit CWG/MCWG December 16, 2015 ERCOT Public.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Response to TAC Questions on PGRR031 TAC– January 28, 2014 Jeff Billo, ERCOT 1.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
GATF Loss of Load Process (or How to Make Sausage) October, 2012.
POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE Analysis of a Residential 5kW Grid-tied Photovoltaic System Presented by: Yacouba Moumouni Co-authors:
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Modeled Load Levels in the Valley
Heat Rate Calc based on CEMS Data April 12, 2016
University of California at Berkeley
Fundamental Supply Factors Driving Current Market Prices
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
DEC System Voltage Planning - June 2018
2015 UNS Rate Case – DG Trends in Action
INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM GENERATING CAPACITY RELIABILITY EVALUATION
Study Results Drought Scenario Study
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

atcllc.com Using CEMS Data to Estimate Coal-Fired Plant FORs and Scheduled Maintenance Chris Hagman

atcllc.com 2 FORs on large coal-fired plants can have a significant impact on transmission congestion. –Transmission constraints may prevent lower-cost power from getting to load when large low-cost generation is forced off. –FORs and scheduled maintenance can also vary widely on coal-fired plants –Modeling better mimics actual congestion when this variability is captured, i.e. when there is better granularity. Significant Impact on Congestion

atcllc.com 3 Generator Availability Data System (GADS) data is often used to estimate FORs –GADS data can be difficult to interpret –Under-reporting? –Not plant-specific Alternative Approach: Use hourly Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) data to estimate plant-specific: –Forced Outage Rates –Scheduled Maintenance CEMS data is publically available. GADS Data and Alternative Approach

atcllc.com 4 Method using CEMS data works for baseload plants –CEMS data provides hourly generator output. –Coal-Fired plants are typically "Baseload” and operate all of the time, but for maintenance and forced outages. Hours with zero output are considered either scheduled maintenance or forced outages. CEMS Data Provides Hourly Output

atcllc.com 5 How can we distinguish between scheduled maintenance and forced outage hours? –Summer peaking utilities typically do not schedule maintenance on coal-fired plants during the Summer (when they are needed the most). Assume hours with zero output from June through August are forced outages. –Outages lasting 14 days or longer and not during the Summer are assumed to be maintenance. –Assume the opposite for Winter peaking utilities. Hours with zero output from December through February are forced outages. Partial forced outages are not captured so FORs calculated using the CEMS method may be somewhat lower than actuals. Rules for Applying the CEMS Method

atcllc.com 6 Analyzed 65 coal-fired plants in the 2024 Common Case with Maximum Capacities ranging from 150 to 857 MW. To be conservative, used 10 years of hourly CEMS generation data (2005 to 2014). When FORs and scheduled maintenance are low, relative to actuals, coal-fired plants over-generate in the model. Analysis

atcllc.com 7 Middle Third Sorted Based on CEMS FORs

atcllc.com 8 Top Third Sorted Based on CEMS FORs

atcllc.com 9 Bottom Third Based on CEMS FORs

atcllc.com 10 Using the CEMS method, average FORs and Scheduled Maintenance outage lengths are somewhat higher than current WECC 2024 Common Case values. –Completed analysis last night--may want to refine the rules for analyzing the CEMS data. Forced outages and scheduled maintenance on coal-fired plants can have a significant impact on congestion, especially when multiple plant outages occur at the same time. Conclusion

atcllc.com 11 Questions? Chris Hagman Questions?