Advanced Controls Research Alan D. Wright Lee Fingersh Maureen Hand Jason Jonkman Gunjit Bir 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Wind turbines generate electric power from clean renewable sources. They must be robust and.
Advertisements

11 June 2009 American Control ConferenceSt. Louis, MO Control of Wind Turbines: Past, Present and Future.
Scheduled Model Predictive Control of Wind turbines in Above Rated Wind Avishek Kumar Dr Karl Stol Department of Mechanical Engineering.
1 © 2011 The MathWorks, Inc. Designing Control Systems for Wind Turbines Steve Miller Technical Marketing, Physical Modeling MathWorks Root LocusBode Plot.
Un-freezing the turbulence: improved wind field modelling for investigating Lidar-assisted wind turbine control Ervin Bossanyi.
Dynamic Response and Control of the Hywind Demo Floating Wind Turbine
Delft University of Technology Aeroelastic Modeling and Comparison of Advanced Active Flap Control Concepts for Load Reduction on the Upwind.
Advances in Condition Monitoring – Linking the Input to the Output Martin Jones Insensys.
A Comparison of Multi-Blade Coordinate Transformation and Direct Periodic Techniques for Wind Turbine Control Design Karl Stol Wind Energy Symposium AIAA.
Disturbance Accommodating Control of Floating Wind Turbines
Hazim Namik Department of Mechanical Engineering
Gireesh Ramachandran Amy Robertson Jason Jonkman Marco Masciola
Controller design for a wind farm, considering both power and load aspects Maryam Soleimanzadeh Controller design for a wind farm, considering both power.
Funded by and in collaboration with EPRI Tony Rogers, DNV
Alan D. Wright Lee J. Fingersh National Renewable Energy Laboratory
CONTROL SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION. What ‘Control System’ mean for a Wind Turbine Yawing of nacelle Blade pitch adjustment.
Deep Water Offshore Wind Energy By Paul D. Sclavounos Horns Rev Wind Farm (Denmark) - Rated Power 160 MW – Water Depth 10-15m.
1 Residual Vectors & Error Estimation in Substructure based Model Reduction - A PPLICATION TO WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING - MSc. Presentation Bas Nortier.
Aeroelastic Stability and Control of Large Wind Turbines
1 Modeling and Control of Magnetic Bearing Systems Zongli Lin Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Virginia U.S.A. ICCA ’02.
Coordinated Control Design for Wind Turbine Control Systems W.E. Leithead and S. Dominguez University of Strathclyde.
Active Control Systems for Wind Turbines
An Introduction to wind power By Jack Bradley, University of Bradford.
THE POWER OF THE WIND. The wind: a key factor in world economy Wind needs clean, renewable and competitive sources of energy; wind is a very competitive.
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
Design Process Supporting LWST 1.Deeper understanding of technical terms and issues 2.Linkage to enabling research projects and 3.Impact on design optimization.
Where: I T = moment of inertia of turbine rotor.  T = angular shaft speed. T E = mechanical torque necessary to turn the generator. T A = aerodynamic.
1 11 A review of wind energy technologies part two. Adviser : Dr. Yuan-Kang Wu Student : Po-Kai Lin Date :
Some effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability Bjarne S. Kallesøe Morten H. Hansen.
A Quantitative Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbines
NAWEA 2015 Symposium Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, VA June 9-11, 2015
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
Dave Corbus, Craig Hansen Presentation at Windpower 2005 Denver, CO May 15-18, 2005 Test Results from the Small Wind Research Turbine (SWRT) Test Project.
LOAD ALLEVIATION ON WIND TURBINE BLADES USING VARIABLE AIRFOIL GEOMETRY Thomas Buhl, Mac Gaunaa, Peter Bjørn Andersen and Christian Bak ADAPWING.
Wind Turbine Aerodynamics Section 2 – Power Control E-Learning UNESCO ENEA Casaccia - February Fabrizio Sardella.
Jason JonkmanSandy ButterfieldNeil Kelley Marshall BuhlGunjit BirBonnie Jonkman Pat MoriartyAlan WrightDaniel Laird 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10,
 Large Blade Testing Facility LARGE WIND TURBINES Rahul Yarala Executive Director, Wind Technology Testing Center May 12, 2011.
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines EWEC2007 Milan, Italy 7-10 May 2007 B. Skaare 1, T. D. Hanson 1, F.G. Nielsen 1, R. Yttervik.
REDUCTION OF TEETER ANGLE EXCURSIONS FOR A TWO-BLADED DOWNWIND ROTOR USING CYCLIC PITCH CONTROL Torben Juul Larsen, Helge Aagaard Madsen, Kenneth Thomsen,
Power Management of Wind Turbines presented by: Barry Rawn MASc Candidate University of Toronto Wind Power Generation Symposium- February 20th, 2004 SF1105.
Technische Universität München Wind Energy Institute Technische Universität München Wind Energy Institute Detection of Wake Impingement in Support of Wind.
EWEC 2006, AthensMartin Geyler 1 Hardware-in-the-Loop Development and Testing of New Pitch Control Algorithms EWEC 2006 Athens Martin Geyler, Jochen Giebhardt,
EWEC 2007, MilanoMartin Geyler 1 Individual Blade Pitch Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines EWEC 2007 Milano, 7-10 May 2007 Martin.
Control of a Helical Cross-flow Current Turbine
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
An Introduction to Rotorcraft Dynamics
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2009
Using the wind to create electricity is great. By using windmills to create wind power is great because we are helping the Earth and the O-zone layer.
Wind Energy. How does wind energy work? The wind blows on the blades and makes them turn. The blades turns a shaft inside the nacelle (the box at the.
Sandy Butterfield 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10, 2006 Overview of the Technology & Opportunities.
A Quantitative Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbines
WIND TURBINE CONTROL DESIGN TO REDUCE CAPITAL COSTS P. Jeff Darrow(Colorado School of Mines) Alan Wright(National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Kathryn.
WIND POWER By: Saed Ghaffari HOW DO YOU CONVERT WIND INTO ELECTRICITY
Period 7.   The more curved side generates low air pressures, due to more surface area. While high pressure air, pushes on the other side of the design.
Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic Rotors Peter F
Evan Gaertner University of Massachusetts, Amherst IGERT Seminar Series October 1st, 2015 Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Aerodynamics.
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Simulation of the Aerodynamics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines under.
Chapter 8, pp (*figures from text)
Wind Power Kelly Farmer.
Raja M. Imran, D. M. Akbar Hussain and Mohsen Soltani
Classical Design of Wind Turbine Controllers
Wind Turbine Control System
INVESTIGATION OF IDLING INSTABILITIES IN WIND TURBINE SIMULATIONS
DYNAMIC STALL OCCURRENCE ON A HORIZONTAL AXIS WIND TURBINE BLADE
Wind observers and Advanced Controls for Innovative Turbines
Dynamic Controllers for Wind Turbines
Anatomy of Modern Wind Turbines-1
Exploring the limits in Individual Pitch Control S. Kanev and T
ECE 445 Wind Turbine Generator System Design and Characterization
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Controls Research Alan D. Wright Lee Fingersh Maureen Hand Jason Jonkman Gunjit Bir 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10, 2006

Wind Program Peer Review  Create design methodology for advanced controls: –regulate rotor-speed and/or maximize energy extraction. –stabilize important flexible modes of the turbine to reduce dynamic loads and response.  Develop control design and modeling tools.  Develop controls field testing capability. Objectives

Wind Program Peer Review Commercial Turbine Control Generator Torque Nacelle Yaw Blade Pitch Control Actions

Wind Program Peer Review What else can we do?  Improve energy capture –Active rather than passive rotor control Negative inertia - Use of shaft torque to cancel rotor inertia –Adaptive control –Active pitch following –Optimal torque control  Reduce loads –Load feedback –Independent pitch control –Periodic gains –Active tower / blade / drive-train damping –Advanced sensors –Look-ahead controls

Wind Program Peer Review Adaptive control 0.3% - 5% energy capture increase

Wind Program Peer Review Control of Flexible Modes

Wind Program Peer Review  Regulate rotor-speed in the presence of wind-speed disturbances and stabilize turbine modes. –Stabilize flexible modes through full state feedback. –Use state estimation to provide the controller with needed states (including wind-speed). –Represent wind disturbance with extra states. Controller accounts for fluctuating wind speeds and shears.  Multiple input/multiple output, single control loop State Feedback Control

Wind Program Peer Review State-Space Linear Model  Linear time-periodic model Structural DOFs & rates Pitch actuator states Wind disturbance Up to 17 states Turbine measurements State matrices periodic over each rotation Up to 9 measurements Tower & blade strain gauges LSS torque Yaw, teeter, LSS angles Pitch angles where

Wind Program Peer Review Process/Tools DesignSimulate Linear ModelFAST DACADAMS LQRSimulink Field test CART CART-3 Industry Modify Analyze data Make changes Iterate

Wind Program Peer Review Field Tested Collective Pitch Controller 15% - 50% reduction in Shaft Torque fatigue loads

Wind Program Peer Review CART Test Results – Pitch Control Normalized to Baseline Controller Performance  Significant reduction in most measured loads (30-70%) Region 2 Region 3

Wind Program Peer Review Disturbance Model h z hub V h z V Uniform wind component Fluctuating wind component

Wind Program Peer Review Simulated Control With New Independent Pitch/DAC Must measure either tip- deflection or flap-bending moments on each blade

Wind Program Peer Review Use of Lidar Measured Wind-speed  Simulated single lidar hub-mounted on CART  Conical scan achieved through rotor rotation

Wind Program Peer Review Simulated Results Steady 18 m/s wind, power law exponent = 0.17 Steady 18 m/s wind, power law exponent = 0.3 DACDAC + LIDARDACDAC + LIDAR Blade 1 RFB moment DEL (kNm) Turbulent 18 m/s wind, power law exponent = 0.17 Turbulent 18 m/s wind, power law exponent = 0.3 DACDAC + LIDARDACDAC + LIDAR Blade 1 RFB moment DEL (kNm)

Wind Program Peer Review No controlControl Measured Tower Load Reduction Using Generator Torque Control (CART)

Wind Program Peer Review Conclusions 17  Must move away from using old control schemes with multiple loops  Advanced Controls show great potential for meeting multiple control objectives –Stabilizing turbine structure –Enhancing energy capture –Mitigating dynamic loads  Will be critical for large flexible machines as well as offshore turbines with many flexible modes

Wind Program Peer Review Plans - Future Work  Complete development of control design tools for industry.  Continue advanced controls development and testing.  Develop new field testing capability on a large flexible turbine – partner with industry.  Implement and test controls on commercial turbines.

Wind Program Peer Review CART-3 – 3-bladed hub testing  Supplement to the 2-bladed CART  Advanced controls integration  Designed for testing modern controls –Loads –Deflection –Advanced sensors

Wind Program Peer Review Opportunities  Partner with industry to implement controls on large turbines.  Develop controls test-bed/floating platform simulator.

Wind Program Peer Review Questions and comments