Neutron Wall Loading Update L. El-Guebaly, A. Jaber, A. Robinson, D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ARIES-Advanced Tokamak Power Plant Study Physics Analysis and Issues Charles Kessel, for the ARIES Physics Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan.

Advertisements

Thermal Load Specifications from ITER C. Kessel ARIES Project Meeting, May 19, 2010 UCSD.

April 23-24, 2009/ARR 1 Proposed Effort Over the Next 1-2 Years on ARIES-DB DCLL A. René Raffray, Siegfried Malang, Xueren Wang University of California,

09 FNST meeting Preliminary Neutronics Analysis for IB Shielding Design on FNSF (Standard Aspect Ratio) Haibo Liu Robert Reed Fusion Science and Technology.

Exploring Capability to Calculate Heat Loads on Divertors and Walls T.K. Mau UC-San Diego ARIES Pathways Project Meeting September 6-7, 2007 Idaho Falls,

P ROGRESS ON THE O VERALL P OWER C ORE C ONFIGURATION OF THE ARIES-ACT X.R. Wang 1, M. S. Tillack 1, S. Malang 2 1 University of California, San Diego,

Neutronics Analysis on a Compact Tokamak Fusion Reactor CREST Q. HUANG 1,2, S. ZHENG 2, L. Lu 2, R. HIWATARI 3, Y. ASAOKA 3, K. OKANO 3, Y. OGAWA 1 1 High.

Progress on the Configuration Design of the Fusion Power Core for the ACT (Draft) X.R. Wang M.S. Tillack S. Malang Sept. 29, 2011.

1 Lane Carlson ARIES Pathways Project Meeting Gaithersburg, MD, Oct 13-14, 2011 Substantiating the ASC & Implementing the DCLL Blanket.

First Wall Thermal Hydraulics Analysis El-Sayed Mogahed Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin With input from S. Malang, M. Sawan, I.

Systems Code Status J. F. Lyon, ORNL ARIES Meeting June 14, 2006.

June 14-15, 2006/ARR 1 ARIES-CS Power Core Engineering: Updating Power Flow, Blanket and Divertor Parameters for New Reference Case (R = 7.75 m, P fusion.

Neutron Wall Loading Profile Using CAD/MCNP Interface and (progress report) Mengkuo Wang ARIES Meeting June 16-17, 2004 University of Wisconsin - Madison.

Poloidal Distribution of ARIES-ACT Neutron Wall Loading L. El-Guebaly, A. Jaber, D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Power Loads and Divertor Design Hayden McGuinness Don Steiner Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute In collaboration with T.K. Mau and A. Grossman.

Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.

Progress on Determining Heat Loads on Divertors and First Walls T.K. Mau UC-San Diego ARIES Pathways Project Meeting December 12-13, 2007 Atlanta, Georgia.

IPP Stellarator Reactor perspective T. Andreeva, C.D. Beidler, E. Harmeyer, F. Herrnegger, Yu. Igitkhanov J. Kisslinger, H. Wobig O U T L I N E Helias.

ARIES-CS Systems Studies J. F. Lyon, ORNL Workshop on Fusion Power Plants UCSD Jan. 24, 2006.

AN UPDATE on DIVERTOR DESIGN and HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS T.K. Mau (UCSD) H. McGuinness (RPI), D. Steiner (RPI) A.R. Raffray (UCSD), X. Wang (UCSD), A. Grossman.

MCNP/CAD Activities and Preliminary 3-D Results Mengkuo Wang, T. Tautges, D. Henderson, and L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin.

Status of 3-D Analysis, Neutron Streaming through Penetrations, and LOCA/LOFA Analysis L. El-Guebaly, M. Sawan, P. Wilson, D. Henderson, A. Ibrahim, G.

26 Jan Lane Carlson, Charles Kessel Mark Tillack, Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES-Pathways Project Meeting San Diego, CA Jan 26-27, 2011 Needful Systems.

10/04/ D Source, Neutron Wall Loading & Radiative Heating for ARIES-CS Paul Wilson Brian Kiedrowski Laila El-Guebaly.

Highlights of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi For the ARIES Team VLT Conference call July 12, 2000 ARIES Web Site:

June19-21, 2000Finalizing the ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Designs, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch)

ARIES Systems Studies: ARIES-I and ARIES-AT type operating points C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting, San Diego, December.

APPLICATION: The first real application of the CAD-MCNP coupling approach is to calculate the neutron wall loading distribution (Γ) in the Z and toroidal.

Initial Activation Assessment for ARIES Compact Stellarator Power Plant L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, D. Paige and the ARIES Team Fusion Technology Institute.

March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.

Minimum Radial Standoff: Problem definition and Needed Info L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison With Input from:

Development of the FW Mobile Tiles Concept Mohamed Sawan, Edward Marriott, Carol Aplin University of Wisconsin-Madison Lance Snead Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Re-Examination of Visions for Tokamak Power Plants – The ARIES-ACT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Director, Center.

Neutronics Parameters for Preferred Chamber Configuration with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Ed Marriott, Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst.

Progress in ARIES-ACT Study Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Power Plant Studies and Related Advanced Technologies 8-9 March 2012 US.

1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Three-Dimensional Nuclear Analysis for the US DCLL TBM M. Sawan, B. Smith, E. Marriott, P. Wilson University of Wisconsin-Madison With input from M. Dagher.

1 Lane Carlson ARIES Pathways Project Meeting San Diego, CA Jan 23-24, 2012 Updating the SCLL Design & ASC Documentation.

U PDATED ARIES-ACT P OWER C ORE D EFINITION AND S I C B LANKET X.R. Wang, M. S. Tillack, S. Malang F. Najmabadi and L.A. El-Guebaly ARIES-Pathways Project.

Systems Code – Hardwired Numbers for Review C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, July 29-30, 2010.

EAST Data processing of divertor probes on EAST Jun Wang, Jiafeng Chang, Guosheng Xu, Wei Zhang, Tingfeng Ming, Siye Ding Institute of Plasma Physics,

1 Lane Carlson 1, Mark Tillack 1, Farrokh Najmabadi 1, Charles Kessel 2 1 University of California, San Diego & 2 Princeton Plasma Physics Lab US/Japan.

1 Parametric Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of TBM Primary Helium Loop Greg Sviatoslavsky Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

1 Lane Carlson ARIES-Pathways Project Meeting Gaithersburg, MD, July 27-28, 2011 Generalization and Blanket Updates to the ASC.

1 Neutronics Assessment of Self-Cooled Li Blanket Concept Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

Stabilizing Shells in ARIES C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting, 5/28-29/2008.

1 Neutronics Parameters for the Reference HAPL Chamber Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

Heat Loading in ARIES Power Plants: Steady State, Transient and Off-Normal C. E. Kessel 1, M. A. Tillack 2, and J. P. Blanchard 3 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe FZK - EURATOM ASSOCIATION 05/14/2005 Thomas Ihli 1 Status of He-cooled Divertor Design Contributors: A.R. Raffray, and The.

Systems Analysis Development for ARIES Next Step C. E. Kessel 1, Z. Dragojlovic 2, and R. Raffrey 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 2 University.

DCLL ½ port Test Blanket Module thermal-hydraulic analysis Presented by P. Calderoni March 3, 2004 UCLA.

Required Dimensions of HAPL Core System with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst. Rene Raffray UCSD HAPL Project.

1Field-Aligned SOL Losses of HHFW Power and RF Rectification in the Divertor of NSTX, R. Perkins, 11/05/2015 R. J. Perkins 1, J. C. Hosea 1, M. A. Jaworski.

ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.

1 Lane Carlson, Charles Kessel, Stephen Efthyvoulos ARIES-Pathways Project Meeting Bethesday, MD April 4-5, 2011 Finalized Systems Code Modifications &

1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL Meeting ORNL March.

Comments on ARIES-ACT 1/2011 Strawman L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison

Engineering models in the ARIES system code, Part II M. S. Tillack, X. R. Wang, et al. ARIES Project Meeting January 2011.

Summary of Nuclear Input for Safety Analysis for the DCLL TBM -update-

ARIES Pathways Project 05/29/08

X.R. Wang, M. S. Tillack, S. Malang, F. Najmabadi and the ARIES Team

Stellarator Divertor Design and Optimization with NCSX Examples

Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling

DCLL Blanket Analysis and Power Core Layout for ARIES-DB

Manifolding and MHD issues

Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering

Comments on ARIES-ACT 10/20/2010 Pre-Strawman

Updated DCLL TBM Neutronics Analysis

Systems analysis of ACT2 design space

ACT-1 design point definition

Presentation transcript:

Neutron Wall Loading Update L. El-Guebaly, A. Jaber, A. Robinson, D. Henderson Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison Contributor: X. Wang (UCSD) ARIES Project Meeting Bethesda, MD April 4 - 5, 2011

2 ARIES-ACT New FW/Div Configuration January 2011 Strawman Key parameters: R = 5.5 m a = m SOL = 10 cm Elongation = 2.2 Fusion power = MW Ave. NWL = 2.8 MW/m 10 cm from plasma surface Surface areas: –Plasma = 475 m 2 –FW area: IB FW = 139 m 2 OB FW = 313 m 2 IB & OB FW= 452 m 2 –Upper & lower divertors: IB plate = 22.5 x 2 m 2 Dome = 28 x 2 m 2 OB plate = 21 x 2 m 2 Div total = 143 m 2 FW + Div Surface area = 595 m 2 Area of cm from plasma = 547 m 2 Main features: Curved IB FW (allowing 11 cm extra space at top/bottom) Per Kessel, OB div R-a/2 IB div R-a Main features: Curved IB FW (allowing 11 cm extra space at top/bottom) Per Kessel, OB div R-a/2 IB div R-a

3 New vs. Old FW/Div Configuration Plasma Old New Smaller entrance to divertor region. More conforming FW to: Capture neutrons before reaching divertor Allow 11 cm more space at IB top/bottom for DCLL He/LiPb manifolds Reducc nuclear heating at IB magnet. Smaller entrance to divertor region. More conforming FW to: Capture neutrons before reaching divertor Allow 11 cm more space at IB top/bottom for DCLL He/LiPb manifolds Reducc nuclear heating at IB magnet.

3-D NWL Model –Includes: –Plasma boundary –IB & OB FW –IB & OB div plates and dome. –FW and divertor segmented vertically and radially to improve accuracy. –10 million particle history. –Statistical error < 1%. MCNP 3-D Model

5 Neutron Source Sampling Options: 1.Uniform within plasma boundary. Unrealistic, but used to check geometry (1/2011 ARIES presentation by El-Guebaly). 1.Three-nested source regions with variable intensity peaking at magnetic axis: Good approximation. Intensities borrowed from ARIES- RS: 63%, 32%, 5%. 3.Actual distribution: Source density distributed on R-Z grid not available yet. Results identical to 3-nested source, except for 10% higher peak at IB midplane (refer to 5/2008 NWL presentation by Wilson). 5% 32% 63% MCNP 2-D Plot (3-nested Source Regions)

6 Three-nested Source Regions Within Plasma Neutron Source Intensity: 63%, 32%, 5% (Example: 10,000 particles random sampling)

7 IB and OB Results Machine Ave NWL (P f x 0.8/area) 10 cm from plasma surface2.8 Peak OB OB midplane 4.7 Ave OB NWL 3.6 Peak IB IB midplane3 x 1.1 * = 3.3 Ave IB NWL 2.3 ______________ * Correction factor for actual source distribution (refer to 5/2008 NWL presentation by Wilson).

8 Divertor Results Machine Ave NWL (P f x 0.8/area) 10 cm from plasma surface2.8 Peak Div NWL 2 Ave Div NWL 0.7 Peak Div NWL

9 Summary of NWL Results Machine Ave NWL (P f x 0.8/area) 10 cm from plasma surface2.8 Peak IB NWL 3.3 Ave IB NWL 2.3 Peak OB NWL 4.7 Ave OB NWL 3.6 Peak div NWL 2 Ave div NWL 0.7 Peak to average NWL = 1.68

10 Conclusions Peak NWLs will be used to redefine radial builds for ARIES-ACT: – 3.3 MW/m 2 for IB – 4.7 MW/m 2 for OB – 2 MW/m 2 for divertor. For ASC, peak to average NWL = 1.68 (not 1.5).