Educational Service Unit 7 Wednesday, September 24, 2008 Dr. Dan Ernst and Dr. Bill Kenagy Administrator Evaluation: Superintendent Principal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works Session 1.
Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Van Buren School District Principal Evaluation Pilot District July 2012.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
What should be the basis of
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. 6 leadership standards what are they? 3 2 Teaching & Learning 1 Vision, Mission & Goals 6 The Education System 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders.
Using Technology with Classroom Instruction That Works January 2011.
1 What School Boards Can Learn From School District Leadership That Works WSSDA – November 2007 Rick Maloney, University Place SD & Director Area 3.
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
Curriculum & Staff Development Center
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
AdvancEd Standard 2: Governance and Leadership The district has governance and leadership that promotes student performance and school effectiveness.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
ISLLC Standard #4 ISLLC Standard #4 Monitoring Diverse Needs Name Workshop Facilitator.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
Module Three: Instructional Leadership for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
© 2005 McREL.  Know generalizations from research and recommended classroom practices related to the nine categories of instructional strategies.
EDAD 5389 Domains and Competencies. Domain I—School Community Leadership Domain II—Instructional Leadership Domain III—Administrative Leadership.
Kevin Croff Educational Leadership Portfolio March 2005.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Rachelle Kuehl Assistant Principal Applicant Roanoke City Public Schools.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
OCM BOCES Day 2 Principal Evaluator Training 1. Back to the beginning: 2 Nine Components.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Candidate’s Name: Date:.  Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Office of Service Quality
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Accreditation External Review
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Educational Service Unit 7 Wednesday, September 24, 2008 Dr. Dan Ernst and Dr. Bill Kenagy Administrator Evaluation: Superintendent Principal

The Superintendent School District Leadership That Works Timothy Waters & Robert Marzano (Executive Summary)

Superintendent Leadership Influence of Superintendents On student achievement Characteristics of effective superintendents Findings from 27 studies 2,817 districts 3.4 million students 4 major findings

Finding 1 District-level leadership matters.24 statistically significant District leadership and student achievement

Finding 2 Effective Superintendents focus their efforts on creating goal-oriented districts Five district-level leadership responsibilities 1. Collaborative goal setting – board, staff, and administrators 2. Non-negotiable goals for achievement and instruction; specific achievement targets and research based instructional strategies

Finding 2 (continued) 3. Board alignment and support of district goals; board is aligned with and supportive of the non –negotiable goals for achievement and instruction; primary focus of board’s efforts and allocations 4. Effective superintendents continually monitor progress to ensure these goals remain the primary focus and driving force behind a district’s actions 5. Use resources to support achievement and instruction (time, money, people, & materials)

Finding 3 Superintendent tenure positively correlates to student achievement Positive effects tends to manifest itself as early as two years into the supt. tenure

Finding 4 Building Autonomy – an increase in autonomy is associated with an increase in student achievement Site-based management is associated with a decrease in student achievement Effective superintendents provide “defined autonomy” – clear non-negotiable goals (what) and the school team determines how

McREL District Leadership: the five responsibilities  The goal setting process (.24)  Non-negotiable goals for achievement and instruction (.33)  Board alignment with and support of district goals (.29)  Monitoring the goals for achievement and instruction (.27)  Use of resources to support goals for achievement and instruction (.26) 9

Summary Board Supt.Administration

Why Evaluate the Principal? Marzano: What Works in Schools School and Teacher Scenario Achievement Percentile After Two (2) Years Average School and Average Teacher 50 th Least Effective School and Least Effective Teacher 3 rd Most Effective School and Least Effective Teacher 37 th Least Effective School and Most Effective Teacher 63 rd Most Effective School and Most Effective Teacher 96 th Most Effective School and Average Teacher 78th 11

Principal Evaluation Legal requirement Instrument agreement Clarity on responsibility, goals Who participates in the evaluation? How is the evaluation communicated? What evidence will be accepted? Electronic portfolios Performance with personality Leadership and management

Credits ©NEBRASKA STATE ASSOCIATION OF SECONDARY SCHOOL PRINCIPALS, an affiliate of the Nebraska Council of School Administrators, 455 So. 11 th Street, Suite A, Lincoln, NE 68508, in conjunction with PERRY, GUTHERY, HAASE & GESSFORD, P.C., L.L.O., Attorneys at Law, 233 South 13 th Street, Suite 1400, Lincoln, NE WARNING: This evaluation instrument along with the job description and evaluation policy is intended as a guide only; the forms should not be implemented or used in any manner unless and until the provisions thereof have been reviewed and found to be consistent with existing board policy by the administration and legal counsel for the school district.

The Instrument STANDARD #1: VISION - A principal is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by the school community. STANDARD #2: SCHOOL CULTURE FOR LEARNING - A principal is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by advocating, nurturing and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional development.

The Instrument (continued) STANDARD #3: SCHOOL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND RELATIONSHIPS - A principal is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by ensuring a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment through management of the organization, operations, and resources of the school. STANDARD #4: ACADEMIC STANDARDS AND ASSESSMENT - A principal is an educational leader who establishes, implements and encourages achievement of academic standards.

The Instrument (continued) STANDARD #5: WORKING WITH PARENTS AND COMMUNITY - A principal is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by collaborating with families and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources. STANDARD #6: ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM MEMBER - A principal is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by facilitating the development, implementation, and success of school district curriculum and pr ograms.

The Instrument (continued) STANDARD #7: ETHICS/INTEGRITY - A principal is an educational leader who is a role model and exemplar and promotes the success of the school by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner. STANDARD #8: GREATER POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CONTEXT - A principal is an educational leader who promotes positive public relations in the context of the school community.

The Instrument (continued) The Principal is expected at a minimum to meet the ethical requirements set forth in Nebraska Department of Education Rule 27, to satisfactorily complete the job duties set forth in the Principal’s Job Description, and to comply with Board policies and the directions of the Superintendent, and to perform the descriptors for each standard at a satisfactory level.

Student Achievement and Learning Does your evaluation instrument hold the principal responsible for student learning and achievement????? If it doesn’t, should it?

How Do You Evaluate Achievement and Learning?

21 Principal Role As Instructional Leader Use instructional strategies that provide students with focus, feedback, and sufficient opportunity to master skills. Use appropriate strategies to assess the performance of students’ academic, cognitive, and meta-cognitive skills, Adapt instruction to meet individual needs and engage students Maximize the use of time for instruction

22 The Nine Meta-analysis combines the results from a number of studies to determine the average effect of a given technique. Researchers translate the results of this meta-analysis into a unit of measurement referred to as the effect size.

23 The Nine and Effect Size Effect size of.20 is small Effect size of.50 is medium Effect size of.80 is large

24 The Big Nine Instructional Strategy Ave. ES%ile Gain Identifying similarities & differences Summarizing & Note Taking Reinforcing Effort and Providing Recognition.8029 Homework & Practice.7728 Nonlinguistic Representation.7527 Cooperative Learning.7327 Setting Goals & Providing Feedback.6123 Generating & Testing Hypotheses.6123 Questions, Cues, & Advance Organizers.5922

What Does Your Data Say? Review Multiple Sources Develop Goals

Who Participates in the Evaluation? Superintendent Principal Teachers Staff What Role does the Board play?

Performance Portfolios Artifacts Evidence

What About Remediation? Areas for Growth Continuous Improvement Recommendations Action Plans Targets Evidence Timeline

Additional Tools To Gain Information 21 st Century School Administrator Skills Administrator Goal Setting Form McRel Staff Anecdotal Records

When Do You Evaluate? Every day As needed Per statute Walk by Full instructional period Honest Summary Recommendation to the Board of Education

Good Luck!!!!!!!!!!!! Contacts: Dan Ernst Bill Kenagy NCSA