Expanded Clearinghouse Pilot February 2016 – June 2017 1 Selected as one of 41 institutions nationally to be included in the pilot!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services The PEPH Resource Center: A New, More Convenient Login.
IRBshare Overview: Investigators Emily Sheffer, MPA Vanderbilt University Medical Center IRBshare Project Manager
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Kuali Coeus User Group Austin, Texas March 2011 Dennis J Paffrath Assistant Vice President for Sponsored Programs Administration 1.
Subrecipient Monitoring December 7, 2007 Office of Research Services Brown Bag.
JANUARY 8, 2013 SESSION 1 OF YEAR 3 AAPLS ( APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES ) Grant Submission and Research Policies at Tufts: Review.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Subrecipient Monitoring. A formal binding legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity A portion of your sponsored project's.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust Past, Present, and Future A Brief Introduction.
Collaborating with Others? If so, why and how? OSP AWARENESS MARCH 5, 2015 OSP.SYR.EDU
Cobb County School District After School Program Financial and Operational Training APS Directors Monday, July 13,2015.
The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Overview Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality APHA CEI Session  November 2006.
O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR O FFICE OF S CIENCE & R ESEARCH OSR Welcome to the Research Navigator Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Learning.
CILogon and InCommon: Technical Update Jim Basney This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers
SUBAWARD RISK ASSESSMENTS & FEDERAL FUNDING ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY ACT (FFATA) GMUN General Meeting September 2010.
Diane Rathbun, Office of Grant & Research Development, Lauren Hatley, Sponsored Programs Services,
Pre-Award Issues Related to Human Research and Animal Use March 15, 2013.
Got the Grant What’s next??????????? Joy R. Knipple Team Leader, National Institute of Mental Health July 26, 2006.
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
FQHC Look-Alike Registration for Implementation of Electronic Information Systems June 16, 2010 Twyla Adams, MHS, Branch Chief Anil Bommakanti, Consultant.
Student Financial Assistance. Session 28-2 Recertification & Updating Your Eligibility Status It’s a Snap with the EAPP!
Office of Sponsored Programs All rights reserved GTRC The New OSP Request for Subaward & Subrecipient Monitoring Course Dana Simpson: Contracting Officer,
SUBRECIPIENT Sponsor SFSU Sub. Sub-Award Checklist (Pre-Award)  Scope of Work  Budget  Budget Justification  Biosketch  Subrecipient vs. Vendor Determination.
Contract Compliance Reporting Contract Update Questions and Answers.
1 Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
ONLY THE SHADOW (SYSTEM) KNOWS Randi Wasik, MBA, Director of Administration and Finance, University of Washington.
Cindy Hope – Chair Assistant Vice President for Research and Director, Office for Sponsored Programs, The University of Alabama.
HR Research Resource Faculty Tuition Policy Sub-awards in Cayuse Recent NIH & NSF Notices Brief Reminders & Announcements.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Financial Conflicts of Interest and Research: 2012 Developments Mike Klein Associate Director, Office of Research Compliance and Training August 2012.
Session Session 29-2 Updating Your Eligibility Status.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
Financial Conflict of Interest: We Met the Deadline for the PHS Regulations...Now What? Brenda Seiton, Assistant Vice President for Research Administration,
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda November 14, 2012 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DIRM Vendor Management.
MRAM Monthly Research Administration Meeting FEBRUARY 11, 2016 UW TOWER AUDITORIUM NEXT MRAM MARCH 10, 2016 UW TOWER AUDITORIUM TOPICPRESENTERCONTACTMIN.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
 Subaward Request Form Sole Source Justification Multi-Campus (MCA) Commitment Form.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Expanded Clearinghouse Pilot February 2016 – June 2017 (UNC-CH joined Cohort 2: August 18, 2016 – June 2017) 1 We’ve been selected to join a national demonstration.
FDP Expanded Clearinghouse Lynette Arias, University of Washington Pamela Webb, University of Minnesota NCURA Annual Meeting – August 2016.
SMARTIRB.org Conceived at Hubs Hubs Coalesced Into Regions UC Braid New England Ohio Consortium U New Mexico U Texas Vanderbilt Wisconsin/MARCH IRBrely.
FDP Expanded Clearinghouse
IRBchoice Connections Call: June 10, 2016
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
FDP Update to GUIRR Cynthia (Cindy) Hope, Chair
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Campus Research Administrators Meeting Thursday, December 8, 2016
Cost Sharing Policy and Procedure Updates and Overview
Welcome to the Nevada Test Administration Training and Q&A Session
Uniform Guidance Discussion
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
CAYUSE 424 Sarah B. Dumais Research Grant/Contract Specialist
Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determinations
Pre-Award Updates Research Administrators’ Forum
Melissa Korf and Melissa Maher SPA/Office of Research Administration
RAIN Meeting March 3, 2009.
FDP Expanded Clearinghouse Pilot
Expanded Clearinghouse Initiative
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
From Innovation to Commercialization Access to Data
Revised PHS FCOI Regulations & Subrecipients
Fundamental Science Practices (FSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey
Presentation transcript:

Expanded Clearinghouse Pilot February 2016 – June Selected as one of 41 institutions nationally to be included in the pilot!

Remember how the FDP FCOI Clearinghouse saved pass-through entities and subrecipients from having to swap written confirmations that we each had PHS- compliant FCOI policies? Now we welcome its big sister: The FDP Expanded Clearinghouse! 2

Goal of Pilot Reduce administrative burden associated with verifying standard information required for subrecipient issuance and monitoring Eliminate swapping of subrecipient commitment forms completed on a transaction-by-transaction basis in favor of accessing an on-line, up-to-date standardized, streamlined subrecipient data repository (an “entity profile”) Determine whether such a repository effectively reduces the data collection and review burden f or pass-through entities and subrecipients alike 3

Contents of Profile (continued) Entity Certifications Conflict of Interest Debarment and Suspension Lobbying Affirmative Action Compliance FFATA Single Audit Information (will eventually also include Financial Questionnaire option) Single Audit Status & Links Core info about any findings, deficiencies, material weaknesses Entity Official Certification 4

Contents of Profile Entity Information Demographic Information (name, address, type, small business status, parent information, etc.) Entity Identification Numbers and Codes Entity Rate Agreements Department of Defense Registration Numbers Department of Education Registration Numbers Assurances and Agency Approvals (Accreditations) DOD/ONR System Reviews Entity Key Contacts 5

REPOSITORY ON FDP WEB SITE Expanded Clearinghouse – Phase I (~41 institutions) 6 Institution 1 Entity Profile Institution 3 Entity Profile Institution 4 Entity Profile Institution 1 Institution 4 Institution 3 Minnesota SIMPLE EXAMPLE: 4 Standard Templates OR 13 Variant Sub Commitment Forms

Core Elements of Pilot Institutions participate as both a subrecipient and as a pass- through entity Participants formally agree to terms of the Pilot (done) Participants create their Entity Profile (mid-February) FDP posts each participant’s Entity Profile (early March) PTEs access their participating subrecipients’ on-line Entity Profile in lieu of sending a subrecipient commitment form for each subaward between the parties (throughout the pilot) Transaction-specific information may still be shared Participants track how many subwards are transacted via this mechanism (throughout the pilot, reported quarterly) Participants evaluate the pilot (at least twice) 7

At Time of Proposal Still acceptable & expected to collect from the Subrecipient at time of proposal: Statement of Work Budget Any other forms needed for the proposal Small business plans, biosketches or other support, certifications required at time of proposal, etc. Subrecipient’s proposal endorsement Signature of the Subrecipient’s SPA office and/or indication they are willing to enter into a subaward if proposal is funded 8

Process Changes to Plan For When We are the Subrecipient: DO NOT COMPLETE a Subrecipient Commitment Form for a pass-through entity participating in the pilot Instead, please remind the other institution that we are a pilot Expanded Clearinghouse institution – see sample language on the next slide Please be kind - remembering that many pilot institutions are large and decentralized – so it may take awhile for this updated process to filter down to all parts of the organization. 9 When We are the Pass-through Entity: DO NOT COLLECT a Subrecipient Commitment Form from another participating pilot institution

Sample Language for Pushing Back if you are asked to complete a Subrecipient Commitment form by another pilot institution “I am writing to let you know that the University of Minnesota is a pilot participant in the FDP Expanded Clearinghouse. It is my understanding that your organization is also a pilot participant. As a part of the pilot, both our organizations have agreed that we will not send or require completion of a subrecipient commitment forms, but will instead use our profile that is posted on-line at the FDP Expanded Clearinghouse site. Please use my profile to obtain the information you need about the University of Minnesota. If you have transaction-specific requirements, I will be happy to provide those but I will need you to tell me precisely what you need via an or a transaction-specific request form (one that does not also include data elements found in our profile.)” 10

At Time of Proposal or Award Okay to ask for or to complete a “transaction- specific” request but only for data elements NOT included on the entity profile, such as: Human subjects approval for that project Animal subjects approval for that project 11 Getting pushback? Talk to Pamela or Judy

12 Participating Institutions Tufts University University of Alabama University of Alabama, Huntsville University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences University of Cincinnati University of Florida University of Kansas University of Miami (includes University of Miami Medical School) University of Minnesota University of North Carolina Chapel Hill University of South Alabama (ERI) University of Tennessee Health Science Center University of Tennessee, Knoxville University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston University of Texas, Austin University of Washington University of Wisconsin-Madison Vanderbilt University Washington University Wayne State University Brandeis University Brown University California Institute of Technology Cedars-Sinai Health System Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Duke University & Duke University Medical Center Florida State University Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Regents University Harvard University (including Harvard Medical School) Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Institute for Systems Biology (ERI) Johns Hopkins University Michigan Technological University New York University, Washington Square Campus Northern Illinois University (ERI) Northwestern University Oregon Health & Science University Partners Healthcare (includes Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital and McLean Hospital) Purdue University Syracuse University

Next Steps Approximately March 15, 2016, we will “Go-Live” with the pilot (we will tell you when) No change until then At that time: We will inform departments to not collect or complete subrecipient forms from participating institutions (you shouldn’t either) At time of award, both you/Lesley will use the EC to obtain the information you need to issue a subaward or to do a risk assessment for participating institutions (more details coming) Lesley will be asked to do our subaward tracking You may be asked to participate in evaluations, as appropriate 13