Spatial distribution of hourly trajectory endpoint frequencies top 10% of daytime RGM vs. total year with estimated 2002 emissions of reactive gaseous.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UPDATE ON DAQS AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENTS & MERCURY STUDIES NC DENR/DAQ Mercury/CO 2 Workshop Raleigh, NC April 19, 2004 Steve Schliesser Todd Crawford NC.
Advertisements

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
 Great Lakes Areas of Concern  U.S. urban areas (pink shading)
Tekran ® Automated Mercury Speciation F.H. Schaedlich 1, Robert K. Stevens 2, D.R. Schneeberger 2, Eric Prestbo 3, Steve Lindberg 4, Gerald Keeler 5 F.H.
Out-of-state and Natural Contributions to Baseline Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in Alaska Krish Vijayaraghavan, Jaegun Jung and Ralph Morris ENVIRON.
1 Source-attribution for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory.
Atmospheric Mercury Research Mark Cohen Air Resources Laboratory ARL Laboratory Review May 3-5, 2011.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
Mitigation Strategies Review LP Mitigation Strategy #1: Transportation Efficiency A car that gets 30 mpg releases 1 ton of carbon into the air.
Mercury Source Attribution at Global, Regional and Local Scales Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Kristen Lohman, and Prakash Karamchandani AER.
Mercury in the Great Lakes Region Sponsored by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s Environment, Economy and Trade and Pollutants and Health.
Evaluating the HYSPLIT-Hg Atmospheric Mercury Model Using Ambient Monitoring Data Mark Cohen 1, Winston Luke 1, Paul Kelley 1, Fantine Ngan 1, Richard.
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
Atmospheric Mercury Deposition to the Great Lakes A Multi-Year Study Supported by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Principal Investigator: Dr. Mark.
(work funded through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative)
Grand Bay Mercury Intensive, Data and Planning Meeting, Jan 24, 2011, Georgia Tech University Forecast and Hindcast Modeling in the Grand Bay Mercury Intensive.
Air Pollution as a Feedback Control Loop Andrew McCarthy.
Simulations of Atmospheric Mercury with the NOAA HYSPLIT Model Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, Winston Luke, Paul Kelley, and Richard Artz NOAA Air Resources.
The Effect of Color on Temperatures Inside Hardhats July 28, 2009 Presenter(s): Adam Bell.
Continuous measurements of the atmospheric concentrations of Reactive Gaseous Mercury (RGM), Fine Particulate Mercury (FPM) and Gaseous Elemental Mercury.
Air Pollution Sources: Coal-Fired Power Plants April 13, 2011.
Modeling the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury to the Great Lakes Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, Hang Lei, Richard Artz NOAA Air Resources Laboratory.
Transfer of energy by electromagnetic waves. Spontaneous emission of radiation when the nucleus of an atom breaks down to form a different element.
Air Emissions Treatment. Because air pollutants vary in size many orders of magnitude, many different types of treatment devices are required for emissions.
NOAA’s Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico Region [April 2007 summary] This summary is updated periodically, and the current version is.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
Atmospheric Mercury Modeling 101 Mark Cohen Air Resources Laboratory ARL 101 June 19, /19/2012Air Resources Laboratory1.
Grand Bay Episode March 6, 2007 March 6March 7. March 6.
CONTRIBUTION FROM DIFFERENT VOC EMISSION SOURCES TO PHOTOCHEMICAL OZONE FORMATION IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific This work was supported by the UK.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Ultra-trace Mercury Monitoring in Air. Company History Founded in 1989 to develop custom instrumentation for environmental analysis Founded in 1989 to.
How to Make Starlight (part 1) Chapter 7. Origin of light Light (electromagnetic radiation) is just a changing electric and magnetic field. Changing electric.
Modeling the Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury to Lake Champlain (from Anthropogenic Sources in the U.S. and Canada) Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources.
Mercury Measurement Programs within NOAA/ARL Steve Brooks, Mark Cohen, Tilden Meyers, Paul Kelley, Winston Luke NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory NOAA/Air.
Trajectory Calculations Trajectory or backtrajectory analyses use interpolated measured or modeled meteorological fields to estimate the most likely central.
COUNTING Directions: Write your word on the I pad and on the paper. Count the amount of letters in your word and then find the color that matches that.
Simulations of RGM air emissions from 30 power plants + 16 other large RGM sources in the 4-state region Simulations with HYSPLIT-Hg for Oct-2004 through.
Mercury in the Everglades Rebecca Barefoot EnvE 524.
1 Modeling the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland Mercury Workshop, Great.
 Great Lakes Areas of Concern  U.S. urban areas (pink shading)  Large U.S./Canadian 2005 point sources of mercury Type of Emissions Source coal-fired.
Uses of biomass energy Sources of Energy Biomass Biomass energy is defined by any organic materials that can be burned and used as a source of fuel. (a)
Using HYSPLIT to Understand Source-Receptor Relationships: Some Examples HYSPLIT Training NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Jun 2-4, 2009 Silver Spring, MD,
Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland
The Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury to the Great Lakes Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland Collection.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
Atmospheric mercury measurements in the Gulf of Mexico and mid-Atlantic regions: Early results from an emerging monitoring network Winston Luke, Mark Cohen,
Color Distribution A block BrownYellowOrangeRedGreenBlue GreenYellowOrangeRedPurple M&M Skittles.
Skip Counting Counting by 2’s, 3’s, 5’s, and 10’s Standard 2.1 Numbers, Number Systems and Number Relationships A. Count using whole numbers to 100 by.
ARL Mercury Measurements in the mid-Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Regions: Status and Update Winston Luke, Paul Kelley, Mark Cohen NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory.
Not all gases have the same behavior Some gases are greenhouse gases. Most of the gases in the atmosphere do not absorb long wave radiation.
Source-apportionment for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, and Richard.
 Income: $75,900 (average) $97,800 (top)  Education: 7-8 years of college  Availability: 190,000 jobs in america.
2002 U.S. data from USEPA National Emissions Inventory (NEI); 2002 Canadian data from Environment Canada; 1999 Mexican data from inventory prepared by.
Scientific Notation. = 5.4 =3.47 Write the following in standard form A 1.8 X 10⁴ B 3.47 X 10⁷ C 4.3 X 10⁰ D 5.4 X 10⁻⁴ E 5 X 10⁻⁶ F (6 X 10⁴) (7 X 10⁵)
Life Cycle Approaches for Sustainable Brownfields Cleanup Karen Scheuermann EPA Region 9 April 5, 2011 APRIL 3-5, 2011 | PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.
NOAA’s Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico Region January 17,
Analysis of Mercury Data A Cooperative Experiment NESCAUM Monitoring & Assessment Committee April, 2007 Charlie Pietarinen NJDEP.
Mitigation Strategies Review
Mitigation Strategies Review
Colors.
Environmental Topic #1 Primary Air Pollution.
5.1 Light & Energy F. Electrons & Light
Average Number of Photons
Can I color yellow?. Can I color yellow?
I. Waves & Particles (p ) Ch. 4 - Electrons in Atoms I. Waves & Particles (p )
How Many Colorful Shapes?
What Color is it?.
MONTANA REGIONAL HAZE VISIBILITY PROTECTION PLAN
Counting by 2’s, 3’s, 5’s, and 10’s
Let’s Learn the Basic Colors
Presentation transcript:

Spatial distribution of hourly trajectory endpoint frequencies top 10% of daytime RGM vs. total year with estimated 2002 emissions of reactive gaseous mercury 0.1 degree lat/long regional grid color of symbol denotes type of mercury source coal-fired power plants other fuel combustion waste incineration metallurgical manufacturing & other size/shape of symbol denotes amount of mercury emitted (kg/yr) – Difference between selected case and total year in percent of back-trajectories passing through grid square > to to 2.0 Air Emissions Piney Measurement Site 1.0 to – – 0.5 < to to to to to -0.5 Yellow /Orange grid squares: trajectories pass through more often than “average” Purple grid squares: trajectories pass through less often than “average”

Spatial distribution of hourly trajectory endpoint frequencies bottom 10% of daytime RGM vs. total year with estimated 2002 emissions of reactive gaseous mercury color of symbol denotes type of mercury source coal-fired power plants other fuel combustion waste incineration metallurgical manufacturing & other size/shape of symbol denotes amount of mercury emitted (kg/yr) – Difference between selected case and total year in percent of back-trajectories passing through grid square > to to 2.0 Air Emissions Piney Measurement Site 1.0 to – – 0.5 < to to to to to degree lat/long regional grid Yellow /Orange grid squares: trajectories pass through more often than “average” Purple grid squares: trajectories pass through less often than “average”

Spatial distribution of hourly trajectory endpoint frequencies top 10% of Hg(p) vs. total year with estimated 2002 emissions of particulate mercury color of symbol denotes type of mercury source coal-fired power plants other fuel combustion waste incineration metallurgical manufacturing & other size/shape of symbol denotes amount of mercury emitted (kg/yr) – Difference between selected case and total year in percent of back-trajectories passing through grid square > to to 2.0 Air Emissions Piney Measurement Site 1.0 to – – 0.5 < to to to to to degree lat/long regional grid Yellow /Orange grid squares: trajectories pass through more often than “average” Purple grid squares: trajectories pass through less often than “average”

Spatial distribution of hourly trajectory endpoint frequencies bottom 10% of Hg(p) vs. total year with estimated 2002 emissions of particulate mercury color of symbol denotes type of mercury source coal-fired power plants other fuel combustion waste incineration metallurgical manufacturing & other size/shape of symbol denotes amount of mercury emitted (kg/yr) – Difference between selected case and total year in percent of back-trajectories passing through grid square > to to 2.0 Air Emissions Piney Measurement Site 1.0 to – – 0.5 < to to to to to degree lat/long regional grid Yellow /Orange grid squares: trajectories pass through more often than “average” Purple grid squares: trajectories pass through less often than “average”