Performance Debate! If I can’t dance I don’t want to be part of your revolution. - Emma Goldman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1st Proposition Speech 1.Statement of the Resolution 2.Definition of Essential Terms (should be clear to the average person) 3.Outline Arguments/Pillars.
Advertisements

By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
LD: Lincoln-Douglas Debate History:  Illinois senatorial debates between Abraham Lincoln & Stephen Douglas  Became high school competitive.
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Introduction to Kritiks Ryan Galloway Samford University.
Debate Judges Orientation. Volunteers make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. YOU are making an investment. YOU are performing a teaching role.
Theory CODI 2014 Lecture. Rules of Debate Debate has surprisingly few rules Time limits and speaking order There must be a winner and loser No outside.
UNDERSTANDING THE KRITIK by Lurp Lank and Alex Kosmachavelli.
By Beth Mendenhall. Introduction Why you should listen Please ask questions.
STRUCTURED ACADEMIC CONTROVERSY Mrs. Moss’s 8 th grade social studies.
Political Communications. Political Communications is the art and science of influencing public opinion for political purposes.
Cross Examination.
PART ONE: Topicality  Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Training of Trainers o Refresher on presentation & facilitation skills o Group into teams of 3 people (4 teams) o Presentation Practice  Topics  UN Reform.
Debate V: Cross-examination Doris L. W. Chang. Outline (Johnston 92-98; )  Refutation Review Refutation Review  The Purpose of Cross-examination.
Selecting a Research Topic Asa H. Gordon Library Savannah State University.
ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Thursday, 6/27 Baxter and Dave.
Understanding Human Differences 3rd Edition - Koppelman © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc Chapter Chapter 3 Communication,
Public Forum Debate Partner debate.
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
Mary Lynn Manns Green Drinks March Large opposing goals The belief that this is not a pressing issue A “collective action” issue “Others” are.
“Society is fundamentally dead,” says Derrida. Thus, subconstructive dialectic theory holds that the establishment is capable of social comment, given.
ITS OUR PARTY WE CAN DO WHAT WE WANT: TOPICALITY AND PROCEDURALS Tuesday, August 5th Baxter and Steve.
MDAW All debate is performing Form and content are inseparable. The norms of debate performance are conditioned by systems (and histories) of oppression.
Week 1. Q. From where did LD debate come? Q. Where policy debate involves federal policy, what does LD involve? Q. LD involves which civilization?
Lincoln Douglas Debate RJ Pellicciotta, Cary Academy Dogwood Speech & Debate League.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
Theory Debating Baxter MDAW  It Really is  There are 4 Components of a Theory Argument  Interp  Violation  Standards  Voting Issue  You.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
Going Negative The Surveillance Topic. Outline for the topic I. Categories of neg ground -Go over the specific arguments we have II. Dealing.
The First Negative Constructive. Steps 1.Introduction 2.Address Definitions 3.Rebut the Aff Contentions 4.Outline Neg Contentions 5.Summation.
How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
Communication Applications Unit 3:2 Group member Roles & Responsibilities.
Counterplans. Counterplan Burdens Competitiveness To be competitive, CP must be: – Mutually exclusive – Net beneficial Topicality – Traditional theory.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Controversial Subject Matter. Life is filled with controversy. Psychology is, too. Tell students in advance that there are going to be controversial topics.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate. Resolutions: The resolution is a statement with which one contestant must agree (affirm) and the other contestant must disagree.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards & Russell Kirkscey June 2015.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Topicality “That sounds good. That’s a good skill to have.” –Julia Marshall “Naw. Advantages don’t matter when it comes to Topicality.” –Humza Tahir.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Orientation.
KRITIKS Melissa Witt.
LD Debate Study Information
We Compose: Music Photographs Letters, s Ourselves
Writing Analytically Chapter 1 Sections 1-3 How to think of good ideas
Debate Chapter 13 Pages
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation
UNDERSTANDING THE KRITIK
Debate Orientation.
4 Step Refutation.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Communications 11/12 Exploration of Media.
Introduction to the aff
Times and Tasks in an LD Round or What Do I Do Now?
Topicality Casey Parsons.
Thinking like a Policy Debater
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Orientation.
Presentation transcript:

Performance Debate! If I can’t dance I don’t want to be part of your revolution. - Emma Goldman

What is Performance Debate? Challenge to the Form and/or Content of Normative Policy Debate. BETTER QUESTION: WHAT IS NORMATIVE POLICY DEBATE? –Highly Research Based (Objective, Expert) –Minutia (Flowing, Detailed organization, Dropped arguments) –3 rd Party Oriented: Judge –Competitive –Constrained: Aff, Neg, Resolution –Refutation

Primarily 2 camps Camp: Modernism! - Identity Politics - Cap Bad Judge - Existentialism Is there a material reality? Yes. Is there such thing as Truth? Yes/No little truths Camp: PoMo - Nihilists (Not in Name) - Deconstructionists - Queers Is there a Material reality? No. Language Is there such thing as Truth? No – Violent

The Performance Motto DO NOT DO WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE

In the Beginning… Narrative - Fiction - Telling Experience - Showing Experience What we learned? Competition makes debate a judgment on the self. When the personal is political, debate can be painful for everyone.

Fort Hays Taking on the Grid! –What we learned? The flow isn’t as important as we think. Functionally answered arguments count. Minutia is silly. Topicality is Genocide –What we learned? Kritiking T – We make violent structures in our language. We discipline and do violence to ourselves and others. Debate rounds matter to violence in the world.

Identity Politics Treaties/CEDAW/Topic Committee – –What we learned: It’s our resolution & our community. Language Barriers – -What we learned: We overlook some of the simplest things. Increasing Meaningful Participation –What we learned: There’s a place for you too! –Towson: Take a tough line.

The Medium is the Message Poetry –Human Agency What we learned? Roland Bleiker taught us we can dissent even in realms that we don’t expect. Hip Hop –Louisville: Identity, Purpose, Method What we learned? Simplicity & the organic intellectual – challenging evidence –Long Beach: Hip Hop as Culture What we learned? Doing is better than saying

Deference Nihilism ala Bard –What we learned: Nihilists often don’t call themselves nihilists or defend Nietzsche WGLF: –What we learned: Must differentiate ass clowns from serious argument. There was always an argument amongst the jokes & the jokes were also a K. Idaho State –What we learned: Make your argument early and know they will K that shit!