F irst Health S ervices South Carolina Quality Assurance Review Process Discovery … Remediation … Improvementpage 1 Did Agency Receive Letter? Sample 5%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Advertisements

March 25, Quality Assurance Overview. March 25, Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented, taking.
CMHW Outcome-based Standards for Rights and Dignity General Provider Requirements Outcome-based Standards The Six Outcomes Quality Assurance Reviews.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Arizona Department of Homeland Security SAA Site Monitoring 6 th Annual Homeland Security UASI Conference May 2012 May 2012 Governor Janice K. BrewerDirector.
Flow Chart 1 of 4 St. Landry Parish PAC FBA and BIP Procedures
SHC Verification of Relative/Legal Guardian as Provider Process Decision Tree No STOP! This process is not applicable. Does the Relative/Legal Guardian.
South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs
Preparing for Compliance Monitoring Reviews Understanding CMS Protocols Used by Review Organizations January 14, 2009 Presented by: Margaret deHesse, RN,
4/30/20151 Quality Assurance Overview. 4/30/20152 Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented, taking into consideration.
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS The National Quality Contractor Technical Assistance to State HCBS Waivers Beth Jackson, Ph.D
ODP’s Waiver Quality Strategy Where does IM4Q fit in? Dolores Frantz, ODP Diana Ramirez, ODP Jennifer Fraker, ODP William Posavec, ODP.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
Meal Benefit Eligibility and Verification for Certifying Students’ Eligibility for Meal Benefits Benefit Issuance Verification.
1 Licensing in the Energy Sector Georgian National Energy And Water Supply Regulation Commission Nugzar Beridze June 27 – July 3, 2008.
September D.I.S.H Director Information Share Hub Verification 2014 Katie Embree-Cleveland September 11, 2014.
External Quality Review Process August 6, The Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence (CCME) A physician-sponsored, nonprofit health care quality.
Verification Kentucky Department of Education September 2012.
How to Prepare for a FTCA Site Visit Office Hours
Primary Care Physician (PCP) is notified ASAP about the evaluation result and service plans in order to have a follow-up with the family. PCP shares results.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
7/16/20151 Quality Assurance Overview. 7/16/20152 Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented  included CMS Quality.
For producer or registered representatives use only. Not for use with clients. a day in the life using practice accelerator – workflow series Darla Wilton.
2012 Fall Conference Program Audits
Administrative Reviews Determining Compliance. Administrative Review Basics Formal “full” reviews – At least once every 3 years – Announced or unannounced.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Title I Administration May 21, 2012 through May 29, 2012 Title I Technical Assistance Session School Level Parental.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
THEN and NOW Lessons Learned with Process Change and Management Evaluation in the State of Pennsylvania August 2014.
VERIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR SCHOOL MEALS. IT’S ALMOST VERIFICATION TIME IN TENNESSEE!!
1 MEDI-CAL CERTIFICATIONS & RE-CERTIFICATIONS (General Overview) Mental Health Services Division Compliance Section Certification & Questionable Medi-Cal.
School and LEA Users
Verification. What is Verification? Verification is confirmation of eligibility for free and reduced price meals under NSLP and SBP. -Verification is.
Eligibility Traditional and Mixed Districts- Stay in Training Room with Katie Full CEP- Conference Room with Cindy McIntosh RCCI’s- Valerie’s Office with.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee III-4.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Establishing a Fiscal Foundation DFSS 2009 Annual Fiscal Conference – Fiscal Indicators WELCOME Fiscal Indicators for Youth Development Agencies.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
Interim Policy for Reporting Alleged Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Misappropriation and Injuries of Unknown Source.
Incident Management PCCYFS June 27, 2007 Incident Management for the Office of Children, Youth and Families.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
CHDP DIRECTOR/DEPUTY DIRECTOR TRAINING SECTION III EPSDT: A Comprehensive Child Health Program 1 7/1/2010.
Monitoring for Equal Opportunity and Compliance Evelyn Rodriguez EO Officer, Washington State Employment Security Valerie E. Kitchings EO Officer, District.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Electronic Records Management: A New Understanding of Policy, Compliance, and Discovery Robert J. Sobie, Ph.D. Director Information Systems Department.
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Understanding the Audit Process Presentation to: KWWOA Department for Environmental Protection Environmental & Public Protection Cabinet To Protect and.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
New Mexico Post-School Outcomes Sub-group Analysis 2009 A Comparison of Outcomes by Ethnicity and Gender and Strategies to Address Disparities NPSO Presentation.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Special Education Compliance Monitoring. 3 Phases of Compliance Monitoring Review Pre-Site phase Pre-Site phase On-Site phase On-Site phase Post-Site.
Meal Benefit Eligibility and Verification for Certifying Students’ Eligibility for Meal Benefits Benefit Issuance Verification Verification Reporting.
Data Coordinators Conference – 2014 Laura Marroquin CASEWORKER/JCMS Specialist Everything New Data Coordinators Should Know.
1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction English Learner Program Categorical Program Monitoring Bilingual.
REVIEW PROCESS FOR CDC+. Important Numbers Phone & fax numbers for consultants to contact eQHealth Voice: Fax:
Plans of Correction (PoC) Donna Tiberi, RN Standards Interpretation p: e: 1.
CHILDREN OF PRISONERS PARTNERSHIP What is the Children of Prisoners (CP) Partnership? The CP Partnership is a funding project between PFI and selected.
Component D: Activity D.3: Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
The FTA Drug & Alcohol Audit Process George Gilpatrick & Michael Redington.
Developing VF/EA FMS Readiness and Ongoing Performance Review Protocols May 4, 2015.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Presentation transcript:

F irst Health S ervices South Carolina Quality Assurance Review Process Discovery … Remediation … Improvementpage 1 Did Agency Receive Letter? Sample 5% Random Sample Start Establish Annual Review Calendar Upload State Sample Data into Review Database Send Review Notification Letter to Agency 2 weeks prior to review First Health CSR calls Agency to confirm receipt of notification letter First Health CSR provides verbal notification and faxes letter to Agency Entrance Conference 1. Review process explained 2. 1st day’s sample provided 3. NCI Agency surveys distributed 4. NCI Consumer Survey Pre-Surveys distributed 5. Agency administrative review initiated Administrative Review completed Administrative Reconsideration Conference conducted Are any findings overturned? Overturned indicators corrected in remote database Review of services initiated NCI Consumer Surveys initiated First Health interviewer coordinates obtaining consents and appointments with agency staff, individuals, and legally responsible family/advocates Agency provides service files and completed NCI Pre-Surveys Services Reconsideration Conference conducted Are any findings overturned? Overturned indicators corrected in remote database A B Yes No Yes No Concurrent Process

F irst Health S ervices South Carolina Quality Assurance Review Process Discovery … Remediation … Improvementpage 2 A B Next review sample provided to agency Review of services continues Services Reconsideration Conference conducted Are any findings overturned ? Overturned indicators corrected in remote database Exit Conference 1. Administrative findings/trends reviewed 2. Service findings/trends reviewed 3. Consumer Interview s trends reviewed 4. Follow-up procedures reviewed First Health makes mandated reports to all applicable agencies First Health provides immediate report to state agency Did individual or legal representative request direct communication to agency? Report of Findings Sent to provider agency and state agency 30 days following Exit Conference 1. Agency review findings 2. De-identified NCI Consumer Survey outcomes 3. Recommendations 4. Plan of Correction template for each recommendation Does provider agency appeal findings? Appeal State agency, supported by First Health, conducts Appeal Was review of 5% sample completed? Did any events require mandated reporting? C Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes

F irst Health S ervices South Carolina Quality Assurance Review Process Discovery … Remediation … Improvementpage 3 Follow-Up Review First Health conducts onsite Follow-Up Review within 120 days of approval of Plans of Correction Was agency compliant implementing POCs? Technical Assistance First Health provides technical assistance Quarterly Reports First Health provides state agency with Quarterly Report that includes aggregate quarterly and year-to-date review findings, statewide trends, and conclusions Annual Report First Health provides state agency with Annual Report that includes: 1. Aggregate annual review findings 2. Statewide trends/analysis 3. NCI Consumer Survey data 4. NCI Provider Survey data 5. NCI Family Survey data 6. Data analysis 7. Crosswalk with CMS HCBS Quality Framework Outcomes / Systemic Recommendations Plans of Correction Provider agency develops action steps to address findings... due to First Health within 30 days of receipt of Report of Findings Did First Health approve submitted Plans of Correction? Technical Assistance First Health provides technical assistance to enhance Plans of Correction Agency resubmits Plans of Correction No Yes No Yes C Follow-Up Report Sent to provider agency and state agency 30 days following Follow-Up Review Repeat Process