Short Pipe Model with Nested TTL and No PHP Processing -slide 45 TTL=k-1 TTL=j TTL=k-2 TTL=j TTL=m TTL=k-2 TTL=j TTL=m-1 TTL=n TTL=k-2 TTL=j TTL=m-2 TTL=k-3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intra-Carrier Solutions Enabled by the OIF NNI Erning Ye Nortel Networks.
Advertisements

Ethernet OAM Update Overview & Technical Aspects Dinesh Mohan May 18, 2004.
Geneva, 27 May 2010 Types and Characteristics of Packet Transport Network (PTN) Equipment (Draft Recommendation - G.ptneq) Jia He and Hilmar Hofmann G.ptneq.
EVC structure for a Protected E-Line service
Nortel Confidential Information 1 VPLS OAM (draft-mohan-l2vpn-vpls-oam) L2VPN WG, IETF-71 (Philadelphia) Mar 13, 2008 Dinesh Mohan (Nortel) Ali Sajassi.
George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.
MPLS-TP Lock Instruct MPLS WG, IETF 76, Hiroshima, 9 Nov 2009 draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00 ZTE Corporation Xuehui.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum MEF 17 Service OAM Framework and Requirements February 2008.
MEF 30 Service OAM Fault Management Implementation Agreement
Information and Communication Networks Carrier Ethernet / Broadband Evolution Dr.Ulrich Schoen Siemens ICN Carrier Products – System Engineering ITU All.
1 Transport Services Layer Protection Switching Types Interacting with DRNI Maarten Vissers
1 DRNI Examples and DAS position Maarten Vissers Version 01.
1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v4 v2: includes a few slides at the end illustrating segment protection.
Carrier Ethernet Network Solutions: The Benefits of End-To-End Ethernet Service Management Slide 1 Carrier Ethernet Network Solutions: The Benefits of.
802.1ag - Connectivity Fault Management Tutorial – Part 1 Dinesh Mohan July 12, 2004.
1 DRNI and Distributed Protection Examples Maarten Vissers v01 Based on slides presented in IW meeting in Nanjing on Thursday Sept 22.
1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v3 v2: includes a few slides at the end illustrating segment protection.
1 UNI-N Trib Card in PE node Two operational modes:  service model 1 (client/server)  service model 2 (peer) Two stack modes:  EVC only  EVC & MS-PW.
1 MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile References 1.Slides taken from ITU-T - IETF Joint Working Team Report (RFC 5317), By Dave Ward,
DRNI Examples, DAS position, MEP/MIP position
Old Dog Consulting Multi-Segment Pseudowires: Recognising the Layer Network Adrian Farrel Old Dog Consulting.
1 Why Carriers Like Pseudowires… Payload (IP, L2 data, voice) PseudoWires Layer-2 (Ethernet, ATM…) Physical (Optical, Wireless) User Applications Payload.
IETF 59, March 2004Mustapha AïssaouiSlide 1 OAM Procedures for VPWS Interworking draft-aissaoui-l2vpn-vpws-iw-oam-00 Mustapha Aïssaoui, Matthew Bocci,
MPLS-TP OAM Framework draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-framework-07 editors: Dave Allan, Italo Busi, Ben Niven-Jenkins.
LSP-Ping extensions for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping- extensions-00 Nitin Bahadur Sami Boutros Rahul Aggarwal Eric Gray.
1 DRNI Data Plane Model I/II Comparison & MAC Address Values in DRNI Maarten Vissers v00.
Draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal- hitless-psm th November Beijing Yoshinori Koike / NTT.
Draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal- hitless-psm-04 November 17th, 2011 Taipei Alessandro D'Alessandro (Telecom Italia) Manuel Paul (Deutsche Telekom) Satoshi.
9/8/2015 draft-bocci-mpls-tp-gach-gal-00.txt MPLS Generic Associated Channel draft-bocci-mpls-tp-gach-gal-00.txt Matthew Bocci (ALU) & Martin Vigoureux.
Draft-koike-mpls-tp-temporal- hitless-psm th July Maastricht Yoshinori Koike / NTT.
Draft-akiya-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping Nobo Akiya George Swallow Carlos Pignataro Nagendra Kumar IETF 88, Vancouver, Canada.
1 MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile ITU-T - IETF Joint Working Team Dave Ward, Malcolm Betts, ed. March 28, 2008.
Slide 1 MPLS-TP Linear Protection / Author / RTP IE Fixed CET I insert classification level © Nokia Siemens Networks MPLS-TP Linear Protection.
PWE3 Agenda – Monday 8 th Nov 15 min - Agenda bash, WG Agenda and Status - Andy Malis and Matthew Bocci 5 min - Dynamic Placement of Multi Segment Pseudo.
MPLS-TP Pseudowire Configuration using OpenFlow 1.3 draft-medved-pwe3-of-config-02 J.Medved A.McLachlan D.Meyer.
73rd IETF Minneapolis Nov Framework and Requirements for Virtual Private Multicast Service (VPMS) draft-kamite-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-02.txt.
Applicability of Existing Solutions to the Problem Space draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-03.txt.
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 1 25 March 2009 Peer Interworking Ethernet and PDH service cases Maarten Vissers.
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-ingress-protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-egress-protection Huaimo.
Indication of Client Fault in MPLS-TP OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-csf-01 IETF 80 th, March 27-April 1, 2011 Jia He Han Li Elisa Bellagamba.
IETF 57, July 16, 2003Mustapha AïssaouiSlide 1 Extended MPLS/PW PID Mustapha Aïssaoui, Matthew Bocci, David Watkinson, Alcatel Andrew G. Malis, Tellabs.
February 2006 MPLS Interop 2008 # 1 MPLS-TP OAM OAM for an MPLS Transport Profile Loa Andersson, Acreo AB IAB, MPLS WG co-chair.
MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile
MEF Protection Work Pascal Menezes Technical Contributor June 3 rd 2003.
1 Distributed Network Protection (DNP) architecture study Maarten Vissers v1.
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-ingress-protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-egress-protection Huaimo.
Common OAM between IEEE and TRILL November, 2012.
Ethernet 802.1ag Fault Management Across Domains Freek Dijkstra, Sander Boele, Ronald van der Pol – SARA TERENA Networking Conference – Reykjavík, 23 May.
Open discussion - MIP MEP OAM maintenance point model 11 th November Beijing Yoshinori Koike / NTT.
Mobile Ethernet-based Networking and Transport Services
Supporting VUNI in DRNI Maarten Vissers v00
draft-nadeau-pwe3-msgmap-00.txt IETF #56 San Francisco, CA USA
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
Handling MPLS-TP OAM Packets Targeted at Internal MIPs
George Swallow Martin Vigoureux Rahul Aggerwal July 30, 2008
Point-to-Multipoint Pseudo-Wire Encapsulation draft-raggarwa-pwe3-p2mp-pw-encaps-00.txt R. Aggarwal (Juniper)
MPLS-TP Survivability Framework
Diagnostic tool-test for MPLS transport profile
Yimin Shen (Juniper) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc)
Zhenbin Li, Shunwan Zhuang Huawei Technologies
Bala’zs, Norm, Jouni DetNet WG London, 23rd March, 2018
Kireeti Kompella Juniper Networks
EVPN a very short introduction
Optical Fast Reroute Adrian Farrel : Old Dog Consulting
PW-CE2 E PWE3 – 58th IETF 10 November 2003 Yaakov (J) Stein.
OAM Configuration Framework and Technology Specific Extensions
PW Control Word Stitching
PW Control Word Stitching
Presentation transcript:

Short Pipe Model with Nested TTL and No PHP Processing -slide 45 TTL=k-1 TTL=j TTL=k-2 TTL=j TTL=m TTL=k-2 TTL=j TTL=m-1 TTL=n TTL=k-2 TTL=j TTL=m-2 TTL=k-3 TTL=j TTL=k-3 TTL=j TTL=k-2 TTL=j TTL=m-1 TTL=n-1 TTL=k TTL=j PW LSP 1 LSP 2 LSP 3 ABCDEFGH Bottom of stack Stack going into pipe Stack received at H From the TTL perspective, the treatment for a Pipe Model LSP is identical to the Short Pipe Model without PHP (RFC3443).

Pipe Model with Cascaded TTL Processing =Slide 49 TTL=k TTL=j TTL=k-1 TTL=jTTL=j-1 TTL=n TTL=m TTL=n-1 TTL=m TTL=n-1 TTL=m ABCDE Stack received at E Stack going into pipe PW LSP PW m <= j-1 C’

Multi segment Transport example PW over LSP-slide17 P P MEPMIP MEP PE MEP MIP A segment is between MEPs OAM is end to end or per segment In SDH/OTN and Ethernet segment OAM is implemented using Tandem Connection Monitoring (TCM) The OAM in each segment is independent of any other segment Recovery actions (Protection or restoration) are always between MEPs i.e. per segment or end to end Carrier 1 Carrier 2 NNI MEP:Maintenance End Point MIP:Maintenance Intermediate Point end to end LSP OAM segment LSP OAM (inter carrier) Note: A policing function (traffic management/shaping) is normally co located with a MEP at a business boundary (UNI/NNI) CE Attachment circuit segment LSP OAM (carrier 2) segment LSP OAM (carrier 1) Attachment circuit PE MEP end to end PW OAM (no PW stitching shown) P MIP UNI

Nested LSP segment example - slide18 CE PE P P MEP PE Region 1 Region 2 NNIUNIINNI Carrier 1 MEP MIP MEP end to end LSP OAM Carrier 1 LSP OAM segment carrier 1 region 2 LSP OAM segment 3 LSP OAM levels + PW OAM end to end LSP + 2 nested segment LSP levels (Carrier 1 + regions 1/2) Nested segments are supported by Tandem Connection Monitoring (TCM) in SDH/OTN and Y.1731 carrier 1 region 1 LSP OAM segment MEP end to end PW OAM (no PW stitching shown) segment LSP OAM (inter carrier)