1 The progenitor stars of core-collapse supernovae Stephen J. Smartt Astrophysics Research Centre Queen’s University Belfast Queen’s SNe & Massive star.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Physics of Supernovae
Advertisements

Chelsea Braun Credit: Artist illustration ESO, content/uploads/2006/12/ supernova.jpg.
The Flavours of SN II Light Curves Iair (“ya-eer”) Arcavi Advisor: Avishay Gal-Yam.
Stephen C.-Y. Ng McGill University. Outline Why study supernova? What is a supernova? Why does it explode? The aftermaths --- Supernova remnants Will.
SN 2012fr in NGC 1365 Mark M. Phillips, Carlos Contreras, Eric Hsiao, Nidia Morrell, Kevin Krisciunas, Peter Brown, and Max Stritzinger.
NuSTAR CIT JPL Columbia LLNL DSRI UCSC SLAC Spectrum The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) Hard X-ray ( keV) Small Explorer (SMEX) mission.
1 The structure and evolution of stars Lecture13: Supernovae - deaths of massive stars Complete notes available online:
Supernovae Supernova Remnants Gamma-Ray Bursts. Summary of Post-Main-Sequence Evolution of Stars M > 8 M sun M < 4 M sun Subsequent ignition of nuclear.
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
Supernovae from Massive Stars: light curves and spectral evolution Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
Collaborators:  K. Krisciunas (CTIO/Carnegie), N. Suntzeff (CTIO)  M. Hamuy (Carnegie), E. Persson (Carnegie), W. Freedman (Carnegie), M. Roth (Carnegie)
The Molecular Environment of the SNR HESS J (G ) refs: By: Zhang, Xiao ( )
Sample Type SECM08 LWVetal07 VLF05 PSB08 CET99 II-P 58.7±8.0% 67.6±10% 62.9±4.7% 75.59±9.8% 77.7±10.8% II-L 2.7±1.7% IIn 3.8±2.0% 4.4±2.5% 9.2±1.8% IIb.
Engine-Driven Supernovae Alicia M. Soderberg Caltech Astronomy Dept. Zwicky Supernova Workshop January
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
A Radio Perspective on the GRB-SN Connection Alicia Soderberg May 25, 2005 – Zwicky Conference.
A burst of new ideas Nature Vol /28 December 2006 徐佩君 HEAR group meeting 12/
Planetary Nebula Luminosity Functions Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function is Universal (Jacoby & Ciardullo) Advantages: Reasonable Physical Understanding.
Supernovae Historically: “new stars” in sky Seen in 1006, 1054, 1181, 1572, 1604, 1680 SN 1054 visible in daytime sky for many months (Chinese records)
Observed properties of SN From Woosley Lecture 16 See also Filippenko (1997; ARAA 35, 309) See also
Margaret Meixner (STScI, JHU) March 7, 2013
Natalie RoeSNAP/SCP Journal Club “Identification of Type Ia Supernovae at Redshift 1.3 and Beyond with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on HST” Riess, Strolger,
Weidong Li Jesse Leaman Alex Filippenko Department of Astronomy University of California, Berkeley Nearby Supernova Rates from the Lick Observatory Supernova.
Black holes: do they exist?
Extragalactic stellar astronomy with the brightest stars in the universe Rolf Kudritzki, Fabio Bresolin, Miguel Urbaneja.
A Step towards Precise Cosmology from Type Ia Supernovae Wang Xiaofeng Tsinghua University IHEP, Beijing, 23/04, 2006.
Gamma-ray Bursts in the E-ELT era Rhaana Starling University of Leicester.
Chapter 27 Hubble’s Law and the Distance Scale Revised 2007.
The monitoring of GRB afterglows and the study of their host galaxies with the SAO RAS 6-m telescope from 1997 V. Sokolov et al. The review of main results.
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts. Summary of Post-Main-Sequence Evolution of Stars M > 8 M sun M < 4 M sun Subsequent ignition of nuclear reactions involving.
Quasars, black holes and galaxy evolution Clive Tadhunter University of Sheffield 3C273.
The Extremely Red Objects in the CLASH Fields The Extremely Red Galaxies in CLASH Fields Xinwen Shu (CEA, Saclay and USTC) CLASH 2013 Team meeting – September.
1 The structure and evolution of stars Lecture14: Type Ia Supernovae The Extravagant Universe By R. Kirshner.
SNLS-03D3bb Andy Howell University of Toronto and the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS)
Precise Cosmology from SNe Ia Wang Xiao-feng Physics Department and Tsinghua Center for Astrophysics, Tsinghua University 2005, 9, 22, Sino-French Dark.
Supernova study with BATC Sky Survey Wang Xiao-feng Physics Department and Tsinghua Center for Astrophysics, Tsinghua University 2005, 8, 12, Weihai.
SN Ia rates and progenitors Mark Sullivan University of Southampton.
SUPERNOVA! SN 1994D in NGC 4526, NASA / ESA / Hubble Key Project Team / High-Z Supernova Search Team
SN Ia Margutti Raffaella, Observational methods.
Ay 123 Lecture 11 - Supernovae & Neutron Stars Timescales for HS Burning faster and faster..
Radio and X-ray observations of SN 2009ip Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics January 4, 2013 Collaborators: Raffaella Margutti (Harvard),
Are Stellar Eruptions a Common Trait of SNe IIn? Baltimore, MD 06/29/11 Ori Fox NPP Fellow NASA Goddard Based on arXiv:
The nature of the longest gamma-ray bursts Andrew Levan University of Warwick.
Thessaloniki, Oct 3rd 2009 Cool dusty galaxies: the impact of the Herschel mission Michael Rowan-Robinson Imperial College London.
Searching High-z Supernovae with HSC and WFMOS
Limits on Ia progentors from pre- explosion imaging : Lessons from core collapse progenitor studies S. J. Smartt Astrophysics Research Centre Queen’s University.
Smartt, S. J. (2009). Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae. doi: /annurev-astro
Progenitor stars of supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada.
NICMOS IMAGES OF THE UDF Rodger I. Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
ESo Santiago October 2003 Cosmology with Type Ia Supernovae.
Study of the type IIP supernova 2008gz Roy et al. 2011, MNRAS accepted.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
The Delay Time Distribution of Type Ia Supernovae: Constraints on Progenitors Chris Pritchet (U. Victoria), Mark Sullivan (Oxford), Damien LeBorgne (IAP),
A Proposed Collaboration Between LIGO-Virgo and Swift to Improve the Chances to Detect Gravitational Waves from Core Collapse Supernovae Kiranjyot (Jasmine)
IFU studies of GRBs and SNe regions Lise Christensen (Excellence Cluster Universe, Technical University Munich) + Maryam Modjaz (NY), + Christina Thoene.
1 Observations of Cosmic Explosions Review, and results from the Palomar Transient Factory Avishay Gal-Yam | Weizmann Institute of Science Avishay Gal-Yam.
Gamma-Ray Bursts Please press “1” to test your transmitter.
Modern cosmology 1: The Hubble Constant
Single versus Binary Star Progenitors of Type IIb Supernovae
A photometric method to classify high-z supernovae found with HSC
Keck Observations of Two Supernovae Hours After Explosion Shock-Breakout Flash Spectroscopy as a New Window into the Evolution and Death of Massive Stars.
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts
Mid-infrared Observations of Aged Dusty Supernovae
DVU, Playa de Carmen, Mexico Dec. 12, 2017
Just What is a Supernova?
The structure and evolution of stars
Just What is a Supernova?
Single Vs binary star progenitors of Type Iib Sne
The structure and evolution of stars
NGC3184 Tetyana Dyachyshyn Professor Jennifer West
Presentation transcript:

1 The progenitor stars of core-collapse supernovae Stephen J. Smartt Astrophysics Research Centre Queen’s University Belfast Queen’s SNe & Massive star group: J. Eldridge, S. Mattila, A. Pastorello, M. Crockett, D. Young, M. Hendry, P. Dufton, C. Trundle, I. Hunter Others: J. Maund (Texas), J. Danziger (Trieste), P. Meikle (Imperial),

2 Overview Core-collapse SNe drive the chemical evolution of galaxies, and formation through feedback Test stellar evolution theory and NS/BH formation scenarios Linked to the formation of long duration GRBs Are the ideas of SNe progenitor stars correct ? Are SNe explosion and lightcurve models consistent ?

3 Credit: LOSS and T. Debosz

4 Summary of SNe types Supernovae are classified by their optical spectra No hydrogen  Type I    Si He He or Si    Ia Ib Ic ——— Hydrogen lines  Type II  Photometry/spectra properties  II-P, II-L, IIn, IIb, II-p

5 Example: HST Key project – H 0 with Cepheids Blue supergiants at 2-7Mpc from 8m telescopes - Bresolin et al. (2001) M101 NGC3621 NGC3949

6 M81 zoom in

7 First red supergiant progenitor SN2003gd discovered 2003 June 12 Normal type II-P M74 - distance 9.3  1.8 Mpc 3100s WFPC2 pre- explosion image F606W Gemini gri ( s), 0.56” images

8 Detection of progenitor HST ACS - ToO (Cycles 10-15) Smartt et al. (2003), Van Dyk et al. (2003): possible progenitors from ground based astrometry calibration Star A: Differential astrometry:  r = 13 ± 33 mas

9 Magnitudes and colours of progenitor V=25.8 ± 0.15 V–I=2.5 ± 0.2 d=9.1 ± 1.9 kpc ; E(B– V)=0.14 ± 0.13 K5-M3Ib supergiant (Elias et al. 1985) STARS stellar evolutionary tracks: M = 8 -2 M  +4 Smartt et al. 2004, Science

10 SN2005cs in M51 SN2005cs – discovered Hubble Heritage Team - deep mosaic BVI+H  with ACS (Jan. 2005) F814W/F555W 1360s WFPC2 U+R band (Jul. 1999) Also deep NIR images: NICMOS (F110W+F160W; see Li et al. 2006) Gemini NIRI (JHK) s  deep UBVRIJHK images

11 Detection of progenitor HST ToO : ACS post-explosion (F555W) Star detected in I-band only (J. Maund PhD thesis) I=23.3±0.05, and limiting V-band mag is V 5  > 25 Not detected in any of the NIR bands; K>20.7 Maund et al. (2005), Li et al. (2006)

12 Other examples: no detection SN1999gi in NGC3184, HST U+V pre-explosion D=11Mpc (Leonard et al. 2002) M  12 M  SN2001du in NGC1365 HST UVI pre-explosion D=17Mpc (Cepheid Key P.) M  15 M  Smartt et al Smartt et al. 2002

13 Summary of II-P progenitors SNTypeMassZRef 2006bcII-P<15~Z  2005csII-P9 +3/-2~Z  2004etII-P 15  2 ~1-0.5Z  Li et al djII-P 15  5 ~Z  Maiz-Apellaniz et al. 2004, Wang et al. 2005, amII-P8-10~Z  2004dgII-P<12~Z  2004AII-P 10  2 ~0.5Z  2003gdII-P8 +4/-2~Z  2002hhII-P<15~Z  2001duII-P<15~Z  1999evII-P 16  Z  1999emII-P<151-2 Z  1999giII-P<121-2 Z  1999brII-P<12~Z  1999anII-P<20~2 Z  Rest from Crockett et al. 2006, Maund & Smartt 2005, Maund et al. 2005, Hendry et al. 2006, Smartt et al. 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001

14 Heger et al. (2000) - now can place observational constraints Observed II-P 93J 87A 80K Observed Ib/c

15 STARS stellar evolutionary tracks (Eldridge & Tout 2004) Eldridge, Smartt (in prep) - probability without mass cut ~5%

16 Late time tail powered by radioactive 56 Ni 56 Ni explosively created from Si burning after core- collapse Direct probe of the explosion How Is it related to progenitor mass ? UVOIR Light Curves and 56 Ni Mass

17 Black-hole forming SNe ? Zampieri et al., Nomoto et al - low luminosity SNe form black-holes No evidence so far of the branching at high luminosity Detailed comparison with models now possible

18 Constraints on a Type Ic SN2004gt - type Ic Gamma-ray bursts coincident with Ic supernovae

19 Restricted region in the HRD We would have detected massive evolved stars Either a star of M  or More likely a lower mass object in a binary Maund, Smartt, Schwiezer (2005) Gal-Yam et al. (2005) Four other Ib/c SNe, all with similar luminosity limits Type Ia SNe - 7 events, no object/cluster.

20 Conclusions SN II-P: most common type, red supergiant progenitors (~M0Ib 8-12M  ) Detections and limits on 15 II-P SNe imply they only come from RSG stars with M ZAMS <15M  No evidence for BH forming Sne Within 3 years project  ~30 progenitors (HST SNAP + VLT/Gemini NIR purpose built archive) Optical/NIR monitoring of SNe gives 56 Ni - probe of explosion Direct constraints on all core-collapse SNe types

21 Nearby core-collapse SNe: discovery rates No. of SN per year in galaxies less than V rad km/s N sn (V rad <1500) = 8.7 yr -1  H 0 = 75 kms -1 Mpc -1

22 Radio and X-ray luminosity of II-P Chevalier et al. (2005) Radio and X-ray L P consistent with direct mass estimates

23 M31 RSG variable Young, Smartt et al. in prep. 4 years monitoring of M31 (microlensing) Largest variation ±0.5 m ±0.2 dex in logL/L M-type supergiant, M~20M , logL~5.2 dex

24 Magnitudes and colours of progenitor d=8.4 ± 1 kpc; E(B – V)=0.14 ± 0.02 Colours of K5-M4Ib supergiant scaled to I=23.3 Bluer than early K- type and it would be detected in V and R. Wavelength Magnitude

25 Dust enshrouded red supergiants ? Could progenitors be dusty red supergiants, some of higher luminosity ? SNe are clearly not reddened But could be destroyed in explosion (e.g. Meikle & Graham 1986)? Our deep K-band image rules this out (K>20.7) If visual extinction A V ~5 K-band limit implies M K >-9.5 or log L/L  < 4.6 Hence M < 12M  Gemini NIRI K-band 0.5” 50 Galaxies (<10Mpc) surveyed with VLT/Gemini/UKIRT. Deep JHK images for future SNe

26 ACS images SN1993J: U 330 = Faint companions within 0.35” Contribution to SN of <20% Why is SN1993J so bright in UV ? Deep, near-UV Keck spectrum with LRIS-B

27 Evolutionary model ZAMS = 15 and 14M  stars 5.8 year period High mass loss from progenitor to companion ~1000 yrs pre-explosion (4x10 -2 M  /yr) SN1987A like event (in years time) ? Maund, Smartt, Kudritzki, Podsiadlowski, Gilmore 2004, Nat.