ON/OFF news. Reflected Transmitted Stroke 8.0 mm RF power, dB Piston position (gap width), mm ON OFF Compact design of the high RF power variable (mechanically)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC08 workshop Structure production: CERN activities and Master Schedule G. Riddone, W. Wuensch, R. Zennaro, Contributions from C. Achard, S. Atieh, V.
Advertisements

PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
SLAC workshop 7-10 July 2009 WP1: microwave based accelerators Status of CLIC X-band high-power components G. Riddone, (contribution from A.
Automatic Conditioning J. Alberto Rodriguez. Outline Purpose of an automatic conditioning system General overview Fast signals Long term access to data:
Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen
ON/OFF news. Reflected Transmitted Stroke 8.0 mm RF power, dB Piston position (gap width), mm ON OFF Compact design of the high RF power variable (mechanically)
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting - 24 th May 2013 CTF3 1 CTF3: Highlights of the 1 st run R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
CTF3 commissioning status R. Corsini - CTF3 committee 17 th September 2009 Update on CTF3 Operations and schedule This time I will try to give a more complete.
Andrew Moss ASTeC 7 th December 2011 MICE RF System.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
CIEMAT CONTRIBUTION TO TBL PETS (January 2009) David Carrillo on behalf of the Accelerators Team.
HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
30 GHz waveguide line modification towards 12 GHz.
R&D proposals for EuCard 2 EuCard2, April 21Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  SRF basic research (W. Weingarten)  CTF3 and CTF3+, possible infra - structure for.
J. Haimson and B. Mecklenburg Haimson Research Corporation FG02-05ER84362 Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy SBIR Grant.
Providing Beams for Power Production What has been done Problems and Boundary Conditions Future improvements and possibilities.
RF Power production at CTF3 X-band structure collaboration meeting,SLAC 6 th July 2009 Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  30 GHz power production  12 GHz power production.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
X-Band RF Structure and Beam Dynamics Workshop, December 2008 CERN experience with 12 GHz high power waveguide components Igor Syratchev (CERN)
Higher-Order Modes and Beam-Loading Compensation in CLIC Main Linac Oleksiy Kononenko BE/RF, CERN CLIC RF Structure Development Meeting, March 14, 2012.
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting October 24, 2012 CTF3 Experimental program for end 2012 R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team.
RF DEFLECTORS AT CTF3 BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH MINI-WORKSHOP ON CRAB CAVITIES FOR THE LHC Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY Feb 25-26, 2008 Fabio Marcellini.
Overall strategy for the rf structure development program W. Wuensch CLIC ACE
Summary of progress towards CLIC goals and next steps for structure testing 6 th X-band collaboration workshop, April 18 th- 20 th 2012 Steffen Döbert,
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
I. Syratchev, CLIC Breakdown Workshop, CERN, 20 May 2008 Power Circulation in a CLIC Accelerating Structure I. Syratchev.
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure.
CLIC work packages CTF3-003 (TBL+) CLIC0-001 (CLIC DB injector) CLIC0-002 (photo injector option for CLIC DB injector.
PETS TESTING ANALYSIS 4 th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting 3 rd May 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for CLIC collaboration.
RF break-down studies in the CTF3 TBTS Accurate measurements on TBTS RF Break-Down Studies in the CTF3 TBTS 29 Jan Wilfrid Farabolini 1.
Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK.
Two-Beam Test Stand results 5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program SLAC, Stanford, CA, USA Erik Adli, University.
Peak temperature rise specification for accelerating structures: a review and discussion CLIC meeting
Some Results and Analysis from CTF3 1HG2012-April-18 Some Results and Analysis from CTF3 W. Farabolini - A. Palaia.
KCS Main Waveguide Testing Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista and Faya Wang LCWS12 Arlington, Texas October 25, 2012.
1 CTF3 CLEX day July 2006 CLEX day 2006 Introduction G.Geschonke CERN.
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
I. Syratchev, HGW 2012, KEK, Japan The high power demonstration of the PETS ON/OFF operation with beam. I. Syratchev for CLIC team.
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen
Update on PETS experiments (Igor for the CLIC collaboration)
02-Dec XB Dec-2010 XB-10 Engineering design, production and follow-up of X-band RF components G. Riddone in collaboration.
Status of CTF3 G.Geschonke 1CTF3/CLIC Collaboration Board
High Power Crab Cavity Testing Ben Woolley HG2016 Argonne National Lab. 8 th June 2016.
2010 TESTING PROGRAM AND RESULTS FOR THE CLIC PETS X-BAND WORKSHOP ON RF STRUCTURES, BEAM DYNAMICS AND SOURCES 2 nd December 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
Two-beam module layout
Franck PEAUGER – CEA SACLAY LCWS11 - Grenada 29 th September 2011 High power RF components F. Peauger, A. Branco, M. Desmons, W. Farabolini, P. Girardot,
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
First Year of Operation at the Two-beam Test Stand
Manipulating RF phase and amplitude at high power level.
News from TBTS International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders,
CLIC RF Structure Development Mtg, Alexey Dubrovskiy and CTF team
X-band high-power variable RF splitter
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities
Upcoming longitudinal MDs
FEA of the On-Off Mechanism Piston Movement Impact
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer structure (PETS)
Presentation transcript:

ON/OFF news

Reflected Transmitted Stroke 8.0 mm RF power, dB Piston position (gap width), mm ON OFF Compact design of the high RF power variable (mechanically) reflector Radiation through the chokes The variable reflector is a core element of the PETS ON/OFF mechanism. It is activated when the local termination of the RF power production in PETS is required. S-parameters, dB

PETS ON/OFF operation (CLIC PETS) Power to the structure Power extracted from the drive beam ON OFF

OpenClosed RF measurements Broadband high RF power variable reflector prototype Stroke 8 mm

High power variable short circuit Originally the reflector was designed to provide reliably the phase advance. The dynamic range was increased up to about by further movement of he piston, until the chamber resonance became a danger. +30MHz

ON OFF PETS output Structure input (as predicted by computer simulation) TBTS PETS layout with internal recirculation for testing the ON/OFF concept. Movable RF short circuit (for tuning the resonant length) Variable reflector (for tuning the recirculation coupling)

Variable reflector Movable RF short circuit The components have been installed on the PETS tank.

Chat in a corridor: Igor... ‘Roberto, why do we need to run PETS with power levels above 200 MW?’ Roberto... ‘ Well, it works, so why do you ask? As well we have showed 150 M/m.’ Few words about TBTS results during the past testing period MW ns Measured RF power extraction CLIC requirement Peak power in the PETS BDR in recycling loop It did, indeed! With BDR> 0.3 when peak power was > 200 MW!

attenuator E-bend/split INOUT IN OUT phase shifter E-bend/direct Highest peak power point Let’s look inside attenuator loadsplit E-bend IN Observations:  All he stainless steel flanges show sort of breakdown erosion on the surface.  The copper surfaces in attenuator (GYCOM) are seriously damaged in ALL the channels.  In the phase shifter (also made by GYCOM) copper surface is pretty clean.

Reflection Transmission ON OFF Bold line – measured Thin line -HFSS Variable reflector installed in CTF3 TBTS PETS tank ON/OFF tests with beam. The RF variable reflector prototype installed in TF3

ON/OFF, operation with beam

Piston tuning range Phase tuning Short circuit S-parameters measured at two extreme (locked) positions Step#1: Identify the short circuit position for the full (in-phase) recirculation as a reference. Measured isolation>20 dB Forward Reflected RF phaseRF power Reference (“0”) phase position Reflector is set on full reflection Procedure:  Low (3A) current, short (200 ns) pulse  Reflector was set on the full reflection  The short circuit position was tuned to provide highest peak power and flat RF phase both for the forward and the reflected pulses.

Step#2: Validate the short circuit position for the destructive (anti-phase) recirculation (0FF-mode) FF 0N Waveform for the different reflection and fixed (180 0 ) phase advance Procedure:  Medium (10 A) current, long (240 ns) pulse  The short circuit was set on the expected phase advance position.  The variable reflector position was change from full transmission to the full reflection. 0N 0FF Summarized by Alexey Dubrovskiy To the accelerating structure Due to some? luck, the necessary RF phase tuning range stays within the hardware limits. Combination x 4 In the PETS 0N 0FF 0N 0FF

PETS single bunch response (GDFIDL) Measured transfer spectra of the recycling loop artificial RF phase delay for tuning Number of round trips The complete system single bunch response and spectrum Multi-bunch part Number of bunches PETS with recirculation modeling and analysis OFF case RESULT 0N OFF case OFF OFF case

“0”“45”“90”“135”“180” Examples of the power production for the full reflection and varying recirculation phase (ideal current pulse ).

0N (simulated/measured) OFF (measured) OFF (simulated) PETS output, forward Simulation vs. experiment Spectra comparison

interlock was deactivated Vacuum gauges Peak power Pulse length at 50% level PMT installed on the PETS tank Interlock level 2.7 A, 340 ns4.5 A, 240 ns #1 #2 #3 #2 #3#4 Breakdown events? Power PMT signal Current 30 October (logbook pictures) 45 MW 150 MW 80 MW

TBTS processing results to date